“The split continues," said Archbishop Andre Vingt-Trois of Paris in his February 27 statement. He warned the faithful that the priests who now serve at the church of St. Nicolas du Chardonnet are not recognized by the Paris archdiocese or any other jurisdiction of the Catholic Church.
In 1977, members of the SSPX entered the parish church in the Latin quarter of Paris, ousted the pastor, and began an occupation that continues to this day. French courts have ruled on several occasions that the occupation is illegal, but declined to expel the traditionalists for fear of creating a greater disturbance.
Some public officials have argued that the occupation at St. Nicolas du Chardonnet is an internal matter that should be resolved by Church authorities, and the Archdiocese of Paris has not pressed for the eviction of the SSPX.
Archbishop Vingt-Trois did not press the legal issue in his February 27 statement. But he said that many Catholics might be misled into the belief that the St. Nicolas du Chardonnet was a normal parish church, and the priests members of the clergy of the Paris archdiocese.
Retracing the history of the occupation, the archbishop noted that the SSPX members who seized possession had “deprived the faithful of the use of their parish church.”
In 1988, he noted, when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre broke with the Vatican, the SSPX clerics at the Paris church allied themselves with that schismatic act.
Noting that his predecessor Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger had reached out to traditionalist Catholics by authorizing the celebration of the pre-conciliar liturgy in three parish churches in Paris, Archbishop Vingt-Trois concluded his message with a call for all Catholics to pray for unity within the Church.
The head of the SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, has defended the occupation of St. Nicolas du Chardonnet, explaining that the traditionalists there were acting out of necessity, to preserve the faith from the “bishops and pastors who, since the Council, have suffocated Catholic life.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce