Can’t you just imagine the triumphant glee of some pathetic little jobsworth when they (I bet it’s a ‘they’) realised St Andrew’s Church on Westland Row could be penalised under planning laws for displaying the notice of services on the protected railings in the same manner as it has done for almost 200 years?
How the virtue-signalling wetwipes in the council must have high-fived the genius who spotted this latest opportunity to take another potshot at the Catholic Church and the country’s Christian heritage.
The coveted ‘Employee of the Month’ mug, previously treasured by the bright spark who came up with the idea of the ‘Winter Lights Festival’ to avoid any mention of the word Christmas, has surely landed on a new desk.
In 1829, Daniel O’Connell secured Catholic Emancipation, and the repeal of the Penal Laws, through the Catholic Relief Act. Three years later, the foundaculturally tions of St Andrew’s Church were laid in the very heart of the capital, to provide a place of worship for the citizens of the inner city.
Cramped
The Liberator himself donated the baptismal font, and a mortuary chapel was later added so the tenement-dwellers of the area no longer needed to wake their dead in their cramped homes.
Since it opened in 1837, St Andrew’s has placed a sign on its railings notifying passers-by, tourists and visitors as well as locals, of the times of its services – Masses, Confessions, Stations of the Cross. Over Christmas and Easter in particular, when extra services are celebrated, it is particularly important that up-todate schedules are posted.
And so it was at Easter time, the greatest celebration in the Christian calendar, that Dublin City Council chose to strike with its shabby little diktat.
Alongside its traditional notice advising parishioners of Easter Mass times, last week the church was forced to display a sign stating: ‘We have been informed by Dublin City Council that notices such as this, that have been in place since the mid-nineteenth century, are in breach of our planning laws and have to be removed.’
So a service to the local community, which was in place long before either Dublin City Council or planning laws were ever heard of, has to be discontinued by order of Dublin City Council and planning laws.
As ‘this leaves us with greatly reduced means to inform you’ of service times over the Easter celebrations, including the fact that world-class soprano Celine Byrne was to perform during the liturgies, St Andrew’s asked parishioners to ‘assist us by sharing this information on social media’. Because I’m sure the older members of the church’s congregation are never off TikTok these days.
As the church has been forced to consult lawyers, incurring expenses it could surely do without, and is hoping to find a way forward in consultation with the council, parish administrator Fr Alan Hilliard told our sister paper, The Irish Mail on Sunday, they couldn’t really comment on the matter for the moment.
But he did admit that it was ‘a bit of a shock’ to receive the missive telling him the practice of fixing notices to the front railings, one dating back ‘a long number of years’, had to cease.
Local Independent councillor Mannix Flynn, never one to mince his words anyway, was less constrained in his response to this absurd bureaucratic overreach. This was a church with a ‘dwindling flock’, he said, ‘trying to tell people that this church is open – they’re not advertising half-price Victoria’s Secret’.
And he pointed out that the council’s argument, that the railings are protected structures, doesn’t hold water, as other protected structures in the area are permitted to hang notices on their equally venerable and ancient railings.6
‘This is where the city council gets a little bit ridiculous,’ he said, surely a masterful understatement. ‘If you go round to the National Gallery of Ireland or Collins Barracks, you’ll see signs plastered all over the place and there’s no issue in relation to it, because it’s seen as cultural.’
So paintings, military artefacts and stuffed dead animals are so important that planning laws can be waived to advertise them to the public, but a notice telling parishioners of Mass times in a 200-year-old church, in a country in which 70% of the population identified as Catholic in the 2022 census, has no historic or cultural significance? How exactly do the they/thems of Dublin City Council reason that one out?
Mocking, belittling and denigrating the Catholic Church in Ireland has long been a popular sport with this country’s selfstyled liberal elite, and it is difficult to see this spiteful measure as anything other than a bid by the council to burnish its woke credentials once again.
Publicity
Have a look back at the council’s online publicity for its 2025 Christmas festivities, and see if you can find the C-word anywhere in all that carefully curated, quaveringly anxious and achingly neutered blather – I certainly could not.
You’ve got to wonder who, exactly, the city council is hoping to impress, to pander to or to curry favour with, through disingenuous and craven measures like these.
Is it just about showing off how ‘progressive’ they are up there in City Hall? Or are they fearful of offending religious minorities – other than the Jews, of course, since the council’s efforts to rename Herzog Park continue apace – by acknowledging that this is a AS an act of petty, ignorant and jaundiced righteousness, Dublin City Council’s high-handed command to an iconic city-centre church to remove its Mass times notice from its railings is hard to beat.
Can’t you just imagine the triumphant glee of some pathetic little jobsworth when they (I bet it’s a ‘they’) realised St Andrew’s Church on Westland Row could be penalised under planning laws for displaying the notice of services on the protected railings in the same manner as it has done for almost 200 years?
How the virtue-signalling wetwipes in the council must have high-fived the genius who spotted this latest opportunity to take another potshot at the Catholic Church and the country’s Christian heritage.
The coveted ‘Employee of the Month’ mug, previously treasured by the bright spark who came up with the idea of the ‘Winter Lights Festival’ to avoid any mention of the word Christmas, has surely landed on a new desk.
In 1829, Daniel O’Connell secured Catholic Emancipation, and the repeal of the Penal Laws, through the Catholic Relief Act. Three years later, the foundaculturally tions of St Andrew’s Church were laid in the very heart of the capital, to provide a place of worship for the citizens of the inner city.
The Liberator himself donated the baptismal font, and a mortuary chapel was later added so the tenement-dwellers of the area no longer needed to wake their dead in their cramped homes.
Since it opened in 1837, St Andrew’s has placed a sign on its railings notifying passers-by, tourists and visitors as well as locals, of the times of its services – Masses, Confessions, Stations of the Cross. Over Christmas and Easter in particular, when extra services are celebrated, it is particularly important that up-todate schedules are posted.
And so it was at Easter time, the greatest celebration in the Christian calendar, that Dublin City Council chose to strike with its shabby little diktat.
Alongside its traditional notice advising parishioners of Easter Mass times, last week the church was forced to display a sign stating: ‘We have been informed by Dublin City Council that notices such as this, that have been in place since the mid-nineteenth century, are in breach of our planning laws and have to be removed.’
So a service to the local community, which was in place long before either Dublin City Council or planning laws were ever heard of, has to be discontinued by order of Dublin City Council and planning laws.
As ‘this leaves us with greatly reduced means to inform you’ of service times over the Easter celebrations, including the fact that world-class soprano Celine Byrne was to perform during the liturgies, St Andrew’s asked parishioners to ‘assist us by sharing this information on social media’. Because I’m sure the older members of the church’s congregation are never off TikTok these days.
As the church has been forced to consult lawyers, incurring expenses it could surely do without, and is hoping to find a way forward in consultation with the council, parish administrator Fr Alan Hilliard told our sister paper, The Irish Mail on Sunday, they couldn’t really comment on the matter for the moment.
But he did admit that it was ‘a bit of a shock’ to receive the missive telling him the practice of fixing notices to the front railings, one dating back ‘a long number of years’, had to cease.
Local Independent councillor Mannix Flynn, never one to mince his words anyway, was less constrained in his response to this absurd bureaucratic overreach. This was a church with a ‘dwindling flock’, he said, ‘trying to tell people that this church is open – they’re not advertising half-price Victoria’s Secret’.
And he pointed out that the council’s argument, that the railings are protected structures, doesn’t hold water, as other protected structures in the area are permitted to hang notices on their equally venerable and ancient railings.
‘This is where the city council gets a little bit ridiculous,’ he said, surely a masterful understatement. ‘If you go round to the National Gallery of Ireland or Collins Barracks, you’ll see signs plastered all over the place and there’s no issue in relation to it, because it’s seen as cultural.’
So paintings, military artefacts and stuffed dead animals are so important that planning laws can be waived to advertise them to the public, but a notice telling parishioners of Mass times in a 200-year-old church, in a country in which 70% of the population identified as Catholic in the 2022 census, has no historic or cultural significance? How exactly do the they/thems of Dublin City Council reason that one out?
Mocking, belittling and denigrating the Catholic Church in Ireland has long been a popular sport with this country’s selfstyled liberal elite, and it is difficult to see this spiteful measure as anything other than a bid by the council to burnish its woke credentials once again.
Have a look back at the council’s online publicity for its 2025 Christmas festivities, and see if you can find the C-word anywhere in all that carefully curated, quaveringly anxious and achingly neutered blather – I certainly could not.
You’ve got to wonder who, exactly, the city council is hoping to impress, to pander to or to curry favour with, through disingenuous and craven measures like these.
Is it just about showing off how ‘progressive’ they are up there in City Hall? Or are they fearful of offending religious minorities – other than the Jews, of course, since the council’s efforts to rename Herzog Park continue apace – by acknowledging that this is a Christian country?
Earlier this year, the Minister for Justice, Jim O’Callaghan, made headlines when he declared that immigrants to this country should respect our ‘social and cultural’ values.
Calculated insults to the country’s Catholic population, such as this, suggest that respect for our history and heritage, our social fabric and our unique culture, should first begin at home.













