Last 30 June, just days after the start of the
Society of St. Pius X’s General Chapter, Benedict XVI wrote a letter to
the Lefebvrian Superior, Bishop Bernard Fellay.
The letter was revealed
during a conference
held on 16 September at the Priory of St. Louis-Marie Grignon de
Monfort in France, by Mgr. Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, one of the
Fraternity’s four bishops, who is renowned for his disapproval of an
agreement with Rome.
During the conference, the prelate said: “On
30 June 2012 – this is a secret but will be revealed to the public – the
Pope himself wrote a letter to our Superior General, Mgr. Fellay: “I
confirm to you that in order to be fully reintegrated into the Catholic
Church, you must really accept the Second Vatican Council and the
post-conciliar teachings.”
“This really is a sticking point –
Tissier de Mallerais said – because we cannot accept or sign something
like this. Clarifications can be made as the Council is so vast and it
does have its positive points but this is not the essential element of
the Council.”
The Lefebvrian bishop was very tough in some of
the points he made during the conference: “Weapons cannot be surrendered
right in the middle of a battle; we will not look for a truce while the
war rages on, with the beatification of a fake beatification, that of
Pope John Paul II. This was fake, it was a fake beatification. And
with the requirement, continuously stressed by Benedict XVI, that we
accept the Council and the reforms to the post-conciliar teachings.”
Tissier de Mallerais also said that
“the collegiality that destroys the power of the Pope who no longer
dares to show resistance to the bishops’ conferences.”
He added that
ecumenism “allows respect for the values of salvation of false religions
and Protestantism, of false things,” while religious freedom “allows
the free construction of mosques in our countries.”
“Evidently – the Lefebvrian bishop said
– we cannot sign such an agreement. There isn’t and never will be
agreement over this point.”
Despite “modernist Rome’s” insistence,
Tissier stressed: “Personally I will never sign anything like this that
is for sure. I will never accept that the new Mass is legitimate or
licit; I believe it lacks validity, as Mgr. Lefebvre used to say. I will
never accept the idea that “the Council, if interpreted correctly,
could be made to correspond with the Tradition [and that] an acceptable
meaning could be found.”
After calling the doctrinal preamble which Cardinal William Levada
delivered to Fellay, “false”, the Lefebvrian bishop said some “very mild
and soft” decisions were taken at the General Chapter of the Society of
St. Pius X, convened last July, so as to “present Rome with such great
obstacles that it would be prevented from making any new proposals to
us. But the Devil is evil and I think they will strike again, so I am
discreetly preparing to defend us and the Fraternity will defend
itself.”