.jpg)
Illinois priest, Fr Kevin Laughery, has criticized a nativity scene at the state capitol rotunda for breaching the separation of church and state.Illinoishomepage.net reports that for the first time ever a private group has been granted permission for the display, but some religious leaders feel it crosses the line.
"If people have a problem with it I suppose that's their right," said Dan Zanoza.
For almost a year he's been raising money to make his dream of a nativity scene under the Illinois state capitol dome come true.
"It could appear to be an endorsement of a particular religion which I think moves closer towards establishment," said Fr. Kevin Laughery of Holy Cross Parish.
Laughery thinks all religious symbols should be kept out of public buildings, even if they're paid for using private funds like the nativity scene. But Zanoza says this all is about freedom of speech. The A.C.L.U. agrees saying the capitol is a public forum for anyone to express any message.
"Part of the reason is to educate to let people know they have the right to do this in the public square, they don't have to hide their expression of faith," said Zanoza.
The secretary of state's office oversees all of the capitol permits. A few years ago a menorah was put on display and supporters say this is no different.
Even though Zanoza is blind and will never see the scene for himself he wants everyone else to get that chance.
"Does it make it more special? I think it's special whether I get the chance to see it or not," said Zanoza.
The state does put up some decorations of its own including a "holiday tree" inside the dome and lights on the outside of the capitol. The secretary of state's office says this has been going on for years.
The nativity scene will remain on display at the capitol through December 28th.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce
(Source: CTHUS)