Monday, October 26, 2026

Pope remembers Cardinal Paolo Romeo: "He generously served the Gospel and the Church."

Pope Leo XIV has expressed his condolences for the death of Cardinal Paolo Romeo, Archbishop Emeritus of Palermo, who passed away on Sunday, October 25, at the age of 88. 

The Pontiff remembered the cardinal as a «dear brother who generously served the Gospel and the Church,» highlighting his extensive career in Vatican diplomacy and at the head of the Sicilian archdiocese.

In a telegram sent to Monsignor Antonino Raspanti, Bishop of Acireale, Leo XIV expressed his closeness to the cardinal’s family and the entire diocesan community, recalling with gratitude his «intense ministry» as a priest, papal representative, and Archbishop of Palermo.

Leo XIV recalls his service to the Church

The Pope especially highlighted the years Romeo dedicated to the diplomatic service of the Holy See, during which he served as papal representative in Haiti, Colombia, Canada, Italy, and the Republic of San Marino.

He also recalled his work as Archbishop of Palermo, a see he governed from 2006 to 2015, before becoming Archbishop Emeritus.

Romeo died at San Marco Hospital in Catania after a long illness. The cardinal had been created by Benedict XVI in November 2010 and participated in the 2013 conclave that elected Pope Francis.

Full text of Leo XIV’s telegram

To His Excellency the Most Reverend Monsignor Antonino Raspanti, Bishop of Acireale:

Upon learning of the death of Cardinal Paolo Romeo, I wish to express to Your Excellency and to the entire diocesan community, as well as to the family of the late cardinal, my sharing in their sorrow, remembering with affection this dear brother who has generously served the Gospel and the Church.

Recalling with gratitude his intense ministry, first as a priest of the Diocese of Acireale, then in the diplomatic service of the Holy See, especially as papal representative in Haiti, Colombia, Canada, Italy, and the Republic of San Marino, and finally as a devoted Archbishop of Palermo, I offer fervent prayers to the Lord that He may welcome him into His peace and impart from my heart to all who mourn his passing the consoling apostolic blessing.

From the Vatican, October 25, 2026.

LEO PP. XIV

Bishop of Sant Feliu calls for making confession easier in parishes

The bishop of Sant Feliu de Llobregat, Monsignor Xabier Gómez García, has encouraged Catholics to rediscover the sacrament of confession and has asked priests to facilitate access to it in parishes. 

In his Sunday letter of October 25, titled «The sacrament of reconciliation», the Dominican prelate reminds us that «Catholics can and must turn to the sacrament of forgiveness» and warns that «it would be a mistake to think it is something outdated».

Gómez presents confession as a healing sacrament that allows one to acknowledge sins, receive God’s forgiveness, and recover peace of conscience. 

He also highlights its confidential nature, in contrast to a society increasingly accustomed to publicly displaying intimacy.

The bishop asks priests to facilitate access to confession

In his reflection, the bishop issues a specific exhortation to the priests of his diocese to promote the regular practice of the sacrament of Penance.

«Let us rediscover the benefits of the sacrament of forgiveness and make it accessible in everyday life», he writes.

He then calls for a review of the conditions under which it is offered to the faithful: «I invite priests to review the schedules, spaces, atmosphere, motivation, and welcome».

The prelate also insists on the attitude with which those who come to the confessional should be received: «Let us offer an exquisite, patient, and compassionate sacramental listening, capable of making each confession a liberating and gratuitous experience. Treating those who come as we would like to be treated».

Gómez recalls that everyone needs divine mercy and describes confession as a sacrament that «bestows peace and serenity of conscience, spiritual consolation, and strength to resume daily life with its world of relationships».

He also clarifies that sacramental confession should not be confused with spiritual accompaniment or psychological therapy, as each belongs to a different sphere.

Confession in the face of a society that displays its intimacy

The letter begins with a reflection on the constant exposure of private life. «We live in an exhibitionist society», the bishop notes, observing how social networks invite people to show where we are, what we do, what we think, and even how we feel.

According to Gómez, behind this need to express oneself often lies the legitimate desire to be seen, heard, and loved. 

However, he warns that while one’s own image is being exposed, «the architecture of our deep being, the peace of the soul» may be neglected.

The prelate also addresses the feeling of guilt and the value of remorse when it helps to recognize a mistake, ask for forgiveness, repair the harm caused, and change one’s own conduct.

In this context, he claims confession as a space of protected intimacy through confidentiality, where the penitent can acknowledge their mistakes, immaturities, and sins without fear of being trapped by them.

«In the sacrament, confession turns intimacy into a sacred realm of confidentiality, respect, and forgetting», he explains.

The bishop concludes his reflection on the liberating value of forgiveness with an affirmation: «There is only one thing as liberating as hearing “I forgive you,” and that is hearing “I will always love you”».

Pope to the Sisters of Charity: "Having roots in Christ means putting Him alone at the center of one's own existence"

Pope Leo XIV received this Monday, October 26, at the Apostolic Palace of the Vatican, the delegates of the Elective General Chapter of the Sisters of Charity of Saint Jeanne Antide Thouret. 

During the meeting, the Pontiff highlighted the importance of keeping Christ at the center of consecrated life and of attending to both the spiritual and material needs of people, especially the poorest.

The Holy Father congratulated the new superior general of the congregation and recalled that the General Chapter constitutes «a privileged context for the action of the Holy Spirit for the good of the People of God.» 

He also valued the communal discernment carried out by the religious sisters during their days of work.

«Roots in Christ, Mission in the World»

Leo XIV dwelt especially on the motto chosen for the General Chapter, «Roots in Christ, Mission in the World,» which, as he explained, expresses the essence of religious consecration and the apostolate of the Sisters of Charity.

Following the example of Saint Jeanne Antide Thouret, the Pope pointed out that taking root in Christ requires placing Him at the center of existence and recognizing His presence in every moment of life. He also recalled that union with the Lord strengthens communion among the religious sisters and their capacity to serve others.

The Pontiff also insisted on the need to attend to the integral good of persons, both spiritual and temporal. He warned that contemporary society tends to fragment the human being, separating people from one another and causing divisions within their own inner life.

In this context, he emphasized that charity is fundamental to recovering, promoting, and authentically respecting human dignity, especially that of the most needy.

A Congregation Present in 32 Countries

The audience took place during the bicentennial year of the death of Saint Jeanne Antide Thouret, founder of the congregation. Leo XIV recalled the saint’s fidelity to the Successor of Peter, even when that fidelity entailed misunderstandings and renunciations.

The Pope also highlighted the expansion of the Sisters of Charity, currently present in 32 countries, where they carry out their mission with the collaboration of religious sisters, laypeople, young people, and volunteers.

At the conclusion, he encouraged the sisters to continue their work generously and entrusted them to the intercession of the Virgin Mary and their founder.

Below, we offer the full text of Pope Leo XIV’s greeting:

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Peace be with you.

Dear sisters, welcome!

I receive you with great joy at this important moment for your Congregation. I greet the newly elected superior general, congratulate her, and entrust her to the Lord, together with the sisters entrusted with advising and assisting her in her service.

The General Chapter of a religious family is always a privileged context for the action of the Holy Spirit for the good of the People of God. In the days of grace you have lived, with an attitude of docility to His inspirations, you have exercised communal discernment, which is already in itself an edifying experience. The fruits of your listening—to God and among yourselves—are the most beautiful gift you bring me today: like a basket of first fruits that together we wish to offer to the Lord.

Saint Jeanne Antide Thouret had understood very well the importance of this «offering together» in the Church, manifesting throughout her life a great love and respect for the Successor of Peter, even at the cost of facing painful misunderstandings and renunciations for the good and unity of the persons entrusted to her.

Dear sisters, the theme you have chosen for your work is very beautiful: «Roots in Christ, Mission in the World.» It adequately describes the essence of your consecration and your apostolate. Having roots in Christ means, in effect, following the example of Saint Jeanne Antide, placing Him alone at the center of one’s existence and thoughts, becoming accustomed to feeling and celebrating His presence in every moment, trusting that, closely united to Him, we will be ever closer to one another and more capable of helping others according to His designs.

In this regard, I would like to emphasize another important aspect of the charismatic heritage that your holy founder has left you: attention to the integral good, spiritual and temporal, of one’s neighbor. I recall this because, in a society like ours, which tends to fragment man, dividing people not only from one another, but also, and more gravely, within themselves, this dimension of charity is fundamental to recovering, promoting, and authentically respecting the dignity of each person, especially the poorest and most needy (cf. Francis, apostolic exhortation Evangelii gaudium, 186). Treasure it, cultivate it, and spread it.

Dearest sisters, in this bicentennial year of the birth into Heaven of holy Mother Thouret, it is consoling to note how much the Lord has blessed and accompanied your path over time. This is witnessed by the richness and variety of your apostolic expansion, today present in thirty-two countries, in which you keep alive the «charism of Charity» thanks to the work of religious sisters, laypeople, young people, volunteers, and collaborators of all ages and backgrounds.

Continue your work with generosity: it is precious in the eyes of God and of the Church. Thank you for what you do! Entrusting you to the intercession of the Virgin Mary and Saint Jeanne Antide, I bless you from my heart. Thank you.

Kwasniewski calls the obstacles to the Summorum pilgrimage "petty"

Professor Peter Kwasniewski described this Sunday, in a message published on X, as «petty and vindictive» the decisions of Vatican staff regarding the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage, held in Rome from October 23 to 25. 

According to him, after having granted the permits, the authorities withdrew them at the last moment. 

«Among the pettiest and most vindictive things I have ever seen,» stated the Catholic writer and lecturer, who listed four specific measures.

The first, according to Kwasniewski, was forcing the Vespers to be moved forward «so that many would miss them.» 

The second was preventing the pilgrims from entering in procession into St. Peter’s Basilica to profess their Catholic faith and their communion with the successor of Peter. 

The third was communicating at the last minute that the Mass at Santa Maria Maggiore could last «only one hour,» which, he added, disrupted the carefully planned solemn pontifical Mass. 

The fourth was the prohibition of official photographs, which the professor linked to the rule attributed to Cardinal Arthur Roche of not including the traditional Mass in parish bulletins.

Kwasniewski also warned of the consequences of these decisions. In his view, they make the Vatican appear «desperate and out of touch,» alienate and radicalize traditionalists, and rhetorically strengthen the arguments of the Society of St. Pius X. 

«If the Vatican’s desire is to create more division, polarization, and resentment while fueling the traditionalist fire, they have done a brilliant job,» he concluded.

Kwasniewski’s message cites another post on X about the pilgrimage, which sought to clarify «theories» circulating on the internet.

According to that text, the organizers requested permission for the Mass in the Vatican through a letter that Bishop Athanasius Schneider personally delivered to Leo XIV in December. 

The pilgrimage marks its fifteenth edition and is always celebrated on the same date. They received no response until August, when the Secretariat of State communicated that there could be no Mass in the Vatican. 

The organizers then announced that it would not take place and that the pilgrims would enter in procession at 1 p.m. on Saturday to attend the 3 p.m. Mass at Santa Maria Maggiore; permission for that procession had been granted in April 2026.

The same post recounts that in September St. Peter’s announced an event at 3:30 p.m. at the Altar of the Chair, the place where the pilgrimage celebrated its Mass last year. 

This week, «just yesterday» according to the author, the organizers received another letter from the Secretariat of State informing them that they could not enter in procession into the Vatican. 

The text emphasizes that events in the basilica do not fall under the jurisdiction of the Secretariat of State, but rather the archpriest and the Fabric of St. Peter’s, making its intervention «strange.»

On Saturday, according to that account, the pilgrims walked through the streets to the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square, accompanied by the Italian police, and there they were stopped by the Vatican, as that is the limit of Italian police jurisdiction. 

They were then informed that they could only remain one hour at Santa Maria Maggiore, so the authorized solemn pontifical Mass had to be converted into a low Mass, and that official photographs were not permitted.

InfoVaticana already reported on the prohibition of entering St. Peter’s and, in September, that Rome vetoed the traditional Mass at St. Peter’s and moved it to Santa Maria Maggiore.

Jesuit priest suggests saints are ‘often’ gay

Father James Keenan, S.J., during the keynote address for this year’s annual Outreach Conference, blasphemously cited a “queer theologian” to suggest that saints are “often” homosexual.

During his keynote address for the 2026 Outreach Conference at Georgetown University, the Jesuit cited the work of Flora Tang to claim that the saints are “often themselves instructive as queer saints.”

Keenan, who has served as a theology professor at the nominally Catholic Boston College for over 20 years, also compared “queer theologians” to civil rights activists and so-called “Catholic feminists.”

“Flora Tang makes clear in ‘What Queer Theory Taught Me About the Saints’ that the saints are often themselves instructive as queer saints,” Keenan said during his address. “Yet she prompts us ‘to go beyond clinging onto narratives of queer certitude and move toward an openness to fragmented narratives that do not tidy up voices of mourning and unfulfilled hopes for a queer and decolonized church.'”

Tang’s 2022 article for Political Theology Network blasphemously insinuates that several saints were homosexuals, including Sts. Sergius and Bacchus, fourth-century Roman soldiers who were martyred together for refusing to offer sacrifice to the Roman gods, and Sts. Perpetua and Felicity, third-century companion martyrs, each of whom had children.

The allegations appear to stem from the sexualization of stories involving several great saints who had completely platonic Christian friendships.

Keenan continued in his address: “Let me add that I do not think the prudence of queer theologians is much different from the prudence of civil rights activists nor of Catholic peace activists or of Catholic feminists.”

The priest notably omitted any mention of the Catholic Church’s perennial teaching on same-sex “marriage.”

Furthermore, while Keenan glowingly compares “queer theologians” to “Catholic feminists,” he ignores the Church’s teaching that clearly condemns this ideology.

Traditional Catholic teaching holds that men and women are equal in dignity as creatures made in the image and likeness of God, while at the same time defending the hierarchical diversity of roles within the conjugal relationship. This is taught according to an order rooted in nature for the sake of complementarity, rather than as a prejudice.

Fr. Keenan, like his fellow Jesuit Fr. James Martin, the founder of Outreach, has a long history of explicitly contradicting the Church’s teaching on same-sex “marriage.”

Unlike Martin, Keenan holds three theological degrees, including a Licentiate in Sacred Theology (S.T.L.) and a Doctorate in Sacred Theology (S.T.D.) from the Pontifical Gregorian University, and has worked as a theology professor for nearly 40 years at multiple nominally Catholic universities.

Most notably, back in 2003, Keenan testified against H.3190, a proposed constitutional amendment in Massachusetts that would have defined marriage as a stable union between a man and a woman, on the erroneous grounds that it was “contrary to Catholic teaching on social justice.”

“As a priest and as a moral theologian, I cannot see how anyone could use the Roman Catholic tradition to support H. 3190,” the priest falsely claimed at the time.

ISIS claims responsibility for deadly Greek Orthodox church attack in Jordan

Horrifying footage out of Jordan shows the moment that gunmen storm a Greek Orthodox church during a funeral procession, killing seven and injuring as many as 40 more.

The brutal terrorist attack took place in broad daylight at the St. George’s Greek Orthodox Church in Karak, located southwest of the capital, Amman.

A video shared on X shows three armed assailants firing their weapons as they approach the church.

A second, far more disturbing video shows the gunmen chasing down and shooting members of the church service.

While Christians once made up 12 percent of Jordan’s population, today they account for less than 2 percent due to religious discrimination, threats and violence.

Following the attack, the terrorists sent a chilling message: “Allahu Akbar, and glory belongs to Allah. We have brutally punished the Christians of Karak in revenge for Islam and the Islamic State. Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!”

Ahmed al-Tayeb in Cairo, the grand imam of Al-Azhar, offered his condolences to the victim’s families and called the shooting a “heinous terrorist attack.”

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein “affirmed Iraq’s solidarity with Jordan in the face of terrorism. ”

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the attack as “especially heinous,” and called “for all those responsible to be found and to be held to account.”

Three days of national mourning have been proclaimed in Jordan. 

Poland's bishops take step to reappraise abuse claims

For years, the church in Poland has been planning an investigative body for sexual abuse of minors. 

The bishops now elected the commission chief.

The Krakow historian Piotr Franaszek (71) is to lead the commission planned by the Polish bishops for the investigation of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. 

This was announced by the Bishops’ Conference on Saturday in Zakopane, southern Poland, after the conclusion of its general assembly. 

The Commission has been tasked with determining the extent of the sexual abuse of minors in the dioceses and religious communities since 1945. When she starts her work is still open.

The bishops elected Franaszek as commission chief in consultation with the Orders of Men and Women. The emeritus history professor of the University of Krakow is associated with a monastery as a so-called Benedictine oblate, but layman. His professional field is the social and economic history of the 19th and 20th. century. From 2006 to 2010 he sat for the right-wing conservative party PiS in the Krakow City Council.

"At the very beginning"

Bishop Slawomir Oder spoke of a milestone on the way to the commencement of the Commission's work. The bishops would have adopted the Commission's revised statute. It will now be submitted to the competent ministry in order to continue the procedure for obtaining the legal personality.

Chairman-designate Franaszek said at the joint press conference: "We are at the very beginning, but we have a convened commission, a statute and a chairman." The remaining members of the panel have not yet been appointed. The Commission will be composed of experts with relevant expertise, Franaszek said.

Doubts of those affected

Robert Fidura, a well-known abuse victim, reacted in surprise to the historian's appeal. Franaszek is completely unknown to him, he told the Catholic News Agency (KNA). “I have never heard of him on the subject of sexual abuse in the Church.” 

He was worried by reports that Franaszek PiS chief executive Jaroslaw Kaczynski was very close, according to Fidura. "I hope that the professor will leave his political connections aside and prove to be completely impartial and independent."

Already in March 2023, the bishops had decided to investigate abuse by an independent commission.

However, their complete instigation has not yet taken place. Most recently, Polish ministries had objected to the statutes submitted, which regulates, among other things, the working principles, and demanded changes. 

The bishops' conference calls the panel "Commission of Independent Experts to Investigate the Phenomenon of Sexual Abuse of Minors in the Catholic Church in Poland."

US Archbishop issues apology over White House photo with Trump

The Most Reverend Jeffrey S Grob, Archbishop of Milwaukee has issued the following statement today, in the wake of the controversy over a group of 12 Catholic bishops photographed praying with President Trump.

A Public Apology - Archbishop Jeffrey Grob

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

I write this message to you from the Dominican Republic while visiting with fellow pilgrims our sharing parish, La Sagrada Familia.

Over the past several days, I have received many questions and comments about the October 22 meeting I and 11 other bishops attended at the White House, which was soon thereafter publicized by the administration without the consent of the participants. Please know that my intention was never to cause confusion, anger, or disappointment among the people entrusted to my care. My hope here is to provide some measure of context for my decision to participate.

To begin, the meeting was in no way an endorsement of the president, his policies, or his party. In mid-September, I was invited to join a group of a dozen bishops to discuss matters of importance to the Church and our people, including immigration enforcement, religious worker visas, and human dignity. The meeting was the second of two such gatherings arranged by the Heritage Foundation. The first, to which I was not invited, was held last June. We were told the meeting was to be a private discussion, that several Catholic members of the cabinet might make an appearance, and that there could be an opportunity to pray privately with the president.

I took some time to weigh the decision and ultimately felt that, if I had the opportunity to offer my voice in a way that might improve the lives of God's children, I ought to take it. I pray for our elected officials on a daily basis, so it seemed appropriate to do so in person.

So, following a 90-minute discussion with White House domestic policy staff and advisors, we were eventually ushered into the Oval Office. The president greeted us, took a seat at his desk and presented us with commemorative tokens. We were then directed to stand behind him and pray. After which several photos were taken and we were ushered out. Unbeknownst to the group of bishops a video was also taken. But permission for the public distribution or posting of either the video or photos was not given by the bishops.

It did not take long thereafter for the White House to post a video and photos of the prayer. I soon began receiving messages of serious concern over the possibility that I had inadvertently participated in a political event less than two weeks before a national election. I also heard from some who felt wounded because of the ways they or their family had been harmed by the president's policies.

I feel a heavy sadness, not only over the pain I caused, but also for the fact that something so sacred to a group of religious leaders, prayer to our Heavenly Father, would be manipulated in that way. We came in good faith to try to work for the betterment of our fellow human beings, to ease their suffering, to build up the common good, and to pray with a president, not to pose for a political photo opportunity to benefit the few. We should never have been put in that position by the White House. I did not go without reservations. I wish I had heeded them. Please know that I have heard these concerns, understand how I caused them, and I apologize for any damage my actions have done.

We are, as ever, a pilgrim people. And that includes bishops.

With sincere regret,

Most Reverend Jeffrey S Grob
Archbishop of Milwaukee

Ireland: Homelessness is a continual blight on society North and South

The continuing rise in the numbers of people seeking emergency accommodation across the island of Ireland was referenced in a report by the Bishops' Commission for Social Issues and International Affairs during the Bishops' autumn general meeting held in Maynooth this week.

Bishops stated: "This continuing crisis of homelessness in our society - North and South - is a blight on our society. It is a failure of government and public policy at all levels for not providing one of the most basic human rights of people: the right to a home. Just reacting to a crisis is both costly and ineffective. We need to address the root causes of homelessness, causes that have long existed in our economy, so that human dignity and the common good can be served authentically."

"In the Republic, the number of homeless people accessing emergency accommodation in August 2026 reached a record 17,885. This marks a 111% rise since the Housing for All plan was initiated in 2021 and a 169% increase over the past decade."

"Regarding Northern Ireland, over 90,000 people are applicants for social housing while more than 5,600 people are living in emergency accommodation. Low social housing supply, coupled with higher demand, is causing this problem to accelerate. The absence of a Budget in Northern Ireland is further exacerbating the problem and leaving authorities with only emergency accommodation as a response," Bishops said.

‘Like a tourist attraction’ — Calls to remove 15-foot headstone erected at Sligo Cemetery

Sligo County Council has launched an investigation following widespread outrage and growing calls for the removal of a towering 15-foot marble memorial erected at Sligo Cemetery.

The massive stone surround and statues were brought in and assembled over several hours last week.

The structure – which stands three times higher than the maximum allowed limit – has sparked intense public backlash, with both council officials and local representatives inundated with complaints.

Under Sligo County Council guidelines, headstones for a triple grave plot are capped at a maximum height of 5 feet, with double plots restricted to 4.6 feet and single plots allowed up to 4 feet.

Speaking on Ocean FM, local resident Dympna Mannion voiced her upset over the development, describing the severe disruption and emotional impact on regular visitors.

‘It’s absolutely appalling – it’s become not a nice place now because people have come to photograph it. It’s like a tourist attraction’ she said.

Praising the dedicated cemetery staff, she added: ‘The graves are really well looked after. It really upsets me to see what’s happened. It really upsets me to see the beautiful graves on either side dwarfed by this charade that’s now in the graveyard.’

Questioning how the construction was permitted to take place in the first place, she called for strict enforcement of the rules: ‘Why was there not an injunction taken out to stop what’s going on? If the rest of us have to abide by the rules that are there, that’s what you do.’

New DDF doc highlights dangers of ‘mission creep’ (Opinion)

The publication of a major new document from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith last week sparked a good deal of debate, almost all of it confined to the spaces filled by professional Catholics of the chattering classes.

Part of that was due to the subject matter of the document: passing on the faith in an era of profound change. Part of it was due to the document’s length: More than 25 thousand words.

The DDF’s Venite ad me: Considerations on the Transmission of the Faith in an Epochal Change addresses a crucial issue in the midst of major decline across the civilizational areas with the oldest and most consolidated Christian tradition. On the other hand, it is as long as a good many theological monographs and it touches on a vast array of questions.

Reading it, one gets the impression its authors intended it to be readable by non-experts.

Venite is not marked “by terminological precision and systematic treatment, but instead allow[s] a more discursive style,” illustrated especially by a final chapter dedicated to “personal testimonies” from people who have rediscovered the faith.

More to the point, the document explicitly states it is not meant to settle doctrinal questions, but “primarily to stimulate ecclesial reflection and pastoral commitment regarding the transmission of the faith.”

“For this reason,” Venite continues, “the text examines a variety of points of view without, however, claiming to settle the matter, which remains open to further analysis and development.”

Readers used to hearing the DDF called “the Vatican’s doctrinal watchdog” may do a double-take at that.

Historically styled La Suprema because of its elevated status among the Roman dicasteries, the DDF has oversight responsibility for official Vatican documents and certain “police” power over theological texts and published teaching resources throughout the whole Church.

When Pope Francis gave the running of the DDF to then-Archbishop (now Cardinal) Victor Manuel Fernández, however, he spelled out a novel mission profile for his old friend and sometime ghostwriter: to foster theological dialogue.

That sounds lovely, but in practice it creates problems, among them “mission creep” – the expansion of an organization’s scope of responsibility, usually without sufficient consideration – a perennial danger in any complex organization.

In fairness to Fernández (and Pope Francis), the 2022 law that reorganized the Roman curia – the Church’s central governing apparatus – already put the DDF’s mission profile in a missionary and evangelizing register.

Praedicate Evangelium, as the 2022 fundamental law is called, also still tasks the DDF with its traditional role of safeguarding the deposit of faith.

“The task of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is to help the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops to proclaim the Gospel throughout the world,” Praedicate states. Even according to Praedicate, however, the DDF is to do this “by promoting and safeguarding the integrity of Catholic teaching on faith and morals.”

“The Dicastery over which you will preside in other times came to use immoral methods,” Francis wrote in his 2023 letter to Fernández. “Those were times,” Francis continued, “when, rather than promoting theological knowledge, possible doctrinal errors were pursued.”

“What I expect from you is certainly something very different,” Francis wrote. Under Fernández, the DDF would still “guard the teaching that flows from the faith,” only it would do so “in order ‘to give reasons for our hope’,” and “not as an enemy who critiques and condemns.”

That last line was an explicit reference to Francis’s 2013 Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii gaudium, which concluded the Year of Faith proclaimed by Pope Benedict XVI (his immediate predecessor). It just happens that Fernández had a hand in the drafting of Evangelii gaudium, by the way.

The 2022 fundamental law rearranging the curia and Francis’s 2023 letter were both long on vision and short on practicalities, which is fine for high-level documents but leaves the How? largely to be worked out on the go.

In short, it is still the DDF’s job to say what the doctrine of the faith is, whatever else the pope may want the department to do, and exactly how an office designed to have the last word should foster dialogue was anything but clear when Fernández took over the DDF.

When an office like the DDF offers “considerations” on anything, it is hard to take them as such, for much the same reasons it is difficult to take the boss’s “suggestion” as such, even – sometimes especially – when the principal says, “I’m only suggesting.”

Since it is October, and the Boys of Summer are playing the Fall Classic, let me use a baseball metaphor: The DDF’s job is to call doctrinal balls and strikes. The DDF is not supposed to coach or manage the teams or offer color commentary.

Fernández got the job in 2023, when Francis was nearing the end of his pontificate. Several DDF projects were still in the works when the cardinals elected Leo XIV, one of which has become Venite ad me.

“Toward the end of his life,” Venite explains in its conclusion, “Pope Francis entrusted the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith with the task of offering the Church a reflection on the transmission of the faith, and Pope Leo XIV subsequently reiterated this request.”

“The Dicastery has embraced this task in the spirit of the missionary renewal that is asked of the whole People of God,” Venite further states, “including the institutions of the Roman curia.”

The thing is, there is an entire department of the Roman curia dedicated to mission and evangelization – the propagation and transmission of the faith – and it is a behemoth with its own assets and resources.

More to the point, Venite admits – in words – that its task “falls within the purview of another Dicastery: namely, the Dicastery for Evangelization’s Section for Fundamental Questions Regarding Evangelization in the World.”

Venite even explains how the Fundamental Questions section at Evangelization “has long been engaged in research and dialogue not only on the transmission of the faith but also on related topics,” including several treated at greater or lesser length in the DDF document, itself.

Why the Dicastery for Evangelization did not get the job that Francis instead gave to DDF is a legitimate question only partially answered by Francis’s predilection for relying on personal relationships rather than institutional profiles.

It hints at a bigger problem within the whole curial system.

In my book on Leo XIV and Catholic Reform in the 21st Century, I noted that Francis’s decision to make evangelization the central focus of the Roman curia’s work “put ideas above reality,” which broke one of Francis’ own cardinal rules.

It also tried to make the curia do something it still isn’t designed to do.

Said simply, the curia is a power structure. It is a bureaucracy. On a practical level, making evangelization the mission of the curia bureaucratized the Church’s missionary mandate, even as it blurred the lines distinguishing the purviews of the various dicasteries.

On the other hand, one of the longstanding criticisms of the curia is that its departments tend to work in isolation from one another (something Leo XIV has noted publicly with undisguised chagrin).

The changes Francis undertook may yet be harnessed in a way that gets them out of their silos, but at present things are still more than a little unsettled.  

Leo XIV was elected to stabilize the curia and to “take down the temperature” in the Church after the frequently feverish whirlwind Francis pontificate.

So far, Leo has mostly let offices and senior curial officials do their thing without papal interference. A measure of stability has come from that. Leo has also been content to let DDF complete projects already underway, and that is in keeping with his modus operandi.

Now, the work Francis cut out for the office under Fernández is all but complete.

Earlier this month, the cardinal secretary of state, Pietro Parolin, made headlines when he said the pontiff would “remodulate” his pontificate “if necessary” in the wake of his cancer diagnosis.

Whether the pope will remodulate the DDF’s mission profile remains to be seen. How he remodulates it, if he does at all, will tell a good deal about how the pope intends to govern, and about what the Leonine era will look like when it comes fully into its own.

Tony Flannery: The Lost Children of Tuam

It was about twelve years ago, when I was on a speaking tour of the United States organised by the Church Reform movement, that the dramatic news from Ireland about nuns ‘dumping babies bodies into a septic tank’ had reached the U.S. I was asked many questions about it by the different gatherings I addressed. 

This was the year when Catherine Corless released the story about the Tuam mother and baby home. I know Catherine asserts now that she never said the babies were put in the septic tank, but she certainly did nothing to correct the version that was being reported. 

It was precisely that image, of the nuns, the babies and the septic tank that made it such a sensational story around the world, a godsend especially to the tabloid outlets, and of course to social media. 

Currently a dig of the area is progressing, and I know that much more excavation is outstanding but so far over a hundred bodies have been discovered, all buried carefully in coffins.

We are also aware of a couple of basic facts that are generally overlooked in the media presentation of this story.

The building, which had previously been a workhouse, was owned by the County Council, not the Bon Secour Sisters, who largely depended on the Council for the resources to run the home.

During the decade of the nineteen forties the home was over-crowded, and diseases of various types were rampant. In some instances even whole families arrived for shelter. 

The nuns appealed to the Council for resources to provide an isolation area for those with disease, but were constantly refused. As a result there were a great number of deaths during those years. And it is also known that the supply of coffins had run out, and for a time they were unable to acquire any, so they had to improvise as best they could. It must have been extremely difficult trying to run the home during those years. 

But still the Bon Secour nuns continued to do their best in providing a service that no one else in society was willing to provide. It is ironic that now they are being vilified, when in fact they were the only people that I know of, in the society of that period,  who did not abandon the children. 

In the way this story is being portrayed in the public domain the focus is almost totally on the nuns. There is scarcely a mention of the families from which the mothers of the children came, and even less so of the person who in all probability is most to blame, the father of the child, the one who most of all abandoned both mother and child.

Even as someone who, during my work with the Church Reform movement, and in my own personal life, haven’t been short on criticism of various aspects of the Catholic Church, I find the ease with which commentators and media discussions so quickly and easily conclude that a great many of the problems in society, both past and present, are the fault of the Church. 

Over and over again I find myself recoiling from the superficiality, the lack of depth or breadth in the thinking that underlies the regular attacks particularly on nuns in this country.

Recently a relation of my own, a woman in her eighties living in the U.S., of whom we had no knowledge, came to light. Her birth and parents are uncertain, but she is clearly part of our extended family. She was an abandoned baby, and was brought to the Tuam mother and baby home. 

In a recent conversation with her, having met her for the very first time, she told me she had spent the first seven and a half years of her life in that home. 

She has good, even happy memories of those years, and she asserted very strongly that the nuns were extremely kind and caring, and that she had never seen any of them abuse a child in any way. She was quite upset and annoyed by the current depiction of the Tuam home in Ireland today.

From the reviews I have read, and from the discussion Liam Neeson had with Patrick Kielty, it would appear that his movie fits in with this prevailing narrative. 

It is sad that someone of his stature and experience has probably done a lot to lend credence to the septic tank version of the burial of the children who died in the Tuam mother and baby home.

I won’t be going to see the movie.

Tony Flannery

Brendan Hoban: A weekly column is a privilege, not a chore (Contribution)

More than 45 years ago – on January 23rd, 1980 to be exact – my first column was published in the Western People. 

The then owner of the paper, Rita de Vere Durcan, was anxious that the Western People would have a regular religious column and the then editor, Terry Reilly, was asked to search for a willing recruit. 

A weekly column written by a priest had been a prominent part of the Western for some years until the then writer, Fr Colm Kilcoyne, moved to the newly-founded Western Journal. Sin scéal eile.

I had written a few bits and pieces over the years and someone suggested my name to the editor. I was happy to take it on for a while. Little did I imagine at the time that churning out almost a thousand words would become part of the pattern of my week for 45 years.

When I started with the Western I was a curate in Dromard in County Sligo and I remember investing in a tiny Brother typewriter. (Computers, I think, hadn’t been invented and email certainly didn’t exist!)

I couldn’t type of course. For all the useless things we learned in Maynooth, we were never taught the two most important skills of all – to type and to cook. I imagined that typing would come easy to me. It didn’t, though I soon learned how to type with one finger and later I progressed to a finger and a half – dodgy typists will get my drift.

First, I would write out my copy in long hand and then type it painstakingly word for word and then I either had to post it, or drive to Ballina with it, or cajole Johnny Nealon, who drove for Duffy’s Bakery, to drop it into the Western for me. It was a considerable logistical task to get it all together. 

However, the later purchase of an Amstrad computer, the Massey-Ferguson of the computer world, and later again the luxury of a basic Apple Mac made life much easier. And, of course, later the invention of the worldwide web and email were the icing on the cake.

Like riding a bicycle, belting out nearly 1000 words a week became easier over the years. What helped was the freedom to use this space to do with as I pleased. I was presented, for over four decades, with the luxury of a platform on which I could sound off (if you’ll pardon the mixed metaphors) on any subject under the sun. And while it is sometimes a burden – like tonight as I write at an unearthly hour – it was always a privilege and sometimes a joy.

The fact that I’m still here means, I trust, that sufficient people are sufficiently happy with what I do for the Western to continue to justify employing me. Knowing as I do that the managers of newspapers are notoriously unsentimental, if this column wasn’t working, neither would I. And enjoying it as I do presently, God and the present editor willing, I hope to continue in this space for a while longer.

Not indeed that everyone was always delighted with my contributions. During the H Block days of the 1980s, I took what was then a politically incorrect line, criticising Sinn Féin for exploiting the hunger-strikers – though it now seems embarrassingly obvious – and I remember an unofficial visit from a few ‘republicans’ who pushed themselves into my house and who insisted on clarifying the issues involved. 

Two rather large individuals stood in my kitchen in Dromard (for what felt like an inordinately extended visit) and suggested that I should withdraw my position publicly in the following issue of the paper. Or else what, I ventured? There was a lot of humming and hawing and vague hints and feet shuffling. Clearly they had expected me to capitulate completely and, when I didn’t, out of foolishness rather than bravery, they didn’t seem to have any Plan B – thankfully.

It was an instructive encounter with the bully-boys of the IRA who felt at the time they could intimidate any critical voice into submission. It was too a dangerous time and I don’t think, in similar circumstances, I would be quite as brave now. Youth, for all its foolishness, has its advantages.

The other group I’ve successfully alienated are members of the religious right who have tracked me over the years, in person and in print, and who have never spared me. A few had the courage to sign their names; others imagined that an anonymous missive would inflict a deeper wound. 

They were right, of course, until the day a friend advised me never to read a letter unless it was signed. It was good advice and has stood me in good stead over the years. Sometimes people ask why I don’t respond to criticism that seems, to the neutral observer, personal and often patently unfair. My answer is that usually I do but if the criticism was from a current parishioner, my operating principle is not to respond.

Sometimes people have asked me too if my religious superiors have ever taken me to task for writings that sometimes have an edge to them or that are perceived as unduly critical of the Catholic Church or that some people believe are imprudent or inappropriate. The answer is No. 

In all of more than four decades none of the four bishops I served under have ever (as yet!) even vaguely suggested that they were unhappy with anything I have written here. All things considered I doubt if other institutions would have similarly indulged my scribblings.

Columnists, of course, are a peculiar breed. We’re opinionated, precious, know-alls, attention-seekers, obsessives and, it goes without saying, experts on every subject we imagine needs our attention. 

Little wonder that we annoy, frustrate, infuriate and disorientate our readers, as well as hopefully on occasion entertain, instruct and encourage them to look at life through a different prism. 

May I thank my readers, some of whom have stayed with me for all of 45 years on what has been, for me at least, a satisfying adventure.

Perth Anglicans vote in favour of a conversion therapy ban

A motion in support of a conversion ban bill for WA was passed by the Perth Anglican Synod on the weekend.

The motion:

• Affirms that all people are created in the image of God and that LGBTQIA+ people in our community belong in the Body of Christ as equal friends and fellow disciples of our Lord Jesus Christ;

• Recognises that so-called “conversion therapy”, including practices and interventions that seek to change or suppress a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, has been shown on the basis of clear evidence to be ineffective and harmful;

• Expresses its support for the Western Australian Government for legislative efforts that prohibit conversion and suppression practices and will provide robust protections for minors and other persons at risk of being subjected to these practices; and

• Acknowledges the freedom of religious bodies to provide prayer and spiritual support that does not constitute conversion therapy and/or conversion or suppression practices.

The Mover, Associate Professor Dr Mark Jennings, Academic Dean of Wollaston Theological College, described conversion practices as formal or informal activities or treatment that seek to suppress, eliminate or change someone’s sexual or romantic orientation, gender identity or gender expression. He said the definition had been composed by people with firsthand experience: SOGICE survivors.

He said these practices are grounded in “conversion ideology”: the belief that people are naturally expected to be heterosexual and have a gender identity that matches the sex assigned to them at birth. In his account, that belief leads to LGBTQIA+ people being viewed as damaged or in need of fixing. He argued that conversion practices cannot work because LGBTQIA+ people are not broken and do not need to be healed or fixed.

Dr Jennings cited statements from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and the Australian Psychological Society that conversion practices are ineffective and can cause harm. He cited 1 Corinthians 12 and the equal dignity of the members of Christ’s Body.

Seconding the motion, Jack Lambert, Commissioner of the diocesan Social Responsibilities Commission, said every person is made in the image of God and deserves dignity, respect and compassionate care, including LGBTQIA+ people. 

Lambert distinguished praying with someone from attempting to change or suppress their sexual orientation or gender identity. He said the motion did not require Synod to resolve every question about sexuality and gender, but asked it to affirm dignity, recognise evidence of harm and support protections.

Mark Grobicki, Minister of St Marks Bassendean, an evangelical parish, opposed the motion. He began by affirming the dignity of every person as made in the image of God. He condemned coercion, abuse, humiliation and manipulation directed at people because of their sexual orientation or experience of gender incongruence. He said churches or individuals responsible for such conduct should acknowledge the harm, repent where necessary, apologise and ensure their ministry is marked by gentleness, patience and love.

He referred to the Christian call to repentance, faith and a transformed life, and argued that the motion could support legislation that prevented the Church from carrying out that ministry.

Meg Warner, Principal of Wollaston Theological College, spoke for the motion, citing Church of England debates and saying the motion would place the Church in good company and help limit future suffering in Western Australia.

Peter Brain, the retired Bishop of Armidale and locum at St Luke’s Maddington, spoke against, and said being created in the image of God is a basis for respecting and honouring people, but argued that becoming a member of the Body of Christ involves faith in Jesus and the baptismal commitments to turn to Christ and reject evil. He was concerned the wording might leave out the need for forgiveness, repentance and the work of the Holy Spirit.

Jan Joustra, the Rector of South Perth, described a young man who had come to him when he was vicar of St Andrew’s in Brighton. The young man had told him about the conversion practices he had experienced from his Pentecostal parents. Joustra said the young man wanted to love God and be loved by God, and that his sexuality was not a choice.

He said he had tried to reassure the young man that he was loved and accepted by God. A few weeks later, he learned that the young man had died by suicide. Joustra said this was not what the Church should be about, and spoke of the Church’s calling to proclaim God’s love and welcome people.

Tom Allen, a delegate from Christ the King Willetton, urged Synod to vote against the motion. He asked whether the Church’s moral understanding was being formed by government or by God’s word. He said the motion did not appear to him to proclaim Christ or reflect the heart of God, and referred to Jesus Christ’s ministry of reconciliation.

A delegate (name withheld) spoke in favour, describing their personal experience. Growing up in an evangelical charismatic setting, they had been told both implicitly and explicitly that praying hard enough, trusting God enough and surrendering enough could make them straight.

They described years of pleading with God to change them, believing they were broken, hating themselves and self-harming. They said conversion practices take something that is not wrong with a person and teach them to see it as a flaw, failure or sin. In their experience, faith, which should offer love, hope and belonging, became associated with shame, fear and self-hatred.

A delegate, Janice, asked whether the definition of conversion practice would cover schools telling pre-primary children that they could change their gender, drag queens in libraries and schools, or books saying that gender is not fixed. Janice also asked whether it was premature for Synod to support legislation it had not yet seen.

Justine Coverdale, Archdeacon of Perth and Archbishop’s Registrar, responded to Rev Brain’s concern about the first clause. Archdeacon Coverdale read the wording as affirming that LGBTQIA+ people belong in the Body of Christ as equal friends and fellow disciples, not as removing the importance of faith in Jesus. Coverdale said she knew LGBTQIA+ people who were committed Christians.

In response to Janice’s questions, Associate Professor Jennings, responding as the mover, said the legislation did not address gender-affirming care. He said the motion concerned evidence of harm from conversion and suppression practices, rather than hypotheticals. He anticipated a similar model to the Victorian legislation.

The motion passed in all three houses:

  • House of Bishops: in favour; no tally was stated in the transcript.

  • House of Clergy: 61 in favour, 32 against.

  • House of Laity: 151 in favour, 48 against.

Shevchuk brings ‘Ukraine’s prayers’ and list of prisoners to Pope Leo

The head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk, came to his audience with Pope Leo XIV bearing gifts, the prayers and gratitude of the Ukrainian people, and a list of hundreds of prisoners of war held in Russia.

According to a statement from the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, the Major Archbishop handed the list to the Pope during their meeting in the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace.

It was his fifth meeting with Pope Leo, whose efforts for peace between Russia and Ukraine have included recent telephone calls with Presidents Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky. 

In those conversations, the Pope appealed for a truce in the Russian-occupied city of Oleshky, where civilians face a desperate shortage of food, water and medicine.

Major Archbishop Shevchuk expressed particular gratitude for the calls—the conversation with President Putin took place while the Pope was in Rome’s Gemelli Hospital—and for the attention given to the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Oleshky.

Gratitude for support for Ukraine

Throughout the audience, Major Archbishop Shevchuk repeatedly thanked the Pope for his support for Ukraine, so often described by Pope Francis as “martyred”, and for his continuing appeals for an end to the war.

He expressed particular appreciation for the Holy See’s “humanitarian diplomacy”, aimed at easing the suffering of civilians, securing the release of prisoners of war and civilians held by Russia, and bringing home Ukrainian children transferred away from their places of origin.

The missions of Cardinal Zuppi and Archbishop Gallagher

Launched under Pope Francis and renewed by Pope Leo XIV, that mission included visits to Kyiv and Moscow last summer by Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, President of the Italian Bishops’ Conference, and Archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher, Secretary for Relations with States and International Organisations.

Their four visits included meetings with political and Church representatives. Cardinal Zuppi also visited a Russian detention facility holding Ukrainians captured on the battlefield.

Major Archbishop Shevchuk stressed that this was the first time a representative of an international institution had been able to visit Ukrainian prisoners of war in Russia.

“It is a sign that no one is forgotten. The Lord God remembers everyone. And the Mother Church is working to ensure that all our prisoners of war and illegally detained hostages are released as soon as possible,” he said.

He also recalled Archbishop Gallagher’s words in Moscow that there can be no military solution to the war, and that conditions must therefore be created for a political and diplomatic process.

Concern as winter approaches

During their conversation in the library of the Apostolic Palace, Major Archbishop Shevchuk also spoke of the challenges facing Ukraine as another bitterly cold winter approaches, with the country’s infrastructure damaged by bombardment.

He asked for the support and solidarity of the international Catholic community during this time of trial for the Ukrainian people.

A response will come in the next few days, when Archbishop Luis Marín de San Martín, the Papal Almoner and Prefect of the Dicastery for the Service of Charity, visits Ukraine from 27 to 30 October.

He will bring food, medicine and other essential supplies, and above all convey Pope Leo XIV’s closeness to the people. The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is closely involved in the mission.

The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Synod

Major Archbishop Shevchuk also briefed the Pope on his Church’s latest Synod of Bishops, which focused on vocations to the priesthood and consecrated life.

The Synod, he explained, reaffirmed the need to nurture vocations amid the demographic and humanitarian crises caused by Russia’s aggression.

‘Thank you for your witness’

According to Major Archbishop Shevchuk, Pope Leo XIV thanked the bishops, priests, monastics and faithful of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church for their distinctive witness of faith during the war.

The Major Archbishop, in turn, assured the Pope of the prayers and support of Ukrainian Greek Catholics as he continues his recovery from thoracic surgery.

Gifts from Kyiv

Among the gifts brought from Kyiv were a Vatican City postage stamp and an accompanying booklet commemorating three significant events in the life of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, produced in cooperation with the Vatican postal service.

Major Archbishop Shevchuk also presented a special Ukrainian stamp depicting Pope Leo XIV, issued, he explained, “as a sign of gratitude to the Holy See for its humanitarian mission”.

Other gifts included a photographic album entitled Pilgrims of Hope, commemorating the Ukrainian community’s meeting with the Pope, and Hemingway Knows Nothing, a book by Arthur Dron, a veteran of the Russian-Ukrainian war.

Previous meetings

Pope Leo XIV’s first official meeting with Major Archbishop Shevchuk took place on 15 May 2025, when the newly elected Pope received him at the Apostolic Palace.

On 28 June that year, the Pope went to St Peter’s Basilica for the Jubilee celebration of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Looking out at the children, older people, couples and, especially, the mothers of soldiers killed on the front line, he expressed his sorrow over “a senseless war”.

Another private audience followed on 12 February 2026, when Major Archbishop Shevchuk handed the Pope a list of 400 prisoners of war.

The Major Archbishop subsequently returned to the Vatican for the summit marking the tenth anniversary of Amoris laetitia, to which the heads of the Eastern Catholic Churches were also invited.

Melania Trump faces backlash for not giving Pope Leo credit for Ukraine ceasefire

First Lady Melania Trump is facing criticism for taking credit to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine without acknowledging Pope Leo XIV’s earlier efforts.

A ceasefire in Oleshky, a city in southern Ukraine occupied by Russian forces, will begin October 29, the White House announced Friday. 

The deal would allow humanitarian aid deliveries and evacuations of elderly residents.

Melania called conditions in Oleshky “dire” and “on the brink of disaster,” claiming her intervention was crucial to securing the deal without mentioning Leo’s earlier outreach to Russian and Ukrainian leaders.

“It was abundantly clear that without my intervention, the possibility to bring humanitarian aid into the city and to evacuate the elderly would be impossible,” she said in a statement.

President Donald Trump praised his wife’s role in the agreement, saying she had contacted both sides and that both were willing to cooperate.

“What she wants to do is save children,” Trump said. “She’s doing a very good job.”

The announcement prompted criticism online after the Vatican outlined Pope Leo’s diplomatic efforts in the days before the ceasefire was announced. 

According to the Vatican, Leo contacted Russian President Vladimir Putin on October 16 and asked him to arrange a ceasefire to allow food and humanitarian assistance into Oleshky.

The Kremlin confirmed Putin’s October 16 call with the pope, saying he agreed to help protect residents and provide essential supplies.

The Vatican said Leo spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy three days later, and Vatican Secretary of State Pietro Parolin later credited the pope with initiating the ceasefire effort.

Former Biden aide Chris Jackson accused the White House of crediting Melania while ignoring Pope Leo’s efforts.

“Pope Leo personally called Putin and Zelenskyy, pushing for a ceasefire in Ukraine,” Jackson wrote Friday on X. “Now the Trump White House is trying to give MELANIA TRUMP the credit, completely ignoring the Pope’s efforts!”

Officials on both sides of the conflict have also acknowledged the agreement. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed the ceasefire arrangement Friday and credited Melania with helping broker it.

Ukrainian human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets also confirmed the arrangement and the first lady’s mediation, while Ukrainian official Davyd Arakhamia said the agreement was the result of a longer process involving both Melania and Pope Leo.

Although the Vatican has not endorsed Melania’s assertion that the agreement would have been impossible without her intervention, it has acknowledged her efforts.

The dispute comes amid an increasingly public feud between Trump and Leo, who have clashed over the administration’s immigration policies and the war in Iran. 

The pope has repeatedly criticized the human cost of military action, while Trump has accused him of being weak on crime and foreign policy.

The feud escalated in April, when Trump attacked the pontiff on Truth Social after Leo criticized the war in Iran.

Trump also shared an AI-generated image depicting himself as Jesus Christ, drawing backlash from critics, including some Christians.

Leo responded that he was not afraid of the Trump administration and would continue speaking out for peace, insisting his message was rooted in the Gospel rather than politics. Trump refused to apologize, saying that the pope was wrong to criticize his Iran policy.