Thursday, August 06, 2026

German diocese rebukes €500 baptism scheme

An initiative by a German Catholic millionaire to offer €500 to families who baptise their child has been criticised by the Diocese of Augsburg, which says that baptism is an obligation.

The initiative, called Starnberger Schutzengelchen (“Little Starnberg Guardian Angel”), is being financed and led by investor Peter Löw.

Löw, who is based in the Starnberg area, set aside €20,000 for up to 40 baptisms in 2026.

The spokesperson for the Diocese of Augsburg said that combining the Sacrament with a financial aspect, “however well-intentioned”, leaves a “stale feeling”. 

The diocese stated that, whilst people are free to gift to others, Baptism is entitled to everyone if conditions are met.

Pope invites from Assisi: "Europe and the whole world are looking to you for new saints"

Pope Leo XIV presided over the Holy Mass for the feast of the Transfiguration of the Lord this Thursday at the Basilica of Santa Maria degli Angeli, in the Porziuncola of Assisi, together with the participants of the GO! Franciscan Youth Meeting 2026, an event organized by the Franciscan family on the occasion of the eighth centenary of the death of Saint Francis. 

The celebration marked the conclusion of the pastoral visit that the Pontiff made to the Italian city.

Taking the Gospel account of the Transfiguration as his starting point, the Pope presented this mystery as an invitation to discover in Christ the meaning of history and of one’s own vocation. 

Drawing inspiration from the example of Saint Francis and Saint Clare, he encouraged the young people to welcome the Gospel “without discounts,” to overcome “resignation and fear,” and to respond generously to God’s call.

During the homily, Leo XIV stated that the present world needs a new generation of saints capable of living the Gospel amid contemporary challenges. “Europe and the entire world are looking to you for new saints,” he affirmed, before urging the participants to go out to meet those living on the peripheries and to contribute, from faith, to building a more fraternal society.

The Pontiff linked this call to the Franciscan charism, presenting Saint Francis and Saint Clare as examples of a life transformed by Christ. 

In this context, he invited the young people to place their abilities, studies, work, and relationships at the service of peace and the dignity of every person, following the mandate contained in the meeting’s motto: «Go!».

Below we leave the complete homily of Leo XIV:

Dear brothers and sisters, dear young people!

The feast of the Transfiguration that we are celebrating is a mystery of light that helps us to deepen our encounter, so joyful, yet also filled with questions about the present and the future. 

In the Gospel account we find the contrast between light and shadow, silence and words, wonder and incomprehension. 

We are in Assisi, a city to which for centuries countless pilgrims have ascended - today we too - because here everything whispers that our life can change form, radiate light, and repair the world. 

Here began the transfiguration of Francis, of Clare, and later of thousands of other young people: they welcomed the Gospel sine glossa - we would say today: without discounts -and the life of Jesus began again in them.

We have come here to understand where history is going and where we ourselves are going. In the Gospel we see that it is possible to find meaning, to glimpse a path. Like Peter, James, and John, we too are led apart, and Jesus is with us. That is what matters: his presence. 

On the mountain, the apostles contemplate Jesus orienting himself toward his own future. On this point there had been misunderstanding among them. 

Six days earlier, Peter had reproached the Master for speaking openly of the cross (cf. Mt 16, 21-26): he expected glory for the Messiah and perhaps also for himself, without counting on resistance or risks and, above all, without asking what glory really is. 

Now, in the transfiguration of Jesus, it is God himself who reveals himself in his glory, which has the appearance of a cloud that protects and envelops. He points to the Son and invites us to listen to him. 

The path of life is discovered by following him together. Its beauty takes on a new aspect, an unprecedented intensity, to the point that Peter would like to stop time and prolong that vision. 

Generously, he offers to build three tents, as if he wanted to see the conversation between Jesus, Moses, and Elijah continue. 

But one must enter into that conversation. One cannot remain merely a spectator. 

We are called to read the Scriptures with the Master, to interpret our time, and to make decisions following his way. 

We are here to overcome resignation and fear, to dispel the doubts that also hold us back, as they held back the apostles. Jesus calls us to dialogue with his history in order to write new pages of history.

As we listen that “his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became white as light” (Mt 17:2), we think of the morning of Easter, when an angel of the Lord rolled away the stone that closed the tomb and announced the resurrection. “His appearance was like lightning, and his clothing white as snow” (Mt 28:3). 

It is the light of a new day toward which we are oriented, while around us, and sometimes also within us, darkness still reigns. We see its dawn in the canonized saints, such as Saint Francis and Saint Clare, and in a multitude of brothers and sisters who respond to evil with good. 

We are not alone! In these days you have experienced it: you have met and listened to one another, moving from the noise of dominant and opposing voices to the art of conversation. 

Today we contemplate Jesus transfiguring himself precisely in conversation with the Father, with those who preceded him, Moses and Elijah, and with his contemporaries, the disciples.

The Church exists to introduce us into this dynamism of listening and decision, in which we understand for whom to live and how to live. 

It is the community in which we learn to distinguish the voice of God, which never simply coincides with our opinions, and to dare that obedience to the Holy Spirit which made all those who accepted following Jesus bold and creative: we are disfigured when we separate ourselves from Him and from others; on the contrary, we are transfigured in the bonds that nourish life and call us to it. 

Franciscan spirituality, in which you have been formed, is one of the most attentive to restoring fundamental relationships with God and with all his creatures: a harmony that today, more than ever, we must guard and cultivate.

In this sense, at the beginning of my first Encyclical I suggested that “each generation receives as inheritance the task of giving shape to its own time: of maturing history as a place where the dignity of every person is protected, justice promoted, and fraternity made possible. 

But upon every age weighs the risk of building an inhuman and more unjust world. Where humanity is in danger of losing its face, we Christians raise our gaze to the God who became flesh, knowing that ‘only in the mystery of the Incarnate Word does the mystery of man find true light.’ 

This magnificent humanity in Jesus Christ becomes the Way, the Truth, and the Life, opening for each of us the path to grow toward fullness” (Magnifica humanitas, 1).

Dear friends, the reason why Saint Francis, eight hundred years after his death, continues to attract us lies in the magnificent humanity that led him to abandon the already traced paths in order to open a new one, more consistent with the way of Jesus. 

Even in a city already Christian for centuries, like Assisi, this seemed revolutionary. 

“The choice of Clare was even more impressive: a young woman who wanted to be like Francis, who wanted to live, as a woman, free like those brothers!” (Jubilee Audience, October 4, 2025). That is the energy of Christianity, that of its beginnings and that of its multiple rebirths.

Well then, dear young people, today Europe and the entire world are looking to you for new saints: dare to believe in the word of the Gospel, become fully human with the freedom of Jesus Christ, embrace Sister Poverty. 

The title of your meeting - Go! - is a mission, a sending forth along paths for which we have no maps, because they open by listening to the heart, obeying the Spirit, and following the Risen One where he has chosen to precede us. Go! Go! Or better still: Let us go! Let’s go! Toward the peripheries, where the injustice and arrogance of a few deny the dignity and dreams of many, of too many sons and daughters of God. 

Pope Francis, inspired by the Poverello of Assisi, warned us against the “temptation of being Christians while keeping a prudent distance from the wounds of the Lord. Jesus wants us to touch human misery, to touch the suffering flesh of others. 

He expects us to renounce seeking those personal or communal shelters that allow us to keep our distance from the core of the human drama” (Francis, Evangelii gaudium, 270).

It is possible not to be understood, even by those of one’s own household, as happened to Saint Francis. 

However, withdrawing from the culture of power and tearing down the walls that separate human beings never means betraying the family, the city, or tradition, but rather freeing them from their ghosts, from enemies invented by fear and ignorance, from the violence with which one seeks to impose one’s own limited order upon a reality that surpasses us on all sides. 

Trusting in God is rediscovering, like Francis and Clare, a world of brothers and sisters to appreciate and serve, not to exploit or dominate. Not a world to defend, but a world to embrace.

Consecrate yourselves, dear young people, to the civilization of love, whose shoots you have found in so many examples of gratuity and which transfigures - after the image of Christ- countless artisans of peace who still today serve life in the most tragic scenarios of death. 

Unite the best energies of your magnificent humanity - studies, skills, work, friendships, love, prayer - updating in various ways the vision of Francis. 

I imagine that the prayer often attributed to him, a text from the last century, is dear to you:


Lord, make me an instrument of your peace:

where there is hatred, let me bring love;

where there is offense, let me bring pardon;

where there is discord, let me bring union;

where there is error, let me bring truth;

where there is doubt, let me bring faith;

where there is despair, let me bring hope;

where there is darkness, let me bring light;

where there is sadness, let me bring joy.


Here is “where” to go! Go! But above all, here is “how” to go:


Lord, grant that I may not so much

seek to be consoled, as to console;

to be understood, as to understand;

to be loved, as to love.

For it is in giving that we receive;

it is in forgetting ourselves that we find ourselves;

it is in forgiving that we are forgiven;

and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.

Dear friends, may these days in Assisi remain engraved in your memory and may the return home, to the various countries of Europe toward which you will travel, be like the descent of Peter, James, and John from the high mountain of the Transfiguration. 

A return full of reflection, open to the future, and committed to Jesus Christ. He trusts in you, counts on you, and remains always with you.

Pope Leo XIV to young people: "The most revolutionary act today is to decide forever"

Pope Leo XIV held a dialogue this Thursday with more than 2,000 young people from various European countries gathered in Assisi for the GO! Franciscan Youth Meeting 2026, held as part of the eighth centenary of the death of Saint Francis. 

During the meeting, the Pontiff encouraged participants to face definitive commitments without fear, warning that in a society marked by provisionality, «the most revolutionary act today is to decide forever.»

This is the second visit of Leo XIV to the city of Saint Francis since the beginning of his pontificate. 

After being received by civil and ecclesiastical authorities and by the general ministers of the three branches of the Franciscan family, the Pope went to the square of Santa Maria degli Angeli. 

There, in a format already common in this type of youth meetings, he answered questions from three young people about peace, vocation, and love for the Church.

«Deciding forever» in a culture of the provisional

The Pontiff’s most extensive reflection was dedicated to the Christian vocation. 

Responding to a young man from Bologna who asked how to respond generously to God’s call in a context marked by uncertainty and fear of definitive decisions, Leo XIV stated that assuming a permanent commitment constitutes today «perhaps the most revolutionary act.»

The Pope observed that while in the past the Church constantly reminded people of the passing nature of earthly realities, today many people live with the impression that no decision should be definitive. In his view, this mentality fosters fear and the possibility of losing one’s way.

«Deciding forever does not lock us in a cage, but opens us to a greater dynamism,» he affirmed. In this sense, he explained that every vocation is a path walked together with God and that fidelity does not consist of a single response, but in renewing that «yes» every day.

Leo XIV illustrated this reflection with his own experience, recalling that he has never walked his vocational path alone. 

He pointed out that the Lord has accompanied him through concrete people and that this journey led him to respond successively to the priestly vocation, to Augustinian life, to mission, and finally to the Petrine ministry.

A call to be «artisans of peace»

Another question was asked by a young Croatian woman, who asked the Pope for advice on living Franciscan spirituality today in a society marked by divisions.

Leo XIV recalled that the region from which the young woman came had experienced a war just three decades ago in which religion became mixed with nationalism. 

In that context, he highlighted the role played for centuries by Franciscans in fostering coexistence among Catholics, Orthodox, and Muslims.

The Pontiff stated that Christians are called to become «artisans of peace» in societies where there is a temptation to instrumentalize religion to pit identities against each other. 

He also noted that the evangelical radicality of Saint Francis «is the opposite of fundamentalism,» because it leads to following Christ from humility, welcome, and closeness.

He also encouraged young people to cultivate personal encounters in an era in which, he indicated, technology can hinder direct relationships between people.

Love for the Church despite its wounds

The third intervention was dedicated to young people’s relationship with the Church. 

A Sicilian participant asked how to remain united to it when many claim to believe in God but not in the Church, due to its contradictions and internal crises.

Leo XIV acknowledged that there are people who «have not been able to experience the Church as Jesus Christ wants it to be» and admitted that this reality can leave wounds, cause disillusionment, and even become an obstacle to faith.

At the same time, he recalled that Christ’s desire was to gather a people in which divisions among men would be overcome, and stated that the renewal of the Church comes through listening to the Word of God, celebrating the sacraments, and practicing charity.

Evoking the mandate given to Saint Francis, »Go and repair my Church», the Pope affirmed that this task remains open and that it is up to all the baptized to participate in it from their own vocation. 

In this context, he invited young people to speak of the Church «with the affection with which one speaks of a mother,» recognizing that it is in her that Christ continues to make himself present and accompany the faithful.

The meeting concluded with the Pope’s blessing to the participants of the GO! Franciscan Youth Meeting 2026, organized by the Franciscan family on the occasion of the eighth centenary of the death of Saint Francis of Assisi.

Syrian Christians suspend religious festivities due to arrests and the kidnapping of community members

The Greco-Orthodox, Syriac-Orthodox and Melkite Greek-Catholic communities of the Syrian city of Sednaya, one of the country’s main historical centers of Christianity, have suspended all public celebrations planned for the major religious festivals in August and September in protest against the detention of several Christian youths, the abduction of community members and the deterioration of security in the locality.

The decision was announced in a joint statement signed by the parish councils of the three Churches, which denounce the continuation of what they consider arbitrary detentions, the lack of information on the whereabouts of several abducted persons and the increase in threats against the city’s Christians. 

Until this situation is resolved, celebrations will be limited to liturgical acts inside the churches.

They denounce detentions without legal basis

In the communiqué, the parish councils express their “deep concern” over the situation of several young people from Sednaya who remain detained despite efforts made before the authorities and promises that they would be released.

According to them, no evidence has so far been presented to justify their imprisonment, nor has the legal basis for the detentions been explained.

The organization Christian Solidarity International (CSI), which has followed the case in recent months, notes that the Syrian authorities attribute to some of these youths an alleged involvement in a massacre of jihadist fighters. 

However, the Christian communities maintain that these accusations remain unproven and demand their immediate release.

Abductions, checkpoints and threats

The parish councils also denounce several cases of abduction of local residents and demand that the missing persons return to their homes, that those responsible be identified and brought to justice.

They also cite the restrictions imposed at the Jdeidet Yabous border crossing between Syria and Lebanon, where, according to the statement, Sednaya residents are subjected to prolonged checks and procedures they describe as humiliating.

The document further denounces an increase in thefts and a campaign of incitement, defamation and threats against the city’s Christians on social media.

Major Christian festivities suspended

As a protest measure, the three communities have decided to cancel all public events related to the upcoming religious festivities, including the Transfiguration of the Lord, the feast of Our Lady of Sednaya, the Exaltation of the Holy Cross and the celebration of Saint Sophia.

The parishes specify that the suspension will remain in effect until the detainees are released, the abducted return and the proceedings they consider unjustified against several local youths are dropped.

They also reiterate that any reconciliation process will only be possible on the basis of justice, citizenship and respect for human rights.

An exceptional measure in one of Syria’s main Christian centers

Located about 30 kilometers north of Damascus, Sednaya houses some of the most important Christian monasteries and shrines in the Middle East, including the monastery of Our Lady of Sednaya, one of the country’s main pilgrimage sites.

The festivities now suspended are among the most significant religious events on the local calendar and usually bring together numerous pilgrims from different regions of Syria and neighboring countries. 

The decision to cancel all public celebrations represents an exceptional measure that reflects the concern of the Christian communities over the security situation they have been denouncing for months.

A Church without a tongue: more and more cardinals no longer master the language of the Church (Contribution)

More than two-thirds of cardinals would now barely master Latin. 

What at first glance sounds like a marginal note for classical philologists could, in reality, reveal one of the deepest crises in the Catholic Church. 

For whoever loses the language in which faith, liturgy, and canon law were formulated for centuries ultimately also loses immediate access to their own tradition.

Italian Vatican correspondent Francesco Capozza of the newspaper Il Tempo has concluded, after months of investigation, that more than 65 percent of the current College of Cardinals lack appreciable knowledge of Latin. 

Those who know Capozza know that he does not usually make sensational claims lightly. For many years he has been considered one of Italy’s best-informed Vatican observers, whose assessments are often confirmed. 

His diagnosis points to a problem that has been brewing in the Church for decades and whose consequences are now difficult to ignore.

This is not at all about romantic nostalgia for a supposedly glorious past, nor about the preference of lovers of classical liturgy. 

It is a much more fundamental question: can a Church preserve its unity when its highest representatives no longer master the language in which its theology, its canon law, and its magisterium were formulated for centuries?

An immutable truth protected by an immutable language

Latin has never been for the Catholic Church a mere historical relic. It is, properly speaking, its official language. 

For nearly two thousand years, papal legislative texts, canon law, and numerous magisterial documents have been promulgated in their binding form in Latin. 

And for good reason: a language that no longer changes preserves the precision of theological concepts better than any modern vehicular language. 

Its words are not subject to the ideological and social shifts to which living languages are constantly exposed. 

Precisely for this reason, Latin is especially suited to expressing truths with precision and durability.

Pope John XXIII formulated this with remarkable clarity in his Apostolic Constitution Veterum Sapientia. 

Latin, he said, is a language that by its dignity, stability, and universality is particularly suited to making visible the unity of the Church. 

It belongs, so to speak, to the very essence of a universal Church, because it does not privilege any nation and is equally open to all the faithful. 

It is also notable that this conviction was not at all overturned by the Second Vatican Council. On the contrary. 

In the constitution on the liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, it is expressly stated that the use of the Latin language must be preserved in the Latin rites. 

At the same time, the Council required that clerics be trained to understand Latin texts well and to use them appropriately. 

The conciliar fathers, therefore, did not intend to banish Latin from the life of the Church. Rather, they took for granted that every priest and every bishop would master this language.

Direct access to the sources of the faith, almost impossible

All the more astonishing is the development of recent decades. In numerous seminaries, Latin today plays only a marginal role. 

Many candidates for the priesthood encounter this language, at most, in introductory courses, without ever acquiring the ability to read ecclesiastical documents or the Church Fathers in their original language. 

With this, not only is a piece of classical formation lost: above all, immediate access to the sources of the Catholic faith fades away.

For theology lives on precise concepts. 

Saint Thomas Aquinas already knew that a small conceptual shift can have far-reaching consequences for the understanding of a doctrine. 

Concepts such as gratia, persona, substantia, natura, or caritas can only be rendered approximately in modern languages. 

Every translation necessarily already contains an interpretation. 

That is why the Church has always drafted its binding texts in a language whose meanings remain stable over the centuries.

The relevance of this problem became evident precisely with the first encyclical of Pope Leo XIV. 

For the first time, a magisterial document of this importance was not published from an original Latin text, but appeared directly in various modern-language versions. 

It may seem practical, but it raises considerable questions. 

Shortly after its publication, discussions already arose around central concepts, for example where it speaks of “humanity.” 

What exactly is meant? 

The biological species? 

The human family? 

The totality of all human beings? Or the common human nature on which natural law is founded? The different linguistic versions suggest different emphases. 

A binding original Latin text would at least have created an unequivocal hermeneutical point of reference.

Expression of the Church’s catholicity

Precisely in an age in which fundamental anthropological concepts are increasingly pressured by gender ideologies, transhumanism, and technological developments, conceptual precision is not a secondary academic question. 

It determines how the Church’s statements are understood and what consequences are drawn from them. 

Pope Benedict XVI repeatedly insisted that the Church can only preserve its identity if it keeps alive the memory of its own tradition. 

In his exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis he expressly recalled that priests and faithful should also know the most important liturgical texts in Latin. 

For Benedict, Latin was not an end in itself, but an expression of the Church’s catholicity, of its unity across times, cultures, and nations.

A language that belongs to all Catholics

In this light, Capozza’s words appear as a wake-up call. 

A Church whose highest dignitaries no longer master its own official language loses an essential instrument of its theological self-understanding. 

It becomes more dependent on translations, on national linguistic spheres, on diverse theological schools, and ultimately also on the currents of each era. 

And yet, precisely in Latin resides a freedom that is often overlooked today. 

Unlike English, it is not the language of a global political or economic power. 

It does not belong exclusively to any people. An African, Asian, American, or European bishop meets the other on the same linguistic ground. 

That is why Latin was never an expression of cultural superiority, but precisely the bond of a universal Church.

Perhaps the time has come to reread the warning of John XXIII. He was convinced that the Church does not gain its future by renouncing its traditions, but by rediscovering their enduring value. That also applies to its language. 

For whoever loses the language of the Church ultimately loses much more than vocabulary and grammar: they lose immediate access to a spiritual treasure that has shaped Western thought for nearly two millennia. 

And a Church that only knows its sources second-hand runs the risk of one day being unable to raise its own voice in an unmistakable way.

León XIV is not Francis: the difference that marks the Church in Argentina ahead of the Pope's visit

Argentina will once again receive a Pope after nearly four decades. 

The apostolic visit that Leo XIV will make from November 8 to 11 will carry a significance that goes far beyond the return of a Pontiff to the country. 

It will be the first time that the successor of Peter visits Argentina after the pontificate of Francis, the first Argentine Pope in history, who never returned to his homeland during his twelve years of Petrine ministry.

Precisely that circumstance seems to set the tone with which the Church in Argentina is preparing for the trip. 

The first statements from the bishops of the three dioceses that will receive the Pontiff—Buenos Aires, Córdoba, and Mercedes-Luján—reveal a striking common denominator: the insistence on presenting Leo XIV with his own identity and avoiding that his visit be reduced to a permanent comparison with Francis. 

All this is happening, moreover, amid a progressive decline in religious practice in a deeply polarized society.

Forty years later, a very different Church

The last visit of a Pope to Argentina was that of Saint John Paul II in 1987. Since then, not only has Argentine society changed profoundly; the Church itself has as well.

During the years of Francis’s pontificate, the Argentine episcopate underwent a profound renewal through numerous episcopal appointments and a reorganization of the country’s pastoral structure. 

Leo XIV will therefore encounter a Church largely shaped during the pontificate of his predecessor.

However, that renewal of structures has coexisted with a very different evolution of the main indicators of ecclesial life. 

Religious practice continues to decline, sacramental baptisms and marriages maintain a downward trend, and the crisis of priestly and religious vocations remains one of the country’s major pastoral challenges.

Religious identification also reflects this change. According to a study by the Pew Research Center published this year, the percentage of Argentines who identify as Catholic dropped from 71% in 2014 to 58% in 2024, one of the sharpest declines recorded in Latin America over the past decade.

Aware of this context, the Argentine Episcopal Conference has sought to place the visit on an eminently spiritual plane. 

In the letter sent to the Pontiff after the official announcement of the trip, the bishops express their “deep joy and sincere gratitude” and describe his decision as “a true gift from God” and “an eloquent sign of his closeness as the Successor of Peter.”

They also express their hope that the Holy Father’s presence “will renew the communion of our Church, strengthen the faith of our communities,” and help continue building a society based “on the culture of encounter, dialogue, and service to the common good.”

A particularly complex political and social scenario

Leo XIV will also arrive in an Argentina marked by deep political polarization, an economy still facing significant social tensions, and a public debate where confrontation has often become the dominant tone. 

This context explains why the Church is paying special attention to the development of the apostolic journey and trying to preserve its strictly pastoral character.

The Archbishop of Mercedes-Luján, Jorge Eduardo Scheinig, acknowledged that many dioceses would have liked to receive the Pontiff, but he reminded that the trip must be understood as a visit to the entire nation, beyond the cities included in the itinerary.

“We would have liked the Pope to stay much longer and take him everywhere,” he said, while expressing the desire that “the entire people of God feel invited.”

Scheinig also highlighted that Leo XIV knows the Latin American reality in depth thanks to the years he lived in Peru and his leadership of the Order of Saint Augustine, an experience that, in his view, will facilitate especially close communication with Argentines.

The country Francis never visited now receives Leo XIV

Precisely in a scenario so conditioned by political polarization and by the weight that the figure of Francis continues to have in Argentine public life, the bishops of the dioceses that will receive Leo XIV seem to have assumed a common priority from the very announcement of the trip: to prevent the visit from being reduced to an exercise in comparison between the two pontificates or to a partisan reading. 

Their first public interventions point to presenting the new Pontiff from his own identity and ministry.

The first to mark that difference was the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Jorge García Cuerva.

“The successor of Peter is coming, not the successor of Francis,” he stated in remarks to TN, inviting people to avoid letting the visit be conditioned by a permanent comparison between the two pontificates.

The archbishop added that Leo XIV “is foreign to Argentine domestic politics and partisanship” and expressed confidence that his message “will challenge us all,” precisely because it cannot be read through the categories of the so-called Argentine “divide.”

Likewise, Cardinal Ángel Rossi, Archbishop of Córdoba, insists on a very similar idea.

“He doesn’t have to be a clone of Francis,” he declared, emphasizing that the new Pontiff has his own personality, even while maintaining continuity in the Church’s mission.

Rossi described the confirmation of the visit as “an immense joy” for the faithful of Córdoba and recalled that the Holy See will still determine the specific events Leo XIV will preside over during his stay in the province.

Beyond the event

Leo XIV’s visit will concentrate the attention of all Argentina for a few days and will likely mobilize hundreds of thousands of faithful. 

However, experience advises distinguishing between the immediate impact of an apostolic journey and its real fruits. 

The Pontiff’s visit to Spain last June confirmed the extent to which an event of this nature can be surrounded by excessive expectations, interested narratives, and attempts at political appropriation that ultimately eclipse its authentic pastoral meaning.

The true dimension of this trip will not be measured by institutional photographs or attendance figures, but by its capacity to leave a lasting fruit in the life of the Church in Argentina, far from circumstantial narratives and the permanent comparison with the pontificate of Francis.

Aveline explains the rise in adult baptisms: "We prepared the door; they came in through the window"

While France continues to be one of the most secularized countries in Europe, the Church has witnessed for several years a phenomenon that is as unexpected as it is hopeful: the steady growth of adults requesting Baptism. 

The president of the French Episcopal Conference, Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, has now offered some keys to understanding this awakening of faith in an interview granted to the Italian newspaper Avvenire, in which he invites the Church to look at this phenomenon with humility and without falling into self-complacency.

The figures show a sustained trend. If three years ago there were about 15,000 adults who began the catechumenate, the following year they rose to 17,000 and in 2025 they reached 21,000. Forecasts for 2026 point to further growth, which leads the Archbishop of Marseille to affirm that “this is not a flash in the pan.”

“We prepared the door; they came in through the window”

Far from presenting these data as the result of a particularly effective pastoral strategy, Aveline considers that they constitute a wake-up call for the Church itself.

“There is a temptation to feel proud of these figures, even comparing ourselves between dioceses to see who has more or fewer catechumens. It is something human,” he acknowledges. 

However, he adds that the best remedy against that temptation is to accept that “we have prepared the way to the door; they have come in through the window.”

With this image, the cardinal wants to express that many of the new catechumens have not followed the traditional paths of evangelization, but have come to the faith through unexpected routes that the Church must listen to and understand.

The wounds of life are often the beginning

According to Aveline, those who today knock on the Church’s doors share some common traits. The first is usually a painful experience that changes the course of their lives.

“A bereavement, an illness, a family drama or a personal disappointment” awaken questions that until then remained dormant and open the search for a deeper meaning of existence.

This is often accompanied by the encounter with young believers who live their faith naturally. “It is a very discreet presence,” explains the cardinal, but capable of sparking conversations and accompaniment that recall, in his words, “the Acts of the Apostles and the beginnings of the Church.”

The example of Muslims also challenges us

One of the most striking aspects of the interview is the reference to the role played by some Muslim friends in the journey of certain catechumens.

Aveline explains that many young people discover the seriousness with which their peers live prayer or Ramadan and then begin to wonder what it really means to be Christian.

“Not knowing how to respond, they search the Internet for the most basic questions,” he states. 

That search eventually leads some to a parish or a Christian community, where they begin their preparation to receive Baptism.

An open church and a silence that speaks

The president of the French episcopate also recounts the testimony of a person who, for years, passed by a church every day on the way to work. 

One day he decided to go in.

“In that silence he found the peace he was looking for,” recalls the cardinal. From then on, he began to stop every day, got to know the parish community and eventually began his journey toward the faith.

For Aveline, these testimonies show that evangelization often continues to take place through simple encounters and personal experiences that no pastoral plan can fully foresee.

“The mission of the Church is to cooperate with the Holy Spirit”

The cardinal concludes that this phenomenon constitutes a call to humility for the entire Church. “Let us never forget that the mission of the Church is to cooperate with the Holy Spirit, who always surprises us precisely when we make all our plans,” he affirms.

For the cardinal, this phenomenon is also a call to strengthen the life of Christian communities and formation in the faith, so that the initial enthusiasm of those who discover Christ can be translated into a lasting commitment. 

“Strong links must be created between faith and life,” he concludes, convinced that only in this way will it be possible to consolidate the numerous conversions that the French Church is witnessing today with hope.

Archbishop of Tangier dismantles the myth of Europe as a paradise for thousands of young Moroccans

The invasion experienced in recent days on the border between Morocco and Ceuta has revealed the permeability of Europe’s southern border. 

After several days have passed, the Archbishop of Tangier, Monsignor Emilio Rocha Grande, analyzes in an interview with Vatican News, the causes of this phenomenon and warns of the mirage that leads thousands of young Moroccans to risk their lives to reach European territory.

«Morocco is not a poor country, in the sense that people are dying of hunger. It is a country in full growth, but that economic growth does not benefit everyone, especially many young people», explains the prelate. 

In his view, that frustration combines with the idealized image many have of the European continent.

«Europe currently represents a paradise for many of them», he states. 

According to him, that perception is fueled both by social media and by the emigrants themselves who return temporarily to Morocco during vacations and convey an image of success that does not always correspond to reality.

The archbishop acknowledges that most of those who managed to cross to Ceuta have already returned to Morocco, but he recalls that the tragedy continues for numerous families. 

«Many have no information: they do not know whether their relatives are alive or dead», he laments.

Rocha explains that the Church in Morocco tried to respond to the emergency by offering water and food, although he acknowledges that «the crisis was so severe and occurred in such a short time that the resources we can make available are limited».

The prelate also welcomed with satisfaction the words spoken by Leo XIV after the Angelus last Sunday, when the Pope called for addressing this situation from the perspective of peace, stability, and justice. «We receive them as prophetic words», he affirms.

For the archbishop, the solution lies in abandoning the political instrumentalization of immigration. «Migrants, like those who do not migrate, are not objects of political or ideological trade», he states.

At the same time, he directs a clear message to young Moroccans tempted by irregular emigration:

«Morocco is a country where one can live, where one can work. Do not let yourselves be carried away by the illusions spread by the media and social networks, which present Europe as a paradise on earth».

Finally, Monsignor Rocha maintains that Europe and Morocco must strengthen their cooperation to promote legal channels of mobility and foster the development of Africa, but he insists that any migration policy must be based on an inalienable principle: «The person must be at the center», because «each person is a child of God, deeply loved by the Lord».

Pontiff's effigy returns to Vatican coins after Francis' interlude

The Pope’s face returns to Vatican coins. 

The Governorate of the Vatican City State presented this Monday, August 3, the first euro series of the pontificate of Leo XIV, which restores the pontiff’s effigy after nine years of absence. 

The decision reverses the order given by Francis in 2017, when he requested that his face disappear from Vatican mintings and be replaced by his papal coat of arms.

Effigy and coat of arms, alternated by denomination

The new set, the sixth Vatican euro series since 2002, introduces an unprecedented formula: the profile of Leo XIV appears on the higher-value coins - 10, 20 and 50 cents, 1 euro and 2 euros, while the 1, 2 and 5 cent pieces bear the Pontiff’s coat of arms. 

According to the Governorate, the goal is «to celebrate the beginning of the pontificate of Leo XIV through a singular artistic language that unites tradition and innovation.»

The 2-euro coin highlights the distinctive elements of the papal emblem: the lily, symbol of purity and Marian devotion, and the flaming heart pierced by an arrow over an open book, sign of Augustinian spirituality and the power of the Word of God.

A coin dedicated to the «spoliazione» of Saint Francis

The collection is presented in Brilliant Uncirculated quality in two formats: the eight-coin regular set (face value of 3.88 euros) and an expanded version with a bimetallic 5-euro piece dedicated to the VIII centenary of the death of Saint Francis of Assisi (1226-2026), raising the total face value to 8.88 euros.

The obverse of this 5-euro coin shows the portrait of Leo XIV with the legend «LEONE XIV PP. ANNO II MMXXVI». 

The reverse depicts the spoliazione: the moment when the saint of Assisi publicly strips off his garments and renounces material goods to give himself completely to God. 

The design and modeling are by Daniela Fusco and the engraving by Silvia Ciucci.

A graphic identity for the new pontificate

The presentation case reproduces the papal coat of arms in relief, with a carved plaster effect, on an ivory background, with inscriptions in deep blue: the two colors of the heraldic fields of Leo XIV’s coat of arms. 

The Governorate has confirmed that this combination will also be used in future numismatic issues, creating a visual identity specific to the pontificate.

The 2026 numismatic program also includes two commemorative 2-euro coins — one dedicated to the Magisterium of Leo XIV and another to the IV centenary of the consecration of St. Peter’s Basilica, as well as a Proof-quality set accompanied by a 20-euro silver coin and a 50-euro gold coin dedicated to «Leo XIV – Year II».

From John Paul II to Leo XIV

The first Vatican euro series (2002-2005) bore the effigy of John Paul II; the second (2005-2006) corresponded to the Sede Vacante; the third (2006-2013) showed the face of Benedict XVI; and the fourth (2014-2016), that of Francis, until the Argentine Pontiff ordered in 2017 to withdraw his image in favor of his coat of arms, inaugurating the fifth series. 

With Leo XIV, the papal effigy returns to the coins of the world’s smallest state, minted, as always, by the Italian mint in Rome.

Wednesday, August 05, 2026

Australian bishop testifies for prosecution in former Broome bishop’s abuse trial

An Australian bishop has appeared in court as a witness for the prosecution in the trial of the former head of the neighboring diocese on charges of sexual abuse.

Bishop Michael Morrissey of the Diocese of Geraldton appeared in court to give evidence in the trial of Bishop Christopher Saunders, the former leader of the Diocese of Broome on Monday, August 4, in Perth, Western Australia.

Bishop Saunders led the Broome diocese from 1996 until 2021, when he stepped down citing “ill health” amid allegations of grooming and sexual abuse of young Aboriginal men. 

He has since been charges with 19 counts of sexual abuse, as well as pleading guilty to multiple firearms charges last year.

On Monday, Bishop Morrissey was called as a witness by prosecutors and answered questions on “Integrity in Ministry,” a document first issued in 2004 by the Australian bishops’ conference outlining principles and standards for clergy in the country.

Morrissey was specifically asked about the allegations that Saunders used alcohol as a means of grooming and assaulting young men and minors. While Morrissey said he could conceive of offering some kind of pastoral contact in informal situations “over a beer,” he would never provide “pastoral care” to someone who appeared to be intoxicated, nor involve alcohol in a one-on-one pastoral setting, WAToday reported.

It is believed to be the first occasion a serving diocesan bishop has appeared as a witness for the prosecution in the criminal trial of another bishop charged with sexual abuse. 

After Saunders stepped down from ministry, Morrissey was appointed apostolic administrator of the Broome diocese until Saunders’ successor was appointed in 2025.

Lawyers for Saunders argued that even though the document was issued by the bishops’ conference, of which he was a member at the time of the allegations, it did not represent a binding “one-size-fits-all” code of conduct. The bishop denies all criminal charges.

Lead prosecutor Adam Ebell had previously told the trial that Saunders was sexually attracted to Aboriginal males and invited them to “alcohol-fueled” parties at Church properties across the state’s Kimberley region.

The prosecutor said the dress code at the parties was “shirts off” and there was a “seemingly endless supply of alcohol and cigarettes,” bought using Church funds.

The prosecutor alleged that Saunders used boxing and wrestling as a “subterfuge” to engage in physical contact with the young men.

Most of the charges reportedly concern one alleged victim, who was 16 when the claimed sexual contact began and 19 when it ended. According to the prosecutor, the young man “felt shame” at what had occurred but “felt like he could not say no.”

Saunders is also accused of committing offenses against a 24-year-old man and another man who was in his late teens. 

The jury heard that additional men would give evidence about their encounters with Saunders, though these encounters did not result in charges.

The court has also been shown surveillance footage of Saunders, covertly recorded at his home in Broome in 2024. 

The footage, which did not lead to any charges, reportedly showed Saunders and another man shirtless and drinking, resting their feet on each other’s laps.

Also in court on Monday to appear for the prosecution was Saunders’ former assistant Cherrille Quilty, who told the trial that she was tasked by the bishop with processing for purchase cell phones and alcohol running into the thousands of dollars, allegedly used as gifts for young men.

In a 2024 interview with The Pillar, Quilty said that she was among the first to raise a criminal complaint against the bishop, whom she also accused of abusive bullying as an employer.

She also said that there was “a list of names on the wall in the secretary’s office with victims, potential victims, and their bank account details,” and that “was ostensibly for the payment of men who had done ‘odd jobs’ for the bishop.”

“It wasn’t for odd jobs, I can tell you that now,” she told The Pillar. “It was hush money. One of the first victims that came forward was the one that I paid most frequently and it was to shut him up.”

“You didn’t dare ask why [Saunders] was paying them. Didn’t dare. He wasn’t the sort of person you would ever cross or ask him anything… And he would make me drop whatever I was doing to go to the bank, get petty cash out, go to the bank, and bank that money immediately.”

Saunders formally resigned from office as bishop of the Broome diocese in 2021 after stepping back from governance of the diocese in 2020, after accusations surfaced that he had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of Church funds on gifts for vulnerable young men, including cash, phones, alcohol, and travel.

The bishop was arrested and charged after a second police investigation was opened in 2024 into accusations against Saunders. 

That investigation followed a previous police inquiry, closed in 2021, which filed no charges for lack of evidence, but the case was reopened after law enforcement authorities were given a copy of the results of an internal Church investigation conducted under the norms of Vos estis lux mundi.

Previous statements from the Australian Catholic Bishops’ Conference have said that Saunders’ case is before the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome and he is charged with “alleged canonical crimes, as defined by Vos estis lux mundi, and alleged breaches of the Church’s Integrity in Ministry protocols.”

Leaked portions of the report produced by the Church’s investigation, which triggered the renewed police action against the bishop last year, identified a pattern of behavior by Saunders consistent with grooming dozens of young men over a period of decades.

According to media reports on the leaked text, one man told Vatican-commissioned investigators that Saunders had employed him to do gardening work at his residence and offered him the use of his shower afterwards. According to the alleged victim, the bishop then climbed into the shower with him.

“I was scared. He was a big fella and I was just a teenager at the time,” he told investigators, and that the bishop subsequently started showering him with gifts of cash, phones, cigarettes and alcohol.

Another man testified that Saunders threw so-called “bunga bunga parties,” to which only male guests were invited and at which he saw the bishop ask attendees to strip, and kiss and grope young guests.

“The bishop has been variously described by witnesses as … a sexual predator that seeks to prey upon vulnerable Aboriginal men and boys,” the report said.

But the bishops’ conference also claimed initially that the investigation into Saunder did not identify any alleged or potential victims under the age of 18, even while Saunders has now been criminally charged with multiple sexual offenses against a person under 18.

Following his resignation and the opening of the Vos estis investigation, Saunders was ordered by the Vatican to reside outside the diocese, a directive he ignored, continuing to live in a Church-owned house in Broome and to exercise considerable influence over diocesan affairs. 

By December 2023, Saunders was still listed as the “responsible person” for nine Catholic charities in his former diocese, several of which are affiliated with local parishes.

The Broome diocese covers the Kimberley and Pilbara regions of the sparsely populated state of Western Australia, serving around 15,000 Catholics out of a total population of 44,000 people.

Bishop Timothy Norton, S.V.D., was installed as the new Bishop of Broome on Dec. 4, 2024.

Australian media said Norton stressed that the Broome diocese would continue to cooperate with police amid an ongoing investigation.

“Accordingly, no further comment will be made regarding the former bishop of Broome until such time as all legal proceedings are concluded,” he said.

“The protection of children and adults at risk remains our highest priority. We encourage anyone who has experienced abuse, or suspects abuse within the community, to come forward and report it to police.”

The Wandering Bishops (Opinion)

Immediately after the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) consecrated four new bishops in an Alpine meadow next to its seminary at Écône, Switzerland, it received a personal message from the pope. 

But, from the Society’s point of view, it was the wrong message: All Lefebvrists would remain excommunicated until they renounced their heretical doctrines.

Also, it was the wrong pope—not Leo XIV but Peter III of the Palmarian Catholic Church in Palmar de Troya, Andalusia, which his followers believe is the new Holy See. 

Their “Vatican” is the gigantic Cathedral-Basilica of Our Crowned Mother of Palmar, whose domes and towers are surrounded by fortified walls topped with barbed wire.

In a statement reported by the Ad Vaticanum website, Pope Peter, the Swiss-born Joseph Odermatt, said he wished to “address all Catholic faithful who are wandering through the spiritual desert after witnessing the collapse and the general excommunication of the followers of Marcel Lefebvre.” 

As he explained, the SSPX had been excommunicated decades ago by Gregory XVII.

There has, of course, never been a Catholic pope with that name. Odermatt was referring to the founder of the Palmarians, Clemente Domínguez y Gómez (1946–2005), a Spanish office clerk and alleged Marian visionary who rejected Vatican II, had himself illicitly ordained bishop, and then assumed the title of pope. 

He is not to be confused with another “Pope Gregory XVII,” the French-Canadian Gaston Tremblay, who ruled a sect called the Apostles of Infinite Love in Quebec from 1968 until his death in 2011.

It goes without saying that no one in the SSPX cares what Peter III, or any other antipope, thinks about their canonical status. 

The history of the Palmarian Catholic Church is riddled with criminal behavior that stands in sharp contrast to the austere discipline of the Society. 

Why, then, does the subject of the Palmarians touch a raw nerve with the SSPX? 

Why do Lefebvrists on social media respond so furiously to any mention of the Andalusian “Holy See”?

The truth is that, having carried out consecrations that excommunicated all six of its bishops, the SSPX has moved closer to the ecosystem of episcopi vagantes or “wandering bishops.” 

For centuries, and especially since the fractures created by the First Vatican Council, there have been independent prelates with more or less valid Catholic orders. 

They consecrate and excommunicate each other, their lines of succession becoming ever more entangled as they form and dissolve minuscule denominations, some of which have more bishops than priests and more clergy than laity.

A new episcopus vagans was created as recently as July 25 this year, when Fr. Michael Mary, founder of the Transalpine Redemptorists (FSSR), which was associated with the SSPX before reconciling and then breaking with Rome, was ordained bishop on Papa Stronsay, an island in the Orkneys. The consecrator was Pierre Roy, a Québécois sedevacantist bishop. 

The FSSR Oratory is tiny; rarely can so much silk and lace have been crammed into such a small space.

It was a scene worthy of the heyday of wandering bishops in the early twentieth century. Their pretensions are hilariously described in Peter Anson’s classic study Bishops at Large, which devotes a chapter to Arnold Harris Mathew (1852–1919), self-styled Earl of Landaff and Count Povoleri, an English Catholic priest who left to become a Unitarian and then an Anglo-Catholic curate. 

Mathew was consecrated bishop by the Old Catholics of Utrecht before adopting the titles of Metropolitan of the Western Orthodox Church, Ancient Catholic Archbishop of London, and Patriarch of the Old Roman Catholic Church. 

He ordained an unknown number of bishops and priests; many formed their own denominations, including the theosophical Liberal Catholic Church, which believes in reincarnation.

The dozens of sects created via the “Mathew succession” illustrate the tendency of schismatic consecrations to spin out of control. 

The SSPX, however, is by any standards a special case. It maintains that the Vatican has breached canon law by declaring it schismatic. Its official line is that its bishops must not be confused with sedevacantist episcopi vagantes.

The reality is considerably more messy. Bishop Roy is a former Lefebvrist priest. So is America’s most prominent sedevacantist prelate, Bishop Donald Sanborn, who was rector of the SSPX seminary in Michigan before breaking away to form the Society of St. Pius V (SSPV). 

He is now superior general of the Roman Catholic Institute (RCI) in Reading, Pennsylvania, whose dictatorial style has earned it the nickname “Crazy Church” among ex-members. 

Sanborn is what is known as a “Thuc-line” bishop. 

He and his SSPV colleague, the late Bishop Daniel Dolan, were ordained into the episcopal succession established in the 1970s by the sedevacantist Monsignor Ngo Dinh Thuc, former Catholic Archbishop of Hué, Vietnam, and the older brother of the assassinated South Vietnamese president Ngo Dinh Diem. 

Meanwhile, another ex-Lefebvrist priest, Michael Kelly, rejecting Thuc, was consecrated by a first-generation Catholic bishop from Puerto Rico.

Until this point, there was no “Lefebvre line” of episcopi vagantes. That is no longer true. One of the bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre at Écône in 1988 was the late Richard Williamson. 

After expulsion from the SSPX in 2012, he consecrated five bishops to serve the so-called “SSPX Resistance,” a loosely organized group of Lefebvrist hardliners who, while not formally repudiating Pope Leo XIV, might be described as “sedevacantist-adjacent.”

Williamson was an infamous Holocaust denier; one can readily understand why the SSPX prefers not to discuss him, and also plays down the Lefebvrist connections of so many sedevacantist episcopal entrepreneurs. 

But why should it recoil from mention of the Palmarian Catholic Church? 

The history of this sect is unbelievably grotesque; in terms of doctrinal orthodoxy it is at the other end of the schismatic spectrum from the SSPX. Yet from the Society’s point of view there is an awkward plot twist. 

When the alleged apparitions of the Virgin began at Palmar in 1968, Clemente Domínguez became their main interpreter. He founded a quasi-Carmelite order and was given funds by a gullible baroness to build the Palmarian cathedral. 

After becoming a bishop in 1975, he was involved in a car accident that necessitated the removal of his eyeballs.

Declaring himself Supreme Pontiff in 1978, the blind “Pope Gregory the Very Great” imposed extreme asceticism on his followers while embracing personal debauchery. 

Enemies accused him of being incapably drunk while he was carried aloft by gorgeously vested clergy whom he would consecrate bishop at the drop of a hat. 

Palmarian ceremonies might last for hours or, alternatively, five minutes: A truncated version of the Tridentine Mass boiled it down to 117 Latin words. 

Gregory XVII was succeeded by the self-styled Pope Peter II, Manuel Alonso Corral, who died in 2011, and by Ginés Jesús Hernández, who, as Pope Gregory XVIII from 2011 to 2016, modeled himself on General Franco (a canonized Palmarian saint alongside, implausibly, Paul VI, who is venerated as a martyr drugged by Freemasons). 

But the Palmarians regard Hernández as an antipope rather than as a pope emeritus, and with good reason. 

After suddenly abdicating, he claimed that the Palmarian church was “all a hoax from the beginning.” 

In June 2018 he and his new wife broke into the cathedral-basilica, allegedly attacked a Palmarian bishop with a hammer, and were later both convicted of armed robbery and assault.

None of which would have happened if Domínguez had not been made a bishop by none other than Archbishop Thuc. 

According to Professor Magnus Lundberg of Uppsala University, an authority on fringe Catholicism, this is where the story of the Palmarians intersects with that of the Lefebvrists. 

Lundberg writes that in 1975 individual members of the SSPX “seem to have been attracted by the antimodernist messages from Palmar.” 

He cites Noël Barbara, a French sedevacantist priest who claimed that “Lefebvre did not want to go to Palmar de Troya, but suggested that they should approach Archbishop Thuc instead.” 

This may or may not be true; what we do know is that Thuc was taken to Palmar by Maurice Revaz, who taught canon law at Écône.

The Society of St. Pius X has maintained that its dispute with Rome is confined to aspects of the Second Vatican Council and the liturgy it inspired. 

Yet such protestations ring increasingly hollow in the light of what appears to be the growing influence of anti-Vatican hardliners inside the Society. 

Moreover, they take no account of the further rebellions facilitated by Lefebvre, without whom there would have been no SSPV, RCI, SSPX Resistance, and - if Barbara is to be believed - no Disneyland-baroque cathedral-basilica shimmering like a mirage in the fields of Andalusia.

Making sense of all this is not easy. There is a fine line between drawing attention to the surprising number of episcopi vagantes who were at some point associated with the SSPX and unfairly attributing guilt by association.

In the conclusion to Bishops at Large, Anson writes that once you stray off the beaten track into the ecclesiastical forest, “It is hard to distinguish the wood from the trees, even more to memorize the names of its galaxy of fauna and flora. One almost despairs of disentangling the infinite ramifications of splinter-churches . . .”

Six decades later most of those churches have vanished, but it is in the nature of freelance consecrations that disappearing sects are supplanted by rivals that anathematize each other. 

For observers, this is the stuff of comedy—Monty Python’s People’s Front of Judea vs. the Judean People’s Front and the Judean Popular People’s Front. 

Unfortunately, it is also in the nature of these consecrations that they attract psychologically damaged men under whose autocephalous rule devotees are bullied or sexually abused.

Pope Leo is aware of this - and, also, that some responsibility for such abuses lies with dissident bishops who, however lofty their intentions, pass on episcopal orders in defiance of the Church. 

Hence, perhaps, the unusual severity of his reminder to the SSPX that “to tear the seamless garment of Christ is a sin of extreme gravity.”

Clerical Changes 2026 - Clonfert

This morning Bishop Michael appointed Fr Pat Conroy PP Ballinakill and Derrybrien to minister simultaneously as Parish Priest of Woodford and Looscaun effective 31 August 2026.

Our sincere thanks to Father Pat for his generosity in accepting this new additional ministry. May God bless him into the future. 

Our thanks also to Fr Kieran O Rourke for his many years of dedicated service to the Parish of Woodford and Looscaun. 

We pray God's blessing on him as he takes up his new responsibilities as Parish Priest of Eyrecourt, Meelick and Clonfert, Parish Priest of Lusmagh, Rector of the Shrine of Our Lady of Clonfert and Episcopal Chaplain to Emmanuel House of Providence.

The Catholic Church’s New Schism

At an open-air Mass in Écône, Switzerland, before a crowd of about 16,000 people, four priests became bishops last month. 

The men professed their fidelity to tradition against “heretics, schismatics, and those who rebel against our Holy Father.” 

They did so knowing full well that, in becoming bishops, they lacked something the Catholic Church deems essential: permission from the pope.

All four of these men are members of the Society of Saint Pius X, or SSPX, an arch-traditionalist group of clergy founded in 1970 by the French archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. 

For decades, SSPX has battled with the Vatican over the group’s fear that, as one theologian told me, “in reading the signs of the times, the Catholic Church is more beholden to the times than she is a light to the nations.” 

Now tensions have reached a breaking point.

The Vatican warned SSPX before the Écône Mass that consecrating bishops without a papal mandate would be considered a “schismatic act,” a formal separation from the Catholic Church. 

After the Mass, the Church issued a decree saying that the new bishops, plus the two who ordained them, incurred an automatic excommunication: 

They can neither receive communion nor celebrate licit Masses nor officiate valid marriages and confessions.

The 700 or so SSPX priests worldwide will also fall into schism, and thereby be excommunicated, if they remain with the society. 

Even lay churchgoers who “formally adhere” to the group may face the same sanction.

Maine Catholic Diocese Reaches Financial Settlements With Victims Of Priest Sexual Abuse, Critics Skeptical

The bishop of Maine says the Catholic diocese has arrived at “financial resolutions” with a number of clergy sexual-abuse victims.“

Even though pending cases that were decades old no longer had legal standing based on the ruling, the diocese recognizes that the harm caused by sexual abuse is not erased with time and still desired to respond with compassion,” Bishop James Ruggieri said in a statement.

Ruggieri said the payments are *intended to acknowledge, in a tangible way, consistent with our resources and obligations, the seriousness of what has been reported and the lasting impact of abuse.”

Paul Kendrick of Freeport, a spokesman for clergy sexual-abuse victims, called the bishop’s announcement “a public relations ploy designed to protect the identities of priest abusers, keep secret evidence of the church’s failure to protect children and low ball financial compensation for the lifelong harms and injuries inflicted upon victims.”

The Portland-based diocese has faced numerous civil lawsuits and allegations regarding clergy child sexual abuse spanning from the 1950s through the 1980s, though recent state supreme court rulings have significantly impacted ongoing litigation.

Ruggieri argued that even though the church may be legally immune based on a court ruling from last year, he decided an obligation to make financial offers.

Lawsuits against the diocese have claimed that church leaders were aware of rampant abuse by clergy members, failed to report or stop it, and actively concealed the actions from families and law enforcement.

Pope recalls that "the liturgy is the first school of the spiritual life"

After the summer recess, Pope Leo XIV has resumed this Wednesday the cycle of catechesis dedicated to the Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium, the document of the Second Vatican Council on the sacred liturgy.

At the general audience held in the Vatican, the Pontiff focused his reflection on the ecclesial dimension of liturgical prayer, emphasizing that the liturgy is not an individual practice nor a wellness technique, but the privileged place of encounter with God and the source of the Church’s spiritual life.

In a cultural context marked by efficiency, consumerism, and the search for merely technical solutions to human needs, Leo XIV warned of the risk of reducing prayer to a psychological exercise or considering it a useless activity. In the face of this mentality, he recalled that the liturgy constitutes “the first source of divine life” and called for rediscovering especially the Liturgy of the Hours as a school of prayer for the faithful and for those preparing to receive Baptism.

Below, we reproduce the full text of the Holy Father’s catechesis:

Brothers and sisters, good morning!

In this catechesis we resume our reflection on the conciliar Constitution on the liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium (SC). Today we focus on the ecclesial dimension of liturgical prayer.

As the Apostle Saint Paul suggests, it is the Holy Spirit who teaches us to pray. Since the day of Pentecost, the Spirit dwells in the Church, inspiring all its activities and, in particular, prayer.

The life of the first community, born in Jerusalem after the Passover of Jesus, is a life in the Spirit given by the Risen Lord.

“From that time on,” says the Council, “the Church has never ceased to come together to celebrate the paschal mystery: reading ‘what refers to him in all the Scriptures’ (Lk 24:27), celebrating the Eucharist, in which ‘the victory and triumph of his death are once again made present,’ and at the same time giving thanks ‘to God for the ineffable gift’ (2 Cor 9:15) in Christ Jesus, ‘to the praise of his glory’ (Eph 1:12), by the power of the Holy Spirit” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 6).

In our time, in contexts dominated by a mentality centered on efficiency and consumerism, prayer can seem something useless and ridiculous. In a world where science and technology claim to give all the answers, praying can seem a form of escape. Moreover, even in many Christian families prayer is no longer handed down, while numerous people run the risk of confusing it with yet another technique, psychological in nature and oriented toward personal well-being.

Prayer, on the other hand, as a fundamental dimension of our humanity, deserves to be rediscovered in its truth.

The Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium took this demand seriously. And this deeply pleased Pope Saint Paul VI, who, when promulgating this first document approved by the Second Vatican Council, declared:

“God in the first place; prayer, our first duty; the liturgy, the first source of the divine life that is communicated to us, the first school of our spiritual life.”

(Address in St. Peter’s Basilica, December 4, 1963).

In the Constitution, in fact, the term “prayer” designates the entire liturgy. This perspective is decisive, because it guided the liturgical reform by making the active participation of the faithful its central axis. The liturgy is presented above all as the place of encounter, of God’s initiative who draws near to humanity in his Son, “the Word made flesh, anointed by the Holy Spirit” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 5), to whom we can respond “through Christ, with Christ and in Christ, in the unity of the Holy Spirit,” that is, thanks to “the prayer of Christ, with his Body, to the Father” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 84).

For this reason, Saint Paul VI ardently desired that the Liturgy of the Hours, that is, the Church’s daily public prayer, inseparable from the Eucharist, deeply permeate, revive, guide, and express all Christian prayer and effectively nourish the spiritual life of the people of God (cf. Ap. Const. Laudis canticum).

For this desire to become a reality, the Liturgy of the Hours must be welcomed and lived more and more in the ordinary life of the baptized and of communities.

To the many people who wish to learn to pray, especially catechumens, it can offer the path and the school of Christian prayer.

Each week and each day, the Eucharist and the Liturgy of the Hours are the breath of the Church’s life that makes the Holy Spirit circulate through her Body. In this prayer, Christ “unites to himself the entire community of men and associates it with the singing of this divine hymn of praise” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 83); thus, day by day, we are more and more associated with the paschal mystery and conformed to it.

Saint Augustine affirms:

“When we speak to God in prayer, we must not separate the Son from him; and when the body of the Son prays, let it not separate its head from itself; let it therefore be the same only Savior of his body, the Lord our Jesus Risen, the Son of God, who prays for us, who prays in us and who is prayed to by us. He prays for us as our priest; he prays in us as our head; we pray to him as our God. Let us recognize, then, our voice in him and his voice in us.”

(Enarrationes in Psalmum LXXXV, PL 37, 1081).

Linked to the Eucharist, whose light it prolongs, the Liturgy of the Hours sanctifies the time of our daily life: in the morning, we begin the day with joy and gratitude; at midday, we ask for the strength of fidelity amid fatigue; in the evening, once work is finished, Vespers accompany the moment of sunset; at night, we fall asleep entrusting ourselves to God’s peace. Each hour is an act of hope: during our earthly pilgrimage we keep watch with the whole Church, awaiting the glorious return of the Lord.

Pragmatism of Schönborn: when ceding churches to other denominations becomes a pastoral priority

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn has recognized as one of the priorities of his previous ministry at the head of the Archdiocese of Vienna the transfer of Catholic churches no longer used for worship to other Christian denominations, especially to the Coptic Orthodox Church. 

Beyond the specific fact, his statements reflect a certain way of addressing the profound religious transformation that Europe is experiencing: instead of focusing on the causes that have led certain temples to no longer be necessary for parish life, the emeritus archbishop emphasizes finding them a new ecclesial purpose.

In an interview granted to the magazine Information Christlicher Orient, Schönborn defended this policy naturally when commenting on the recent transfer of the Lazarist church, in Vienna’s seventh district, to the Coptic Orthodox Church. 

This is the fourth temple transferred to this community in the Austrian capital: three of these transfers were carried out during his episcopate and the last under the current apostolic administrator of Vienna, Monsignor Josef Grünwidl.

«This path makes sense and has yielded good results»

Far from presenting these transfers as an exceptional measure or one imposed by circumstances, the cardinal described them as a fully assumed pastoral option.

«In other countries, churches are deconsecrated and converted into libraries, cafés, or gyms. I always wanted to avoid that path whenever possible», he stated. 

Instead, he explained, he preferred to «perhaps forgo an economic benefit» to offer «Christian brothers and sisters an ecclesial home».

Schönborn also assured that this policy was not limited to the Coptic Church, but extended to other Eastern Christian communities present in Austria. «This path is sensible and successful. I hope it continues», he stated.

Half a million Eastern Christians

The emeritus archbishop recalled that around half a million Christians from the Middle East and Asia live in Austria, many of them belonging to Eastern Churches.

Facilitating these communities having temples where they could celebrate worship was, according to him, one of the objectives of his episcopal ministry. 

In that context, he also framed the close relationship he has maintained for years with Coptic Orthodox Patriarch Tawadros II, who again thanked the transfer of several Catholic churches to his community during a visit to Austria last May.

Schönborn also highlighted the fidelity in faith of Coptic Christians and stated that «what separates us is incomparably less than what unites us».

A pastoral response that raises questions

The cardinal’s statements draw attention not so much for the transfers themselves—which have precedents and may respond to legitimate decisions by ecclesiastical authority—but for the way he presents them. 

At no point does he allude to the phenomenon of secularization, the decline in religious practice, or the loss of Catholic presence in much of Western Europe, realities that explain why some dioceses no longer occupy all temples for worship.

His reflection focuses, on the contrary, on the subsequent fate of these buildings and the convenience of them continuing to be places of Christian prayer rather than becoming properties for civil use.

From this perspective, the transfer of churches appears not as a last-resort solution, but as a pastoral policy that Schönborn himself claims as part of his legacy.

For centuries, these temples were built to proclaim the Gospel, celebrate the sacraments, and lead souls to Christ. 

That today some of them are no longer «necessary» for Catholic worship constitutes, more than a patrimonial or administrative problem, a reason for examination regarding the state of faith in Europe. 

Finding a dignified use for these buildings is a practical response; recovering the evangelizing fervor that gave them origin remains a much deeper challenge for the Church and its pastors.

Rome confirms Pope Leo XIV's first trip to Uruguay, Argentina and Peru in November

The Holy See has confirmed today, in its information bulletin, that Pope Leo XIV will make his apostolic journey to Uruguay, Argentina and Peru from November 6 to 17, 2026. 

The Pontiff has accepted the invitation of the respective heads of state and ecclesiastical authorities of the three countries, in what will be one of the most extensive international visits of his pontificate.

The itinerary will begin in Uruguay, where he will remain from November 6 to 8 and visit Montevideo, Paysandú and Florida. 

He will then travel to Argentina, from November 8 to 11, with stops in Buenos Aires, Córdoba and the Marian shrine of Luján, before concluding the journey in Peru, where he will remain from November 11 to 17 visiting Lima, Chiclayo, Cuzco and Pucallpa.

Return to the diocese he shepherded

The Peruvian stage will have a particularly personal significance for Leo XIV. 

Among the cities included in the itinerary is Chiclayo, the diocese of which he was bishop before his election as Successor of Peter and where he carried out a good part of his pastoral ministry for several years.

It will be the first time the Pontiff returns to the northern diocese since his election, a much-awaited reunion for Peruvian faithful who knew him as their pastor.

A long-awaited trip to Argentina

The visit will also include Argentina, a journey long awaited by the country’s Catholics. 

In addition to Buenos Aires, Leo XIV will visit Córdoba and the national shrine of Our Lady of Luján, one of the main centers of Marian pilgrimage in Latin America.

In Uruguay, the Pope will travel through three cities, including Montevideo, the country’s capital, and Florida, home to the national shrine of the Virgin of the Thirty-Three.

The program will be announced later

For the moment, the Holy See has only made public the general itinerary of the trip. 

The detailed program, with the liturgical celebrations, meetings and events planned for each of the stages, will be announced in the coming weeks by the Vatican Press Office.

Lourdes will cover the Rupnik mosaics during the visit of Leo XIV

The mosaics by former Jesuit Marko Rupnik will remain covered during the visit that Pope Leo XIV will make to the Lourdes shrine next September. 

However, the bishop of Tarbes and Lourdes, Jean-Marc Micas, has made it clear that the decision is not due to the Pontiff’s presence, but to the desire that no victim of sexual abuse should feel prevented from coming to the Marian shrine in search of comfort and healing.

In an extensive interview given to OSV News at the end of July, the French prelate explained that covering part of Rupnik’s mosaics was a decision born from direct contact with abuse victims, who made him understand that the works had become, for many, an obstacle to approaching one of the world’s main Marian pilgrimage sites.

«My mission is that anyone can reach the grotto»

Micas recalled two moments that shaped his discernment. The first took place in February 2023, when an English volunteer who had suffered sexual abuse explained to him that many victims were no longer able to make a pilgrimage to Lourdes since the accusations against Rupnik became known.

Months later, the bishop received several women who reported having been victims of the Slovenian artist himself. 

According to his account, those conversations helped him understand the deep suffering caused by the fact that Rupnik’s works continued to preside over the entrance of the Basilica of Our Lady of the Rosary.

«My mission is to allow anyone to enter the shrine and reach the grotto to find comfort», the bishop stated.

«It was impossible for some people to have to pass in front of those mosaics to access the place where they sought to heal their wounds».

For that reason, in March 2025 he ordered part of the mosaics on the basilica’s façade to be covered, a measure that will now be extended throughout Pope Leo XIV’s visit.

A decision that does not depend on the trial against Rupnik

The bishop also addressed the canonical process the Vatican is following against Marko Rupnik for multiple accusations of spiritual, psychological, and sexual abuse.

In recent weeks, rumors circulated about a possible acquittal of the former Jesuit, which prompted a statement from the Holy See. Nevertheless, Micas assured that the outcome of the trial would not change the pastoral criterion that led him to cover the mosaics.

«The reason for my decision is the effect that the presence of these works has on the hearts and lives of people who have suffered abuse», he explained. Even if the judges did not find canonical criminal responsibility, he added, that would not mean that those who reported the facts had lied.

The prelate also stressed that Lourdes was one of the first major shrines in the world to adopt a measure of this kind, convinced that the Church must offer concrete gestures of closeness to victims.

Leo XIV will arrive as a pilgrim

The Pope will visit France from September 25 to 28. On the 27th he will preside over the Eucharistic celebration in the esplanade in front of the grotto of the apparitions, pray the Rosary of the Torches, and greet the sick and pilgrims.

Micas insisted that Leo XIV did not choose Lourdes because of the Rupnik controversy, but because «Lourdes is Lourdes»: a place of prayer, conversion, and hope to which hundreds of thousands of faithful come each year, especially the sick and those seeking comfort.

The bishop also confirmed that the Pontiff will probably meet with victims of sexual abuse during his trip to France, although the final program has not yet been published.

A message about life for a divided France

The papal visit will take place after France approved the law legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide under certain conditions, a decision that has caused deep concern in the French Church.

For Micas, the Pope will not come to France to deliver a political speech, but to proclaim the Gospel. 

«The Gospel speaks of life», the bishop stated, convinced that Leo XIV will remind people that «the value of life does not depend on the decisions of parliaments or human conventions, but on God’s gaze upon each person».

In his view, that message will resonate with particular force precisely in Lourdes. 

While any reference to the defense of life made in Paris could be interpreted in a political key, in the Marian shrine it will be received, above all, as the word of a shepherd who comes to confirm in the faith a people who continue to see in the Virgin a refuge for the sick, those who suffer, and those who seek hope.