Sunday, November 09, 2025

Survey finds most French priests are happy

A large-scale survey of French priests has concluded that 80% are happy in their ministry.

Researchers asked priests to evaluate how they felt about their vocation, providing five options ranging from “happy” to “discouraged.”

The most popular answer, chosen by 45%, was “faithful to this calling, calm, determined, and happy,” followed by “less idealistic in the face of harsh reality, but at peace and happy,” selected by 35%, according to extracts from the data released Nov. 7.

Just 1% said they were “lonely and discouraged,” often doubting their vocation.

Asked to identify the source of their happiness, 53% said it was “being a privileged witness to the wonders that God works in people’s hearts,” 45% highlighted the sense of “being in the right place” and “working in the service of the Lord,” and 34% cited the chance to “meet very different people from all walks of life.”

Priests also expressed a high degree of satisfaction with their relationships. A striking 97% said they were satisfied with their relations with parishioners, 85% with their ties with fellow priests, and 77% with their bishop or religious superior.

The results are notable because a 2020 study of French priests concluded that, while most enjoyed good health, 17.6% had symptoms of depression — more than three times higher than the general average for men in France.

The authors of the study, Le sacerdoce aujourd’hui (“The Priesthood Today”), said it was the first work of its kind since a 1972 report that assessed French priests’ attitudes in the wake of Vatican Council II.

The new survey was conducted by the French polling firm IFOP for the French Observatory of Catholicism, an organization founded in June 2025 with the goal of providing reliable data on the Church in France.

There were 12,019 priests in France in 2023, the last year for which figures are available, down from 25,353 in the year 2000. Out of 5,000 priests contacted by researchers in October 2025, 766 completed the 50-question survey, a response rate of 15%. Most of those surveyed were diocesan priests.

One question focused on which experiences helped to inspire their priestly vocations. The top factors, cited by 61%, were “events, camps, and pilgrimages,” followed by altar service, selected by 52%, and involvement in the Scout Movement, chosen by 49%. In France, Scouting has a deep and longstanding connection to the Catholic Church.

Jérôme Fourquet, the director of IFOP’s opinion department, said: “Young priests tell us that it was thanks to Scouting or pilgrimages that their call to the priesthood was born.”

The survey found that 56% of priests grew up in practicing Catholic families involved in Church life. Anthony 21% said their family practiced the faith but was not engaged in the life of the Church. Only 15% were raised in families that rarely practiced, 6% where one parent was Catholic and the other agnostic or atheist, and 1% in an atheist family.

Researchers also asked priests to assess the record influx of young adults seeking baptism in French parishes.

The majority (62%) agreed that the new catechumens were “a sign of the Holy Spirit and an extraordinary opportunity to focus our communities on welcoming and evangelization.”

A minority (30%) said the newcomers presented “an opportunity that requires commitment in terms of faith content and pastoral accompaniment.” Only 5% said there was a lack of resources to accompany those asking to be baptized.

A large proportion of priests (77%) said they prioritized having a reliable, independent lay team for support. The lay role in parishes is increasing in France, as in other Western European countries, as clergy are asked to oversee multiple churches.

Asked to name their priorities, 76% selected the traditional three priestly tasks of teaching, sanctifying, and governing. Promoting Catholic doctrine and supporting the preferential option for the poor were also notable priorities.

Researchers found significant smartphone use among priests, with 52% reporting screen times of between two and four hours a day and 58% acknowledging “excessive or difficult-to-control use” of the devices.

Only 18% contributed actively to social media, while 43% used it daily solely as readers.

Asked about the future, 34% of priests expressed “confidence and hope, convinced that there is no shortage of missionary fields.” The same percentage said they were serene, even though they had some fears about future assignments. A minority (10%) said they had a pessimistic view of the Church.

Compromise found in the Vatican after dispute over marriage ban

A compromise has apparently been found in the case of the couple who were dismissed by the Vatican Bank immediately after their wedding. 

As the Italian daily newspaper"Il Messaggero" reported on Saturday, the employees who were dismissed due to compliance rules will return to work for the Vatican in future. 

The agreement reached in court stipulates that one of the spouses will be offered employment in an institution other than the Vatican Bank.

The case of the sacked couple made international headlines last year. 

The Vatican Bank had issued regulations prohibiting employees from marrying each other. This was to ensure "transparency and impartiality in the activities of the institution". 

After the wedding in September 2024, the newlyweds were faced with the choice of either one partner resigning or both being dismissed by the bank.

The couple refused, arguing that they had already announced the wedding in February. 

However, the regulation prohibiting marriage between employees was only passed in May. 

As a result, the Vatican Bank dismissed both of them with effect from 1 October 2024. 

The subsequent legal dispute now appears to be over.

Archdiocese of Vaduz: No access to files for Swiss Abuse Investigation

The Archdiocese of Vaduz is not making any files available to the Swiss Bishops' Conference for the investigation into abuse. 

The legal situation in Liechtenstein does not allow personal files to be passed on to foreign third parties, the archdiocese announced on Friday. 

The research team from the University of Zurich, which compiled the Swiss reappraisal study, had requested access to the files of priests who had belonged to the diocese of Chur before the archdiocese of Vaduz was established. 

The archdiocese was formed in 1997 from the Liechtenstein parts of the Swiss diocese of Chur.

According to the information provided, the enquiry was legally examined as promised. The Liechtenstein data protection authority was also involved in the process. 

"Making personnel files accessible to an institution from abroad constitutes a violation of both applicable data protection and personal rights," the statement reads. 

The Archdiocese of Vaduz must therefore reject the request for access to the files in order not to violate the applicable legal framework.

Swiss researchers should refer those affected to Liechtenstein ombudsman's office

However, it is important to the archdiocese "to support the scientific investigation of sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church and to promote prevention work". 

To this end, Apostolic Administrator Benno Elbs set up an independent ombudsman's office in autumn 2023 to provide free and anonymous advice to those affected. The Zurich research team was asked to refer victims with a connection to Liechtenstein to the ombudsman's office. 

"The focus is on protecting victims while maintaining a zero-tolerance strategy towards abusive behaviour," the archdiocese emphasised in its statement.

The issue of the Liechtenstein files was already addressed in the research group's report. According to the report, the files of the former deanery of Liechtenstein were handed over to the Liechtenstein National Archives. 

The files of the diocese of Chur relating to the Principality of Liechtenstein were transferred from the Chur archives to Vaduz. 

"This situation presents researchers with a special source problem: for a large part of the period under investigation (1950-1997), the territories of the Principality of Liechtenstein belonged to the Diocese of Chur. 

However, the source situation was subsequently changed in such a way that research into sexual abuse in this region of the diocese is significantly more difficult and in some cases downright impossible," the report states.

Bishop Donal McKeown: ‘Young people are out there looking for truth’

HAVING reached the retirement age of 75, Bishop of Derry Donal McKeown has submitted his resignation letter to the Pope and is now awaiting news.

It’s a sort of limbo period, in that he doesn’t yet know if Pope Leo will ask him to stay on or will accept his resignation and begin the process of appointing a successor.

But he’s content either way.

“I’ll do what I’m asked to do. I have dedicated my life to this. I don’t have a wife and children or grandchildren to worry about.

“But, having said that, it would be nice to return to being a priest in some little village somewhere with no decisions to make.”

Whatever the uncertainty about his own future, he is remarkably upbeat about the future of the Catholic Church.

After decades of taking a battering on many fronts, he feels a turning point has been reached.

“I think there’s a real crisis for secularism at the present time. I find increasing numbers of young people who are showing signs of dissatisfaction in terms of mental illness, in terms of addiction, in terms of just not being very hopeful about the future,” he says.

“My own experience tells me they are out there looking for truth and beauty, and longing for something better.”

And he adds: “They have gone beyond the rejection of faith their parents’ generation went through, and some of them are discovering the whole notion of God, of learning about the beauty of liturgy, of architecture, of faith.

“They are looking for something more than to eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die. There are way too many people dying for want of reason for living.”

He sees a resurgence in faith in the grassroots in Derry.

“There is a lot of energy here.

“In places like Galliagh there are prayer groups. There are bible study groups springing up in all sorts of arts and parts. There are young men’s groups. There are youth masses on Sunday evenings. And we have eight seminarians at present in this diocese.”

A friendly and engaging man, the bishop makes a point of walking the streets of Derry at least once a week.

And, he says, during his 14 years wearing the bishop’s mitre, he has never encountered a single negative comment from a member of the public.

“I want to communicate with people, to say hello to them, to smile at them.

“I call into the ex-prisoners’ shop in William Street. I know the street drinkers, I know the shop-keepers, I talk to the tour guides. I try to be out and be accessible, not hiding behind my role as bishop.”

Born in Randalstown in Co Antrim, Donal McKeown was raised by a watchmaker father and a mother who was a primary school teacher.

As his dad was one of 13 children and his mother one of eight, he grew up with a huge family network.

At primary school, he was one of four who passed the 11-plus and progressed to Garron Tower in the Glens of Antrim.

It would seem he was one of their star pupils.

“My granny was a Delargy from Glenariff so that was probably the real reason I went there.

“Garron Tower was only founded about nine years before I started, and it was staffed by brilliant teachers, mostly young priests. I got a great education.

“Three of my four A-Level teachers were priests. They were the best teachers, loved their subjects. I did Latin, German, Irish and English, and the priest who taught us Irish wanted us to do Irish in one year. We were up for it.

“So, Fr Brendan McGarry, who taught Latin, asked us if we were up for doing that in one year as well, so we did. And we all got our A-Levels in the one academic year.”

Today Donal McKeown is fluent in Irish, English, Latin, French, German, Italian and has also studied Portuguese and Arabic.

He has a MBA in Business Education and impressive qualifications also in theology and counselling.

When asked, he rejects the description of himself as an academic.

And then we come to the biggest question of all – why the priesthood?

“If you are asking did the skies open or something like that, no. It wasn’t like that at all. It was a gradual thing.

“Towards the end of my time at Garron Tower, one of the career guidance teachers asked me what I wanted to do and I responded that maybe I would like to follow Mammy and become a teacher.

“He asked did I ever think of becoming a priest? For some reason I said I would give it a try. And that was that.”

As the Diocese of Down and Connor had a tradition of sending those studying for degrees to Queen’s University in Belfast, the young McKeown found himself as a seminarian living in a specially designated wing at the city’s St Malachy’s College.

Over the next few years of his life there, he regularly travelled abroad during holidays.

One occasion he recalls was when Star of the Sea basketball club were going to Germany on an exchange programme and they wanted someone who could speak the language, and he was called upon. It was only years later he discovered one of the young lads on the team was Bobby Sands.

Later that same year he went from Germany to Italy to work for six weeks in a factory outside Florence. He became great friends with a young couple, Sergio and Maria, and in 1976 was invited back to be best man at their wedding.

Over the coming years he was to have a career he loved in teaching.

If that wasn’t a busy enough life, he was asked by Bishop Cathal Daly to take on a couple of other fairly demanding roles.

He laughs when recalling that conversation: “He said, ‘Donal, I want you to teach in St Malachy’s, to run all diocesan pilgrimages, but make running the seminary your main job.”

And if Fr McKeown thought that becoming principal of St Malachy’s, which he did in 1995, would become his chief role, he was soon disabused of that idea.

“Bishop Paddy Walsh was looking for an auxiliary bishop and for some reason the lot fell on yours truly.”

How did that come about?

“The choice is made in Rome, but when it comes to an auxiliary I think a bishop can say I need someone, for example, who can cover the educational base or who’ll handle the media, someone who’ll fit in a particular role. But if you want to know why me in this particular instance, you had better ask someone else.”

And that triggers the story of his mother’s reaction: “The night before it was announced, I got the press release so I travelled home to show it to my mother. She said ‘Could they not find someone else?’ I think she thought she would lose me.

“Randalstown wasn’t that far away. Daddy was dead. She was on her own. She depended on us coming about the house. I can only presume she thought then she might not see too much of me when I became bishop.”

As an aside, he mentions that eight days after his installation, he ran the Belfast marathon and thinks he might still be the only bishop to have ever run one.

In a way, running has been a bit of a metaphor for a life in that has always been on the go.

Indeed, he was only getting truly into the auxiliary role when, totally unexpectedly, he got the call in 2014 to be Bishop in Derry.

How did he react to that?

“To be honest, I thought it a privilege to be asked. Derry is a high-profile diocese. To have it thought that I could make a contribution was an honour.

“Edward Daly had been here. It was the second largest diocese in Northern Ireland. It was a cultural, historical centre. It was a major diocese.

“I don’t know if there was any consensus about my appointment, but I was asked to take it on and I said I would with the grace of God.”

And he has enjoyed it immensely, despite the workload.

“Someone once said to me that Derry was a good fit for me. I asked him what did he mean. He said it’s big enough to have tourists, to have a large urban population, to have culture, a radio station, to have local papers.

“It’s not like a small diocese in the west of Ireland where the cathedral is in a village somewhere. It’s big enough to have variety and tourism, but small enough to be homely.“

Having Radio Foyle is also a great personal blessing, in that he can be in the studio in five minutes.

“I have been doing Thought for the Day since the early 80s. They keep asking me, and I enjoy it. There is the teacher in me in that I like communicating. I like learning. I like wrestling with ideas. I like sharing.

“Chesterton’s quote always come to my mind: ‘It always better to be unhappy with the right questions than happy with the wrong answers’.”

He likes Derry too.

“I find Derry is great in that in that bishops like Edward Daly and James Mehaffey worked so well together. Bishop Ken Good and myself also work well.

“Before Covid, we walked together from St Colmcille’s birthplace in Gartan to Derry. We also did a number of other walks. We went to Iona.

“We were in Rome together and met all sorts of significant people including the Pope.

“We have tried to provide a leadership role in encouraging an example that is helpful for community relationships.”

Reflecting on his life, he says we all have to make choices.

“I would love to have been married. I much prefer female company.

“I had a bit of a crisis as a student in 75/76. I was tired, exhausted. I didn’t know if God was saying ‘McKeown get out’ or the devil was saying ‘I have lovely things to show you’, but when crunch time came to decide, the clouds sort of opened. I was struggling, but I got the right word at the right time.”

So, if he does retire, has he any big ambitions left?

“I have done the Via Francigena. It’s the Canterbury to Rome walk. I have done about 600k of that over the past few years. If I retire I would love to do more. It’s a wonderful walk, and having Italian, I don’t feel ill equipped to walk out into the Italian countryside.”

Any final thoughts?

”I am happy if I have been of any use in helping people to find the love and forgiveness of God.

“In St Luke’s Gospel it says we are only servants, and we have done nothing but our duty.

“It is not my job to achieve anything. Sometimes things can go wrong. All the Lord asks us of us is to be faithful. The fruit may not be borne until further down the line but that doesn’t matter.

“That gives you freedom to do your best, and if you make mistakes God can work through that. So, it’s not about me.

“This priestly life was my vocation. I am content with that.”

As Pope Leo XIV meets Belgian abuse victims, Rupnik accusers wait for justice

Pope Leo XIV met with a group of fifteen victims of clerical sexual abuse on Saturday. All from Belgium, the fifteen victims suffered their abuse when they were minors. Many of them had participated in a meeting with Pope Francis during his September 2024 visit to the country.

A statement from the press office of the Holy See sent to accredited journalists early Saturday evening said the encounter lasted “nearly three hours” and unfolded “in a climate of closeness with the victims, of listening and dialogue, both profound and painful.”

A report from the official Vatican News outfit said members of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors accompanied the victims on Saturday evening, after meeting with them separately earlier in the day to continue a dialogue begun in July, when a PCPM delegation visited Belgium.

A plea for patience

On Tuesday of this past week, Pope Leo XIV asked victims of clerical abuse for patience as the wheels of justice turn. It was a startling request, for its frankness and its hopefulness. It was also a very big ask – much bigger even than the shock of it suggests – for several related reasons.

“I know it’s very difficult for the victims to ask that they be patient,” Leo told waiting journalists on Tuesday evening outside the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo, “but the church needs to respect the rights of all people.”

“The principle of innocent until proven guilty is also true in the Church,” Leo said.

The pontiff was not wrong in what he affirmed, but in order to understand how jarring were his remarks – to victims especially but not exclusively – it is important to know that he was responding to a question about a notorious celebrity-artist who escaped justice for decades and is still a priest in good standing, apparently in full possession of his priestly faculties despite the charges against him.

The specific context of Leo’s remarks is at least as important as the remarks themselves, in other words, and the victims to whom Leo addressed his remarks specifically have good reason to doubt the wheels of justice are turning at all.

Remarks in context: The Rupnik Affair

Leo was responding to a journalist’s question regarding the case of Father Marko Rupnik, a Slovenian priest and former Jesuit now incardinated in the Koper diocese of his native country but reportedly residing in Rome.

Rupnik is accused by multiple witnesses – “highly credible” to hear the Vatican’s own investigator tell it – of serial spiritual, psychological, and sexual abuse against dozens of victims, most of them women religious (of whom several belonged to a religious congregation Rupnik helped establish in his native Slovenia), over a period of some three decades, much of it under the noses of his erstwhile Jesuit superiors.

Rupnik grew to worldwide renown during the course of what is credibly alleged to be his inveterately abusive career, as a mosaic artist and spiritual master very much in demand as a speaker and retreat leader, while powerful men in the Jesuit order and in the Vatican either turned a blind eye to complaints against him or else – as is also alleged – actively worked to discredit his accusers.

Rupnik’s accusers, in short, have been patient for decades. So have other victims everywhere in the world. It is certainly the case that Leo XIV inherited an unholy mess from his predecessor, especially insofar as the Rupnik Affair is concerned. Rupnik’s accusers, and victims in general, may be forgiven the impression the pope’s words presumed a greater store of patience than it is reasonable to expect, even if they did not mean to suggest impatience either on the part of victims or the scandalized faithful.

Fear and favor

A frequent – and by every measure reasonable – complaint is that Rupnik has received extraordinarily favorable treatment, both from his erstwhile superiors in his former Society of Jesus and from Vatican officials including Pope Francis.

Francis had Rupniks in his residence and once used a Rupnik as a prop in a video message to participants in a Marian conference in Aparecida, even after grim details of Rupnik’s case had become public knowledge.

“When an individual is credibly accused of very serious offenses like those of which Marko Rupnik is accused,” survivor-advocate Antonia Sobocki of the UK-based LOUDfence advocacy group told Crux, “under law in the UK, they are held on remand in prison awaiting trial.”

“This is not a presumption of guilt,” Sobocki said, “but an act of due diligence in order to protect the public.”

“To permit an individual credibly accused of such actions to remain free in a community is not a neutral act,” Sobocki said. “It puts the innocent at risk.”

The Society of Jesus expelled Rupnik in 2023 – for disobedience, not as punishment for his alleged crimes – and the former Jesuit quickly found a diocese in his native country willing to take him as a priest.

Rupnik even preached the Lenten retreat to the Roman Curia in 2020 – generally recognized as the highest honor any preacher can receive – after a secret panel of investigators had secretly determined Rupnik had “absolved an accomplice in a sin against the Sixth Commandment” i.e. given sacramental absolution to someone with whom he had illicit sexual relations of some sort. Later, secret judges would secretly impose and then secretly lift an excommunication.

The Jesuits would secretly impose restrictions on Rupnik, who not-so-secretly flouted them, rightly surmising that his erstwhile superiors would be reluctant to enforce them and that the Vatican would rather the whole business remain under wraps. He trotted the globe giving talks, cutting ribbons, and collecting accolades.

It would take an entire book to recount all the gruesome twists and turns of the impossibly macabre Rupnik story, so suffice it to say the disgraced Slovenian former Jesuit very nearly got away with it, not without some inexplicable decisions by several very senior churchmen, including Pope Francis.

Justice delayed

Eventually, Francis decided – under sustained pressure from his own Commission for the Protection of Minors and in the face of incandescent global outrage – to waive the statute of limitations and allow a case against Rupnik to proceed. That was in 2023, more than four years after the case had officially reached the Vatican (decades after allegations began to circulate in Jesuit and Vatican circles in Rome and elsewhere) and nearly a year after the story had come before the public.

When Francis died, the Discipline Section of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith was still trying to find judges to hear the case. It was Oct. 13 of this year that the Vatican announced a full slate of five judges had finally been empaneled to try Rupnik.

Rupnik’s work – frequently decried as “rape art” by victims and advocates – continues to be the subject of calls for removal from victims, their advocates, and the scandalized faithful.

The scales of justice

Stepping back from the narrow question of what to do about Rupnik’s art, observers also note a stark discrepancy between the way Pope Francis and the Vatican treated Giovanni Angelo Becciu – a cardinal accused of financial malfeasance – and the treatment Rupnik has received. Francis forced Becciu to resign his high-ranking Vatican position and stripped him of his rights as a cardinal before formal charges were even brought, then changed Vatican City law to allow a trial in Vatican City criminal court to proceed against him.

The trial court convicted Becciu, who has always maintained his innocence and is currently appealing his conviction. The Vatican did not appear to have any difficulty finding judges for either process.

Since his election, Pope Leo XIV has been spending the early part of his working week at the summer retreat outside Rome, frequently leaving the Vatican on Monday to return Tuesday evening, and he has a lot to think about.

The unfinished business of the Rupnik Affair – frequently viewed as a microcosm of Church leaders’ inveterate inability to get a handle on the crisis of abuse and coverup – is largely the result of Leo’s predecessor’s penchant for putting his finger on the scales of justice.

From the outside looking in, it appears that churchmen – including the Pope, at least in the recent past – have been willing to move heaven and earth to secure a conviction against a cardinal accused of stealing money, but will drag their feet, or worse, to ensure abusers never see justice.

Neither Leo XIV nor any other leader can fix that problem by putting his own finger on the same scales.

That, in a nutshell, is why Leo’s answer made news after a journalist – it was Magdalena Wolinska-Reidi of EWTN News, for the record – noted how “[s]ome abuse survivors say, and their advocates as well, say that the presence of Father Rupnik’s art in important churches and shrines, including the Vatican, all over the world, are traumatic for them and for many other people, also scandalous,” and asked: “How can the Church be sensitive to their requests to perhaps cover these pieces of art, or even to remove them?”

The state of the question

“Certainly,” Leo said, “in many places, it’s precisely because of the need to be sensitive to those who have presented cases of being victims, the artwork has been covered up.” One such place is the healing shrine of Lourdes. In other places, including the Vatican, Rupniks are still adorning sacred space.

“Artwork has been removed from websites,” Leo also said, fairly taken as an allusion to the Rupniks’ quiet disappearance from the Vatican’s digital pages, “so, that issue is certainly something that we’re aware of.”

“A new trial has recently begun,” Leo continued, noting the appointment of judges and acknowledging how “processes for justice take a long time.”

“[H]opefully,” Leo said, “this trial that is just beginning will be able to give some clarity and justice to all those involved.”

If those responsible for shrines and chapels where Rupniks are present wish to cover or remove the works, that is their business. The upset and scandal of the whole affair is galling, indeed, not only to victims.

Leo could order the Rupniks in the Redemptoris Mater chapel covered, but doing so would inevitably – and quite reasonably – be understood as an act taken with a view to influencing a high-profile trial, to the outcome of which he must remain officially and effectively indifferent.

Even if Leo’s intentions were pure as the driven snow, the act itself would affect public opinion and quite possibly influence judges’ discernment.

The most important thing Pope Leo can do in the Rupnik case is to ensure that justice be done, and that it is seen to be done.

Still, justice delayed is justice denied, and justice in the Rupnik case has been delayed for far too long. For countless victims of clerical abuse, patience is running out.

Israeli police order C of E delegation to leave West Bank village after stand-off with armed settlers

THE Archbishop of York was forced to cut short a visit to a family in the south Hebron hills on Saturday, after Israeli police ordered the Church of England delegation to leave the area.

Earlier on Saturday, after meeting with Palestinians campaigning against the planned demolition of homes in the village of Umm al-Khair, heavily armed Israeli settlers stood watching the Archbishop’s delegation, and subsequently blocked the road, preventing them from leaving.

The encounter with the police took place in the village of Susya, in the occupied West Bank, where the Archbishop was meeting with members of a family who were injured in an attack on their land by Israeli settlers.

The Church Times is covering the Archbishop Cottrell’s visit to the West Bank and east Jerusalem, which started on Friday and is due to finish on Tuesday.

“The police and a kind of local militia have followed us around this afternoon. They don’t want us to be here, but we are here: to show solidarity with people whose livelihoods, whose homes are under threat, and to tell their story and to do what we can to witness for peace and justice in this land,” he said.

The south Hebron hills are in Area C of the West Bank, under Israeli civilian and military control. Locals in the village Umm al-Khair are asking for international support to save their homes, which are under demolition orders from Israeli authorities.

“It will be a disaster for the village how many people will be displaced by this demolition operation, if it happens. We need more intervention from our friends,” Eid Hathaleen, a community leader, said, and thanked the Archbishop for his visit.

Mr Hathaleen’s cousin, Awdah, was shot and killed during a raid by settlers in July this year.

During his visit to Umm al-Khair on Saturday, the Archbishop met with members of the local Women Development Programme, which is supported by the East Jerusalem YMCA. It was on leaving this meeting that he found his vehicle blocked by the armed settlers.

After a stand-off of around five minutes, police arrived and spoke with the settlers, who then moved their truck.

Armed settlers operate as “quasi-military vigilantes tolerated by the police”, the Dean of St George’s College, the Very Revd Canon Richard Sewell, who is travelling with the Archbishop, explained during the incident.

THE Archbishop’s encounter with the police occurred in the nearby village of Susya. He had just entered the home of a local family, who aren’t being named for their own safety, when the call came: Israeli police had arrived, and the delegation was being ordered to leave.

A police officer said that the area was closed to non-residents, due to the number of recent incidents. When questioned, he seemed to acknowledge that the incidents in question were attacks by Israeli settlers.

But the Archbishop was still able to hear the family’s story, and enjoy the bread they’d prepared for his visit, as the group walked back up the rocky path to the main road, where the police stood waiting.

The mother of the family had baked the bread with one hand, she explained, because she had been injured during an attack by settlers on her home. Her husband received a head injury in the attack.

THE demolition orders in Umm al-Khair follow the murder, in July, of one of the village’s residents, Awdah Hathaleen, by a settler. He was shot while filming a settler raid, and while holding his infant son, according to a report in the Palestine Chronicle

Mr Hathaleen’s body was not handed over by Israeli authorities until a week after his killing. Muslim burial customs require a body to be buried as soon as possible after death, but Mr Hathaleen’s body was not release until after a hunger strike by around 70 women from the village had attracted international attention.

The man who is alleged to have shot Mr Hathaleen, Yinon Levi, was briefly arrested by Israeli police, but has since been released after a judge ruled that he had been acting in self-defence.

Mr Hathaleen’s brother, Khaled Mohammed, told the Archbishop that he “needs justice” for his brother. “I need the person who killed my brother to go to jail. But with this government, in this time, it will not happen.”

He also complained about the difference in response times when settlers call the police, compared to when Palestinians do so. “When the settlers call the police 

According to reports by Al Jazeera, Mr Levi runs an earthworks company that has previously been engaged to demolish Palestinian homes. They report that, since his release, he has been seen again in the village preparing the ground for the construction of a further settler outpost.

On Thursday, a letter signed by over a hundred Democratic members of the US House of Representatives called on the Israeli government to halt the planned destruction of homes.

Settlements are illegal under international law, but are being encouraged by the current Israeli government. The high-profile Minister for National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, lives in a nearby settlement.

Mr Ben-Gvir is currently sanctioned by the UK government for “repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities” in the occupied West Bank.

The East Jerusalem YMCA is providing counselling services to children in Umm al-Khair who are traumatised after witnessing the killing of Mr Hathaleen.

Explaining the importance of the counselling they provide, a member of the YMCA staff said: “If there is no inner peace, there will never be world peace.”

First 6 months of Leo XIV’s pontificate in 12 dates

November 8 was the six-month anniversary of Pope Leo XIV's election. We consider 12 interesting dates from this first half-year.

May 8: At 6:07 p.m., under the gaze of cameras from around the world, white smoke billowed from the stove in the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican, causing a clamor among the crowd that shook the pillars of St. Peter's Basilica (and disturbed the seagull family on the roof, which had been bringing ooohs and aaahs from the Square). 

American Robert Francis Prevost was elected the 267th pope in history at the age of 69. After a conclave lasting barely 24 hours, the 133 cardinal electors reached agreement after only four ballots. 

During his Urbi et Orbi blessing from the loggia of the basilica, the new pontiff, announced peace to the world, a peace that he wanted to be “disarmed and disarming.”

May 18: In the presence of 156 government delegations from around the world, Leo XIV celebrated the official inauguration Mass of his Petrine ministry in St. Peter's Square. 

During the celebration in front of some 100,000 people, whose numbers stretched as far as the Tiber, he received the pallium, a liturgical scarf made of white wool worn by archbishops, and the “Fisherman's Ring,” representing the authority of the pope and the succession of the Apostle Peter. 

Leo XIV also presided over the “rite of obedience” with 12 representatives of the Catholic faithful. 

In his homily, the head of the Catholic Church assured that he would focus his ministry on “charity.” He expressed his desire to see “a united Church, a sign of unity and communion, which becomes a leaven for a reconciled world.”

May 24: “Popes pass, the Curia remains.” In his first speech to Vatican employees gathered in Paul VI Hall, Leo XIV uttered this remarkable phrase and paid lengthy tribute to his collaborators. His words were seen as a desire to begin in a vein of teamwork and esteem. The new pope also provided the €500 “conclave bonus” for employees, which had not been given by his predecessor.

July 7-22: Leo XIV's first vacation in Castel Gandolfo, just southeast of Rome — the former summer residence of Popes Benedict XVI, John Paul II, and their predecessors. There, the sports-loving pontiff can enjoy a tennis court and even horses. 

His brother John confided that Leo XIV enjoys Castel Gandolfo and would vacation there regularly. 

The pope no longer occupies the Apostolic Palace, as it was converted into a museum by Pope Francis, but resides at Villa Barberini, another residence belonging to the Holy See.

July 9: The Pope receives Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, with whom he had already met on May 18 during his installation as Bishop of Rome. During this new meeting, he reiterates his willingness to host “negotiations” between the Russian and Ukrainian parties at the Vatican.

July 28-August 3: For a week in the middle of summer, hundreds of thousands of young people waving flags from around the world take to the streets of Rome for the “Youth Jubilee.” It is Leo XIV's first major encounter with young people. 

During these days, he invited the delegations to spread peace. The jubilee culminated in Tor Vergata, where, according to the organizers, one million young people participated in a vigil and Mass with the pontiff, who urged them to “passionately seek the truth.”

September 7: Leo XIV celebrates the first canonization of his pontificate by declaring Pier Giorgio Frassati (1901-1925) and Carlo Acutis (1991-2006) saints during a Mass celebrated in St. Peter's Square. 

In his homily, the new pope encouraged young people around the world not to “waste” their lives but to become saints by “cultivating love for God” and for the poor. The date of canonization for the two very popular young saints underwent some changes: Carlo Acutis was to be canonized on April 27—an event postponed due to the death of Francis — and Frassati on August 3.

September 18: Publication of the pope's first interview in the biography Leo XIV: Citizen of the World, Missionary of the 21st Century (English translation coming early 2026). Leo XIV opened up on many subjects.

September 26: Appointment of Filippo Iannone as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, the post Prevost had had prior to being elected. To replace him in this key position in the Vatican administration, which the Pope held only from 2023 to 2025, he chose a man from the Roman Curia. The 67-year-old Italian was previously head of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts. This was the first time the Pope appointed a prefect.

October 9: Publication of Leo XIV's first apostolic letter. Titled Dilexi te – “I have loved you,” this text is a legacy of Francis and is dedicated to “love for the poor.” Making attention to the poor the compass of the Catholic Church, the new pontiff calls on Christians to reject ideologies that lead to immobility or perpetuate an “economy that kills,” and to denounce “structures of injustice.” 

Following in the footsteps of his predecessor, who had initiated the drafting of this exhortation, Leo XIV reiterates his message in favor of migrants, abused women, prisoners, and the education of the poor.

October 23: State visit of King Charles III to the Holy See. During the morning, Leo XIV and the British monarch pray together under Michelangelo's frescoes in the Sistine Chapel — a historic first since the separation of the Church of England and the Catholic Church in 1534. 

As a sign of friendship between Anglicans and Catholics, King Charles III receives an honorary title at the Benedictine Abbey of St. Paul Outside the Walls and Leo XIV one at St. George's Chapel at Windsor Castle.

November 1: During All Saints' Day Mass, at the conclusion of the Jubilee of Education, Leo XIV proclaimed British Cardinal John Henry Newman (1801-1890) a “Doctor of the Church” and co-patron of Catholic schools. Drawing on the figure of the former Anglican who converted to Catholicism, he outlines the major missions of Catholic education in a world threatened by nihilism and inequality.

Two important dates are planned for the coming weeks:

November 20: Leo XIV will make his first trip outside Rome and its surroundings to Assisi to conclude the 81st General Assembly of the Italian Episcopal Conference.

November 27–December 2: Leo XIV's first apostolic trip to Turkey and Lebanon.

Pope Leo XIV Meets with 15 Abuse Survivors at the Vatican

Pope Leo XIV met on Saturday with 15 survivors of clergy sexual abuse in a meeting marked by dialogue, listening, and prayer, according to the Holy See Press Office.

The encounter, described as one of “closeness with the victims, of deep and painful listening and dialogue,” lasted nearly three hours. 

The meeting concluded with “an intense moment of prayer” shared between the pope and the survivors.

This was the second time in less than three weeks that Leo has met at the Vatican with victims of clerical abuse. 

On Oct. 20, he received four survivors and two representatives of the international coalition Ending Clergy Abuse, which brings together victims and advocates from more than 30 countries.

That earlier meeting lasted about an hour and was described by participants as a “deeply meaningful conversation.”

Imagine a Church in which Sr Stan had been a bishop (Opinion)

There have been multiple tributes to the towering legacy left behind by Sr Stanislaus Kennedy, a social justice campaigner who “started things with nothing”, as she put it herself, but went on to achieve so much.

She cut a swathe through the red tape of civil society to set up numerous organisations, transforming the lives of thousands. There was much opposition. Former taoiseach Charlie Haughey, for instance, once described her as the most intransigent woman he had ever met.

She wore the remark as a badge of honour and used it to sharpen her resolve to help those most in need. She had considerable success. But imagine the further impact she might have had if this woman of deep faith and even deeper determination had been allowed to advance in the hierarchy of her own Church.

In lay society, she was a leader, a founder, a chairwoman, a co-ordinator, the head of several institutions. In religious life, however, she was simply Sr Stan, although her pioneering work and her commitment to the poor was certainly on a par with her mentor, the bishop of Ossory, Peter Birch.

Imagine if the Church had appointed her a bishop.

She would have made the kind of religious leader that might have helped return the Catholic Church to its original values; a female bishop to restore a little of the trust so deeply shattered in recent decades

Her own early work in the Church was shaped by the bishop of Ossory. In the mid-1960s, she was sent to Kilkenny to help him set up a pioneering project, Kilkenny Social Services. She believed, as he did, that the Catholic Church needed to do more to help the poor.

Except she did not have the right to say so. When she wrote a paper pointing out that the Church wasn’t using its resources to help the poor, “all hell broke loose”, as she recalled later. “People were furious, bishops were furious, I got a letter from Rome. In the end of it, I was silenced. But then I rose up again and started speaking out again.”

She did that again and again, speaking out against mandatory celibacy for priests and nuns, speaking up for a yes vote in the 2015 referendum on same-sex marriage and advocating for equality for women within the Catholic Church.

If her calls for equality in the structure of the Church made little more than an uncomfortable ripple, the opposite was true in lay society. Her many successes have been outlined in detail in recent days.

It is impossible to do justice to all of that here but let us recall them in broad brush strokes. She set up Focus Point (now Focus Ireland) to help the homeless in 1985. In 1998, she founded the Sanctuary, a meditation centre in Dublin city. The Immigrant Council of Ireland and the Young Social Innovators followed in 2001. There were myriad projects and thousands of articles, lectures and books.

There is comfort in seeing that her tireless advocacy for a more just society was acknowledged in her own lifetime, but it’s impossible to ignore the fact that her efforts made not a jot of difference to women’s restrictive roles in the Catholic Church

You have the definition of intransigence right there.

Perhaps it is naïve to expect any change because we have seen, with depressing clarity, how unwilling the Church has been to pay redress, or even fully acknowledge, the unspeakable wrongs perpetrated in so many of its institutions and schools.

Sr Stan herself was not untouched by controversy.

The Ryan Report claimed she had been told of the abuse of children at St Joseph’s Industrial School in Kilkenny, a finding she firmly rejected. She found it deeply hurtful but she did contrast her own hurt with the greater hurt the children went through, “which was terrible”.

She also spoke about the unfair depiction of the Sisters of Charity during the controversy over the transfer of St Vincent’s hospital to the National Maternity Hospital and said, in any other context, the depiction of her order as “a power-grabbing congregation” would be considered “elder abuse”.

Speaking of context, it is always helpful to remember the beginnings of things. In this case, the radical philosophy that informed Sr Stan’s congregation when it was founded in 1815 by Cork woman Mary Aikenhead.

It is difficult to appreciate now, two centuries on, just how norm-shattering their work was

At the time there were about 100 women in religious orders in Ireland, all of them safely cloistered behind convent walls.

For the first time, Mary Aikenhead and her sisters ventured out into the community to help the sick and the poor. They ran schools and visited prisons to spend time, in dank cells, with those facing long sentences and, in some cases, execution.

This column has cited before the remarkable entry in the diary of Mother Catherine (Alicia Walshe) which describes how she and Mary Aikenhead made daily visits to Kilmainham Jail to visit Biddy Butterly and Biddy Ennis, two young women awaiting execution after they were convicted of murdering their mistress, Miss Thompson.

Hours before the baying crowds gathered to watch the execution in May 1821, the two women visited again “to comfort and assist in preparing for death”. That remarkable insight, courtesy of social historian Ciarán McCabe in an article in Archivium Hibernicum, reveals a very hands-on pastoral Church willing to care for even the most wayward of its flock.

It’s easy to forget too, given the recent controversy, that Mary Aikenhead established St Vincent’s Hospital in Dublin in 1834 so that the poor – “the chosen children of God”, in her view — would receive the same medical care as the rich, but without charge.

You have to wonder if the women who worked so arduously in the service of the poor had been more prominent in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, whether we might have avoided the unconscionable hurt the institution inflicted in later years.

It’s impossible to say, but I can’t sign off without noting that Sr Stan died at St Francis Hospice in Blanchardstown.

That brought film-maker Alan Gilsenan’s powerful documentary series The Hospice to mind.

In 2007, Gilsenan wrote this about his mother’s reaction to her terminal diagnosis. “Sucking deep on a Silk Cut (Extra Mild, of course), in a strangely matter-of-fact manner, my mother said, “I'll have to go to Pearl...”. She was newly diagnosed terminally ill and Pearl was Pearl Phelan, her girlhood friend and cousin from Tipperary. But Pearl was also Sr Ignatius of Our Lady's Hospice, Harold's Cross.”

She was also a Religious Sister of Charity and a pioneer in the development of end-of-life and palliative care in Ireland.

In 1987, her work was acknowledged with a Rehab People of the Year award which she received with fellow Religious Sister of Charity, Sister Francis Rose O’Flynn. The judges described their work at Our Lady’s Hospice as “a modern-day miracle”.

When Pearl died in 2010, her nephew John Blake Dillon recalled a woman who had four families — her physical family, her religious community, the hospice and the families of those she helped to negotiate a path through terminal illness and bereavement.

He also said that her leadership style and skill were best summed up by Chinese philosopher, Lao Tzu, who said: “As for the best leaders — the people do not notice their existence.”

That might well be true but it is beyond time that the work of these remarkable women, who moved heaven on earth to improve people’s lives, was at least acknowledged in the hierarchy of the Church they did so much to serve.

Swiss Guard probed over alleged spitting at Jews

A Swiss Guard is under internal investigation after allegedly making a contemptuous spitting gesture towards two Jewish women during a papal audience at the Vatican last week.

The incident occurred on 29 October at the Arch of the Bells entrance to St Peter’s Square as crowds gathered for a general audience marking the anniversary of Nostra Aetate, the 1965 declaration on the Church’s relations with non-Christian religions.

Corporal Eliah Cinotti, spokesman for the Pontifical Swiss Guard, confirmed to the Italian agency ANSA that “a contentious incident was reported at one of the guard stations and, as happens on these occasions, an internal investigation has been launched. This is standard procedure because the service must always be performed with the utmost professionalism.” He said the inquiry “remains confidential.”

The alleged victims were part of an international Jewish delegation attending the papal audience. One of them, Israeli writer and theatre director Michal Govrin, said that as she and a colleague approached the Square, “a member of the Pontifical Swiss Guard visibly hissed at us, ‘les juifs,’ the Jews,” and then “made a gesture of spitting in our direction with obvious contempt.” The claim was first reported by La Repubblica.

The audience coincided with the Pope’s reaffirmation of Catholic-Jewish relations. Addressing thousands in the Square, he said, “The Church does not tolerate anti-Semitism and fights it, for the sake of the Gospel itself.” His remarks drew prolonged applause from the assembled crowd.

Reports of hostility towards clergy in the Holy Land have also attracted attention in recent months. In Jerusalem, Abbot Nikodemus Schnabel was filmed being spat at by young Jewish extremists after greeting them with the word “shalom.” He later commented that the footage showed “a part of the reality of my life that’s rarely filmed… Let’s pray for peace and reconciliation.”

Founded in 1506 under Pope Julius II, the Pontifical Swiss Guard is one of the world’s oldest military corps, charged with protecting the Pope and the Apostolic Palace.

The force is celebrated for its discipline and oath of loyalty. Any verified breach of conduct, Vatican officials indicated, would be treated with the utmost seriousness.

The alleged incident, taking place on the very day Nostra Aetate was commemorated, has caused dismay among those who support Catholic-Jewish dialogue, a relationship that the Second Vatican Council sought to renew after centuries of suspicion and the tragedy of the Second World War.

US bishops’ conference under scrutiny after report links Church funds to pro-abortion, LGBT groups

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has been accused of indirectly funding organisations that actively promote abortion, contraception and gender ideology.

A report based on new findings published by the Lepanto Institute claims that the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) – the bishops’ domestic anti-poverty agency – has given 16 separate grants to the United Workers Association (UWA) since 2004.

The UWA, a community organisation based in Baltimore, is described by the Lepanto Institute as “solidly pro-LGBT – even to the point of advocating for publicly-funded sex-change surgeries”.

The grants from the CCHD to the UWA reportedly total $760,000. Its most recent award, a $25,000 grant for the 2024-2025 funding year, was published this spring.

The Institute claims that the UWA has created two “proxy organisations” promoting abortion, contraception and radical gender policies. One of these, Healthcare is a Human Right – Maryland, has publicly stated that “abortion rights are human rights” and has campaigned for the inclusion of abortion in Medicare coverage.

The other, Put People First – Pennsylvania, lists UWA as its fiscal sponsor and has participated in pro-abortion demonstrations, supported Planned Parenthood and hosted events affirming transgender ideology.

The Lepanto Institute says tax records show that between 2020 and 2022, UWA transferred more than $584,000 to Put People First – Pennsylvania for what it described as “grassroots organising and outreach”.

The report also notes UWA’s historic advocacy for same-sex "marriage" and its involvement in socialist political activity. It claims that the group continues to align with the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a Marxist movement under investigation for extremist ties.

In an exclusive statement to the Catholic Herald, Michael Hitchborn, president of the Lepanto Institute, said: “What we find consistently – and what we have found now – is that the CCHD completely ignores its own grant guidelines by providing grants to organisations promoting abortion, contraception, LGBT ideologies and even Socialism.”

Mr Hitchborn said the USCCB “quietly published the CCHD grants lists for the previous three years, which had been withheld during that time to avoid public scrutiny”, adding that it had taken most of this year to review “all 395 grants provided over that three-year period”.

He added: “There’s no mistake here. I personally met with USCCB representatives for the CCHD back in 2011 and showed them proof that the United Workers Association signed on with Equality Maryland to oppose any legislation that would ban same-sex ‘marriage’.”

He said that after he presented this information to the bishops’ representatives, he later discovered board minutes from the UWA confirming a formal decision to partner with Equality Maryland.

“But this is par for the course,” he said, noting that subsequent attempts to meet the current CCHD chairman, Bishop Timothy Senior of Harrisburg, were rejected.

The latest disclosures come amid growing unease within much of the US clergy about what commentators describe as an ideological divide between more conservative younger priests and the country’s liberal episcopal leadership.

According to a National Study of Catholic Priests published by Catholic University and Gallup, just 27 per cent of younger clergy say they trust the US bishops as a whole, while 70 per cent of younger clergy identify as conservative or orthodox in outlook.

Observers note that younger priests are increasingly critical of the bishops’ political stance, seeing it as out of step with Catholic moral teaching.

The CCHD was established in 1969 by the USCCB as the national anti-poverty and social justice arm of the Church in the US.

Administered through the USCCB’s Department of Justice, Peace and Human Development, the CCHD has distributed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants to local and national groups across the United States.

Pope Leo to call cardinals to Rome for extraordinary consistory

Pope Leo XIV is expected to summon the world’s cardinals to Rome in early January next year for an extraordinary consistory, according to a Vatican communication circulated this week.

A brief note sent by the Secretariat of State on 6 November and obtained by the National Catholic Register stated that “Holy Father Leo XIV has in mind to convene an extraordinary consistory for the days of Jan. 7 and 8, 2026.”

The message added, “In due course, the dean of the College of Cardinals will send to Your Eminence the relevant letter with further details,” concluding with the line, “With profound reverence, coordinating office of the Secretariat of State.”

Asked on Friday about the correspondence by the NCR, Matteo Bruni, director of the Holy See Press Office, said that the Vatican had not yet publicly “confirmed its existence”, adding that an announcement was likely not to be “that far ahead”. The theme of the meeting has not been disclosed, and it is uncertain whether all members of the College have been informed.

Extraordinary consistories are convened when the Pope seeks to consult the entire College of Cardinals on issues of particular importance to the Church. The last such gathering took place on 29-30 August 2022 under Pope Francis and focused on Praedicate Evangelium, the apostolic constitution reforming the Roman Curia.

News of the forthcoming gathering comes amid continuing discussion in Rome about the need for greater collegiality among the cardinals. Some observers note that members of the College expressed an expectation during this year’s conclave that more regular consistories would be held.

Speculation among some Curial circles suggests that the January consistory may coincide with preparations for Pope Leo’s first encyclical. A priest working in the Curia told the Catholic Herald that the meeting may relate to the first papal encyclical that is yet to be released or given a firm release date.

In Church tradition, a consistory, derived from the Latin con-sistere, meaning “to stand together”, is a formal assembly of cardinals summoned by the Pope. Ordinary consistories are largely ceremonial, often used to elevate new cardinals or announce canonisations, while extraordinary ones allow the pontiff to deliberate on matters of wider concern.

Throughout modern history, popes have employed such meetings for major discussions: John Paul II convened six extraordinary consistories, addressing topics from Curial reform to the Church’s mission in the new millennium. Pope Benedict XVI preferred informal pre-consistory sessions, while Francis held two extraordinary consistories, the last in 2022.

The Vatican has yet to issue any formal confirmation of January’s meeting, but anticipation is already growing for the first extraordinary consistory of Pope Leo XIV’s pontificate.

Pope: The Church is a ‘construction site’ for a community to be built without haste

Celebrating Mass on the occasion of the Dedication of the Basilica of St John Lateran, Pope Leo XIV reflects on the Church, urging the faithful to be ‘free from the criteria of the world, which too often demands immediate results because it does not know the wisdom of waiting’.

‘Jesus changes us and calls us to work in God's great construction site, wisely shaping us according to His plans for salvation.’ ‘In Rome,’ says the Pope, ‘there is a great good that grows’ beyond the hardships.

Digging “within ourselves and around us” so that we can then look to Christ and thus build “with humility and patience,” as “the millennial history of the Church” teaches us, a “true community of faith, capable of spreading charity, promoting mission, proclaiming, celebrating, and serving that apostolic Magisterium of which” the Basilica of St. John Lateran “is the first seat.” 

Pope Leo XIV reflected on the mission of the Church as a community of active believers in his homily during Mass on the occasion of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica, celebrated on Sunday, 9 November.

In the presence of some 2,700 people, the Pope recalled the important history of the Cathedral, built at the behest of the Roman Emperor Constantine after he granted Christians freedom of worship in 313 AD, and then dedicated by Pope Sylvester I a few years later. However, Pope Leo XIV emphasised that this Basilica, the “Mother of all Churches,” “is much more than a monument or a historical memorial" but is instead “a sign of the living Church, built with chosen and precious stones in Christ Jesus, the cornerstone.” 

This “reminds us that we too, are ‘living stones here on earth… built into’ a spiritual temple,” he continued. “It is the ecclesial community, ‘the Church, the society of believers, [which] gives the Lateran its most solid and striking external structure’,” he explained, quoting St Paul VI.

Brothers and sisters, as we diligently labor in the service of God’s Kingdom, let us be neither hasty nor superficial.  Let us dig deep, unhindered by worldly criteria, which too often demand immediate results and disregard the wisdom of waiting.

Concelebrating with Pope Leo at the altar were Cardinal Baldassare Reina, Vicar General for the Diocese of Rome and Archpriest of the Basilica of St. John Lateran; and Bishop Renato Tarantelli Baccari, Titular Bishop of Campli and Vice-Gerent of the Diocese of Rome. Approximately 160 priests and 10 Bishops also concelebrated.

In order to build, we must first look to Christ

The Pope began his reflection with the foundations of the Basilica of St. John Lateran. “Their importance is obvious and, even somewhat unsettling,” he explained, adding that those who built the Cathedral of Rome laid a sufficiently solid foundation on which to erect everything else, “digging deep, with great effort,” in this way preventing the structure from collapsing over time.

For the Pope, this is a useful image because we too, “labourers in the living Church, we too must first dig deep within ourselves and around ourselves before we can build impressive structures.” 

ope Leo quoted the second reading of the liturgy, taken from the first letter of St. Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians, in which he says that “no one can lay any foundation other than the one that has been laid; that foundation is Jesus Christ.”

This means constantly returning to Jesus and his Gospel and being docile to the action of the Holy Spirit. Otherwise, we risk overloading a building with heavy structures whose foundations are too weak to support.

The Church as a construction site

The Pope then moved on to the Gospel proclaimed during Mass, taken from the Evangelist St Luke. In it, Zacchaeus, a “rich and powerful man” who “feels moved to meet Jesus,” climbs a tree to see Him among the crowd, “an unusual and inappropriate gesture for someone of his rank who is accustomed to getting whatever he wants at the tax office as though it were his due.” 

Pope Leo pointed out that for Zacchaeus “climbing among the branches” meant “his own limitations and overcomes the inhibitions of his pride.” In the event, he was able to encounter Jesus, an encounter that “marks the beginning of a new life” for him.

When Jesus calls us to take part in God’s great project, He transforms us by skillfully shaping us according to His plans for salvation.  In recent years, the image of a “construction site” has often been used to describe our ecclesial journey.  It is a beautiful image that speaks of activity, creativity and dedication, as well as hard work and sometimes complex problems to be solved.

In Rome, a great good is growing

For the Pope, this image of the construction site "expresses the real, palpable effort with which our communities grow every day, sharing charisms and under the guidance of their pastors." 

He also recalls how, even in the history of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, "there were critical moments, pauses, and corrections to projects in progress.’ Yet, he continues, ‘thanks to the tenacity of those who came before us, we can gather in this wonderful place."

In Rome, a great good is growing thanks to the efforts of many. Let us not allow fatigue to prevent us from recognizing and celebrating this good, so that we may nourish and renew our enthusiasm.  After all, it is through charity in action that the face of our Church is shaped, making it ever clearer to all that she is a “mother,” the “mother of all Churches,” or even a “mom,” as Saint John Paul II said when speaking to children on this very feast day.

He then reflected on how the Church of Rome is currently experiencing the “implementation phase of the Synod,” in which “what has matured over years of work now needs to be put to the test and evaluated ‘in the field.’” “This implies an uphill journey, but we must not be discouraged,” he said, adding that “instead, we should continue with confidence in our efforts to grow together.”

The importance of liturgy

Finally, Pope Leo highlighted “an essential aspect of the mission of a cathedral,” namely the liturgy, “the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed... the source from which all its power flows.” 

For the Pope, all the themes he highlighted in his homily are found therein: “We are built up as God’s temple, as His dwelling place in the Spirit and we receive strength to preach Christ in the world.”

Therefore, care for the liturgy, especially here at the See of Peter, must be such that it can serve as an example for the whole people of God.  It must comply with the established norms, be attentive to the different sensibilities of those participating and keep with the principle of wise inculturation (cf. ibid., 37-38).  At the same time, it must remain faithful to the solemn sobriety typical of the Roman tradition, which can do so much good for the souls of those who actively participate in it.

Quoting St Augustine's Discourses, in which he says that “beauty is nothing but love, and love is life,” Pope Leo emphasised that in the liturgy “this truth is emphasized in an eminent way.” 

He expressed his hope that “every care be taken to ensure that the simple beauty of the rites expresses the value of worship for the harmonious growth of the whole Body of the Lord” so that “those who approach the altar of Rome’s Cathedral go away filled with the grace that the Lord wishes to flood the world.”