The Scottish-based Churches Action for the Homeless (CATH) is worried that its perceived religious identity would make it more difficult to access grants.
Trustees have already asked the charity’s supporters to help come up with a new name for the organisation which would be “fully inclusive”.
The move has been heavily criticised. According to the Christian Institute, CATH patron Vincent Logan, Roman Catholic Bishop of Dunkeld, said: “CATH owes its origins to churchgoers. I am not aware of anyone having been asked about their beliefs before being offered help, nor of anyone being discriminated against.”
The charity fears that Christian groups are being discriminated against when it comes to receiving public funding.
The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, recently endorsed a report claiming that the British Government’s support towards religious groups was overly favouring Muslims.
Another Church of England bishop also recently accused the Government of having a pro-Muslim bias in awarding funding. According to The Christian Institute, the Rt Rev Stephen Lowe said: “Christian groups in particular have suffered irrational prejudice against their funding applications.”
Earlier this year it was revealed that in Scotland Muslim groups receive more public money for ‘equality’ than all other religious groups put together.
The Christian Institute pointed out that in July 2008 Hazel Blears, then Communities Minister, said Christian groups should be used in providing public services as long as they promise not to share the gospel.
Also in 2005, one Christian-run shelter for the homeless was threatened with the loss of £150,000 of funding unless it stopped saying grace at mealtimes and putting Bibles out for use by guests, explains The Christian Institute.
CATH’s supporters will vote on a change of name at the annual general meeting in October.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
SIC: CT