Georgetown University’s updated Title IX webpage dedicated to clerical sex abuse now includes Fr. Alvaro Ribeiro, S.J., but omits the multiple allegations of his sexual misconduct The Hoya publicized last week.
The new webpage, which was changed immediately after The Hoya published its investigation, only notes that Ribeiro resigned after a 2010 university investigation, passing over three public allegations of additional misconduct in the 15 years prior.
To experts and survivors, that nominal language reaffirms Georgetown’s apparent unwillingness to publicly recognize or adequately address misconduct.
Last week, The Hoya confirmed that Ribeiro faced at least four sexual misconduct allegations while at Georgetown — three detailed in The Hoya’s reporting, and at least one that led to the university inquiry and his resignation.
The Hoya’s investigation was the first public report of a Jesuit engaging in sexual misconduct at Georgetown after being placed on leave following similar issues.
Steven Slawinski (CAS ’97), who accused Ribeiro of sexually harassing and groping him in the mid-1990s, said Georgetown’s webpage changes feel like “lip service.”
“It really makes me disappointed in Georgetown,” Slawinski told The Hoya. “It sends a message that they’re covering their ass, and that they’re circling the wagons and they’re not really concerned about this as a problem.”
Experts said the Jesuits’ internal reporting structure, which does not require them to relay conduct reports to university officials, likely allowed Ribeiro to quietly return to campus.
Because of that, it remains unclear if Georgetown ever knew about the three misconduct cases before the 2010 investigation.
On the new Title IX page, Georgetown lists its novel April agreement with the local Jesuit province to ensure misconduct reports are “appropriately shared” with the university.
But the site’s vague language is the exact same as the university’s statement to The Hoya last week, which came six months after the agreement was first established and which survivors of Ribeiro’s alleged misconduct condemned as insufficient.
Slawinski said The Hoya’s reporting forced Georgetown’s hand.
“I think they wouldn’t have made the changes had the article not come out, and it’s very vague about what they’re going to do” Slawinski said.
Georgetown’s public admission comes over two decades after John, another survivor who is referred to by a pseudonym, reported Ribeiro’s alleged misconduct to the local Jesuit province and seven years after a third survivor reported it directly to university officials.
John said Georgetown must confront its years-long silence, in part by adding his allegations to the webpage.
“It makes it seem like it’s less severe than it is,” John told The Hoya. “If you’re going to do it, then provide all the information.”
“I thought I did my job by reporting him,” John added.
Slawinski said Georgetown has continued to disrespect survivors.
“It felt pretty dismissive to me and to the other men that came forward,” he said.
The Society of Jesus placed Ribeiro, who died in 2013, on leave in 1998 after John reported him for sexual harassment, alleging that the priest offered him pornography and shook his penis in front of him.
A year after Ribeiro returned to campus in 2000, he met another student who later alleged similar misconduct, including that Ribeiro attempted to kiss him after he graduated.
Ribeiro resigned after a 2010 university investigation found he had engaged in “unwanted touching of students” and “other inappropriate behavior.” None of the three survivors The Hoya spoke with spurred this inquiry.
A university spokesperson did not respond to comment requests for this story, but said last week that Georgetown officials “condemn in the strongest possible terms any clergy abuse.”
“We are committed to ensuring that University policies are as strong as possible in supporting survivors,” the spokesperson wrote to The Hoya.
John Fortunato, a Fordham University professor who researched university responses to the Catholic Church’s clerical sex abuse crisis, said Georgetown’s response to The Hoya’s reporting does little to rebuild community trust.
“When you get into an institutional crisis such as this, and one that’s not born out of a single incident, but a repeated pattern, the benefit of the doubt has been taken away,” Fortunato told The Hoya.
“It can’t be a one-time solution,” he added. “It’s got to be continuous corrective actions.”
Georgetown’s conduct, Fortunato said, has not met these standards.
The new Title IX webpage also removed the “ongoing work” section that The Hoya disclosed was outdated. That section used to list a board of directors working group aimed at addressing clerical sex abuse that former University President John J. DeGioia (CAS ’79, GRD ’95) established in 2020.
Now, the webpage says the working group became a subcommittee in 2021, but no such committee is listed on the board’s website.
Slawinski said the update remains unconvincing.
“Georgetown is hiding behind this vague, nebulous subcommittee that doesn’t seem to have any rules or numbers, and now they’re saying that its investigation has wrapped up,” Slawinski said. “I’m glad that they added Ribeiro as one of the people that they are concerned about, but I think this goes a lot deeper than just two priests and something on their website.”
The previous Title IX webpage acknowledged students’ sexual misconduct allegations against the late former Provost J. Donald Freeze, S.J., but did not list any of the “Georgetown 14” — the Georgetown-affiliated Jesuits named in the local Jesuit province’s 2018 list of priests credibly accused of sexually abusing minors.
None of those Jesuits’ alleged misconduct occurred during their tenures at Georgetown.
Ribeiro is now listed beneath Freeze, and the Georgetown 14 remain absent from the site.
Georgetown made no public statement recognizing The Hoya’s recent reporting, and did not announce the changes to the Title IX webpage.
For experts and survivors, that lack of transparency raises serious concerns about compliance with the university’s new information-sharing agreement.
Keith Rohman, a workplace misconduct and Title IX investigator, said “appropriately” in the April agreement is a “weasel word” that allows Georgetown and Jesuits to tailor misconduct protocols to their private interests.
“It’s that word which suggests a level of control, and the Catholic Church hasn’t earned the right to make that judgment on their own,” Rohman told The Hoya.
The Boston Globe first publicized how the Catholic Church systematically concealed sexually abusive priests in 2002 by relocating accused priests without notifying the public.
Since then, thousands of suvivors across the country have raised sexual abuse allegations against Catholic clergy.
Slawinski said he does not trust the April protocol, calling on Georgetown to publish the full agreement with the Jesuits.
“I think that should be transparent,” Slawinski said. “Who receives it? Is it the Title IX coordinator or campus minister or the rector?”
When asked by The Hoya for additional details about the protocol’s compliance mechanisms, the university spokesperson only gave its formal title and ignored other questions.
Fortunato said when institutions face misconduct patterns, new protocols are not enough. Instead, he said, universities must respond directly to survivors’ concerns.
“In this particular incident, this would be installing reporting procedures and then also instilling a confidence that something’s going to be done,” Fortunato said.
“Without those steps, that corrective action, I don’t think you’re getting that trust back — and in fact you’re further eroding it,” Fortunato added.
For Slawinski, Georgetown’s lackluster response has done little to address his core goal, which has remained the same since he first reported Ribeiro in 2018. He has received no reassurance, he said, that what happened to him would not happen to someone else.
“Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and it’s difficult to discount this pattern,” Slawinski said.
-1-1.jpg)














