Wednesday, March 04, 2026

Vatican synod study group proposes creation of pontifical commission for new technologies

A Synod on Synodality study group has recommended the creation of a new “Pontifical Commission for Digital Culture and New Technologies” in the first of 15 synod study group reports expected in the coming weeks. 

The Vatican published the first two final reports from its Synod on Synodality study groups on March 3. 

Church’s presence in digital spaces

The first report contains recommendations on navigating the Church’s presence in digital spaces, including a proposal for a Vatican office or commission to monitor emerging theological, pastoral and canonical questions; prepare guidelines and training strategies for bishops, priests, religious and laypeople; and support bishops’ conferences in integrating digital mission into their pastoral plans. 

The second report focuses on guidelines for the formation of future priests and includes a call for more women to play a role in aiding the formation of seminarians for the priesthood. 

The report also lists 26 real world examples of “best practices” from seminaries around the world.

In one of the examples, the report points to how almost all seminaries in France now include at least one woman on their seminary council with voting rights, after a 2021 directive from the country’s bishops. 

In one French seminary, a married couple, a marriage counselor and her retired husband, married 39 years with six children, lives in the seminary as an integral part of its formation team alongside six priests.

‘Transparency and accountability’

Pope Leo XIV directed that the study group reports be made public, according to the General Secretariat of the Synod, “in order to share with the entire People of God the fruit of the reflection and discernment undertaken, thereby giving concrete expression to one of the essential characteristics of the synodal Church: transparency and accountability.”

Cardinal Mario Grech, the secretary general of the Synod of Bishops, noted the final reports “are to be understood as working documents, a point of departure rather than arrival,” but said they “already contain valuable indications … from which local Churches and various ecclesial realities may draw inspiration from this very moment.”

The General Secretariat of the Synod will publish 13 more study group final reports, according to its website, with the next batch expected March 10.

Study groups examining issues raised at assembly

The study groups were established by Pope Francis following the first session of the Synod on Synodality in October 2023. 

Twelve groups were originally formed to examine issues raised at that assembly, including women’s participation in the Church, the role of papal nuncios and the liturgy in a synodal perspective. 

The groups, composed of cardinals, bishops, priests and lay experts from both inside and outside the Vatican, had originally been asked to submit their conclusions by June 2025. 

After the death of Pope Francis and the election of Pope Leo XIV last year, the new pope extended the deadline, requesting final reports be delivered “insofar as possible” by Dec. 31, 2025.

The proposals drawn from all of the final reports will be submitted to Pope Leo XIV, who will evaluate and may approve them, the secretariat said.

Proposals to guide Church’s digital mission

The 26-page final report from the study group on the Church’s mission in the digital environment provided recommendations both at the diocesan level and for the bishops’ conferences and Roman Curia to better serve the needs of people online. 

The report reflected on feedback gathered from Catholics throughout the global synod process, citing clergy who said they felt “ill-equipped to navigate digital spaces.” 

The report called on appropriate Vatican bodies to study potential canonical adaptations to accommodate what it termed “supraterritorial digital realities,” acknowledging that online ministry often goes beyond traditional geographic diocesan boundaries. 

The group noted that “much more consultation and discernment remains to be done regarding jurisdictional issues.”

Digital risks of polarization, manipulation

Additional Vatican-level proposals included developing guidelines on digital risks such as polarization and manipulation, fostering international networks of those engaged in digital mission, and creating a Church-wide digital resource hub.

The group’s recommendations emphasized that digital spaces represent genuine terrain for evangelization. Local churches, it said, should affirm digital culture as “a real space for mission, where true human relationships occur.” 

The report also cautioned that “mainstream digital platforms are not neutral but have algorithms that may hinder the spread of positive messages.”

Study group on seminary formation guidelines 

The second report, a 24-page document, provided guidelines and recommendations for how seminarians are formed, including closer immersion in parish life, the inclusion of women in the process of formation, and greater lay involvement in decisions about priestly candidates.

Rather than issuing a wholesale revision of the 2016 Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Sacerdotalis, a document from the Congregation for the Clergy on priestly formation, which the synod secretariat said the group judged as “still valid in its fundamental principles,” the study group produced a guiding document for its implementation in a “missionary synodal key.”

Among its key guidelines, the report called for priestly formation to be immersed in the life of the Christian community, with the possibility of alternating traditional seminary residence with periods living in parish communities or other ecclesial environments, particularly during later stages of formation. 

The document specified this should not prolong the overall formation period.

‘Well-prepared and competent women’

The report called on seminaries to include “well-prepared and competent women as co-responsible at all levels of formation, also within the formation team, in order to benefit from their indispensable contribution to vocational discernment and to the accompaniment of candidates to the priesthood.”

Responsibility for the formation of future priests, the document said, “cannot remain limited to the Bishop and those directly given the task of formation, but requires the contribution of the entire People of God.” 

It called for bishops to promote listening and interaction among people of different vocations in drafting national formation plans, and said the People of God should be “truly listened to” before the conferral of Holy Orders.

26 real-world best practices

The document includes 26 real-world best practice examples from seminaries around the world. 

Among those highlighted: a program in eight U.S. dioceses focused on healing wounds caused by the excessive use of technology and family breakdown, centered on an eight-day silent retreat and a small-group chastity program; and a Nigerian seminary that requires seminarians to perform all maintenance work and cleaning of their seminary building to “experience the dignity of human labor.”

The report also outlined a three-year action plan under the supervision of the Dicastery for the Clergy, in which each episcopal conference could establish a working group to oversee implementation of synodal elements in its seminaries. 

Comprehensive reports would be submitted to the dicastery at the end of the three-year period, which would compile a summary report for the pope.

With the submission of their final reports, both study groups have concluded their mandates and are considered dissolved. 

The General Secretariat of the Synod and the competent Vatican dicasteries will now work to translate the findings into proposals to be submitted to the pope.

Pope receives advanced telehealth device for children‘s healthcare

The “Patrons of the World's Children Hospital” donate a TELADOC LITE telemedicine system to Pope Leo XIV for paediatric care for children in need.

A sophisticated next-generation technology telemedicine system, destined to provide paediatric healthcare support, has been donated to Pope Leo XIV by a delegation of “Patrons of the World‘s Children Hospital“.

The TELADOC LITE system was given to the Pope on Wednesday morning, March 4, as he received the delegation before the General Audience in the Vatican's Paul VI Hall.

“Patrons of the World‘s Children Hospital“ is an American not for profit Corporation which coordinates the Pope‘s Global Alliance for the Health and Humanitarian Care of Children, a network that brings together hospital facilities from all over the world, including the Vatican‘s Bambino Gesù Children‘s Hospital.

It aims to help provide medical care to about one million young children in developing nations or in areas where paediatric healthcare is insufficient. 

This mission was entrusted to the network by Pope Francis in May 2024.

Fabrizio Arengi Bentivoglio, President of the Patrons, has reaffirmed the Corporation’s mission to children’s wellbeing, and reiterated its commitment to continue this ”miracle” of care and compassion for children in need alongside Pope Leo XIV.

The TELADOC LITE is a next-generation technology system that connects patients and care teams with telehealth devices that support point-of-care visits and clinical collaboration.

Presenting the system to Pope Leo on Wednesday morning, a telehealth connection was established with a venue in Argentina to illustrate the possibilities offered by this particular tool in the field of telemedicine.

Pope Leo XIV renews calls for peace, dialogue as Iran strikes continue

Pope Leo XIV called for prayer and effort for peace on Tuesday, as a U.S.-Israeli air campaign continued for the fourth day in Iran.

“Pray for peace,” Leo told journalists gathered outside the papal retreat at Castel Gandolfo on Tuesday evening. “Work for peace,” the pontiff said, “less hatred – hatred in the world is constantly increasing.”

The pope called for people everywhere “to truly strive to promote dialogue” and “seek solutions – to resolve problems without weapons.”

By Tuesday evening, the conflict had spread to several countries throughout the Mideast region.

Israeli forces responded to Hezbollah attacks in Lebanon on Monday and struck targets in Beirut on Tuesday, while the U.S. embassies in Dubai and Riyadh suffered drone attacks.

Since the air campaign against the theocratic regime in Iran began on Saturday, Iran has hit targets in Bahrain, Qatar, other targets in the U.A.E. and Saudi Arabia, and Oman

The conflict has almost entirely halted commercial traffic in Strait of Hormuz, the maritime shipping lane off the southern coast of Iran, through which nearly 20 percent of the oil consumed worldwide passes each day.

Prices have skyrocketed and insurance carriers have canceled coverage for ships traveling through the Strait. U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier on Tuesday that he is considering whether to order U.S. naval vessels to escort tankers through the waters.

Six U.S. servicemembers are confirmed dead, nearly 800 people have been killed in Iran, and at least 11 people have been killed in Israel as a result of the violence.

On Monday, Trump said the campaign could last as long as five weeks, adding that the U.S. has “capability to go far longer than that.”

Also on Monday, Trump told the New York Post he would not rule out deploying ground forces in Iran “if they were necessary.”

At the Angelus on Sunday, Leo said he was following “with deep concern” the events then beginning to unfold in Iran, and warned that the situation in the country risked escalating into “a tragedy of enormous proportions.”

The pope on Sunday urged all parties involved “to assume the moral responsibility of halting the spiral of violence before it becomes an unbridgeable chasm.”

“Stability and peace,” he said on Sunday, “are not built with mutual threats nor with weapons, which sow destruction, pain, and death, but only with a reasonable, authentic and responsible dialogue.”

Seattle Archdiocese must hand over sex abuse records, WA court rules

The state Attorney General’s Office can enforce subpoenas to determine whether charitable funds were used to cover up sexual abuse by clergy members, a Washington appeals court ruled Monday.

In May 2024, then-Attorney General Bob Ferguson launched an investigation into the Seattle Archdiocese, the Diocese of Spokane and the Diocese of Yakima, to find out “whether recent reforms publicized by the Church are being implemented and whether they are effective,” according to the appellate court ruling.

However, the Seattle Archdiocese refused to fully comply with subpoenas because of the broadness of the scope.

A King County Superior Court judge ruled in 2024 that the attorney general couldn’t force the church to hand over documents. Monday’s decision overturned that ruling.

In the new court opinion, a panel of three judges found the Archdiocese can only seek a religious exemption from specific laws when it’s truly necessary to protect religious freedom.

“This means the AGO’s subpoena is supported by statutory authorization, and we therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings,” the ruling reads.

Archbishop Paul D. Etienne, who oversees the Archdiocese of Seattle, said in a statement Tuesday that the church “shares the same goals” as the attorney general’s office.

“As a way to continue healing for our Church and for victim survivors, we want to give a transparent accounting of the history without jeopardizing the privacy of victim survivors,” Etienne said.

The archbishop wrote that the original subpoena asked for every receipt from Washington parishes and schools since Jan. 1, 1940 — which would produce “irrelevant documents and waste millions of dollars to us and taxpayers.”

Etienne added: “We remain, as we have from the beginning, open to working with the Attorney General’s team to find a more balanced set of records to share — along with a guarantee for the privacy of victim survivors as we do not want the state’s investigation to re-traumatize them in any way.”

The appellate court found that the scope of the documents would need to be narrowed by a trial court, in such a way that it doesn’t infringe on the church’s state and federal rights to freedom of religion.

A spokesperson, Helen McClenahan, also noted the Archdiocese of Seattle has been working to address past abuses for decades now and has a website dedicated to the topic: Protect And Heal — Archdiocese of Seattle.

In a statement on Monday’s decision, now-Gov. Ferguson called for the church to “do the right thing and engage in a public accounting of how the church handles allegations of child sex abuse.”

“This ruling is an important win for transparency,” said Ferguson, who is Catholic. “I am asking church leaders to reflect and pray about this unanimous court decision and stop fighting this investigation.”

The ruling is the latest chapter in the ongoing legal battle between Ferguson and the Archdiocese. U.S. District Judge David Estudillo, a federal judge in Tacoma, ruled the state could not enforce a law requiring clergy members to report sexual abuse when it’s disclosed in the sacrament of confession.

“Any priest who directly violates the sacramental seal,” Estudillo noted, “is subject to automatic excommunication and risks eternal damnation.”

Baltimore Archdiocese bankruptcy case could soon end

Lawyers for the committee representing survivors of child sexual abuse perpetrated by the Baltimore Catholic Archdiocese say they feel confident they have a plan that will bring to a close the two-and-a-half years of bankruptcy negotiations between the parties and bring a payout to claimants.

In a town hall Tuesday night, Ed Caldie, a lawyer with Stinson LLP, told survivors he is cautiously optimistic that the case will come to a close soon.

“We think we have a plan,” Caldie said. “I can't tell you more than that. I can't even promise you the plan will work, but you know what I can promise you? We lost sleep over it. I'm talking about a strategy when I say a plan. We have a way to get out of this case that we think will work.”

Caldie noted that he believes the survivors will get an “above average” payout from the bankruptcy.

According to BishopAccountability.org the average settlement per survivor in the U.S. is $268,000.

“I think this case is an unusually large one in terms of the money that the church has and the real estate that the church has,” Caldie said.

The Archdiocese filed for bankruptcy in October 2023, just before the Maryland Child Victims Act went into effect, which would have allowed hundreds or thousands of survivors to independently sue the church.

Survivors have been frustrated with the progress of the bankruptcy case, with some writing letters to the judge about their fear that they will never see an end to the case. 

Many of the survivors are older adults and fear they will die before the case ends.

To that end, the committee asked to dismiss the bankruptcy case last September. 

It withdrew that request after the church agreed not to continue its bid for charitable immunity, a legal tactic that would have shielded the church from paying settlements and left the responsibility to the insurance companies, limiting the amount survivors would receive.

One individual survivor is still pursuing a dismissal, claiming they have information that shows the church is not being forthcoming about all of its assets. 

The court is looking into the matter, Caldie said.

Last week, the committee filed two motions. The first would require full financial transparency into the 31 parishes the Archdiocese is planning on closing. 

The other, objects to the church’s attempt to protect parishes from the bankruptcy case.

Conservative Anglicans prepare to challenge Sarah Mullally with rival leader

The conservative Anglican group, the Global Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans (GAFCON), is meeting in Nigeria’s capital this week to elect its own leader of the Anglican Communion. 

The appointment, which will happen just weeks before the installation of Sarah Mullally as the 36th Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, is seen as a direct challenge to her leadership.

GAFCON, which claims to represent 85 per cent of the world’s practising Anglicans, though those numbers are likely inflated, formed in 2008 in response to a perceived sense that the Anglican Communion was deviating from biblical principles. 

The group is a movement rather than a church, so it did not formally sever ties with the Anglican Communion, as it was not itself a church capable of being in communion. 

However, some of the provinces it represents have formally separated themselves from Canterbury.

The group has met periodically since its founding in Jerusalem in 2008, roughly every five years, for its global conference. 

The Abuja conference represents a change, as it is meeting just three years after the 2023 conference and is being described as a “mini-conference” of bishops and leaders. 

In October 2025, GAFCON chairman Laurent Mbanda explained that the GAFCON Communion would officially be renamed the Global Anglican Communion and that its members would select a new primus inter pares instead of recognising the Archbishop of Canterbury at the mini-conference.

The decision represents a significant moment in the history of the Anglican Communion. 

A clear dividing line between two factions is now apparent. Dr Gavin Ashenden, formerly a Continuing Anglican bishop and associate editor of the Herald, explains: “Open civil war has arrived among Anglicans as the conservative majority are meeting together at this very moment in Nigeria to elect a chairman who will do two things. 

The first is that he will replace the Archbishop of Canterbury, who has traditionally shaped the Anglican Communion, until now the only global expression of Anglicanism; and the second is to act as a form of conservative guardianship in the civil war between conservative and progressive Anglicanism.”

Parts of the Anglican communion have been on a path of liberalisation for almost one hundred years. 

The acceptance of birth control at the Lambeth Conference in 1930 became a defining moment in the Communion’s approach to ethics, alongside various provinces within the Communion beginning to ordain women in the second half of the twentieth century. 

In 2014 the Church of England introduced women bishops, and in 2015 the Episcopal Church introduced same-sex marriage, making it compulsory across all its dioceses in 2018. 

Conversely, many provinces have been reluctant to change doctrine, particularly across the Global South. 

The Church of Nigeria, the Church of Uganda, the Anglican Church of Kenya, the Anglican Church of Tanzania and the Anglican Church in North America do not permit women bishops in their provinces and have maintained traditional teaching with regard to marriage and the sanctity of life.

The conservative provinces represented by GAFCON have become increasingly dismayed at leadership choices within other parts of the Anglican Communion. 

Last year Cherry Elizabeth Vann was announced as Archbishop of Wales, having received the required two-thirds majority of votes on the second day of the meeting of the electoral college at Chepstow. 

Vann is the first woman to be elected as an Anglican archbishop in the United Kingdom and the first openly lesbian and partnered bishop to serve as a primate in the Anglican Communion.

In response, Henry Chukwudum Ndukuba, Primate of the Church of Nigeria, said: “The recent election of the Rt Rev Cherry Vann on Wednesday, July 30, 2025 as Archbishop of Wales is a further indication of the abandonment of the faith once delivered to the saints, Bishop Vann being a practising homosexual.”

The dissatisfaction reached its height with the election of Sarah Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury, an office which is described as “primus inter pares” (first among equals) within the Anglican Communion.

The response from GAFCON, whose provinces largely have a male-only episcopacy, was unequivocal in its condemnation. Laurent Mbanda, the Archbishop of Rwanda and chairman of GAFCON’s leadership council, argued that “the majority of the Anglican Communion still believes that the Bible requires a male-only episcopacy”. 

He also described Mullally as harbouring “unbiblical and revisionist teachings regarding marriage and sexual morality”.

Dr Ashenden explains: “This has been a long time in preparation, but the catalyst is undoubtedly the election of Sarah Mullally as Archbishop of Canterbury. She is an ex-nurse who believes in abortion and gay marriage and has become the final straw that broke the conservative Anglicans’ back.”

The primate GAFCON elects will likely represent an acknowledgement that much of Anglicanism is now, and will only increasingly be in the coming years, practised in Africa. 

Henry Ndukuba, the Primate of the Church of Nigeria, the largest Anglican province in the world, and Archbishop of Abuja, or Laurent Mbanda, would both be clear indications of this.

With the Abuja conference finishing at the end of this week, the announcement will likely be made on Friday. 

The election will not represent a schism as such, as the provinces of the Anglican Communion do not exist within such rigid structures, but rather it will create rival “primus inter pares” representing significantly different visions for the world’s third-largest Christian denomination.

Rhode Island priest reportedly abused over a dozen boys in two states

The story of priest Robert Marcantonio is one of the more "egregious" spelled out in Attorney General Peter Neronha's recently released report on clergy sex abuse, and coverup, in the Diocese of Providence.

It's a story that spans decades, hundreds of miles, and more than a dozen alleged incidents of abuse across at least two states.

Marcantonio had the same number of alleged victims as notorious Irish visiting priest Brendan Smyth.

Here's the story, laid out in the report:

Marcantonio accused of abusing 'ten to fifteen' boys in RI

The story begins in 1970.

Following accusations that Marcantonio had abused "ten to fifteen" different boys, Bishop Russell McVinney "pushed unsuccessfully for Marcantonio to voluntarily leave the priesthood."

The report says that there is no indication in the diocesan records that further steps were taken to remove Marcantonio from the priesthood, or that any diocesan officials "sought to identify Marcantonio's victims, investigate these allegations, or refer them to law enforcement."

Instead, Marcantonio was moved to Iowa, with McVinney's approval, to participate in "psychotherapy" with a fellow priest.

Diocese of Providence pushed to keep Marcantonio in Iowa

While in Iowa, Marcantonio enrolled at Iowa State University and lived on campus in student housing "with young men," the report states.

Writing to the Archbishop of Dubuque (who oversees the Catholic Church in the northeastern part of Iowa) a year later, McVinney stated in a letter that Marcantonio's case had been so serious in Rhode Island that, "I hesitate to have Father Marcantonio return to do priestly work in this Diocese."

"We must by all means avoid scandal," McVinney wrote, the report states.

In a separate letter to Marcantonio's priest-therapist, McVinney wrote that, "We want this man to live a good priestly life in the best and most favorable surroundings."

Marcantonio remained in Iowa for several more years, living and studying at Iowa State University and serving at a parish in Ames, where the university is located.

Bishop Louis Gelineau, who succeeded Bishop McVinney in 1972, "knew why Marcantonio was in Iowa," according to the attorney general's report.

"But rather than take steps to investigate Marcantonio's abuse, remove him from the priesthood, or notify law enforcement of the allegations against him, Bishop Gelineau gave Marcantonio permission to remain in Iowa to obtain his doctorate in psychology," the report states.

Marcantonio quietly returned to Rhode Island

In 1975, Marcantonio was "quietly invited" back to the Diocese of Providence by Gelineau as a part-time assistant at St. John Vianney Church in Cumberland, the report states.

Marcantonio would be accused of sexually abusing three boys during his time in Iowa and several more after his return to Rhode Island.

Marcantonio died in 1999, and the report states that there was no indication in the diocesan records that they'd referred any of the accusations to law enforcement while he was alive.

According to the report, these five priests abused the most children:

Michael LaMountain allegedly abused 12 children

William O'Connell allegedly abused 23 children

Brendan Smyth allegedly abused 17 children

Robert Marcantonio allegedly abused 17 children

Edmond Micarelli allegedly abused 16 children

'Evil' former Christian Brother jailed for sexual assaults on two boys in 1980s

A former Christian Brother teacher and school principal, who sexually assaulted two boys 40 years ago, has been jailed for five and a half years.

Liam McGrath, who was known previously as “Brother Kilian”, can be named for the first time after a judge lifted reporting restrictions at his sentencing hearing at Limerick Circuit Criminal Court.

McGrath, (75), originally from Dublin, but with an address at Marketpoint, The Deck, Mullingar, Co Westmeath, was described in court by one of the survivors of his abuse as “evil”.

Judge Colin Daly lifted a ban on the media naming McGrath after the two survivors in the case previously said they wished he be identified.

The two survivors, now adult men, were in court to face McGrath at his sentencing hearing. In their victim impact statements they said the sex assaults were McGrath’s “shame” and not theirs.

McGrath had pleaded not guilty at his trial to eleven counts of indecent assault on the two boys separately, on different dates in the 1980, in Limerick and in other parts of the country, and he was found guilty on seven counts and acquitted on the remaining four counts.

The two survivors, now in their 50s, told the court how McGrath’s sexual assaults on them had destroyed their childhood and haunted them into their adulthood.

“Everyday, memories, that I don’t want, infiltrate my psyche and have stolen my sense of safety, trust and peace, and, like a shadow they have followed me through school, relationships, work, and moments I should have enjoyed,” one of the men said.

This man said McGrath was a “persevering predatory paedophile” whose abuse made him suffer “anxiety, self loathing, and a relenting sense of worthlessness”.

“These are not just scars of the past, they are open wounds, they are every thought, every sleepless night,” he said.

“40 years is a lifetime, and I spent decades trying to heal, but, in truth, there is no undoing what was done.”

Turning to McGrath, the man said: “You stole my childhood, my innocence, my ability to like myself.”

McGrath showed no emotion throughout his trial and at his sentence hearing.

Asking the court to impose an immediate custodial sentence, the man said: “There was no leniency availed to me by the perpetrator, thus I believe leniency should not be afforded to the perpetrator who preyed upon a child”.

The second survivor told McGrath: “I was an innocent thirteen year old boy, you manipulated access to me by befriending my parents, and you used your position to get their trust, and you then used me for your sexual gratification.”

“You changed me from a happy, talkative child, to someone more introverted who had to deal with shame and guilt, huge fear; and the effects of it have followed me my entire adult life,” the man said.

The two survivors said their personal relationships with their loved ones and friends had suffered due to the abuse they endured at McGrath’s hands.

One of the them told McGrath: “Each day I battle with the demons of your abuse, which has led me to depression. To cope, I have attended years of therapy, and require daily medication.”

“You refuse to accept responsibility for your abuse of me, but, the truth is out and I will no longer hold your secret.”

“My 13-year old self has been acknowledged and believed, and I can now rest easy, knowing I did nothing wrong and that your evil has been exposed.”

“I am a survivor of your sexual abuse, but at 56 years of age, I am finally free from your clutches and I can now live my life with my head held high.”

McGrath left the Christian Brothers after the abuse and got married and had two children.

Judge Daly said McGrath “befriended” the families of the two boys before going on to sexually assault them separately.

McGrath, who had no prior convictions, had encouraged one of the boys to masturbate him and would then lie naked behind the boy and have the boy masturbate him.

McGrath also attempted to put his erect penis in between the cheeks of this boy’s buttocks, but the boy stopped McGrath who would ejaculate on the boy.

In respect of the other boy, McGrath kissed him on the lips on two separate occasions, the court heard.

In one of these assaults, McGrath cornered the boy and kissed him, and in the other, he pinned him against a wall and kissed him.

The sex assaults took place at various locations around Ireland when McGrath was in his 30s and the boys were aged between 12 and fourteen.

The two survivors each individually made complaints to gardaí in 2020 and 2022, and the cases were prosecuted together in one trial.

Prosecuting barrister Lily Buckley, instructed by State Solicitor Brendan Gill, said McGrath had been “implicitly trusted” by the boys’ families after he befriended them.

Judge Daly said McGrath was “sinister” in “engineering” occasions where he could be alone with the boys on different dates in the 1980s.

The judge commended both survivors for their “dignified” victim impact statements and said McGrath was also guilty of breaching their trust.

Enoch Burke challenges his move to Castlerea Prison in court

Enoch Burke has challenged his move to Castlerea Prison, saying it “breaches” an earlier court order.

He has spent more than 600 days in prison for violating court orders instructing him not to trespass at Wilson’s Hospital School, where he used to teach History and German.

He has been embroiled in a long-running dispute with the school’s board of management stemming from an incident in 2022 when he was asked by the Co Westmeath school’s then-principal to address a student by a new name and pronoun.

Burke’s most recent spell in prison was ordered by the High Court on January 19th.

He had been released five days earlier to prepare for a case against an appeals body due to review his dismissal from Wilson’s Hospital School, but the next day appeared back at the school and passed its gates.

On Wednesday, Burke appeared before the High Court via video link from the Co Roscommon prison where he said he was moved on Sunday.

He said his relocation from Dublin was a breach of the order made on January 19th, which stated he be brought to Mountjoy Prison “until further order of the High Court”.

Before the issue of Burke’s location was raised, he and Mr Justice Brian Cregan had a heated exchange about the jailing of Burke’s sister and mother for contempt of court earlier in the day.

Burke told Cregan “You’ll give an account to God”, and accused him of “mocking God”.

And Cregan repeatedly told Burke “don’t threaten me” and told him: “I did not mock God at all”; adding “don’t even try to pretend” that was the case.

During the morning’s hearings Cregan asked several times for Burke’s microphone to be muted.

When discussing the matter of his relocation to Castlerea Prison, Burke said the judge was “Perfectly unconcerned by a breach of court order”, to which Cregan replied: “Of course I’m concerned by the breech of court order.”

Rosemary Mallon, barrister for the school’s board of management, said she was “completely unaware” of the decision to move Burke, and she had only been aware of what she “has read in newspapers and heard in court”.

On Monday, after Burke was relocated, his brother Isaac Burke posted on the social media site X, saying Enoch was moved “without notice or warning”, adding: “He wasn’t told what was happening, where he was going, or given any reason for this.”

Cregan scheduled a further hearing for March 10th on the matter.

Enoch Burke’s mother and sister jailed for contempt of court

A High Court judge has sentenced Enoch Burke’s mother and sister to two weeks in jail each after finding them guilty of contempt of court.

Ammi and Martina Burke were not in court when Justice Brian Cregan delivered his judgment on Wednesday and he ordered gardaí to arrest the two women immediately.

The two had been removed from court on February 20th for “shouting and roaring” during a hearing.

Mr Cregan also said the two women and Burke’s brother, Isaac, should be banned from attending future court hearings relating to Enoch Burke in person.

Instead, he instructed they be allowed to attend only remotely.

Who is driving the campaign against the Order of Malta?

Somebody has got it in for the Order of Malta, the 900-year-old Catholic order which maintains hospitals and runs charitable activities all over the world. 

In Italy, a stream of very similar articles has been appearing, beginning with an attack last October in the left-wing newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano, by a journalist writing as Thomas Mackinson. 

In recent weeks there has been an accelerating series of articles under different names, all of them repeating the same criticisms. 

People in the Order’s ambit are beginning to wonder who is putting them up to it and why.

The articles accuse the Order of betraying a reform intended by Pope Francis, who wanted to bring it more into line with the life of a full religious order. 

The criticisms highlight the role of the professed knights – those who take the traditional religious vows – and assert that these need to be made to live in community so as to be true religious. 

What the articles do not explain, however, and indeed seriously misrepresent, is how the Order came to be in its present position.

The background is the crisis precipitated among the knights by Pope Francis in January 2017, when he forced the Grand Master, the Englishman Matthew Festing, to resign. 

The result was effectively putting the Order into the hands of its German branch, under the Grand Chancellor (effectively prime minister of the Order) Albrecht von Boeselager. 

The German-backed faction consolidated their control in the five-yearly elections to the Order’s government held in 2019. Of the 18 names back by this camp, all but one were elected.

Publicly, what had happened was that Fra’ Matthew Festing tried to dismiss von Boeselager because, as the minister responsible for the Order’s works, he had permitted the German organisation Malteser International to distribute condoms in third world countries; but Pope Francis decided that dismissal was too severe a punishment, and Festing went instead. 

In reality, von Boeselager’s dismissal had imperilled the resolution of a multi-million-euro legacy dispute in which the Vatican also had an interest. 

Thus the man who tried to uphold Catholic moral teaching was sacked, and the man who had violated it was put in effective control. 

Pope Francis cloaked this paradox by saying that he wanted to reform the Order of Malta, bringing it to a more spiritual ethos, implying that Fra’ Matthew stood in the way.

Only, what Pope Francis had done achieved exactly the opposite. Fra Matthew Festing had been at the head of those who wanted to make the Order more religious and more Catholic. 

He raised the number of professed knights to nearly seventy – the highest number for over a century – and in his 12 years as Grand Master he introduced reforms designed to strengthen the religious life. 

By contrast, the German branch had produced no professed knights for 30 years and was trying to reduce the role of the professed in the Order, emphasising instead its secular works. 

After working with the Germans for five years, the Vatican gradually realised that it had backed the wrong horse. 

In September 2022 Pope Francis summarily dismissed the entire government of the Order, von Boeselager and all, and appointed a new one, largely composed of those who had worked with Fra Matthew. 

There was even a veiled apology to Fra Matthew following his death, delivered by Cardinal Tomasi in his funeral sermon.

It now seems that the Vatican has become disenchanted with the men it put in three years ago and wants to change them again. To be exact, the dissatisfied man is Cardinal Ghirlanda, who was installed by Pope Francis as Patronus of the Order.

In the past, the holders of that office were simply the Vatican’s diplomatic representatives (because the Vatican recognises the Order as a sovereign entity, as do 114 other countries), but Pope Francis’s high-handed intervention, added to Ghirlanda’s own autocratic leanings, has made him the man who calls the shots. 

There are those who suspect that he has ‘inspired’ the latest spate of articles as a way of preparing for another Vatican coup de main against the Order.

So what is the trouble? The trouble is that from first to last the Vatican has had no idea what it was doing in intervening in the Order of Malta. 

Ostensibly the aim was to recall the Order to its proper vocation, against the secularising tendencies brought by the fact that nowadays most of its 13,000 members worldwide are non-religious knights and dames. 

The Vatican wanted to re-affirm the primacy of the professed, who historically were the main force of the Order, and who remain the element that makes it a full religious order. 

The declared objective is to make their vocation as genuinely religious as possible – which is what Fra Matthew had been trying to do. 

Unfortunately, the Vatican has gone about this in a state of ignorance of what the Order of Malta is supposed to be.

The recent articles all repeat that the professed knights ought to live in community ‘like any other religious order’. 

This betrays the common misconception that the term ‘religious order’ is synonymous with monastic order. 

The Knights of Malta (‘The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem’, to give them their official title) are not monks; they fall into two categories of religious order, the military and the hospitaller, neither of which has ever been bound to monastic life. 

Historically, the function of the Knights of St John was to fight the infidel and to serve in the great hospital at the Order’s successive headquarters, in Jerusalem and later Malta. 

The hospitaller orders of the Church, of which there are several, likewise have no vocation to live in community, because it would impede their proper deployment as doctors, nurses, and servants of the sick.

Cardinal Ghirlanda is a Jesuit of absolutist views, and it does not enter his head that there are religious orders different from the ones he is used to. 

Neither he nor the other Vatican appointees have studied the proper canonical nature of military or hospitaller orders. Nor have they addressed the strategic question of what the Order of Malta (and therefore its professed knights) is supposed to be doing. 

The Knights of St John were founded to care for pilgrims in the Holy Land. 

Today, the Order runs a maternity hospital in Bethlehem, and it is a very good one; but a maternity hospital is only a fraction of the work that the Knights of Malta could and should be doing in the Holy Land. 

The plight of that region, and especially of the Christians there, is the kind of challenge that a military order should exist to grapple with, and the tragedy of Gaza has made it all the more topical. 

But the professed knights cannot devote themselves to a work like that if they are turned into a community of imitation monks somewhere in Italy.

Unfortunately, Albrecht von Boeselager, ever since he became Hospitaller in 1989, consciously opposed any attempt to revive the Order’s original vocation, and therefore blocked development of its service in the Holy Land. 

Instead, the Order’s works have grown as an unfocused jumble of ventures all over the world, and the defects have been as much moral as organisational. 

Fra’ Matthew, being a well-instructed Catholic, was appalled at the hospitaller works’ ignorance of Catholic moral teaching, and in 2016 he was trying to create an ethics commission under Cardinal Eijk to give them proper guidelines. 

That venture was killed by his dismissal as Grand Master. 

As a result, whereas nine years ago the problem was merely condom distribution, there are now reports, with which the accusers are making great play, of the Order’s hospitals carrying out abortions.

This points to the fact that the main malady ailing the Order of Malta today is the chaos caused by nearly a decade of half-baked Vatican interventions. 

The number of professed knights has fallen to half what it was, and no wonder – who would commit himself to a vocation which even the Vatican does not understand correctly? 

There is little chance of any improvement unless the Holy See relaxes its narrow, clericalist approach to the Order and permits a return to the strategic path that was cut off in 2017.

Mom’s statement in Buffalo Diocese bankruptcy alleges priest abused of her son

A mother delivered a victim impact statement in federal bankruptcy court in Buffalo last week, alleging that a well-known Diocese of Buffalo priest was connected to her 18-year-old son's death by suicide in 2017 — the latest development in an ongoing case involving nearly 900 clergy abuse claims against the diocese.

Tracy Waring appeared on behalf of her son, Devin, who died by suicide in 2017. She claims his death occurred just hours after he went to confession with Father Joseph Gatto. Waring declined an interview request about her statement but said the priest "needs to be removed."

Father Gatto is currently serving as senior vicar at St. Benedict's Parish in Eggertsville. The Diocese of Buffalo confirmed he has not been placed on leave at this time.

The diocese says Bishop Michael Fisher has implemented its protocol for investigating allegations of clergy sexual abuse, and that the investigation will require cooperation from the family.

"It's unfortunate that something like this is plaguing the diocese and continues to plague the diocese," St. Benedict's parishioner Nandor Forgach said.

Forgach spoke with me about the new allegation and the reaction among parishioners.

"A lot of people worry that it's more of the same by the diocese of continuing to brush things under the rug, saying ‘we've done our due diligence'," Forgach said. "And I hope that they do their due diligence and are transparent with, not just the family, but also with the parishioners who are affected by this news."

Following the outcome of the investigation, Bishop Fisher will decide whether to refer the allegation to an independent review board. That board would ultimately recommend the future of the priest.

This is not the first time allegations have been made against Father Gatto, who was the former leader at Christ the King Seminary. 

He was previously placed on leave, but former Bishop Richard Malone reinstated him in 2019.

Waring had previously spoken to 7 News in 2024 during a mental health awareness event, describing her son before his death.

"He was on top of the world...he was a senior at Canisius High School. He was going in the Marine Corps," Waring said.

"I would feel the same way that she does. I would want to have some form of closure and understand what exactly happened," Forgach said.

Two additional sessions for clergy abuse survivors have been added to the court schedule, set for March 25 and 26 in Buffalo.

He broke the story of the US Catholic clergy abuse scandal. Now he reflects on struggling to keep his faith

In 1965, just shy of my junior year at the Jesuit high school of New Orleans, with good potential as an offensive end, I had an epiphany in the muddy slog of August football practice: Why are you doing something you don’t like?

Soon after, I quit, and was trailed by guilt for a dereliction of duty. Jesuit vaunted student achievements of all kinds. 

I played on the golf team and did some pieces for the school paper. Jesuit fostered a fraternal culture, molding friendships I carry to this day.

For a writer, the Jesuits’ stress on Socratic thinking was a gift. Question seeks answer, answer sparks new questions, yielding synthesis as the wheel of learning turns. 

Picture cerebral basketball coach Kevin Trower, a layperson teaching Latin, pacing the floor with furrowed brow, book in hand on Caesar’s Gallic wars. “Alea iacta est. The die is cast! What does this tell us? Think, boys! Think!”

The priests encouraged us to be “men for others”, with responsibility to those on the margins, emulating Jesus. 

Francis, the first Jesuit pope, emphasized embracing dignity of the dispossessed, clashing with a creed of wealth as virtue. I had no idea how “men for others” would color my spiritual odyssey, nor how that ethos bears on the surfacing world of abuse survivors.

In 1966, on certain nights, I sat in a school parlor with my religion teacher, troubled by a loving father who, after work, downed a few stiff ones, watched Vietnam war protests on TV, then drifted off to bed. I was ashamed to tell Father Pat Koch how Dad was there-but-not-there. I brooded over quitting football.

“Think of yourself in five years, Jason,” he said. “What difference will football make?”

Koch (pronounced Coke) entreated me to pray for a closeness with Jesus. He blessed me when we finished. I left feeling clean, a burden lifted. 

A few years later, Dad got sober, bounced back as a benevolent paterfamilias. By then, Koch had gone to the Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas.

Today, I wince on reading about Koch in a 2021 deposition of Father Philip Postell, the Dallas Jesuit Prep president from 1992 to 2011. 

Nine men alleged they were sexually abused as teenagers, with the cases involving five priests in the 70s and 80s. Four men accused Koch, who died in 2006 at 78. His Legacy obituary is full of praise from people with memories like mine.

Postell, 10 years younger than Koch, testified they were not close. I recall Postell, who taught at my high school: a not-yet-ordained scholastic, easy-going with a wry sense of humor. 

Postell in testimony was 83, questioned by Brent Walker, an adroit attorney among several lawyers suing Dallas’s Catholic diocese, Jesuit Prep and the Jesuits’ regional province, or chapter, among others.

Walker reads from a 1965 letter by an official at the Corpus Christi Minor Seminary: teenage students complained of Koch, recently ordained, coming on to them. 

“If you had heard,” Walker asks Postell, who had no role in that conflict, “that a priest got a boy drunk, took off his clothes and got in bed with him, and kissing him, that would have been an automatic dismissal, correct?”

Postell replies: “It would have been a red flag. I would have talked to the offending priest immediately, reported that to the provincial for further action.”

“The problem with Father Koch is an old one,” a seminary priest wrote the Jesuit provincial, or regional leader, in 1965. “Every year I have had to speak with Father Koch about demonstrations of affection … His response was that he resented people spying on him.”

The seminary rector worried about “a very bad source of public relations” if boys quit and told people about Koch.

Why, Walker asks, wasn’t Koch expelled from the order?

Postell said that on such a report today, “We would act pell-mell to dismiss … the priest or at least get him out of that particular venue. In those days, we were a little more cautious in moving a guy for many reasons. Abusing a kid sexually was very rare. We didn’t have a vocabulary for it. But knowing what I know now, no one would get that far in the pipeline.”

On 12 January 1966, Koch arrived at the Jesuit high school in New Orleans, with all that tortured correspondence to surface half a century later. 

I sat across from the young priest exiled from Texas for abusing seminarians my age. How vulnerable I was! He never made a move on me.

Reading about Koch’s abuses threw me into a strange zone between appreciating his influence on me and revulsion at what he did to those others.

For senior retreat, Koch asked me to share a room with one of seven “Negroes” (the word used then) in our class of 160. 

Jesuit was among New Orleans’ first white schools to integrate; still, one heard sotto voce racism by some classmates and the N-word at the homes of a few friends. 

My parents weren’t activists, but they supported integration and forbade any language like that in our house.

Donald Soniat was the son of the local NAACP leader. 

As we sat on separate beds, he recounted his father’s civil rights activism (events I’d followed like foreign news) – his dad arrested for sitting in the wrong part of a city hall cafeteria. 

My dad was vice-president of an unrelated cafeteria chain. Donald opened my eyes to Black struggle.

A few years later, as a Georgetown undergraduate, I followed the Washington Post coverage of the south’s racial conflicts, embarrassed about where I was from. 

A week after graduation in 1971, I went to Mississippi and joined Charles Evers’ long-shot run for governor. 

Seeing events through a prism of Black people changed me. 

But if not for Koch and Soniat, where would life have taken me? 

In 1973, I published a book on the campaign and became a freelance writer.

Declamations in Dallas

The 2018 Pennsylvania grand jury report investigating the state’s Catholic church found 1,000 victims of priests and long-secret documents exposing bishops’ deceitful strategies protecting predators. 

The report spurred 26 state attorneys general across the US to conduct investigations; Texas was among them. Dioceses began releasing perpetrator lists.

On 31 January 2019, the Dallas diocese issued a list naming Koch, who had not been on the Dallas Jesuits’ list.

The news hit Mike Pedevilla like an electrical charge. An executive with a national healthcare services company, Pedevilla was a 1983 Jesuit Prep graduate from a prominent northern Dallas family. 

He told me about his freshman year, when Koch began abusing him, and how it continued. 

With too much pot smoking and getting into fights, he still made it to graduation “because my mother kept meeting with the young assistant principal Mike Earsing, who saw some good in me”.

Pedevilla told no one for decades. 

Now there was TV coverage of Koch’s name on the list in Dallas, and a list by the diocese of Corpus Christi, Texas.

Pedevilla met with high-profile plaintiff lawyers Charla Aldous and Walker. They knew a lawsuit against Jesuit Prep would be explosive. File as a John Doe, Walker advised. 

Pedevilla agreed, but from the lawsuit’s description of him, five friends quickly called, in sympathy – but warning that he was in for the fight of his life. 

He told Walker to make his name public.

After all the years of bottled trauma, Pedevilla sat in a preliminary meeting with his lawyers and the school attorneys. 

Earsing, now the school president, whom he recalled from many years before, approached him. Pedevilla said: “I don’t want to hurt Jesuit Prep.”

Earsing, he says, replied: “I’m the one who’s sorry. Thank you for doing this,” as the two men embraced, fighting back tears.

Separate from that, David Finn, a former judge, spoke for Koch’s family and friends, aghast and threatening a protest at the Vatican. 

“Father Koch is revered by many Dallas Jesuit students, myself included,” Finn stated. “His picture used to hang up, until this allegation came out a week ago, at Dallas Jesuit and at St Rita’s Church where he was a priest for years … The family’s position is that, by erring on the side of caution you might have some collateral damage here. Maybe the bishop made – and I’m not saying it was intentional – but maybe he made a mistake in including Father Koch on the list.”

After meeting with Koch’s family and Finn, then bishop Edward Burns stated that the process to compile a list of priests “credibly accused” of child sexual abuse “began with an outside group of former state and federal law enforcement officers who went through all of our priest files and identified those which contained allegations of the sexual abuse of minors”. 

The diocesan review board with professional lay experts made final recommendations for disclosure.

Brendan Higgins, a former reporter-anchorman at KTVT, the CBS station in Dallas-Fort Worth, filed suit against Jesuit Prep and the Jesuit province, alleging abuse by Koch. 

Higgins filed suit under a pseudonym but soon went public, too. Two other plaintiffs sued with pseudonyms, saying Koch had abused them.

“We never wanted to sue the school,” Higgins said. “We were not angry with Jesuit Prep because of what one pervert did to us. But we didn’t want the Vatican to clear him.” The Vatican appeal fizzled. Two more men filed cases as Koch victims.

As news of the lawsuits spread, Pedevilla attended a funeral where one of the school’s biggest benefactors pulled him aside, saying: “Mike, my wife and I are behind you 100%.” 

The donor told him to call Lee Taft, a lawyer who had left a lucrative Texas practice to earn a master’s of divinity at Harvard, and now, back in Dallas, specialized in conflict resolutions.

“We wanted to spare the school as much of the loss as possible,” Pedevilla told me, “and force accountability directly on the Jesuits. Lee Taft was absolutely pivotal; he was the architect of this reconciliation model.”

Taft declined an interview request for this article.

As negotiating sessions quickened after the Covid-19 shutdown, Pedevilla sensed a breakthrough with the arrival of a new Jesuit provincial, Father Thomas Greene, a product of Jesuit New Orleans, and an attorney before entering the Society of Jesus. Greene, said Pedevilla, was “apologetic, open-armed, ashamed of what he said his fellow Jesuits did”.

Greene asked if the survivors would agree to interviews with a Houston investigator for the Jesuits. They agreed.

Higgins also came from North Dallas’ affluent Catholic society; he was adopted. His father was a corporate lawyer, his mother a local anti-abortion leader. 

“On paper, it looked like I won the lottery. But my dad was a violent binge drinker, the victim of an Irish Catholic upbringing in the north-east, that cycle where his dad beat him and he beat the shit out of my brother and me, maybe not as bad. My mom took me to protests at abortion clinics. I had a detached upbringing.”

His parents insisted he enroll freshman year, 1983, at the prestigious Jesuit Prep. “My friends were going to other schools. I was sullen, walking around with my shoulders slumped, sad-looking, I’m sure. Koch had been to my house when I was growing up. He was my freshman theology teacher. He told me, ‘I know your dad’s kind of brutal.’ He kept talking to me; in retrospect I think he saw me as a target.”

Things brightened his sophomore year. Higgins was a standout on the tennis team, “one of the best in the country at the time, and I had a girlfriend”.

In the fall of 1984, Koch told Higgins’ mom he was headed to New Orleans for a funeral. 

Would Brendan like to go and visit the Louisiana World Exposition? Higgins resisted. His mother urged him to see the world’s fair.

“We were staying in a dormitory with some empty rooms at Loyola. Koch told the [nun] when we arrived that we’d stay in the same room. She was stone-cold: Oh, no, he’ll have his own room. I had a creepy feeling. At bedtime, he wanted me to sit on the bed as he lay down, wanting to talk. I said, ‘No.’ I went to bed.

“I woke up with him standing over me, stroking my head and his other hand stroking his penis. I ran out of the room to a bathroom in the guest suite area and sat against the door, looking at a mirror, thinking, ‘You’re by yourself. Nobody’s going to help.’ I sat there for hours.”

The next day, he deflected more advances by Koch, says Higgins, adding: “It was pretty horrific.”

Back home, he told no one. 

As spring semester ebbed, he defiantly told his parents he would not go back to Jesuit Prep. Junior year he transferred to Hillcrest, a public high school. 

He went on to University of North Texas, graduating with a degree in broadcast journalism. 

By the time he was 30, he was an NBC reporter in New York.

After his father died, he moved back to Dallas to help his mother, landing at the CBS affiliate. 

Today, with two sons who have graduated from college, he is an independent producer. Despite his contempt for Koch, Higgins says he donated to Jesuit Prep in later years, regretting he’d had to leave.

Postell’s pretrial testimony was a turning point. At the end of the long deposition, Postell said of the reassignment history of Koch and four other priests: “I’m embarrassed, I am ashamed. I apologize for the harm it has done, for what the school has done to these young men. I see some of the long-range damage done.”

On 31 March 2022, the Dallas Morning News reported that a settlement reached by the parties “calls for reforms in how the school, the diocese and the religious order handle abuse reports. Details about the financial compensation for victims remain undisclosed.”

Two additional Koch survivors, represented by other attorneys, participated in the negotiated settlement – totaling six men accusing Koch of abuse at Jesuit Prep.

Postell’s name was removed from the school’s stadium, which Pedevilla insisted be part of the agreement.

Higgins, without disclosing specifics, said the Jesuit order paid most of the claims: “Nobody in our group wanted to hurt the school. The school went toe to toe with the province.”

Earsing, the school president, said in a statement: “Rather than turning away from our past, we will memorialize it by creating a special space in our chapel where our community may pray for all people who have been abused by priests or anyone in religious authority.

“We live in a time where we are confronting anew painful facts about our country, our fellow citizens, and our church … In coming forward, these men have exemplified our school’s motto of being ‘men for others.’ For that, I am forever grateful. Because yesterday we were apart, and today we are reunited.”

Greene, the provincial, officiated at a mass of hope and healing for clergy abuse survivors and families, held at Jesuit Prep.

On 19 May 2022, Higgins and another Koch survivor who had left for another school received honorary Jesuit Prep degrees. 

The night before, Higgins dreamed he was stuck in a meeting with his parents and Koch, coaxing him to stay at the school. 

As Earsing placed a medal of St Ignatius, founder of the Jesuit order, around his neck, Higgins choked up.

“Some really great people there went out of the way to do the right thing,” Higgins told me. “The Catholic experience was a big problem for me, but culturally, I’m a longtime [church] volunteer. I go to church but it depends – sometimes an Episcopal church, sometimes a Catholic.

“Dogmatically I’ve never bought into the full Christian teaching, but I do like the ethical barometer.”

‘These things must be known’

Of my teachers at the Jesuit high school in New Orleans, Father Frank Coco was special. Balding, animated and jovial, Coco guided us through The Canterbury Tales, reading Old English aloud to show how language evolved.

Coco also played jazz clarinet. During carnival season, he invited us to seek him out with jazz legend Pete Fountain’s Half-Fast Walking Club. 

Come Mardi Gras morning, Coco – dressed as an American Indian, bedecked with plastic beads, clarinet aloft – ambled along St Charles Avenue with Fountain’s band.

A few of us approached. He put his hand in a sack, saying, “Who-hooo: something for you!” and palmed us doubloons. Then he rejoined the band, wending jubilantly through the crowds.

Jump cut to the summer of 1985. I was getting slammed in the Daily Advertiser of Lafayette, hub city of Cajun country in Louisiana, for my reporting in the weekly Times of Acadiana on the diocese’s cover-up of pedophile priests, which led to similar reporting in communities across the US. 

An Advertiser editorialist sneered at “vultures of yellow journalism”.

My first child, Simonette, was seven months old and the center of celebratory visits at the home of my mother-in-law in nearby Abbeville. 

My Cajun extended family was supportive of, if a bit baffled at, my reporting. 

The blowback had me depressed.

The Times was getting favorable mail, as the publishers, Steve and Cherry May, stood their ground to the daily paper’s attacks. 

As all of that intensified, I got a letter at the Times from the Jesuit retreat center in an outlying village, Grand Coteau. 

Coco complimented me on “unity, coherence and emphasis” – the traits for good prose stressed at my high school alma mater.

The next day, I drove out to the center where he led retreats. We walked along a path shaded by ancient oaks. 

I let it all out, the betrayal I felt at the church, confiding that Lafayette bishop Gerard Frey was an alcoholic, absent for long stretches from the chancery. 

Coco nodded. “He’s not a bad man,” he said. “But he failed on this, clearly.”

We went inside to a parlor. He kept listening, then said: “Your articles are fair. These things must be known.”

He asked about my spiritual life. I remember fulminating on the violation of innocents, and the larger issue of human suffering versus a loving god. Free will was itself a mystery, he said at one point. 

We solved no metaphysical problems but after several hours, a soothing calm settled over me. 

At the end, he blessed me. “Keep praying, son,” he said. “You’re on the right road.”

Coco performed with a jazz quartet in Lafayette. I saw him several times after that. He shared fragments of a memoir he was writing (Blessed Be Jazz, published in 2009). I felt boosted as the reporting continued.

In early 1986, my last major report ran in the Times of Acadiana, pinpointing seven priests who were shuffled from town to town after abusing children. 

Just before publication, editor Richard Baudouin and I had dinner. 

Richard graduated from Jesuit a few years after me. Over wine, we stewed on how much we did not know. 

I suggested he write an editorial calling on Frey and the vicar general, Monsignor Alexandre Larroque, to resign. 

He nodded and said, “I’ve never written an editorial like that.”

“Richard,” I rejoined, “no one has ever written an editorial like that.”

Publisher Steve May fully supported the editorial.

“Who are they to think they’re above the law?” 

May fumed in his office. “This is outrageous!”

The editorial provoked a call to May from Edmund Reggie, a retired judge in nearby Crowley. Reggie demanded a retraction. 

May asked Reggie if the article had mistakes. 

No, said Reggie, but you can’t run an editorial calling on the bishop to step down. 

Well, said May, the issue is out. Can’t change the editorial.

“Boy,” May said Reggie told him, “you just shit in your mess kit.”

Reggie and a prominent monsignor fomented an advertisers’ boycott that cost the paper – then billing about $1m a year – roughly $20,000. 

That was the cost of an ad salesperson’s base salary before commissions. 

Cooler heads later prevailed. 

The boycott stopped. 

The paper kept on. 

And I moved on, tracking cases in other states.

I had not heard from Pat Koch in many years when his letter came, dated 1 August 1991, on the stationery of the Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas, to say he had a new assignment. 

I had just received a contract for Lead Us Not Into Temptation, my book on clergy abuse. It includes Koch and Coco among Jesuits thanked in the acknowledgments.

Koch wrote of a transfer to a Lake Dallas retreat house: “I felt God nudging me in that direction. I will of course miss the young people I have been accustomed to dealing with for most of my life. I have many, many happy memories from my years of teaching at Jesuit of Dallas, Spring Hill College, Corpus Christi Minor Seminary and Jesuit of New Orleans.” He concludes: “I cherish your continuing friendship and love.”

I see now that he left Jesuit Prep not by God’s nudging – but more likely forced out by Jesuit superiors. He had had a seven-year period as principal of the school, a brief one-year term as president, and several secondary positions from which abuse allegations subsequently arose, according to Pedevilla, one of the former students who accuse Koch of sexual abuse.

After the settlement in Dallas with the school and the Jesuit province, survivors called Pedevilla, and he learned that Jesuit Prep had made at least four secret payments predicated on victims’ silence.

How does one assess a disparity so gigantic of Koch’s “happy memories” and his destructive impact on youths that exploded more than a generation later?

Before those revelations, Koch officiated at the wedding of a lawyer who sued the Lafayette diocese on behalf of victims of its priest Gilbert Gauthe, the notorious serial child molester.

Blessed be jazz

Across the years, I have written about the church crisis, intercut with other books and projects on New Orleans. 

I followed jazz, an art form spawned by Black cultural memory and polyrhythms, as a stream of hope. Sometimes I went for stretches unable to attend mass. I go back for reasons I keep trying to explain.

In 1991, my second child arrived: Ariel, a girl with Down’s syndrome. Soon thereafter, an anger attack hit me. I was furious – after so much struggle on the book, a disabled child! And then I centered myself as we faced the task of dealing with Ariel’s limitations.

Her slow-budding discovery of language in ritual word games we shared gave me hope despite the sadness of knowing she would never be robust. At two, she survived open heart surgery. We soon learned her lungs were compromised. 

As Ariel showed resilience, pressures built on my wife and me. In 1996, we divorced, with a shared custody agreement.

Ariel settled in at St Michael Special School, founded by nuns in New Orleans’ Irish Channel neighborhood; her religion lessons came home. I began a nightly prayer ritual as she lay in bed, call-and-response, saying, “Thank you, Jesus.” 

And she would run down the litany of her mom, Lisa; her sister, Simonette; Aunt Mimi; grandmothers in both homes; adding pets and Disney cartoon characters. 

The dawning of her tiny cosmos gave me hope beyond the darkness of my reporting. I kept praying for her to live.

In 2004, after the long waltz of a midlife courtship, I was about to marry again. 

I had no intention of getting an annulment, answering personal questions about a failed marriage to canon lawyers in a chancery I knew had sheltered pedophiles. 

My former wife wanted no annulment either. So I was ineligible for a church wedding.

My erudite mother, who had given me books by Thomas Merton, Walker Percy and Dorothy Day in high school, wondered if a priest might bless the union. One priest told me canon law forbade it. I called Coco, whom I hadn’t seen in several years, and gave him the facts. His Socratic approach was consoling.

“Well, I think we must ask, what is the greater good? Is it better for Jason and Melanie to marry before the state, without the church’s spiritual comfort? Or should the church play a role?” he said. “I think we can say yes for the greater good.”

We married in the Audubon Golf Club before 80 people. 

After the judge pronounced us wedded, Coco stood and said: “The state has spoken. Jason and Melanie are married.” He then read the rite of Christian marriage. We said “I do” again – probably violating canon law – and he blessed us. Then he pulled out the clarinet and played Love Is a Many Splendored Thing to some misty eyes.

‘Sand shifting under your feet’

In 2018, Pope Francis made a dramatic shift on the abuse crisis after a trip to Chile, where people protested the cover-up of a powerful priest in Santiago. 

The pope soon met with survivors, ordered an investigation of the Chilean hierarchy and accepted resignations from one-third of the country’s bishops, including a prelate he had previously defended. 

“I was part of the problem,” the pope told the survivors he met with in Rome.

“Those of us journalists who were younger had a particularly hard time,” Colleen Dulle, a Vatican correspondent for America Media, the Jesuit news organization, writes in her book Struck Down, Not Destroyed.

“Now, we were having to confront the evil within the church as employees and representatives of the institution,” Dulle notes. “We all believed that for the church to move forward in any credible way, it first had to confront the whole truth.”

Meanwhile, nonreligious elite east coast private schools like Choate, Deerfield, Phillips and Horace Mann had also paid negotiated settlements to abuse survivors.

Catholic religious orders have a different asset profile than dioceses. 

A bishop can close parishes, sell churches or liquidate other holdings to cover settlements. 

Religious order schools often have generous alumni support and property off-limits to a diocese. 

In New Orleans, a suburban street leading to the Louis Armstrong international airport is called Loyola Drive, much of the land once owned by the Jesuits. But few religious orders have assets to rival the diocese they serve.

The Jesuit high school of New Orleans has a distinguished history of National Merit finalists. 

Its notable alumni include Mitch Landrieu, the former New Orleans mayor and Joe Biden White House infrastructure czar; Marc Morial, a former mayor and now head of the National Urban League; jazz singer and actor Harry Connick Jr; retired baseball star Will Clark; and novelist John Gregory Brown. 

The $12,600 tuition is near the lowest of Jesuit schools nationwide. Its full cost per student is $17,454, the balance covered by donations. The school has need-based scholarships.

Jesuit Prep in Dallas charges $26,300. Georgetown Prep in the suburbs of Washington DC has a tuition of $46,065. Alumni donations are pivotal to most Jesuit schools.

Of the more than 40 church bankruptcies, the Jesuits’ Oregon province took federal chapter 11 protection in 2009 and resolved it in 2011 with a $166m settlement to victims from the Pacific north-west and Alaska, where the order sent missionary priests known to be serial sex offenders. 

The 500 claims “were primarily from Alaska natives and Native Americans who said they were abused as children by priests at the order’s schools in remote Alaskan villages and US Indian reservations”, the Catholic News Service reported.

Starting about 2015, New Orleans’s Jesuit high school settled several cases that centered in part on the late Pete Modica, a school custodian and former minor league baseball player. 

In the early 1960s, Modica had received a suspended sentence from a suburban court after admitting he had oral sex with two 13-year-olds. 

Somehow, he got hired at Jesuit in the 1970s and began grooming neighborhood kids he then abused.

Jesuit father Cornelius Carr was accused but not convicted of participating in the abuse against one youth, Richard Windmann, who lived nearby. 

Windmann received a $450,000 settlement “after the Jesuit order had settled other 1970s-era abuse claims, implicating other employees at the Mid-City campus, such as Donald Dickerson – a teacher who was studying to be a priest – and a religious brother named Claude Ory,” Ramon Antonio Vargas, a 2005 Jesuit grad, reported in 2019.

Dickerson, now deceased, was frequently reassigned, as revealed in the documents from Dallas, where he had victims, too. 

The Jesuits face a lawsuit against Loyola University New Orleans over allegations that Dickerson years ago raped a freshman, age 17.

The Jesuit high school faces three lawsuits outside the archdiocese’s long-dragging litigation. 

Settlement attempts collapsed, says attorney Richard Trahant, a 1985 graduate of the school, after a Jesuit high school attorney turned the discussion over an agreement into a harsh cross-examination of his client.

The school has filed motions seeking to dismiss the cases, a strategy Trahant derides “as playing for time”, having already lost key court decisions. “It’s a real Hail Mary pass.”

In response to an interview request for this report, Father Thomas Greene, the Jesuit provincial and former attorney who was central to the Dallas agreement, replied: “We [the province] do not comment on litigation, but I would refer you to the submissions made by our counsel in the cases you mention.”

On 19 May, law firms representing the high school and the Jesuits’ regional province asked the Louisiana state supreme court to review a law which allowed survivors of decades-old sexual abuse to pursue civil court damages.

The court, which upheld that law as constitutional in June 2024, denied the request, sending the Jesuits back into litigation with the survivors.

Meanwhile, a sign of shifting attitudes in Catholic south Louisiana came in June when attorney Kristi Schubert tried a case on behalf of a 68-year-old man abused decades ago by a now-deceased Holy Cross brother. 

The jury verdict of $2.4m was a warning flare to institutions like Jesuit, and at least three other high schools that also face such claims, according to Trahant.

Trahant’s frequent abuse survivors’ litigation collaborator Soren Gisleson graduated from Jesuit in 1988, three years after Trahant. He also graduated in 1999 from New Orleans’s Loyola law school. The Jesuit cases have made Gisleson revisit the geography of his youth.

A prominent Uptown lawyer’s son, he rode his bicycle as a boy on the Loyola campus and leafy Audubon Park nearby. Years later, as the abuse lawsuits made news, Gisleson got emails from out-of-touch high school friends that, he says, he never opened.

“These cases track other abuse survivors’ claims, but they tend to demystify my upbringing, the idea that New Orleans was this magical place where great things happen and we were the best and brightest at Jesuit; your experience will elevate you as leaders of men,” he said. “The older I get, I realize how complicated it is looking back. The past is different things to different people. Some rely on the past to pat themselves on the back: Hey, see how well I’ve done! Others seek a truer grasp on reality. When you confront the experiences that people unlike you had – not the past you remember – it’s like sand shifting under your feet.”

That reality of a changing past, breaking the terrain of common memory, is the Roman Catholic church’s epic task as the aching crisis wears on.

‘Trying to forgive’

“What monetary figure applies when a figure of God has raped someone?” Jesuit father Gerard McGlone, a psychotherapist with long experience treating victims and religious perpetrators, said to me. “It’s a spiritual wound difficult to comprehend, much less heal.”

A clergy abuse survivor himself, McGlone is a research fellow at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs.

“The huge challenge we face, as a religious order and the larger church, is how do we put reparation figures in the light of restorative justice? I have often thought of a parent who loses a child, the pain that never goes away. It’s our sacramental being as a church, our duty as Christians to acknowledge sins of the past, to see them as crimes of history, and give traumatized people a road to healing. The settlement in Dallas met the survivor and tended to the wounds.”

On 10 December 2018, the Jesuit chapter for the region including New Orleans released a list of credibly accused priests. The late Father Donald Pearce was on it.

In my high school years, Pearce was the prefect of discipline and later president. An imposing figure who smoked cigarettes in his office, he once complimented me on an article for the school paper. I avoided him so as not to land in penance hall, which was what Jesuit called detention. Many years later, a man who was ahead of me in school said Pearce had paddled him so hard for some infraction he thought Pearce was “getting erotic kicks” out of it.

With capsule summaries of Koch, Pearce, Dickerson and others, the updated Jesuit website evinces tortured logic.

It says: “A finding of credibility of an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor or vulnerable adult is based on a belief, with moral certitude, after careful investigation and review by professionals, that an incident of sexual abuse of a minor or vulnerable adult occurred, or probably occurred, with the possibility that it did not occur being highly unlikely. ‘Moral certitude’ in this context means a high degree of probability, but short of absolute certainty.

“As such, inclusion on this list does not imply the allegations are true and correct or that the accused individual has been found guilty of a crime or liable for civil claims.”

Pearce’s capsule bio says, “Estimated Timeframe of Abuse: 1960s.” 

He retired in 2003 “due to poor health” and died in 2016. The capsule on Koch is terse: “deceased when allegation established”.

In March 2022 in Dallas at the final negotiation with the lawyers, survivors and Jesuit provincial Greene, Pedevilla said he had heard from 140 men claiming abuse at the school, though many of them would never file suit for fear of personal or professional repercussions if their identities were known. 

Pedevilla asked that the Jesuits establish a reparations fund and a path for survivors to find reconciliation outside the legal process. Greene said nothing, but his attorneys vetoed it.

In response to the crisis, the Jesuits’ Fordham University in New York began a sweeping study of how Jesuit institutions should respond to clergy abuse within the ranks. 

It was inspired in part by an investigation that Georgetown University began of the long-term impact from its early Jesuit slaveholders, who sold 272 enslaved people to Louisiana plantations. The Georgetown Memory Project is a template for universities facing these issues.

Historic sex abuse is more challenging. 

Fordham’s Taking Responsibility initiative has recommendations by various scholars, some of which spotlight specific cases as symptomatic of the larger crisis. From page 33:

“One of the most publicized cases of clerical sexual abuse in the US concerned the late former Jesuit priest Donald McGuire. 

McGuire not only received his Ph.D. from Loyola [of Chicago] in 1976, he also taught at Loyola Academy and developed mission and retreat programs in Chicago and numerous other locations.

“His official posting and address, however, was always Chicago. He officially lived here during the years 2002-2005, when criminal charges were brought against him, and well-publicized lawsuits followed. 

McGuire was arrested in 2005, and subsequently sentenced to seven years of prison time in 2006. His sentence was increased to twenty-five years in 2009 after he was additionally convicted of a federal crime. 

McGuire died in federal prison in 2017. 

But as recently as 2019, a new victim has come forward.”

Profiling a sexual criminal associated with a university, or school, right there for anyone to read, is part of the painful road toward restorative justice, doing right by victims of the past. Failure to confront that hidden past invites it to betray us again.

And yet, defenders of my high school might argue, why the hell should we give some public declaration or website space to priests or laymen who betrayed the Ignatian ideals by plundering young lives, tearing up fragile families? 

Particularly dead priests who stand now like narcissistic ghosts hungry for attention at being profiled? If we have to make settlements, pay, apologize, move on.

A part of me, proud of my Jesuit education, gets that. Why invite more bad publicity? The Dallas resolution suggests another path. 

But there is no guarantee it will be used again in Dallas, where Pedevilla keeps hearing from victims.

The survivors in their quest for justice, and a measure of healing, function like the chorus of a Greek tragedy, warning us that a moral order has been broken. 

In Greek drama, the chorus is on the side of the gods, however jaded or meddlesome they may be. In our day, the survivors occupy a zone between God and the church.

How do we repair a structure that long seemed good, as we witness its evil underside? Gisleson’s notion of a changing past invites a reckoning. The Jesuit high school encouraged its students to be “men for others”. How should men for others respond to wounded brethren, hidden in shame?

Over many years of reporting on this crisis, I have met dozens of survivors and read the testimonies of countless others. 

Along the way I became friends with Father Bruce Teague, a Massachusetts priest who allied himself with survivors after the Pulitzer-winning 2002 Boston Globe Spotlight series on Catholic clergy abuse in that city. Teague announced that he, too, in his youth was abused by a priest.

Teague and I share an appreciation of Flannery O’Connor’s Christ-haunted characters. Teague visited the grave of the priest who abused him as a boy. “I’m in the process of trying to forgive him,” he told a reporter in 2003.

I make regular visits to a cemetery near my home where Ariel is buried. She died in late 2008, just past 17, after a long struggle with heart failure. The beauty of her radical innocence is a light ever bright for me.

After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, she spent stretches with me while her mother was dealing with adjustors over her flooded house. My house did not take water. 

At Ariel’s insistence, trying to understand the “her-cane”, we went driving through some of the devastation Katrina left in its wake. As we drove along streets with the waterline etched on empty houses, I played gospel music for uplift, telling her how the houses would slowly get rebuilt.

Before the flood, at a corner of Claiborne Avenue near her mom’s house, a homeless Black man had stood begging. Each time we approached, Ariel tugged my elbow, and I stopped, giving the man money. She waved to him, he waved back.

After the flood, he was no longer there.

“Man gone,” she said. I tried explaining how many people left to find safer places, slowly repeating the information as she repeated, “Man gone.” This went on for a while.

Months later, as I left a convenience store on Claiborne, a raggedy voice said: “How’s that lul girl?” There he was. I handed him a fiver. I said, “She’s OK; she asks about you.” He nodded, adding: “Tell her I came through.” I shared this small tale of elation with Ariel as the city limped along.

Sometime later, as the recovery from Katrina took hold in New Orleans, I went to mass with Ariel and my mother, Mary Frances. Ariel loved the liturgy, without grasping the sermons. She swayed to songs she could not sing and relished the exchange of peace, shaking hands and waving to people. One Sunday, retired district attorney Harry Connick Sr, the famous singer’s father who has since died, entered the pew to Ariel’s left. He was unaware that I sat a few feet away.

Connick detested me for what I had written about his botched prosecution of a notorious predator priest, Dino Cinel, whose cache of pornography – including videos of his young victims, discovered by another priest – was transferred by church attorneys to the DA’s office. 

There it sat, until a staff investigator leaked dubs to a TV reporter, who surprised Connick on camera, asking if he had stalled because the case involved “Holy Mother the church?”

Connick blurted: “That was an absolute consideration.” Cinel was eventually tried, and acquitted. He was murdered in Colombia in 2018. 

The church paid civil settlements. Sometime later, on a satellite interview with Connick and broadcaster Geraldo Rivera, I ripped into Connick.

When the handshake of peace began, my little girl turned to the aging pol and said, “My name Ariel Berry.” He smiled, and she took his hand and pulled it over, saying, “This my dad, Jason Berry.” Connick blushed, taking my hand.

In driving around the city, thinking of my child as a person for others, I give money to people begging on street corners. Some of them sleep on benches at a park near my grocery store. 

On visits to Ariel’s grave, I pray for a visitation of her spirit – that happens occasionally in dreams whose messages are not altogether clear. I wonder what the radical innocence she radiated means in a world so broken and corrupted as ours.

Two or three times a month I go to mass, seeking a connection to my daughter’s spirit, searching for liturgies that occasionally lift me, more often not. 

I say prayers of thanks for the family that shaped me, the relatives and friends among the beloved dead, and the priests like Frank Coco who taught me. I suspect it is a prompting of Ariel that has me, at times, praying for the soul of Patrick Koch.