It has scarcely been noticed in Britain, but a remarkable development
has recently taken place in Holocaust studies.
Nearly two years ago,
the International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation, a historical research
institute, set out on “a modest project”.
It wanted to mark “Houses of
Life” – places where Jews were sheltered during the war – with memorial
plaques.
It found more than 500 such houses in Italy, France, Hungary,
Belgium and Poland.
Eduardo Eurnekian, chairman of the foundation, wrote
that “to our surprise, we have learned that the overwhelming majority
of Houses of Life were institutions related to the Catholic Church,
including convents, monasteries, boarding schools, hospitals, etc”.
In Rome alone, some 4,500 people found refuge in churches, convents,
monasteries and boarding schools.
In Warsaw, All Saints Church sheltered
Jews. This was remarkable, because the penalty for Poles for rescuing
Jews was the death camp or, more likely, instant execution.
It is appropriate that a foundation named after Raoul Wallenberg
should find such an extensive Catholic contribution to saving Jewish
lives.
Wallenberg was a Swedish diplomat in Budapest during the war. He
and Angelo Rotta, the papal nuncio, saved 120,000 out of the city’s
150,000 Jews. Wallenberg was arrested by the Red Army and never seen
again.
The news about the Houses of Life is only surprising because the
truth about the Church and the Jewish people in the Second World War has
been suppressed.
Several aides of the wartime pope, Pius XII,
acknowledged that they had worked to rescue Jews on his direct
instructions.
They included two future popes – Mgr Angelo Roncalli (John
XXIII) and Mgr Giovanni Battista Montini (Paul VI). Pius XII himself
sheltered Jews both in the Vatican itself and at Castel Gandolfo.
This is a good moment to mark the Church’s witness against Nazism.
Eighty years ago, on March 14, 1937, Pope Pius XI issued Mit Brennender
Sorge (“With Burning Anxiety”), an encyclical, pointedly written in
German, condemning Nazism.
“Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the
state, and divinises them to an idolatrous level, perverts an order of
the world created by God,” the pope wrote.
Pius XI’s secretary of state was Cardinal Pacelli, the future Pius
XII. He distributed the text, which he had helped to draft, secretly
within Germany.
Four years earlier, in 1933, he had negotiated a
concordat between the Holy See and Germany, not to appease Nazism but to
have some means of holding the Nazis to account through an
international treaty.
The regime referred to him as “Jew loving”: he had
made more than 50 protests against Nazi policy, the earliest coming
just days after the passing of the Enabling Act, which granted Hitler
the power to enact laws without Reichstag approval.
Pacelli was regarded
as so anti-Nazi that the Third Reich attempted to prevent his election
as pope in 1939.
Pacelli’s personal story is important. He was a Germanophile – and,
equally, a philosemite – from his youth.
As nuncio in Bavaria during the
brief 1919 communist republic he showed high personal courage,
remaining at his post. His sympathy and friendship with Jews, including
the great conductor Bruno Walter, was well known, and he gave discreet
help to many.
At Walter’s request, he gained the freedom of a musician,
Ossip Gabrilowitsch, arrested in a pogrom while Bavaria was under
communist rule.
Safe in America, Gabrilowitsch became the founding
musical director of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra. Walter himself later
became a Catholic.
Before the war, Pacelli took extraordinary risks to help the German
opposition. He knew which generals were preparing to act against Hitler,
and made sure news of their intentions reached the British government.
In a situation of huge difficulty, Pius XII did what no one else did
to save Jewish lives during the war. He knew quite early on what was
really happening to the Jewish people. At the time, too many were in
denial, including a British diplomat who wrote of “these whining Jews”.
Neither Britain nor America made it easy for Jews to escape into exile –
the Kindertransport was a blessed exception.
In the war years, Pius XII acted directly in Italy and through papal
diplomats in Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and elsewhere. Unsurprisingly
given the circumstances, there is no firm number for those saved by the
pope and the Church in one way or another. It was perhaps between
500,000 and 860,000.
Pius XII’s statements both before and during the war were
unmistakably hostile to Nazism.
The Allies may have wanted more, but the
price would have been the ending of all the good the pope could do.
The
Nazis understood his meaning very well. A plan to kidnap Pius in 1944
was only averted by the unlikely intervention of SS General Karl Wolff.
The pope was also utterly clear about the evils of communism and
vicious Stalinist religious persecution.
But he said nothing about it
during the war. Allied diplomats in the Vatican understood this,
realising that it was only the pope’s preservation of the Holy See’s
neutrality which enabled him to give refuge to thousands of Jews in
religious houses in Italy and the Vatican itself.
It also allowed him to
provide contacts so that information about prisoners of war and the
Holocaust could reach the Allied powers.
All this was acknowledged during and after the war, not least by
Jews. Albert Einstein, who had escaped Nazi Germany, said in 1940: “Only
the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for
suppressing the truth … I am forced thus to confess that what I once
despised I now praise unreservedly.”
Chaim Weizmann, Israel’s first president, and Isaac Herzog, chief
rabbi of Israel, paid similarly generous tributes. Israel Zolli, Rome’s
chief rabbi, became a Catholic and took the pope’s Christian name,
Eugenio, in tribute to him. After Pius’s death in 1958, Golda Meir, then
Israeli foreign minister, wrote: “We mourn a great servant of peace.”
The Nazis hated the Church. Thousands of Catholic priests were
imprisoned, especially in Dachau, the “priests’ camp”. It is true that
some bishops followed a policy of appeasement: Cardinal Adolf Bertram of
Breslau supposedly ordered a Requiem Mass for Hitler in 1945.
Some
Catholics betrayed Jews and even, as in Jedwabne in 1941, massacred
them.
But others, notably Bishop Clemens August von Galen of Münster and
Bishop Konrad von Preysing of Berlin, did all they could to resist
Nazism. Preysing’s agent, Bernhard Lichtenberg, the provost of Berlin
cathedral, was judicially murdered and is now recognised as a martyr.
Yet in the nearly 60 years since Pius XII’s death, his reputation has
been traduced.
One recent example was the BBC’s report that the silent
prayer of Pope Francis at Auschwitz was in reparation for the silence of
the Catholic Church.
The corporation was simply repeating what had
become the received view of Pius XII and of the Church’s record during
the war.
Lord Alton of Liverpool immediately protested, and together he and I
made a formal complaint to the BBC.
A considerable correspondence
ensued.
In early December, the complaint was upheld. Fraser Steel, head
of the editorial complaints unit, wrote: “This did not give due weight
to public statements by successive popes or the efforts made on the
instructions of Pius XII to rescue Jews from Nazi persecution, and
perpetuated a view which is at odds with the balance of evidence.”
The negative view of Pius marked an astonishing reversal of
reputation. In 1963, a previously unknown German, Rolf Hochhuth,
published a play called The Deputy which blamed Pius XII for the
Holocaust. Hochhuth claimed it was historically accurate.
The play was
premiered in West Berlin and performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company
in England and America.
The provenance of Hochhuth’s play, and the degree of communist
support, aroused suspicion.
The USSR had a strong interest in destroying
the moral authority of the pope and the Catholic Church.
As Khrushchev,
a mass murderer in his own right, said at the time, dead men cannot
defend themselves.
Confirmation of these suspicions came only in 1998, with the
publication of the memoirs of Ion Mihai Pacepa, a Romanian three-star
general in the Securitate who defected in 1978.
According to Pacepa, the
project, known as Seat 12, originated in Moscow with Khrushchev.
From
1959, Pacepa had directed his spies, posing as priests, to pilfer
Vatican archives. They found nothing they could use, but Ivan Agayants,
the KGB’s disinformation chief, had been able to feed Hochhuth with
false information, which he was only too ready to use.
The Soviets’ aim
was to discredit Pope Pius and wreck the growing understanding between
the Church and Judaism.
The American writer Ronald Rychlak, who has done the most detailed
work on the story, concludes that Hochhuth was heavily dependent on such
Soviet disinformation.
Not that Hochhuth was the only author: his play
was rewritten and heavily abridged by Erwin Piscator, a famous producer
and communist agent of influence.
In 1964, Blessed Paul VI commissioned detailed research, eventually
published in 1981, which showed the degree of papal and Catholic support
for the Jewish people during the war.
This should have been the end of
the matter.
It was not.
A number of Jewish scholars, such as Daniel
Goldhagen, publishing in the 1990s, endorsed the accusations. This had
its effect.
The distinguished historian Sir Martin Gilbert wrote that he
repeatedly received applications for support for PhD study which
usually included a reference to the “silent” or even “anti-Semitic” Pius
XII.
John Cornwell’s Hitler’s Pope, published in 1999, was seriously
misleading. He implied that Pacelli held “stereotypical” anti-Semitic
views.
This was based on, among other things, mistranslating,
misconstruing and selectively quoting a long letter written by Pacelli
in 1919, reporting on a meeting with the chairman of the Bolshevik
administration in Munich.
Cornwell’s book was overdependent on the
understandably embittered recollections of Heinrich Brüning, the exiled
former German Chancellor. Hitler’s Pope was really part of a campaign
against St John Paul II.
But that is a different argument and has no
business in an evaluation of Pius XII.
Cornwell’s book had wide circulation and favourable reviews from the
liberal media. It and others in a similar vein have been savaged by
knowledgeable critics, such as Rychlak, Gilbert and Rabbi David Dalin.
Together they provide detailed evidence of misquotation,
misrepresentation and even malice in these books. The media have found
little space for these corrections.
So the lie remains the received
story.
But the example of the BBC suggests that this may be changing.
Three steps would do much to right the wrongs against Pius.
First, the BBC should prepare a major documentary on the pope who was
responsible for saving thousands of Jewish lives.
I am advised that the
corporation will consider this.
The BBC has acknowledged that there
should be closer scrutiny.
Which of course there already has been: the
question is whether minds are open.
Secondly, the critical statements about Pope Pius at Yad Vashem,
Israel’s official memorial to Holocaust victims, should be substantially
revised.
Many of the pope’s helpers have now been named Righteous among
the Nations. It is time that Pius was recognised himself as among the
Righteous. He needs not a tree, but a whole forest planted in his
memory.
The story of the Houses of Life adds further weight to the
evidence for his bravery.
Thirdly, Pius’s beatification should proceed without delay.
Rome has
already recognised his heroic virtue, paving the way for him to be
declared Blessed.
Let the last word be with Pius himself. In 1943, he wrote: “The time
will come when unpublished documents about this terrible war will be
made public. Then the foolishness of all accusations will become obvious
in clear daylight. Their origin is not ignorance but contempt of the
Church.”
At that time he was referring to Nazi propaganda.
His words
apply equally to the malicious libels of the past 60 years.
* The Very Rev Fr Leo Chamberlain osb is a former headmaster of
Ampleforth College. He is parish priest of St John the Evangelist,
Easingwold in North Yorkshire