On 1st. November 2025, we were in receipt of a rather interesting email from a person we will identify as John, and to whom we wish to directly address this posting.
1. You claim to have spoken to a Senior Priest in an Irish diocese, and accuse us here in CW as being a second Pat Buckley - to which we take serious exception.
Unlike Mr Buckley, and indeed yourself John, we only deal in facts, and if, as you allege in your email, you are dealing with a senior priest who perceives us as such, then perhaps they have more to hide than they will ever tell you...or anyone else.
(a) Are you carrying out an investigation of your own John?
(b) At whose behest?
(c) For what purpose?
(d) Are you, like us, engaging with the lawful authorities in so doing?
(e) If it's not an investigation John on your part, what are you doing interfering in ongoing lawful investigations?
(f) In relation to Mr Buckley, lest anyone forget that he could barely spell the word truth never mind publish it - of which so so many are aware...and yet you had no problem in being part of a slander and smear campaign by him against others - of which you are well aware. You are more alike than perhaps you'd care to admit John.
2. Any and all evidence which we in CW (via our solicitor) do have, is forming part of ongoing criminal investigations by the necessary lawful authorities in two separate jurisdictions alongside an international lawful authority - of which we have made mention heretofore.
At no point would we here in CW ever undermine such investigations as you would seem to allege in your email to us. We respect the authority of the law of the land - even if you do not, and indeed considering the Diocese you reference, they certainly have no respect for ANY law - canonical or civil as has been well attested to thus far.
3. You make reference to Cardinal Parolin and his being aware of this website, a fact to which we are well attuned and indeed he is not the only resident of the Vatican who tunes in on a daily basis...and yes John, we have verified evidence of that fact as well.
(g) Are you in contact with Cardinal Parolin to such a point as to claim that he awaits our evidence?
(h) If so, can you provide us with a direct dial number perhaps?
(i) Or a personal email our solicitor could use so as to initiate correspondence?
4. You claim that Bishop Fintan Monahan et al have not lost a nights sleep over CW - which is worrying as it means that he has no conscience - a fact you have now somewhat confirmed for us.
(j) Do you communicate regularly with Bishop Fintan Monahan and get updates from him relative to his sleeping patterns?
(k) Do you and Bishop Fintan Monahan laugh together at the contents of CW - as implied in your email?
5. You make reference - ill-advised as it is - to people who claim to have babies with priests only come forward for money and support.
What a beligerent attitude and one which stinks of the Chief Shepherd of the Diocese of Killaloe ....although, without an investigation into any such allegation, he hands out money, apartments and character references so he obviously inspires your attitude also.
(l) Do you think anyone should have to look for support and money?
(m) Should the priest and the Diocese not already be providing such without it being sought?
(n) Interesting that you made no reference to the priest having procured and paid for the abortion in the matter we referred to - why?
6. You made reference to a priest by name, whom we have informed and he is taking the matter up on a legal footing so take this as notice of such, and as referenced elsewhere in this posting, we will respect the law of the land - irrespective of where that land is located.
7. As for Bishop Fintan Monahan taking action, it is regrettable he did not initiate an investigation when the initital allegations were raised, a fact of which he was reminded by An Garda Síochána - twice in a year no less, and has still failed to action.
(o) Perhaps next time you are having your bromance chat on the phone, or indeed by email, you can ask him why he has failed to so do?
8. As for pantomimes, well John, you played a heavy hand in one when Mr Buckley was alive, and continue to still involve yourself in situations not of your business - perhaps you like the drama on an ongoing basis?
9. You make reference to Cleo and her Safeguarding obligations - perhaps you could send her the same and advise her accordingly as she seems to be remiss in carrying out her obligations and responsibilities.
Anyway John, we would offer the following words to you which we were in receipt of and indeed are very pertinent for you....
Always remember that no matter how hard people may try to hide it, or stop it, the truth always comes out in the end.
Lies and feelings presented as facts are just merely a temporary delay to an inevitability that will happen when the one in possession of the full truth decides its time, and not when you or we decide.
This is one cage that you should not have rattled....
AODHÁN DE FAOITE
Eagarthóir / Editor