Thursday, May 21, 2026

Tulsa deacon pleads guilty to stealing $1.4 million from parish

A 70-year-old deacon in Tulsa pleaded guilty last week to bank fraud and unlawful monetary transactions, after stealing nearly $1.5 million while working at a local Catholic parish.

Deacon John Sommer, the former business manager and parish manager of Christ the King Parish, accepted a plea deal with federal prosecutors on May 13.

Sommer acknowledged that from March to October 2025, he stole more than $1.4 million, through more than 70 unauthorized ACH transfers from Christ the King to his own accounts.

“I used the funds to advance what I believed to be certain potential romantic interests online and also fund what I believed to be investment opportunities in purported cryptocurrency-based ventures,” he said in the plea agreement.

“To conceal my embezzlement efforts, I made sure to keep all unauthorized ACH transfers under the $30,000 approval limit. I also altered the Church’s accounting records to make it appear as if transfers were made to legitimate vendors, including to the Church’s third-party payroll and retirement service providers.”

Sommer faces up to 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million or twice the loss caused by his actions. A sentencing hearing is expected in the case in the coming months.

In a press release this week, the Diocese of Tulsa said leaders at Christ the King discovered “a significant financial inconsistency” in parish accounts last October and immediately investigated the matter.

A forensic audit then uncovered the unauthorized transfers, which were passed on to law enforcement, the diocese said.

Sommer was removed from his position at the parish and placed on a leave of ministry as a deacon when the missing funds were discovered last October.

In its press release, the diocese said the embezzlement “did not impact capital campaigns, parish endowments, or investment accounts.”

“Additionally, $1M of the unauthorized transfers were recovered through insurance, and a plan is in place for the parish to recover the remaining funds.”

As part of Sommer’s plea agreement, the deacon is responsible for reimbursing the $1 million paid by the insurance company, and for paying the remaining $466,916.75 in restitution to the diocese.

The Diocese of Tulsa did not have a comment in response to questions from The Pillar about whether any policy changes are being implemented to help prevent the possibility of similar theft in the future.

But retired IRS investigator Robert Warren told The Pillar that the case “highlights the need to institute robust internal controls.”

Warren, who is a forensic accountant and associate professor of accounting at Radford University, noted that Sommer was authorized to initiate ACH transactions up to $30,000 per day without any outside approval.

“Deacon Sommer was a trusted, high-level employee with almost carte blanche authority over the finances,” he said. “However, the parish should have separated the authorization, accounting, and custody functions of the accounting system.”

“Deacon Sommer’s authorization should have been for a much lower amount, perhaps $5,000 per day or week,” Warren said.

In addition, he said, Sommer should not have been the person responsible for handling the accounting of his own transactions.

“[A]nother person outside of Deacon Sommer’s control should have verified receipt of the goods or services supposedly received before payment,” he continued.

The situation at Christ the King is far from unique, Warren said, as many parishes across the country lack the necessary internal controls to prevent theft.

“This case is just one of a steady drumbeat of parish fraud cases,” Warren commented.

“Until parishes get serious about internal controls, these frauds will keep occurring.”

He added that he does see some “glimmers of hope.”

“First, the Church is not sweeping embezzlement cases under the rug. If they find evidence of fraud, they are ‘following the money’ right to the door of law enforcement,” he said.

“Second, parishes carry insurance against employee thefts, so parishes are being reimbursed for at least some of the loss.”

U.S. bishops get 2027 ‘ad limina’ schedule

American bishops have been scheduled to meet next year with Pope Leo XIV, in the first of the ad limina visits to Rome for U.S. bishops during Leo’s pontificate.

In a May 19 letter, Msgr. Michael Fuller, general secretary of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, told U.S. bishops that while the Vatican had previously indicated quinquennial meetings would not be possible next year, a full schedule of meetings for the bishops of the country’s 196 dioceses has been recently granted.

“On behalf of [USCCB president] Archbishop [Paul] Coakley, I wish to inform you that we have received a schedule for ad limina Apostolorum visits beginning in March 2027,” Fuller wrote to the bishops Thursday, noting that conference officials were “initially informed that no ad limina visits were likely for next year.”

“The Prefecture of the Papal Household also noted that these dates might be subject to change in account of any possible Apostolic journeys of the Holy Father,” the general secretary noted, but said he, “wanted to share this information with you so that you may plan accordingly.”

In accord with canon law, all bishops are required to complete a pilgrimage to Rome every five years, at which they are “to venerate the tombs of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul,” hence the name ad limina Apostolorum — at the threshold of the apostles.

But while a spiritual pilgrimage is at the heart of the quinquennial ad limina visits, the trips are most often noted for the bishops’ meetings with the heads of the Roman curial dicasteries and with the pope, at which they are required to present comprehensive reports on the state of their dioceses, which usually span several hundred pages.

In his letter, Fuller explained that he wanted to give bishops as much advance notice as possible, after the Vatican had previously indicated that the bishops would not be making their ad limina visits next year.

Because of the large number of American dioceses and bishops, U.S. bishops make their ad limina visits by USCCB regional groups, of which there are 15.

The schedule as released to the bishops Tuesday is set to begin with Region I in the first week of March 2027, including the dioceses of New England, followed by Region II (New York) a the end of the month and proceeding in order until Region XV (the Eastern Catholic Eparchies of the U.S.) at the end of September.

The last slate of American ad limina visits took place across the winter months of 2019-2020. 

While the visits are in principle meant to take place every five years, the timeline is often expanded, because of the challenge of scheduling visits for bishops around the world, amid the other obligations of the pope and of Vatican officials. 

While U.S. bishops would have reached the five-year mark, and thus be due for a visit last year, the death of Pope Francis and the subsequent conclave significantly altered the ad limina schedule.

The meetings between the U.S. bishops and the first American born pope will be require significant preparation from U.S. chancery officials, some of whom will have less than a year to produce a comprehensive review of the pastoral, sacramental, financial, demographic, and evangelizing state of their dioceses, complete with data and statistical analysis of various elements in diocesan life.

In addition, the visits will be the first occasion for U.S. dioceses to present to Pope Leo the results, and U.S. bishops to relay their impressions, of the global synodal process inaugurated under Pope Francis.

The meetings will also follow U.S. midterm Congressional elections in November, and come after a series of notable points of disagreement between the Holy See and the White House on issues including military interventions in Venezuela and Iran, as well as the Trump administration’s campaign of mass detention and deportation of illegal migrants last year.

Roman Rota rejects a nullity complaint filed by the canon Rafael Vez and endorses a criminal court whose judges were not formally appointed by episcopal decree

The Court of the Roman Rota has rejected a complaint of nullity against a canonical criminal sentence, filed by the lawyer of the canon Rafael Vez Palomino and to which Religion Digital has had access, in which the absence of a formal decree of the then bishop of Cádiz, Rafael Zornoza, was denounced, constituting the court and appointing the judges in charge of prosecuting the case.

The events took place in the diocese of Cádiz and Ceuta, where the then bishop, Rafael Zornoza did not issue any formal decree of appointment of the judges who made up the criminal court in charge of prosecuting the case. In addition, he elected judges who were from another diocese, but without appointment by decree. Precisely this absence of express constitution of the court by the ordinary diocesan constituted the core of the challenge raised before the Roman Rota.

The foundation of nullity invoked by defense

The defense invoked the canon that insanibly declares the sentence handed down by a judge without power to judge.

The nullity complaint was based mainly on canon 1620 of the Code of Canon Law, which considers insanibly void the sentence rendered “by an absolutely incompetent judge” or “by those who lack the power to judge in the court in which the sentence was given”.

According to the thesis held in the appeal, criminal judicial authority cannot be presumed or implicitly derived from subsequent proceedings, but requires a concrete and formal act of appointment by the ordinary.

Judges outside the diocese

In addition, some members of the court were not priests of the diocese or habitually exercised judicial functions in it.

Therefore, the controversy acquired a special relevance, since the judges who made up the criminal court were not priests belonging to the diocese where the process was developed or ordinarily exercised ecclesiastical judicial functions in it.

Precisely for this reason, the defense argued that it was even more essential the existence of an express episcopal decree, which unequivocally accredited the valid constitution of the court and the effective attribution of criminal judicial authority to its members.

The situation became even more unique during the processing of the case, when one of the priests acting as judge (Theodore León) - without also stating decree of episcopal appointment as a member of the court - was appointed bishop and removed from the procedure. The priest who subsequently became the court in place of his would not have been appointed by formal decree of the ordinary.

For the defense of Rafael Vez, this succession of substitutions and actions without express designation evidenced the absence of a valid legal constitution of the criminal court “ad normam iuris”.

The contradiction denounced by the defense: Bishop Zornoza did issue a formal decree to appoint the Promoter of Justice

One of the most striking arguments of the appeal focused on the fact that the bishop himself did expressly issue a formal decree of appointment of the Promoter of Justice that intervened in the criminal case.

He was also a priest outside the diocese in which the process was carried out, but whose designation was documented by the corresponding express episcopal act in the form of a decree of appointment.

The defense stressed precisely this apparent contradiction: while the Ordinary considered it necessary to formalize by decree the appointment of the Promoter of Justice, there is, however, no equivalent act with respect to the judges in charge of prosecuting and rendering a sentence in the criminal case.

The thesis of the Court of the Rota: The will of the Bishop would be sufficient to validly confer judicial power, without the need for a decree of appointment

Despite this, the Rota considers sufficient the tacit or implicit acceptance of the bishop, deduced from the development of the process and the continued action of the court, to understand validly conferred the judicial power necessary to know the case.

The decree argues, in essence, that the will of the ordinary can be inferred from his institutional behavior and from the continuity of the procedure, even if he does not record documentary a specific decree of appointment of the judges.

In this way, the rotating court prioritizes the principle of the preservation of procedural acts and the stability of judicial proceedings against a strictly formal interpretation of the canonical requirements on the constitution of the court.

A doctrine taken from the matrimonial sphere: La Rota transfers to the criminal process criteria previously used in causes of marriage nullity.

To substantiate this broad interpretation of judicial authority, the judges of the Roman Rota rely on a previous judgment regarding a marriage nullity process.

In that decision, which has nothing to do with criminal proceedings, the rotating court had considered a procedure valid, despite certain irregularities in the action of the ecclesiastical court, understanding that the intervention and continued acceptance of the competent authority were sufficient to heal or supply non-essential formal defects.

From that doctrine, the Rota now transfers to the criminal field the criterion that the will of the bishop can also be manifested in a tacit or implicit way through the tolerance and continuity of judicial proceedings, even without express decree of appointment of judges.

A hard blow to canonical procedural formalism: Canonists warn of the doctrinal impact of resolution

The resolution implies accepting a particularly dangerous principle in the field of canonical criminal law, since it considerably limits the practical scope of structural nullities based on defects in the constitution of the judicial body.

Canonists consulted by Religion Digital recall that the rules of the canon law relating to the constitution of the courts necessarily presuppose a formal act of appointment or appointment of judges, since only in this way can the judicial authority “ad norm iuris” be validly conferred.

Hence, these rules implicitly include the classic legal principle nullus iudex sine constitutione : there can be no legitimately an ecclesiastical judge without prior legal constitution by the competent authority. Until today, in order for a priest to exercise the office of judge in an ecclesiastical tribunal, his appointment by decree of the bishop was habitual.

However, the resolution of the Rota points to a jurisprudential line favorable to broadly interpret the “Episcopi volunteers” above the traditional rigidities of canonical procedural law, allowing to save criminal proceedings and avoiding their complete annulment by organizational or formal defects.

“The resolution is a serious blow to those who defend a particularly strict interpretation of the procedural rules, considered of public order and whose violation was ordinarily substantiating the nullity of actions,” the canonists point out.

“The decision may open up an important doctrinal debate on the minimum guarantees necessary for the development of proceedings before ecclesiastical courts.”

Vance ‘looking forward to reading’ Pope Leo’s AI encyclical

Vice President JD Vance said May 19 during a press briefing at the White House that he is “looking forward to reading” Pope Leo XIV’s upcoming first encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas,” addressing artificial intelligence.

“I think when the pope issues an encyclical on artificial intelligence, it’s going to have some influence,” Vance said in response to a question on the topic, adding, “I, of course, don’t know how much influence. I don’t know exactly what it’s going to say, but I think when the leader of the world’s largest Christian denomination speaks on an issue like that, it’s certainly going to have some influence.” 

The title of the encyclical is Latin for “Magnificent Humanity,” and it will address artificial intelligence and human dignity, the Vatican has announced. It will be published May 25. 

Vance: “I think that it’s going to be a very, very important document.”

Vance said he is sure the encyclical will “contain a lot of insights, some of which I’ll probably agree with, some of which I may not, but I think that it’s going to be a very, very important document.”

In response to a related question on whether the government should create a new mandatory review process for new AI models, Vance argued that President Donald Trump “wants us to be pro-innovation” on AI. 

“He wants us to win the AI race against all other countries in the world,” Vance said. “He recognizes that AI is going to be an important tool, not just for our economy, but for our military, and so he wants to ensure that we are winning that particular race. We also want to make sure that we’re protecting people, we’re protecting people’s data, we’re protecting people’s privacy.”

But Vance also acknowledged the technology “does have some downsides.” 

“We’re trying to balance that safety against innovation, and we think that we’ve got the right balance here in the Trump administration, but something we’re going to have to keep on working on, because that’s just the nature of these technologies, is they certainly change,” he said.

Pope Leo has consistently expressed interest in the issue of artificial intelligence and the dignity of work since the first days of his pontificate, telling the College of Cardinals shortly after his election in May 2025 that he took his papal name partly in honor of Pope Leo XIII, whose landmark encyclical “Rerum Novarum” has shaped the Church’s social teaching for more than a century.

Controversial art show canceled at NY archdiocese venue finds home at Jesuit parish

When Jesuit artist Nicholas Leeper first contacted the Sheen Center for Thought and Culture about a possible exhibition, he imagined it as a culminating moment before the next stage of his formation. 

Over the previous two years, Leeper's paintings — colorful works blending Byzantine iconography with the visual language of pop art and advertising — had appeared in group exhibitions across the United States and abroad, including in Europe, the United Kingdom and Peru. But he had never gathered the work together in a solo exhibition.

"I thought it would be good to do like a show, a solo show, to kind of show all of this work in one place," Leeper told National Catholic Reporter.

The Sheen Center, founded by the New York Archdiocese in 2015 as a venue for dialogue between faith and contemporary culture, seemed like a fitting location. Leeper said he reached out in December after noticing that the gallery calendar for spring appeared open.

After several rounds of discussion, Leeper said, the center agreed to host the exhibition in May.

About two weeks before the opening, however, the exhibition was abruptly canceled. "They emailed me saying they got some phone calls, emails expressing concern about the work," Leeper said. "And then they called me and said it's canceled."

The exhibition, titled "Twilight of the Idols," takes its name from Friedrich Nietzsche's 1889 critique of Christianity and modern morality. Leeper's paintings place familiar forms of commercial advertising inside the structure of Byzantine icons.

In one of the central works, "Madonna and Child (Tomatokos)," Mary appears as a smiling 1950s housewife from a Campbell's soup advertisement, holding a can of tomato soup instead of the infant Jesus. The picture "The Visitation" reimagines Mary and Elizabeth as figures in a midcentury cigarette advertisement, leaning toward one another in conversation and recognition.

"Madonna del Parto (Once Upon a Time ... in Bethlehem)" portrays a pregnant Mary through the image of Sharon Tate, suspended between expectancy and uncertainty. While in "Santa Abraham (The Three Strangers)" Abraham is depicted as a Santa Claus figure from a vintage Coca-Cola advertisement.

The work is intentionally provocative, but Leeper describes the project less as an attack on religious imagery than as an invitation to reconsider it.

"For us Jesuits, it's finding God in all things," he said. "How can we really see God working through all art forms, not just the ones we like?"

Leeper said he was never told who objected to the exhibition or what specific concerns had been raised. Surprisingly, one of Leeper's works remains displayed in the rectory of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York.

The Sheen Center for Thought and Culture did not respond to NCR's request for comments.

Leeper described the cancellation as disappointing and "certainly a shock," particularly given the Sheen Center's role as a cultural institution connected to the New York Archdiocese. Yet the setback proved brief.

Within a day, the exhibition had found another home. At lunch in the Downtown New York Jesuit residence where he lives, Leeper informed Jesuit Fr. Kenneth Boller, pastor of the Church of St. Francis Xavier, about the cancellation.

"We were in the Jesuit dining room, and he said he had just gotten the bad news. And I said, 'How many pictures do you have? How much space does it need?' We looked around the dining room. I said, 'The Mary Chapel will do very well.' That's it," Boller said. 

The exhibition ultimately opened May 9 in the Mary Chapel at St. Francis Xavier Church in partnership with Xavier High School, where Leeper teaches art, Scripture and ethics.

"I appreciate his work and the perspective he has on it to present our own Catholic belief that the Holy Family and the various saints were ordinary human beings touched by the divine," Boller said. "And so using the pop art medium to depict it is a way to get you to rethink what you see."

To explain the tradition Leeper's work draws upon, Boller pointed to older forms of sacred art.

"There's a wonderful exhibit on Raphael in the Metropolitan Museum of Art now," he said. "Raphael has wonderful pictures of Mary, Jesus, John the Baptist, etc., all through the image of Renaissance art, the style of clothing, the manner in which they hold themselves, the surroundings are from the perspective of his time and place, beautifully done. But that's not how Mary looked."

He also referenced images of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which depict Mary as an Indigenous woman appearing to Juan Diego in 16th-century Mexico. "The point of it is that Our Lady relates to the Indigenous people as well as everybody else," Boller said.

Leeper's work, he argued, operates similarly, but through the imagery of modern consumer culture.

"What Nick does is a different medium, but it's the same idea," Boller said. "He uses the medium of pop art, the '50s and '60s commercialism, to say, 'What would an ordinary person do?' "

Jack Raslowsky, president of Xavier High School, said he was disappointed by the cancellation at the Sheen Center. "I think it's a missed opportunity on the part of Sheen," Raslowsky said to NCR. "I would always hope there's dialogue and conversation before decisions are made, and that was lacking here."

Like Boller, Raslowsky viewed the exhibition as an invitation to reconsider familiar religious images. "How many works of art of the Blessed Mother look the same, right?" he asked. "Reality is not that simple. Life isn't that simple. The Blessed Mother's not that simple. God's not that simple."

The exhibition's move to St. Francis Xavier also placed it within institutions with long Jesuit traditions emphasizing dialogue, intellectual inquiry and engagement with culture. Xavier Church in New York is internationally known for being a welcoming Catholic hub at the forefront of social justice issues, such as the environment, the fight against racism, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, especially during the AIDS epidemic. Leeper connected his project to broader questions about aesthetics, faith and identity within contemporary Catholicism.

"Right now, there's this kind of return to this older Catholic aesthetic, which is great and fine," he said. "But I think we can't be so close-fisted about our style preferences, our aesthetic. What we should be close-fisted about is our ethic, that we care about the good, the true, the beautiful, not aesthetically, not just in looks, but in meaning."

For Leeper, the title "Twilight of the Idols" also reflects what he sees as a danger of turning particular artistic styles into absolutes.

"Sometimes we think like Jesus must look like this and that, he must be a white guy, he must be half naked on a cross," he said. "That is an aesthetic, but that's not the only way to depict him."

"When we look at those things and think that's the only way our church should look, or when we go to our parish and we find something we don't like in the liturgy, and we think that's the only way, like, this can't be, 'We need it to look the way I want it to look,' we're kind of becoming idolaters in a certain sense," he added. "We're worshiping the thing rather than God."

Leeper said some viewers initially skeptical of the work became more receptive after discussing it. Among the most enthusiastic responses, he said, came from his students.

For Raslowsky, the educational value of the exhibition lies in its ability to unsettle assumptions.

"I think good art helps us break free of those limits," he said. "And then hopefully helps us enter into relationship with that God who loves us beyond all understanding in new ways."

"There are no limits to that love," he added. "There are no limits to that forgiveness. There are no limits to God's hopes, dreams and desires for us."

The controversy surrounding "Twilight of the Idols" arrives at a moment when Catholic aesthetics have gained renewed visibility among younger generations, especially online, while debates over tradition, liturgy and artistic expression continue within the church.

Leeper said he hopes the exhibition can contribute to those conversations rather than deepen divisions.

"With the polarization and the silos, that's really because we don't talk to each other," he said. "And I feel like art is something to talk about. Art brings us together to have that conversation."

Criminalizing John 3:16: A pastor’s arrest shows the West is losing its mind

A retired Baptist minister has been criminally convicted for preaching the Gospel near a Northern Ireland hospital that performs abortions.

Pastor Clive Johnston, 78, a former president of the Association of Baptist Churches in Ireland, was found guilty on May 7 at Coleraine Magistrates’ Court on two charges under Northern Ireland’s Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act 2023 for preaching on John 3:16 near the abortion buffer zone located outside of Causeway Hospital.

Pastor Johnston must pay a fine of £450 (approximately $600) and now has an official criminal record, according to The Christian Institute, which has supported his legal defense.

The Abortion Services Act in Northern Ireland, which became law in 2023, bans anti-abortion demonstrations and certain other activities within designated safe access zones surrounding abortion facilities. The law is enforced by the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

Prosecutors argued that the retired pastor either intended to influence people seeking abortion services at Causeway Hospital or acted recklessly regarding whether his actions could influence those individuals. 

During the proceedings, the court reviewed evidence and police body camera footage showing Johnston standing beside a large cross, speaking into a microphone while reading passages from the Bible, including John 3:16.

“We held a small, open-air Sunday service near a hospital,” he said. “We made no reference whatsoever to the issue of abortion. And yet the buffer zones law is so broad that holding a Sunday service has been found to be a criminal offense. And at 78 years of age, I find myself, for the first time, convicted of a crime.”

John 3:16, one of the most widely known Bible verses, states: “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

Before the hearing, Simon Calvert, the deputy director for the Christian Institute, argued that the verse had no connection to abortion and accused authorities of improperly expanding the scope of the law. “John 3:16 is a wonderful, famous verse and everyone knows it says nothing about abortion,” he said.

He also criticized police and prosecutors for pursuing the case, stating:

“We have amazing freedom in this country to share the Christian message. That’s why we’ve taken on this case. Prosecuting Pastor Johnston for preaching ‘God so loved the world’ near a hospital on a quiet Sunday is a shocking new attempt to restrict freedom of religion and freedom of speech in a part of the world where open-air Gospel services are a part of the culture.”

Pastor Johnston’s conviction for preaching the Gospel shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone who understands the slippery slope strategy of abortion ideologues — they ask for an inch, and soon they take it all.

For context, it’s important to remember that Northern Ireland — which is part of the U.K. but has its own government — had long been one of the most devoutly pro-life countries in the world.

Until October 2019, abortion in Northern Ireland was criminalized in all but very limited circumstances — chiefly where continuing the pregnancy posed a serious, long-term or permanent risk to the mother’s life or physical or mental health. That legal framework reflected a culture that regarded unborn children as image bearers of God and recognized moral limits on what any just society should permit.

In 2019, thanks to unremitting pressure from the U.N., the global pro-abortion movement, and activist judges, the U.K. Parliament used an amendment to the Northern Ireland Executive Formation Act 2019 to decriminalize abortion in Northern Ireland while the region had no functioning Executive as part of a much larger bill known as the Northern Ireland Executive Formation Act 2019; prior to the official vote, U.K. lawmakers slipped in an amendment that repealed two sections of Northern Ireland’s Offences Against the Person Act 1861 which had long rendered abortion illegal.

The legislation was passed by MPs from England, Scotland, and Wales, but fully rejected by MPs from Northern Ireland, effectively forcing abortion on Northern Ireland against its will. Within the year, a new legal framework governing abortion was passed, further expanding and normalizing abortion access and services across the tiny country’s six counties.

As a result, abortion is now permitted without conditionality up to 11 weeks and 6 days; after that, it is lawful in specified cases, including risk to physical or mental health up to 23 weeks and 6 days, and in cases of severe fetal impairment or fatal fetal abnormality without a gestational time limit.

In 2019/20, Northern Ireland recorded 22 hospital terminations of pregnancy. By 2024/25, official figures show 2,899 abortions carried out in Northern Ireland — a staggering post-legalization surge, though officials note the newer abortion statistics are not directly comparable with pre-2024 publications.

Given that background, it’s little wonder that getting Christians in Northern Ireland to accept abortion — or at least to remain silent about their opposition to it — would necessitate tyrannical censorship laws; the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act in Northern Ireland, similar to buffer zone laws rolled out across the rest of the U.K., received Royal Assent from King Charles III in 2023.

Now, less than three years after Northern Ireland’s first safe access zones were introduced, a 78-year-old retired pastor has been officially branded a criminal for preaching the Gospel near a hospital where, among other things, abortions are performed.

Johnston was not accused of violence, harassment, obstruction, or intimidation. Even authorities acknowledged that he was not threatening anyone. He was preaching a Christian message and quoting John 3:16, one of the most recognized verses in the Bible: “For God so loved the world.”

If that can be treated as criminal behavior, then the definition of “safe access” has expanded far beyond protecting patients from harassment. As has been seen repeatedly in England and Scotland, these laws are nothing less than weapons to suppress disapproved thoughts and speech and to criminalize Christian beliefs about the sanctity of life.

A free society cannot survive when religious expression is considered dangerous based only on the possibility of disagreement.

Christianity has had a major impact on Northern Ireland’s identity and its people for generations. Historically, open-air preaching, public prayer, and visible displays of faith have all played important roles.

If quoting one of the most beloved verses in the Bible can now lead to criminal punishment on the off-chance it might influence a pregnant woman to keep, rather than kill, her child, then the real question facing the West is no longer whether religious freedom is under pressure, but whether society still truly believes it deserves to exist at all.

UK pastor arrested for preaching Gospel message, criticizing Islamic violence

A pastor was arrested in London for criticizing the violence of Islam as he preached the Gospel in the street.

“It’s called inciting religious hatred — which is false,” Pastor Steve Maile, 66, told Fox News. “The cross of Christ is a message of hope, love, mercy, and reconciliation to a fallen world. … How could that be hate?”

Christian Concern reported that Maile “had been peacefully singing and preaching for around 10 minutes … calling people to repentance” and “discussing whether Islam is a religion of peace” before his arrest. 

“He criticised the history of violent Islam but said he had compassion and wanted Muslims to be saved by Jesus,” the report noted.

Video footage of Maile’s arrest shows an officer telling the pastor there was an allegation he had assaulted a child.

“There is no offence being committed here. None whatsoever,” Maile insisted as he was being handcuffed. “This is an utter disgrace. I’ve not assaulted anyone.”

Hertfordshire Police told Fox News that “A man aged in his 60s was arrested on suspicion of assault and a Section 5 public order offence (racially or religiously aggravated disorderly behavior).”

Section 5 makes it illegal in the U.K. to use “threatening or abusive words or behavior, or disorderly behavior” visible or audible to a person “likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.” A religiously aggravated Section 5 offense, considered to be “religiously aggravated harassment,” could carry heavy fines.

While police have dropped Maile’s charge of assault, he remains under investigation for an alleged public order offense after being released from jail on bail.

Maile said he needed wrist splints for three weeks after being double handcuffed in “excruciating pain” for around 90 minutes. He also said he was detained for 12 hours without being permitted to use a restroom and without his phone.

“I don’t preach hate. I don’t preach violence. I preach the love of God, the mercy of God and the goodness of God in Christ Jesus,” he told Fox News. “Everybody needs to come by the way of the cross And nobody gets a free pass.”

The Christian Legal Centre decried Maile’s arrest as “deeply troubling.”

“A peaceful, Christian preacher was treated like a serious criminal for expressing his Christian beliefs and that Islam is a false religion in a public place,” said Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre. “The footage raises fundamental questions about whether policing in this country is now criminalizing Christianity while failing to apply the law equally and consistently.”

Maile is the senior pastor of Oasis City Church in Watford, England, about an hour drive from central London. He has preached and conducted mission work globally for 45 years and is also a singer who often replaces the lyrics of famous songs with Christian messages.

Pope Leo XIV defends liturgical reform

Pope Leo XIV spoke about the decision of the Second Vatican Council on the liturgical reform of 1963. 

In doing so, he gave some indirect indications of his view of the ongoing debate on the rules for celebrating church services with the traditionalists in the Catholic Church.

At the general audience in St. Peter's Square, he spoke in detail about the Council's decision "Sacrosanctum concilium." 

This text was the starting point for a comprehensive modernization of the liturgy since 1970. 

Unlike the Council’s decision, the modernization of a minority of Catholics has been controversial for decades. This led to the formation of traditionalist groups, some of which split off from the church.

'It wasn't just about a reform of the rites'

The Pope stressed that the Council Fathers were not only concerned with reform of the rites. “They wanted to make the Church look at and deepen the living bond that unites us: the mystery of Christ.” 

The liturgical renewal of the 20th. century has revealed that this mystery does not show an obscure reality, but the plan of salvation of God, which has been hidden for ages and was revealed in Christ.”

The Pope went on to say, "Every time we participate in the community gathered in his name, we immerse ourselves in this mystery." The participation of people in the liturgy is at the same time internal and external. It is also evident in Christian action in daily life. Leo XIV called for being transformed internally by the rites, symbols and gestures of the liturgy.

More and more hatred and violence: growing concern for Christians in Israel

It was disturbing images that a surveillance camera recorded in the old city of Jerusalem at the end of April: A Catholic religious woman walks along a street near the German-speaking Benedictine abbey Dormitio on the Zionsberg, when a man suddenly rushes towards her from behind, brutally pushes her to the ground and then enters the woman lying on the ground. 

The video of the attack spread rapidly – and caused horror far beyond Israel.

For many Christians in the Holy Land, however, the scene was not an isolated incident, but an expression of a social and political climate that has changed dramatically. "The signs of brutalization meet us daily," wrote the Catholic priest and author Stephan Wahl, who has lived in Jerusalem for eight years, recently in a post for the weekly magazine "Christ in the Present." 

"It's the contemptuous spit attacks on clergymen that are no longer a marginal phenomenon." What had been dismissed from the official side in the past often as behavior of individual "mentally confused" has normalized under the current right-wing religious government.

Spit on in broad daylight

In fact, Christian clergy and church representatives have been reporting assaults for years: priests are spit on, monasteries are smeared, churches are attacked, cemeteries are desecrated. Jerusalem is particularly affected. The abbot of the Dormitio Abbey, Nikodemus Schnabel, reported in recent years again and again of hostility. 

"As soon as I visibly take to the streets in Jerusalem as a monk, I can count how many times I am mobbed," the 47-year-old Benedictine told Deutschlandfunk about his experiences. In the past, such attacks were rather hidden and happened in the dark. "Now I get spit on in broad daylight."

The perpetrators, according to Schnabel, are usually national religious Jewish extremists. Their motto is Israel to the Jews. Non-Jews out." The situation in Jerusalem in the Armenian Quarter, on Via Dolorosa and Mount Zion, where the Dormitio Abbey is located, is particularly tense. But the situation is now also catastrophic in Taybeh, the last living Christian village in the Palestinian territories. 

According to Schnabel, massive hostilities by Jewish settlers occur again and again. "This starts with intimidation, then fires are set," the abbot recently told the "Verlagsgruppe Diocesan Press." 

"The next thing is physical violence." In addition, the Christian farmers of militant settlers would often be prevented from reaching their olive groves. Out of fear, some Christian families would have already left the place.

From the point of view of many affected and experts, the current right-wing Israeli government is at least complicit in the development. We are witnessing a "complete de-tabooing" of Christian hatred, according to Schnabel. 

After incidents such as the attack on the religious woman, the government did not react indignantly. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has never given a solidarity address for Christian victims of assault. 

"The state would have to show clear edge, and I don't see that." Instead, Christian clergy and church officials on the ground report a climate co-created by the government, in which Jewish extremists felt increasingly encouraged.

A "notorious Christian hater" as a minister

In this context, the name of Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir falls again and again. Schnabel recently recalled that a few years ago, Ben-Gvir had appeared as a lawyer for Jewish extremists, who were blamed for the arson attack on the Dormitio Abbey-owned Tabgha am See Galezareth in 2015. 

"This man who threw the most unflappable things to us in the courtroom to us monks is now Minister of National Security," said the Benedictine, who also describes Ben-Gvir as a "notorious Christian hater" based on the experiences in the court proceedings.

Stephan Wahl also sees Ben-Gvir as a political fire accelerator. The atmosphere is poisoned "by a policy of maximum provocation," according to the priest. By way of example, Wahl mentions a photo of the cake to the 50, which circulates on the Internet. Birthday of Ben-Gvir in early May. 

The cake was decorated with a golden executioner's sling and the phrase "Sometimes dreams come true" – a reference to a recently passed law on the death penalty, which, according to general estimates, would in fact exclusively affect Palestinians. "When a minister celebrates death as a birthday wish, the moral brutalization of society is barely stopping."

The ongoing and continuing violence against Christians now leads to concerns about the fundamental survival of the Christian minority in the Holy Land. "This is about the creeping displacement of a community that has been part of this city for 2,000 years," Stephan Wahl said. The Christian minority in Israel is small. Around 190,000 Christians, most of them of Arab origin, currently live in the country – about two percent of the total population.

The Federal Government Commissioner for Freedom of Religion and View, Thomas Rachel, is also alarmed. "It is with great concern" that he looks at the situation of Christians in the Holy Land, says the CDU politician in a recent interview with katholisch.de. 

"The attacks on Christians are increasing noticeably – such as attacks in Jerusalem as recently as the recent unbearable attack on a Catholic religious woman or violence by extremist settlers in the West Bank," Rachel said. This is unacceptable.

Religious Freedom Officer sees Israel in duty

Rachel sees the State of Israel as a duty to ensure the safety of all people. Asked if the federal government would have to put more pressure on the Netanyahu government on this issue, the member of the Bundestag replies: "As friends, you also openly address difficult issues." He himself also addressed the situation of Christians during talks with Israeli deputies and representatives of religious parties during a visit to Israel last year.

At the same time, Christian voices warn against pointing out the situation as a conflict between religions. Stephan Wahl explicitly referred in his article to Israeli initiatives such as "Tag Meir" or "Rabbis for Human Rights", which showed solidarity with Christians and publicly oppose hatred. After the attack on the religious in Jerusalem, these groups had reminded that "the conflict does not rage between religions, but between those who seek peace and the 'hooligans of religion'."

Schnabel also emphasizes again and again that he does not want to condemn Israeli society in a blanket manner. Israel and Palestine have "both a wonderful civil society." Many Jewish Israelis loathed violence against minorities. The problem is "the power-making politicians on both sides."

Frightened by creeping exodus of Christians

Nevertheless, the concern of many Christians is growing that their presence in the Holy Land could be pushed back further and further. In this context, Rachel points to the development in other countries in the region. 

In Iraq or Syria, for example, the Christian population has already been severely pushed back. "This would also be a disaster for the Holy Land and must be prevented," the religious freedom officer said. Interreligious dialogue is crucial here.

Stephan Wahl, meanwhile, observes "with frightening the creeping exodus of Christians." Jerusalem is a mosaic of religions. "Yet a mosaic disintegrates when one side begins to systematically break out the other stones," he writes. If the Christian heritage is perceived only as a target, Jerusalem will lose "its face." 

His warning is therefore addressed not only to Israel, but also to the international community, which should no longer look away. "He who thinks that Christianity can be spit out of the streets of Jerusalem without definitively destroying the soul of this city is greatly mistaken. A city that sacrifices its diversity will end up losing itself.

"The issue is no longer liturgical": French canonist warns about the direction of the FSSPX

The episcopal consecrations that the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X plans for July 2026 continue to generate strong reactions in France. 

The canonist and priest Albert Jacquemin, a former member of the FSSPX and currently president of the National Canonical Penal Tribunal of the French Episcopal Conference, has stated that new bishops consecrated without a pontifical mandate would no longer be an isolated act as in 1988, but “the consummation of a de facto schism”.

The statements were made in an extensive interview given to Le Salon Beige on the occasion of the publication of his new book Le Choix de la rupture. Mgr Lefebvre, Rome, les sacres, 1974-2026, a work dedicated to analyzing the doctrinal and ecclesiological journey of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre from the years following the Second Vatican Council to the present.

“The issue is no longer liturgical, but ecclesiological”

Jacquemin maintains that the true conflict between Rome and the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X no longer revolves primarily around the traditional liturgy, but about doctrinal authority and the very nature of the Church.

“The problem is no longer the traditional Mass”, says the French priest, recalling that the rite of Saint Pius V continues to be celebrated in numerous communities fully recognized by Rome.

In his view, the possible repetition of the 1988 episcopal consecrations would demonstrate that the Fraternity has progressively assumed a logic of doctrinal and hierarchical autonomy vis-à-vis the Holy See.

According to his explanation, the FSSPX has developed an “ecclesiology of substitution”, de facto claiming the mission to preserve the true Tradition against what it considers the doctrinal deviations of the contemporary Church.

“A state of necessity cannot be invoked against the Pope”

One of the central arguments historically used by the Fraternity to justify episcopal consecrations without papal authorization has been the so-called “state of necessity” within the Church.

However, Jacquemin categorically rejects that interpretation. The canonist recalls that Church law provides for exceptional circumstances where a true state of necessity may exist, but insists that it never can be used against the explicit will of the Roman Pontiff.

In addition, he underlines that in 1988 Rome had already accepted the possibility of consecrating an bishop from the Fraternity through a canonical agreement with Archbishop Lefebvre, which —according to him— completely invalidates the argument that there was no other legitimate solution.

For this reason, he recalls that Saint John Paul II described those consecrations as a “schismatic act” in the motu proprio Ecclesia Dei.

Jacquemin criticizes the doctrinal evolution of the Fraternity

The French priest considers that the current position of the FSSPX is even more radical than that of 1988.

According to him, the Fraternity implicitly holds that the ordinary means of sanctification have practically disappeared from the Church, and that only it would fully preserve the Catholic Tradition.

For Jacquemin, that vision directly contradicts the Catholic doctrine on the indefectibility of the Church and ultimately transfers doctrinal authority from Rome to a parallel structure.

“The real authority is de facto shifted toward the jurisdiction of the Fraternity”, says he.

Traditionis Custodes and the responsibility of Rome

During the interview, Jacquemin addresses the impact of Traditionis Custodes, the document promulgated during the pontificate of Francis that considerably restricted the celebration of the traditional liturgy.

The canonist admits that those measures could have generated confusion and discomfort among many faithful connected to the traditional Mass, but he considers that that does not justify new consecrations without a pontifical mandate.

In his view, the core problem is no longer liturgical, but doctrinal and ecclesiological: the Fraternity’s claim to constitute a normative reference against the Roman magisterium.

Will the future bishops be excommunicated?

Jacquemin recalls furthermore that canonical law automatically provides for excommunication for those who participate in an episcopal consecration without a mandate from the Pope.

The priest also responds to those who compare this situation with the doctrinal controversies arising in Germany around the so-called “synodal way”.

Although he recognizes the seriousness of some positions defended by sectors of the German Church, he maintains that juridically they are not the same type of canonical act.

While an episcopal consecration without a papal permission constitutes immediately a public rupture of the hierarchical communion, doctrinal deviations require distinct processes and progressive discernment by Rome.

Despite this, Jacquemin acknowledges that in both cases the same core issue is at play: the unity of the Church and the effective communion with the successor of Peter.

President of the Argentine episcopate denies a reprimand from Rome regarding kneeling communion

The president of the Argentine Episcopal Conference and Archbishop of Mendoza, Monsignor Marcelo Colombo, denied having received any formal reprimand from the Vatican regarding the application of liturgical norms on the reception of Communion, after reports circulated in recent days about an alleged intervention by the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.

According to a social media post, Colombo described as “a lie” and “fake news” the versions claiming that both he and the Bishop of San Luis, Monsignor Gabriel Barba, had been corrected from Rome for applying the Communion regulations in a restrictive manner.

Wanderer exposed Colombo and the restrictions on receiving Communion kneeling

In his statement, the bishop mentioned that the controversy arose after “anonymous blogs” published that, according to “unimpeachable sources,” officials from the Dicastery for Divine Worship had held “conversations” with him and Barba to remind them that the faithful have the freedom to receive Communion according to the modes admitted by the Church.

The publication in question was made by Wanderer, who specifically pointed out that the Vatican had expressed reservations about certain restrictive applications related to the reception of the Eucharist, also recalling that Colombo had already shown support for prohibiting the reception of Communion kneeling, a fact supported by letters signed by the bishop himself.

Colombo denies any intervention from Rome

In statements to Radio Maria, Monsignor Colombo stated that “there is nothing” and affirmed that he had never received any official communication from the Vatican on this matter.

“Even I have not made any determination that would merit any qualification from the Holy See,” declared the Archbishop of Mendoza.

According to his explanation, he only responded last year to a specific query by copying what the Argentine liturgical legislation establishes regarding the usual manner of receiving Communion. The president of the Argentine episcopate also published a message to the faithful in which he lamented the spread of rumors and anonymous accusations.

“Many faithful of good will end up being confused, deceived, or drawn into climates of permanent suspicion,” he wrote.

What Church norms say about Communion

The underlying issue revolves around the liturgical norms on the reception of the Eucharist.

The Argentine Episcopal Conference established in 2002 that the usual form of receiving Communion in the country is “standing,” preceded by a bow of the head as a gesture of reverence.

However, the universal norms of the Church also make clear that Communion cannot be denied to those who wish to receive it kneeling.

The instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum, published in 2004 by the then-competent Vatican body, expressly states that “it is not lawful to deny Holy Communion to a faithful” solely for wishing to receive the Eucharist kneeling or standing.

Mons. Mutsaerts denounces that a "rainbow" parish expelled a boy from Confirmation for rejecting an LGBT act

The auxiliary bishop of ‘s-Hertogenbosch (Den Bosch), Robert Mutsaerts, has publicly denounced that a boy was excluded from Confirmation preparation in a Dutch parish that calls itself “LGBTQ” after he described a pro-LGBT initiative promoted in the Netherlands as “nonsense.”

The story was recounted by the bishop himself in an extensive reflection published on his personal blog under the title Visit to an LGBTQ Parish

Mutsaerts describes in detail the atmosphere experienced during a Confirmation celebration in a parish where a rainbow flag flew at the entrance of the church.

“A boy with opinion and character”

Although he was ultimately able to administer the sacrament to the young man in another location a week later, the prelate explained that the conflict began after the minor expressed his rejection of “Purple Friday,” an initiative promoted in the Netherlands to advance the social acceptance of the LGBT agenda in schools and public spaces.

“A boy with opinion and character. Apparently, that does not fit in this tolerant, inclusive, open, welcoming, and understanding parish,” wrote Mutsaerts with evident irony.

Mutsaerts later visited the parish to administer Confirmations and personally observed the ideological atmosphere of the place. A rainbow flag flew in front of the church, and after the Mass, parish officials explained to him that it was a “Rainbow Church.”

Inclusion for some, exclusion for others

The bishop denounced the contradiction between the rhetoric of inclusion and the attitude shown toward those who defend traditional Catholic doctrine on sexuality.

When he attempted to address these issues after the ceremony, he said he was immediately rejected for not sharing the ideological premises of the so-called “rainbow religion.”

“Inclusion turns out not to be an open door, but a carefully guarded access,” he wrote.

A growing fracture within the Church

The episode recounted by Mutsaerts also reflects a growing tension within numerous European ecclesial environments, where the discourse of “inclusion” increasingly coexists with greater difficulties in accepting positions aligned with traditional Catholic doctrine.

Robert Mutsaerts has become in recent years one of the few European episcopal voices openly criticizing the expansion of the LGBT agenda within ecclesial structures.

“The real question is not whether these churches are inclusive or exclusive, but what truth they are willing to recognize and what limits they dare to admit honestly,” he wrote in his reflection.

The strong man of the Doctrine of the Faith for abuses: «We have to try to protect the Church from scandal»

Previously unreleased audio recordings of the apostolic commissioner of the Sodalicio reveal the logic with which part of the Roman apparatus continues to handle sexual abuse cases: the Church’s institutional priority above the victims. 

Bertomeu himself even compares this principle to “the law of the Third Reich”.

InfoVaticana today publishes two audio recordings of Mons. Jordi Bertomeu, an official of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and one of the principal instructors of sexual abuse cases within the Church. 

This Spanish priest is part of the core of the Roman apparatus that decides how some of the most sensitive canonical proceedings against clerics accused of sexual abuse are investigated, channeled, and resolved, and for years he has acted as one of the trusted operational figures used by Rome in cases of major international impact. 

He has been a trusted man of Pope Francis, continues to be so under the current pontificate, and works at a very high level within the dicastery led by Cardinal Víctor Manuel “Tucho” Fernández under the wing of Archbishop Charles Scicluna.

The figure, moreover, does not arrive clean to this story. Bertomeu already carries the delirious controversy of having been accused of formally threatening two lay journalists with excommunication after they had denounced him to both civil and canonical authorities for an alleged breach of confidentiality. That episode, which in any other institution would have been politically devastating, also functions as a very precise warning about the way part of the Roman apparatus still understands power, public criticism, and control of the narrative when uncomfortable complaints or sensitive investigations come into play.

The audios contain a coherent, repeated, and extraordinarily clear explanation of how sexual abuse is understood from within part of the ecclesiastical structure precisely charged with combating it. And what Bertomeu explains, with a clarity as stark as it is unusual in a high-ranking ecclesiastical official, is that the Church’s ultimate priority remains protecting itself and shielding itself from scandal even in the context of sexual offenses committed by clerics.

He also speaks with unusual frankness. He explains that the Church does not have sufficient resources, that victims “also have redress in the civil sphere,” and that, above all, the institution must protect itself. In other words: the victim can turn to the State; Rome must focus on preserving the Church.

“I have told him once, it is very limited, very limited, because we do not have the judicial or police structure of the States. I would have liked to have a team behind me of a hundred people, the… and all the Interpol and everything you want. We do not have it. With the resources we have, with the resources we have, we have to try to protect the Church first. The Church as the Mystical Body of Christ. That is, why? Because victims also have redress in the civil sphere. They can go to the civil courts.”

The central phrase pulverizes years of institutional rhetoric built around victims as the supposed “absolute priority” of the Church after the major abuse crises of recent decades. Because Bertomeu does not say that the main objective is to establish the truth, to repair the wounded, or to radically eliminate any corporate logic. He says something else. He says that “we have to try to protect the Church first.”

And then he completes the reasoning by de facto shifting the reparation of victims toward civil jurisdiction, as if the existence of state courts allowed the Church itself to partially divest itself of a moral, institutional, and legal responsibility that arises precisely within its own structures.

In the second audio Bertomeu attempts to justify that institutional priority by resorting to a comparison that exposes the real core of the logic with which he is thinking.

“Then when civilly, here it is, when civilly it is prescribed, we have a problem, right? Then, canonically you have to do something, but above all we have to protect the Church and this, you see… with civil eyes it does not understand, because that would appear to be the law of the Third Reich, right?, that above the person is the people, is the Volk, right? It is, we are such that above the person is the good of the Church, which is the good of Christ. Then, in this case, it is, we are not subordinating the person, we are not subordinating them, but we also have to take into account the good of the Church. And it is not always easy, right?, and people do not always understand it. And you do it with resources, I insist, very, very, very poor, because I would have liked to have a, you see, a much more mature legislation, a more powerful judicial system, with more human, technical, etc. resources. And I do not have it, period, it is what it is and with what we have we have to try to protect the Church from scandal.”

The comparison is not formulated by a hostile journalist, nor by a resentful victim, nor by an ideological adversary of the Church. It is formulated by Bertomeu himself while trying to justify why the “good of the Church” must be placed above the concrete person. And precisely because of this the fragment is so devastating: because it verbalizes in an unintentionally transparent way a mental structure that the Church had been assuring for years that it had left behind.

Bertomeu tries to soften the scope of the analogy by substituting the “Volk” for “the Church” and by “Christ,” but the approach is per se devastating: he has just described a moral scheme in which the institution occupies a higher plane than the individual who has suffered sexual abuse within it.

That logic—the practical subordination of the victim to the institutional interest—is exactly the same that for decades allowed cases to be hidden, abusive priests to be transferred from diocese to diocese, evidence to be destroyed, victims to be silenced, and sexual scandal to be administered inside the Church as an essentially reputational problem instead of confronting it as a moral and legal crime.

The most serious aspect of the audios is not the tone. It is the criterion. Because when one of the men charged with instructing canonical proceedings explains that when offenses are time-barred civilly “we have a problem” and that the governing objective becomes “protect the Church from scandal,” he is describing a logic extraordinarily close to institutional cover-up.

It is not necessary to participate directly in the main offense to contribute materially to a system of impunity. It is enough to turn the protection of the institutional structure into a priority superior to the truth of the facts, to the effective repair of the victims, and to the elementary duty of justice.

It is also impossible to notice the disastrous theological foundation of the argument of the high-ranking Vatican official. Bertomeu invokes the “good of the Church” and the “Mystical Body of Christ” to justify a balance against the rights of victims. But Christianity does not identify Christ with institutional self-protection. It identifies him precisely with the wounded, with the small, with the destroyed. 

“Whatever you did to one of these kleinen, to mich it did to me”. Using the “good of the Church” to relativize the justice due to victims of sexual abuse committed by clerics is not defending the Church. It is completely inverting the Gospel.

Over the years it was promised to the faithful that the Church had learned. That victims were already the absolute priority. That the time of clericalism, of containment maneuvers, and of institutional cover-up had ended definitively. But the audios that today publishes InfoVaticana show one of the most relevant men of the Vatican, charged with managing those cases on behalf of the Pope, explaining with absolute naturality that the priority still is “protect the Church from scandal”.

And when that is said precisely by one of the officials charged with combating sexual abuse within the Church, the problem is not a crisis of communication nor an isolated rhetorical error, but the mentality that still governs part of the system.