Two religious figures of Colombian origin, a night out at a gay bar in Barcelona, alcohol consumption and a rape allegation filed 15 months after the alleged incident.
These are the main elements of a case that has caused considerable concern within the Diocese of Urgell and resulted in the precautionary suspension of a 54-year-old priest, accused of sexual assault by a 26-year-old former seminarian.
The complaint, filed with the Mossos d'Esquadra, Catalonia's regional police, on October 26, 2026, alleges that the sexual assault occurred during the early hours of July 17, 2025, in a private apartment in Barcelona.
According to the complainant's account, the two men had gone out for drinks before spending the night in the same apartment.
The former seminarian alleges that the priest restrained him and penetrated him without consent, taking advantage of a vulnerable condition that he associates with alcohol consumption.
The investigation remains ongoing, and no court ruling has established that the alleged events occurred or determined any criminal responsibility.
A night in Barcelona that would lead to a rape complaint
The relationship between the two religious figures began several months before the alleged assault.
The former seminarian, a Colombian national, arrived in Spain in 2024 to continue his religious training at a seminary in Toledo.
After leaving that institution, he came into contact with the 54-year-old priest associated with the Diocese of Urgell, who offered him accommodation and assistance in finding another institution where he could continue his studies.
On July 15, 2025, the young man arrived in Catalonia. The following day, he accompanied the priest to Barcelona, where the clergyman reportedly had administrative matters to attend to.
According to details of the complaint reported by the newspaper ARA, the two decided to go out that evening and visited The Moon, a gay bar located on Carrer de Villarroel in Barcelona.
After spending some time at the establishment, they returned to the apartment where they were staying and continued drinking beer together by mutual agreement.
The complainant claims he was not accustomed to consuming that amount of alcohol and that his physical condition left him particularly vulnerable.
According to his statement, the two shared a bed because no other bed was available in the apartment. He alleges that the sexual assault took place during the early hours of the morning.
A relationship marked by dependency and allegations of pressure
Following that night, the relationship between the priest and the former seminarian reportedly continued for several months.
The complainant claims he was partially dependent on the priest for accommodation, the continuation of his religious studies and assistance with renewing his Spanish residence permit.
In this context, he accuses the priest of threats, coercion and controlling behaviour, including telephone calls and messages intended to monitor his movements.
He also alleges that the priest warned him that he had influential contacts who could cause him problems if he disclosed what had allegedly happened.
In January 2026, the then-seminarian requested a transfer to another parish, citing difficulties in their relationship and pressure from the priest.
However, he did not report the alleged sexual assault in that initial complaint. According to his account, he did not directly disclose the allegation to the Bishop of Urgell until several months later.
Sources raise the possibility of a financial motive, without supporting evidence
Separate from the allegations contained in the police complaint, sources close to the case have also raised the possibility that an attempted financial blackmail scheme may have played a role in the conflict.
However, no substantiated evidence or judicial finding has been presented to support this hypothesis.
Consequently, it cannot be established that the complainant attempted to obtain money from the priest or that any form of extortion occurred.
It will be for the competent authorities to determine whether there are grounds to investigate any additional alleged conduct beyond the facts reported to the Mossos d'Esquadra.
Fifteen months between the alleged assault and the police complaint
One of the notable aspects of the case is the period between the alleged incident and the formal filing of the police complaint.
The alleged sexual assault reportedly occurred on July 17, 2025, while the complaint was not filed with the Mossos d'Esquadra until October 26, 2026.
During that period, according to the former seminarian's account, several episodes of tension with the priest took place, alongside contacts with religious authorities.
On August 31, 2026, the complainant says he met with the Bishop of Urgell, Josep-Lluís Serrano i Pentinat, to explain his allegations.
Subsequently, on October 5, he sent a formal registered legal notice to the diocesan office responsible for receiving reports of sexual abuse.
The Diocese of Urgell maintains that on October 17, after receiving information identifying the accused priest, it opened the corresponding canonical investigation and offered support to the complainant.
Meanwhile, crime experts consulted by La Veu Lliure have suggested that the time elapsed between the alleged incident and the police complaint could be compatible with a possible unsuccessful attempt at financial blackmail.
However, this remains an unverified hypothesis, and the delay in filing a complaint does not, by itself, provide evidence of extortion.
Delayed reporting of alleged sexual assault can occur for a variety of personal, psychological or dependency-related reasons, which must be assessed in light of the specific evidence in each case.
Serrano Pentinat had been sworn in as Co-Prince just 21 days earlier
The timeline also places the alleged events within the first weeks of Josep-Lluís Serrano i Pentinat's term as Episcopal Co-Prince of Andorra.
The bishop had sworn an oath to uphold the Principality's Constitution on June 26, 2025, during a solemn ceremony at the Consell General, Andorra's parliament.
Just 21 days later, according to the complaint, the alleged rape took place in Barcelona.
However, this chronological coincidence does not imply that the Co-Prince was aware of the alleged events at the time.
According to the complainant's account, the first personal disclosure of the alleged sexual assault to the bishop did not take place until late August 2026, more than a year later.
Diocese removes priest from duties and opens investigation
On Monday, November 9, the Diocese of Urgell confirmed that it had held an in-person meeting with the former seminarian to hear his account of the alleged events.
The meeting was attended by Father David Codina, who is responsible for the canonical investigation, and provided an opportunity to formally hear the complainant's testimony.
Following the meeting, the diocese announced that the priest had been removed from his pastoral responsibilities and prohibited from publicly exercising his priestly ministry while the investigation continues.
These measures are precautionary and do not constitute a finding of guilt.
The accused priest had served for approximately fifteen years as parish priest in several towns in La Noguera, a region of Catalonia, and was well known within the diocese.
Depending on the findings and the applicable provisions of canon law, the ecclesiastical investigation could result in disciplinary measures ranging from suspension of ministry to dismissal from the clerical state.
A case involving two investigative processes and unanswered questions
The ecclesiastical investigation and any proceedings conducted by the ordinary criminal justice system are independent.
Internal Church disciplinary measures do not replace any criminal responsibility that may ultimately be established by the competent courts.
The alleged sexual assault, accusations of coercion, the timeline of communications with the Diocese of Urgell and any other hypotheses surrounding the dispute must be examined on the basis of evidence, statements and witness testimony.
At present, the confirmed procedural developments include the filing of a police complaint, the opening of a canonical investigation and the precautionary removal of the accused priest from his duties.
Neither the alleged rape nor the possibility of financial extortion has been established by a court.
The accused priest retains the presumption of innocence, and any allegation of additional criminal conduct likewise requires supporting evidence and investigation by the competent authorities.
.png)



.jpg)










