Sunday, February 08, 2009

Parish in Bray (19)

Let us hope that in this case the conclusions reached by said Dr. Mohan were in fact reached by him after "extensive" tests, checking with his GP, checking his extended medical records etc. and "NOT" just from HERESAY evidence as in another case from the likes of a prejudiced employer who just happened to be a Parish Priest in an unfair dismissal situation against a member of the laity and where said Parish Priest "NEEDED" someone to back him up so that the person he wanted to stay out of their job did not return.

The "DAMNING" report provided as a result of this HERESAY briefing of said Doctor by the Parish Priest resulted in the "victim" of the Church being thrown out of her job and her good name tarnished all of which was to cover up certain facts that Parish Priest preferred not to get out AND the fact he kept a man who had porn in employment after complaints.

We always understood it was A BREACH OF MEDICAL ETHICS for a person who was SUPPOSED TO GIVE AN INDEPENDENT IMPARTIAL ASSESSMENT OF A STRANGER NOT to meet said stranger first without any preconceived ideas about them and make their judgment based on that.

We were assured at the outset that the Parish Priest did not know the person doing the assessment.

However prior to the "victim" having her assessment the Parish Priest DID KNOW HIM because he met and gave him a briefing which Dr. Mohan took and we have a copy of 2 pages in all so he had this information and had preconceived ideas about the person prior to her assessment.

He met the Parish Priest knowing he was in a serious employment dispute with the person being assessed and that the Parish Priest was the one paying his fees!!!!!

Dr. Mohan admitted under oath that MAYBE in hindsight it would have been better IF he had spoken to the victim's GP of 35 years standing and checked her medical records "BEFORE" he wrote his DAMNING report but he still would not admit that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, he made a mistake in his quick judgment) as medical personnel have stated to the "victim" since it would have been CAREER SUICIDE for him to go back on this diagnosis.

Interesting too when said victim's GP requested an independent diagnosis from Dr. Mohan's Colleague in Dundrum Dr. Harry Kennedy he refused to see the victim saying leave the law to the lawyers.

In other words he did not want to maybe have to dispute the HORRIFIC REPORT or question of even discredit it.

As these two men are the top Forensic Psychiatrists in the country naturally enough it is not the done thing to check out each others work - we saw how all those women had their wombs removed for years because no medical professional would question things as to maybe something was VERY wrong in what was going on.

One would have to ask why the Parish Priest and Church paid for a man of his standing to do a simple assessment for a possible return to work when "victim" agreed to go to a Psychologist in order to get the job back.

There is a big difference in what was agreed and what happened going to the Forensic Psychiatrist but when one has nothing to hide and is just going to tell the truth there should have been no problem with the assessment.

Unfortunately it ended up as the victim walking into THE MOUTH OF HELL.

Interesting too that when Dr. Mohan replied to queries a CC of his letter was being sent to his medical insurers in UK - maybe just in case there was going to be a claim against him???

One would ask the Church why did they choose and pay a Forensic Psychiatrist who is mainly responsible for hardened criminals and murderers who are locked up sometimes against their will in Dundrum Mental Hospital and formerly of Broadmoor to do a regular work return assessment.

How can a normal hard working Secretary be in her job for over 4 years one day, the next day loses favour with her employer and be turfed out of her job while on two weeks annual holidays and then asked to go and have such an assessment in order to get her job back????

There was never a complaint about her work and there is verbal evidence from said employer the Parish Priest telling his best FEMALE friend that the Secretary "WAS A HIGHLY DEDICATED SECRETARY" when FEMALE FRIEND said to him "AREN'T YOU LUCKY TO HAVE SUCH A GOOD SECRETARY" - (he corrected her by saying HIGHLY DEDICATED rather than just GOOD) but the Parish Priest refused this verbal evidence IN HIS OWN VOICE to be played at the hearing. WHY? Because it would prove the whole thing was a set up and make a mockery of the case?

Why would the Medical Council not investigate how the Report could be given WITHOUT consultation with GP,

NOT checking 35 years of medical records,

NOT doing any kind of medical Tests

NOT doing any psychological tests,

NOT asking a colleague for a second opinion,

NOT asking the "Victim" to even return for a second meeting to make sure the diagnosis at the end of a 2 hour casual chat was correct??????

All of the above in light of the seriousness of the DAMNING REPORT he intended to write which would change the "victims" life forever.

WERE ALL OF THE ABOVE PROPER PROCEDURES IGNORED??

Because the Parish Priest and the Church were paying him and NEEDED a specific report to vindicate what they had ALREADY DONE???

Was he under pressure to produce a SPECIFIC REPORT to his Paymasters????

WHY do those who have POWER AND ENDLESS MONEY BEHIND THEM like the Church, Medical profession, their Lawyers have the RIGHT to

NOT have an investigation into this and therefore get away with it without question of the POSSIBILITY there was a MISTAKE?

IS THIS A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE???????

Why should the "Victim" of the Parish Priest in this case lose her job?

Her good name?

Her right to remain in all her Church groups where she had been for years?

Her right to be a Special Minister of the Eucharist?????

Why has the "Victim" on occasion been told in the Church to move back some rows seats were reserved when they were not and thus be belittled in front of other Parishioners???????

Why is said "Victim" treated like a LEPER in her own Parish when once every 7 weeks she serves tea after Mass with 2 other ladies and the PP talks to the other 2 ladies standing next to her and ignores her in front of entire Parish and REFUSES to take a coffee but asks one of the other ladies to make him one??????????

Is that both the height of ignorance and UNCHRISTIAN for the Parish Priest to do that to ANY of his Parishioners??????????

******************************

As comment to contribution earlier about recent verdict on the other case referred to by last contributor ~ friends have said to see said Doctor on the news two days recently coming out of Court after such a horrific hearing it did not really instill much confidence in us to see said Doctor smiling and grinning ear to ear after listening to such horrors of the killing. It was a bit "sick" to be honest!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer

No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.

The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.

Sotto Voce

(Source: FF/PVT)

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

The posting of these reports about the Bray parish, bring the integrity of this otherwise wonderful blog, into question. And that's a pity.

Anonymous said...

The truth hurts those who have done the dirt on others and then have cronies to cover it up and support them.

Thank God some are not afraid to publish the truth.

Bray Garda station have evidence of the verbal quotes in above article. Garda John McDonnell has it in his possession if writer cares to check it out.

Everything in these postings can be proven by way of verbal or written evidence that was withheld by Church. Copies of some of it was sent to Clerical Whispers for verification before publication as proof.

If anyone wants to come along to the Parish Centre at the Church next Sunday when this lady serves teas they can witness for themselves the Leper treatment there by the Clergy!

Anonymous said...

Parish in Bray 20?

At last Diarmuid Martin takes his head out of the sand regarding Our Lady Queen of Peace Parish in Bray. The Parish Priest had said the Church would be helped with the expense of his grandoise renovations by the SHARE collection fund but THANK GOD that has now been TURNED DOWN. I think the Banks must have given him the THUMBS DOWN also because he is now talking about FUNDRAISING to the tune of €400,000. What a hoot from a man who lives in his own sad little world of dreams. In this economic climate people are not contributing they are trying to scrape up enough cash to pay their day to day living expenses and not have their homes repossessed due to being unable to pay their mortgages so if this (supposed) man of God had the wit of a 5 year old he would get the roof replaced which is required, update the confession box to the standard required for child protection and leave it at that. All the other grandoise ideas from his cronies around him and his own can wait until he has left the Parish and someone who is a true Priest takes over, one that cares about his flock and their Church.

This stupid project of his was to start on JANUARY 12 when the Church closed and was locked and it still lies that way while we have Masses in the tin box on Parish Premises. It is now due to start on FEBRUARY 24 which is 6 weeks behind schedule with the rent of said shipping containers and tin box Church costing us an arm and leg for all this time.

The Archbishop did half his job turning down the SHARE donation but if he had done his job right he would have said NO WAY FATHER (SIC!) WHITE you get your roof fixed and child protection confessional and that is all.

Here is the latest from the Parish Website - at last the little man had to come clean on the plans after we have waited 6 weeks to hear (does he feel smaller yet - he ought to - his dictatorship has been dealt a nice little blow and it won't be the last - his misdeeds are slowly catching up with him - yipeeee!!!)

"Repairs & Refurbishment to the Church
Due to the commencement of the work on Monday 24th February, parking in the Church grounds will be severely restricted.

We thank you for your co-operation.

Our project has been reduced in scale due to the economic climate and the unavailability of financial support from the Diocesan SHARE Fund. Works to be carried out will be under Health & Safety and Liturgical guidelines. The tendered budget is €643,065. As we have raised quite a substantial amount our fundraising target €400,000. We hope to complete the project by the end of April. The Parish Canvass will take place over the next few weeks If you can help, please give your name to any of the priests this weekend, or come to the meeting next Thursday night 19th February at 7.30pm in the Villa. Looking forward to seeing you there. Thank you."

Anonymous said...

Parish in Bray 20?

At last Diarmuid Martin takes his head out of the sand regarding Our Lady Queen of Peace Parish in Bray. The Parish Priest had said the Church would be helped with the expense of his grandoise renovations by the SHARE collection fund but THANK GOD that has now been TURNED DOWN. I think the Banks must have given him the THUMBS DOWN also because he is now talking about FUNDRAISING to the tune of €400,000. What a hoot from a man who lives in his own sad little world of dreams. In this economic climate people are not contributing they are trying to scrape up enough cash to pay their day to day living expenses and not have their homes repossessed due to being unable to pay their mortgages so if this (supposed) man of God had the wit of a 5 year old he would get the roof replaced which is required, update the confession box to the standard required for child protection and leave it at that. All the other grandoise ideas from his cronies around him and his own can wait until he has left the Parish and someone who is a true Priest takes over, one that cares about his flock and their Church.

This stupid project of his was to start on JANUARY 12 when the Church closed and was locked and it still lies that way while we have Masses in the tin box on Parish Premises. It is now due to start on FEBRUARY 24 which is 6 weeks behind schedule with the rent of said shipping containers and tin box Church costing us an arm and leg for all this time.

The Archbishop did half his job turning down the SHARE donation but if he had done his job right he would have said NO WAY FATHER (SIC!) WHITE you get your roof fixed and child protection confessional and that is all.

Here is the latest from the Parish Website - at last the little man had to come clean on the plans after we have waited 6 weeks to hear (does he feel smaller yet - he ought to - his dictatorship has been dealt a nice little blow and it won't be the last - his misdeeds are slowly catching up with him - yipeeee!!!)

"Repairs & Refurbishment to the Church
Due to the commencement of the work on Monday 24th February, parking in the Church grounds will be severely restricted.

We thank you for your co-operation.

Our project has been reduced in scale due to the economic climate and the unavailability of financial support from the Diocesan SHARE Fund. Works to be carried out will be under Health & Safety and Liturgical guidelines. The tendered budget is €643,065. As we have raised quite a substantial amount our fundraising target €400,000. We hope to complete the project by the end of April. The Parish Canvass will take place over the next few weeks If you can help, please give your name to any of the priests this weekend, or come to the meeting next Thursday night 19th February at 7.30pm in the Villa. Looking forward to seeing you there. Thank you."

Anonymous said...

Interesting today the readings at Mass being about LEPERS and the Gospel where Jesus touched the LEPER. As stated before in updates about Bray Parish LEPERS created by the Parish Priest are still treated as LEPERS. He came in as usual said Susan can I have a coffee while Margaret held the coffee pot - he ignores her being his personal LEPER. Margaret had to pour out the coffee to hand to Susan to hand to the Parish Priest.

One could get so annoyed at such an unchristian person that they could add "I hope you choke on it".

Having said that his fan club were out there this morning about 10 middle aged women laughing like school kids as they handed him what could possibly have been a belated Valentines card and donation from the fan club. God help their wit. Will they be ostracised by him for doing such a thing? Not a bit of it his screams of laughter in the middle of them was pathetic. They probably got the idea since he raved on at length yesterday about St. Valentine and boxes of chocolates cards and flowers in spite of the Saints of the day being St. Cyril and his brother!

Oh well we know Mrs. Doyle got hers last night!!

Anonymous said...

I too was subjected to an inquisition by Dr Damian Mohan at the behest of my employer. I complained him to the Medical Council. He lied to the Medical Council (I have proof of this) but the Medical Council rejected my complaint, even though the English Royal College of Psychiatrists has informed me that Dr Mohan’s action in my respect was totally unacceptable.

At this stage everybody should beware Dr Mohan.

You are right about him having worked in Broadmoor. Does anybody know if he was there when the Unison scandal broke?

I am also aware of another person having been subjected to an inquisition by Dr Mohan and who effectively lost her job. She also complained him to the Medical Council but her complaint was also rejected.

As was the case in the Irish financial system the question arises as to who regulates the regulators. According to recent report by Transparency International, the Irish State is riddled with ‘legal corruption’. Is the behaviour of the Medical Council an example of this?

For information, Professor Kennedy, as the Clinical Director in the Central Mental Hospital, is Dr Mohan’s superordinate. The Mental Health Commission was critical of the Central Mental Hospital in a 2007 report. The following are relevant extracts from the introductory section of this Report:

‘There are a number of practices in the Central Mental Hospital, highlighted in the Inquiry, which infringe on patients’ rights and dignity and impact on the standard of clinical care available to them...Chief among the issues of concern are the following: ... Absence of clear clinical leadership in wards ... The Local Management Team must take clear responsibility for standards of care delivered to patients... The nature and degree of service deficiencies outlined in the Inquiry Report are such that urgent reform of the forensic mental health services based at the Central Mental Hospital is required.’

Perhaps all victims of these people should go off website. This could be arranged once agreement is indicated.

By the way, if you were dismissed on grounds of imputed ‘erotomania’ (They seem to pathologise everything these days.), it appears to me that you were dismissed on disability grounds and that you may have a claim under the Employment Equality legislation.

Justice for Margaret said...

A claim was submitted to the Employment Equality appeals in October 2006 and still has not got a date for hearing. It is about both the unfair dismissal over the non existent Erotomania claim that three other doctors have disputed and said they could not treat something that a person does not have and also it was to highlight the fact that this Parish Priest who briefed Dr. Mohan and paid his fee to do Secretary's assessment kept a FAS supervisor working in the Parish Centre for 2 years after the Secretary reported and showed the Parish Priest the porn, told him her computer was being used by said gentleman (sic) to send risque emails to his girlfriend and that he also used to come into her office making sexist and risque remarks about his sex life and remarks about what she the Secretary needed in this regard.

Two months after making this complaint the Secretary was dismissed while on holidays.

Dr. Mohan on oath said she was incapacitated due to the (fake) erotomania and could not work at the Parish again. Parish Priest would not allow her to work from time he dismissed her September 2005 yet he was still technically employing her until January 2006 as she was being paid while trying to get clearance from her medical experts to return to work. When she got said letters and reports they were rejected by Dr. Mohan and Parish Priest and he then stopped paying her but he did not write to her until end of June 2006 6 months later to give her a letter again saying her employment was terminated but he had not allowed her to work or enter her office since the previous September (10 months earlier) and said he was paying her 2 weeks money in lieu of working her notice. She tore up and refused the payment as she had not been paid at this stage for almost 6 months and still had not got either her P45 or P60. These she got backdated to January 2006 as according to her employer her work ended July 4, 2006 but for some reason form was dated January 2006 as he had no intention of ever allowing her back no matter what clearance she got from anyone.

Employment Appeals Tribunal did not peanalise employer for any of this other than to say he was to pay her a month's salary as her dismissal was "procedurally unfair" but because he and Dr. Mohan had spun the story of erotomania although the Tribunal said it was not up to them to say whether Secretary had an illness or not they found that the Parish Priest with his tales meant he had grounds to fire the Secretary because supposedly she was chasing after him and could have caused a scandal. This was backed up by Dr. Mohan who could not possibly back up any chasing having never been in the Parish!!! He also said at the hearing 7 months after her assessment that her condition had worsened yet he never met her after her December 2005 initial assessment. Is he phychic can he diagnose from afar? This was stated on OATH. In other words was he being drip fed lies by the PP and believed him or was he in league with the Church to do whatever it took to get rid of Secretary?

You may like to know that Dr. Mohan is now giving Seminars in Employment law and doing sessions on case studies so your case, that of your friend and that of the Parish Secretary may be used against all of our knowledge. He did one last September at a Hotel near the Airport.

Is the work in employment law now more profitable to the good Doctor than dealing in his usual murder cases? It seems very odd to us to say the least.

As a result of this case Secretary's good name and reputation has been tarnished and she lost all her rights within the Church which is a crime in itself.

It was all done as a cover up on behalf of the Parish Priest where he would not allow witnesses to come along and let them be seen in the Tribunal and have them identified, also he refused to have verbal evidence played.

This case has been appealed by both sides because in spite of the mickey mouse laurel and hardy way the Parish Priest treated the Secretary with the dismissal he said he was right and would not pay the award to her.

She also was not satisfied as her case was a complete farce and stitch up job on an unlevel playing field and she is still going to fight until the end of time to clear her good name and get an apology for the wrong that has been done to her.

Yes she would like to meet you or anyone else that has been DAMAGED by Dr. Mohan and the Church. Maybe with a united front we can have something done about it. Maybe Prime Time would like to investigate it for all concerned as the corruption between the Church, the Medical Council and the law would have good viewing figures for all concerned and may have some of the rats involved pay the price for their ruining of lives and reputations.

Secretary's email details for her campaign to clear her name is justice4margaret@live.com do PLEASE ANYONE who can help or have anything to contribute get in touch.

We need to stick together and get some justice for ourselves.

Thank you for the posting here. God Bless you. It is good to know one is not alone and that it has happened to others and together we maybe can help each other.

Secretary had to get a UK Barrister to represent her against the Church at the Unfair Dismissal Tribunal as it is impossible to have Irish lawyers go up against the Church because they know what they have to deal with and all the dirty tricks they can afford to pull. She has a UK firm of Employment Experts handling her case with the Equality Tribunal and a new Irish Solicitor and Barrister doing the appeal to the Circuit Court in Ireland for Unfair Dismissal appeal as a UK Barrister does not have jurisdiction here. It was felt that a clique exists in Ireland and the Law Library and that is why the Barrister from UK was brought on board.

PLEASE USE THE EMAIL. Thank you.

A VERY DISILLUSIONED CATHOLIC said...

Psychiatric Evaluations in Employment Litigation
Ethical Issues in Assessing Work Stress Disability
Diagnostic Issues in Workplace Bullying
Malingering in Disability Evaluation
Dr. Damian Mohan

The above is what Dr. Mohan lectured on at the Seminar in the Carlton Hotel Dublin last September.

Diagnostic issues in WORKPLACE BULLYING is very interesting seeing as that is what happened to the Parish Secretary being bullied out of her job by her employer and ever since when removed from all her Church groups.

Is this man such an expert when he could not guage that the man who hired him was in fact THE BULLY?

Ethical Issues in Assessing Work Stress Disability

IS IT ETHICAL OR HONEST TO ASSESS A PERSON AS HAVING A DISABILITY IN DR. MOHAN'S VIEW THAT ENDS YOUR WORKING LIFE 10 YEARS BEFORE RETIREMENT AGE WITHOUT DOING ONE TEST, CHECKING MEDICAL RECORDS, TALKING TO YOUR GP, GETTING A SECOND OPINION ETC. ETC.

I think most of the inmates in the Central Mental Hospital would be able to figure that easy question out for themselves if Dr. Mohan could not and the answer is NO DR. MOHAN IT WAS NOT ETHICAL OR HONEST.

How can a person speak about what is ethical and honest when they do not behave that way themselves and they are meant to be the experts.

With all the publicity this case is going to continue to get the culprits are going to have their heads roll in due course.

Too many people are now taking an interest in Dr. Mohan and his methods and his paymaster in this case
FR. LARRY WHITE PARISH PRIEST OF OUR LADY QUEEN OF PEACE BRAY.

Can we predict he will soon be taking another extended 5 month break from the Parish because of stress when the going gets tough or things get a bit too hot for him in the near future with further investigations into these cases?

Is there anyone out there in St. Mary's Parish in Lucan who could add a nasty tale or two about this Priest who served there? He also worked in Parish in Rowlagh anyone there with interesting information to share about him? Going back further inner city Stoneybatter where he still has connections...... An Siol that he was involved with on Committee.... we are looking for anything that will help get justice.

This website is an international one read in UK and all over the world. We believe back in early 70's Fr. Larry White worked in London area as Chaplain in Hospital. Anyone in UK who knew him at that time have any interesting stories to share.

Anyone who knew him late 60's early 70's in All Hallows have any other interesting information to show a pattern.

A bully is always a bully they do not change their spots.
Thank you.

Email justice4margaret@live.com

Anonymous said...

Thank you for your response to my post.

I would like to add some further comments to those already made.

In my situation Dr Mohan withdrew once he was exposed and Professor Harry Kennedy took over his role. He too is exposed.

These people seem to be ‘guns for hire’ that are regularly used by employers. Are we just the tip of the iceberg? Human and constitutional rights, such as the right to natural justice and due process, do not seem to be of any importance in these situations. Regarding this and Dr Mohan’s stigmatising you with the label of ‘erotomania’, the following extracts from an article by Thomas Szasz are relevant:

‘... more Americans are now deprived of liberty on therapeutic than on punitive grounds. ... The proposition that so called kleptomaniacs and dipsomaniacs “suffer from really uncontrollable urges” is erroneous and unsupported by evidence. Hayek here falls into the linguistic trap of psychiatry: he seems to think that because a word ends with the Greek suffix “maniac”, it designates a bona fide disease, characterised by irresistible impulses to commit a particular act... (In the antebellum South, “drapetomania” was considered a mental disease characterised by the slave’s uncontrollable urge to escape from bondage and seek liberty.)’ ... [the behaviour of those deemed “mentally ill”] is not judged and regulated by the criteria of guilt and innocence, the criteria we use to judge and regulate the behaviour of “normal” persons. Instead, it is judged and regulated by the criteria of psychiatry, turning those under “psychiatric treatment” into actual or potential nonpersons, devoid of what we regard as our constitutional or human rights.’
(Szasz, T.S. (2002), Hayek and psychiatry. Liberty. 16: 19-20 & 24 (June). Reproduced at the Szasz site by permission of Liberty. Available on Internet.)

I am not sure if you are aware of it, but you can take a case to the Equality Tribunal on the basis of being discriminated against not only on grounds of disability but on grounds of imputed disability. That is to say, as I understand it, you don’t have to be actually suffering from or accept that you are suffering from a disability to take such a case. The following is a reference to Irish Equality caselaw on this: ‘The Equality Tribunal in the case of a Health Service Employee v. The Health Service Executive, held that in this instance obesity could be considered an imputed disability.’ (Case reference, UD155/200 referred to in Report on Measures to Combat Discrimination, Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, Country Report, Ireland, Shivaun Quinlivan, State of Affairs up to 08 January 2007 – Report available on Internet.)

Professor Harry Kennedy, like Dr Mohan, served in Broadmoor. It might be useful to know the precise chronology in that regard and whether they were in any way involved in the Unison scandal. Any information about the Unison scandal in Broadmoor may help us.

Another question regarding Professor Kennedy is whether he is related to William Kennedy, the Medical Council’s Head of Professional Standards and Legal Adviser.

I am taking further soundings and I will contact your email address as soon as possible.

Parishioner said...

Most grateful for your further response.

I feel the tip of the iceberg is all we have uncovered.

Unfortunately when anything goes on Indymedia even if you can furnish copies of letters to back up things they say unsubstatiated allegations and remove items. We have to find a way to get publicity out there that will stay and have others make contact.

Thanks to the Reverend Father who runs this website we have made a start as he is the one person thanks be to God that has allowed my case to be aired as I sent him some info to back up what I said and lots more will be following. I have never said anything that I cannot back up.

It is a shame that people who are in a career of trust can do this to others. Had Dr. Mohan's recommendations being followed through I would now be a vegable not even knowing my own name as he recommended drugging and lock up in a mental institution at the behest of my Parish Priest and Parish should I not volunteer to go. My three medical assessments would not follow through saying incorrect diagnosis, nothing to treat, they questioned Dr. Mohan's methods of diagnosis but he will not have anyone dare question him and he has the backing of the Irish Medical Council who will not investigate him.

This is the start of a major scandal involving the Catholic Church and the Medical profession and adding in local Gardai like Detective Garda John McDonnell of Bray who jumps when the Parish Priest says jump and pulls out the swabs for DNA and ink for the fingerprints and subjects an innocent mother of two grown up sons and a hard working highly efficient and dedicated Parish Secretary (employed by Very Reverend John Canon MacMahon and holding a reference from him) to these tests and the stress related to same not to mention Garda car calling to your home to take you down to the Station. All of this harrassment on behalf of the Church is a crime against the individual.

Now all of this also warrants a complaint to the Garda Ombudsman and it is not too late for that as next port of call.

There are a lot of corrupt buddies in this together each covering the others back. Did not know Harry Kennedy was in Broadmoor with Dr. Mohan - a nest of vipers!!!

It is time they were all unmasked for what they are corrupt, dishonest and out to persecute the innocent just because of their Roman Collar (that by the way Fr. White never wears) the Garda Uniform or the Certificate that says Dr. Mohan is qualified in his field.

Keep in touch my friend, bring anyone on board that you can. We need to blow these scandals wide open and let the heads roll and clear our good names once and for all.

In due course we may find very relevant connections to Dr. Mohan via inner city religious 'friends' of Fr. White who work with elderly, disadvantaged, perhaps in areas that would require the services of someone like him. More on that later. We will soon have "Nuns on the Run" not just Priests, Psychiatrists and Gardai.

There is also a major tie up with FAS Community Employment schemes to be investigated and how the Church can run these schemes as they wish, how FAS condone that and pay them huge sums of money to do so, give them free staff, how Fr. White put one of same staff into my job illegally and against the rules of FAS for 7 months after I lost my job, how FAS don't mind that they keep staff employed in their Church Offices to supervise FAS staff and who had porn, that the man who had the porn was left to work in the same ROOM in the Parish Centre as young women all under 30 years for 2 years after porn was reported to the Parish Priest. Because another female staff member and Secretary reported this porn and sexual harassment Secretary was gone out of her job 2 months later.

None of this is good enough and thank God the investigations are coming from all angles now and we are getting to the truth.

Former Parish worker said...

While working in Our Lady Queen of Peace Parish Bray some years ago the former Parish Priest Very Reverend John Canon MacMahon had a beautiful water feature built near the Parish Centre. It was and possibly still is his intention in due course to be buried there although he is now retired to a Nursing Home in Dublin but he served in the Parish for about 25 years was the most wonderful man and did so much for the Parish and the community while there. It was a priviledge to have worked for him and to learn so much about the workings of the Church and the Parish from someone who although not from the town loved it as much as those born and reared there.

The point of this posting is that this beautiful water feature both enhances the garden area by the Parish Centre and is a source of refreshment for the local birds who come and drink and wash there.

It was always nice to look out from the Coffee Dock and see them enjoying it.

To show the depths of uncaring Christianity of loving all God's creatures as we are instructed to do I personally was ordered not to give a few crusts daily to those birds who would snap them up in a few seconds and fly off happy. When finishing off lunch it would be a habit to throw the few pieces outside the window on to the grass where they would be eaten instantly and then the birds flew off. When Fr. Larry White the current PP saw me do it he demanded I not feed the birds and then in an off handed remark said THEY WERE THE UGLIEST BIRDS IN GOD'S CREATION. He missed the point of what he said GOD CREATED THEM as he did all of us and we should all be respected and live and let live and take care of each other even if it is one of God's small creatures like the local birds.

Again proof of the uncaring attitude and bully tactics. It was not to stop bird droppings around the church because in the almost 5 years I was there these birds respected that area and there were never any droppings around which I know was very strange. It was like they had a respect for where they were in a Church grounds being given THE WATER OF LIFE from Canon John's water feature.

What a thoughtful man God Bless him in his retirement.

Canon John like the other Parish Priest knew I had budgies and was very fond of birds. When the elderly Canon John went on holidays to his sister in UK while I worked there he brought me back a lovely bird brooch which I still treasure because he knew of my love of God's feathered creatures. The other Parish Priest when he ordered me not to feed the birds also knew it would go against the grain with me because of my own birds and I feel it was again an uncalled for bully tactic.

How different these two men of God are but both served as Parish Priest of Our Lady Queen of Peace. Canon John is still sorely missed and kindly remembered.

Anonymous said...

"Hope is the thing with feathers."

Anonymous said...

When browsing through an item on Indymedia about bullying in the workplace I noticed this posting below - the second half of which refers to this case with the heading above!

**********************************
If your face does not fit in
by Michael - Human League Wed Dec 03, 2008 02:40

My goodness , i thought for one moment you were referring to Big Soap Fans who bully their Partners following a ''rivetting'' episode of
Eastenders or God Forbid ''Corry'' and the usual high standard of acting involved in the making of such anti family trash'
Same episodes will guide the ''Family '' over the holiday period and straight into the NU YEAR ,craftily written to have an impact like never before.
Who am i fooling ,i was recently in a public house in Dublin ,i counted 17 males glued into ''Corry'' and Eastenders was to follow' they were more
than likely there as they had no home to go to but are now following episodes like sheep to a slaughter ,i wont say house as it is probably ''GONE''
while The Applicant begins its NU LIFE thanks to the high standard of acting re the above mentioned.

Sorry u were on about work and bullying in the workplace so it is only fair to mention the Parish Priest of North Wicklow ( Bray ) who systematically
set up the Parish Secretary and almost drove the Lady to Bray Head for a one way walk , ( It is known to have happened how a poor lady went for a
walk up Bray Head and was '''found'''' 14 months later ) however that was NOT THE CASE.
The Former Parish Priest ,who from the pulpit broke down in front of his parishioners citing ILLNESS for his Breakdown has not been seen in an age
. Keep up the good work and dont be pushed out of your job and good luck to you .

**********************************
P.S.
Unfortunately when that was written the Parish Priest had been away for 5 months but soon after (UNFORTUNATELY) he returned to the Parish and nothing has changed he is still as arrogant as ever.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, I posted the following on the other thread by mistake. I'll copy it here as well, as the information may be useful:

By the way, if you decide to include the ground of "imputed disability" (ie imputed “erotomania") in your claim to the Equality Tribunal, it is likely that the opposing party will object to that on the basis that you are outside the six month time limit for making such a claim. You can counter this objection by citing a previous Equality Tribunal determination according to which the scope of an investigation should not be limited by the content of the original claim form. In Equality Tribunal case DEC-E2006-012 Equality Officer Gerardine Coyle stated in her Conclusions, paragraph 4.4: ‘In Long and Powers Supermarket & Others (5) Mr Justice Johnson held that there is an obligation on the Equality Officer to examine all aspects of the claim whether or not they have been referred in the original referral form.’

Anonymous said...

Thank you for your continued interest in this case and your very helpful suggestions.

All ideas that may be helpful to the case are gratefully received and appreciated.

Justice 4 Margaret group said...

We have got some quite negative feedback from people in St. Mary's Parish Lucan.

Are there any others out there who would care to share further information?

If so do contact groups email at justice4margaret@live.com

Thank you.

ANOTHER VICTIM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH said...

Can the writer who has had dealings with Dr. Mohan and Professor Kennedy please get in touch with us at our email
justice4margaret@live.com as soon as possible.

We would like to discuss things further prior to an Equality Tribunal hearing where the date has been set.

Thank you.