Monday, August 29, 2016

'Bishop' hits out as blog on 'gay sex scandal' deleted

'Bishop' Pat Buckley has accused the Catholic Church of attempting to censor him after a blog, in which he revealed an alleged gay sex scandal, was temporarily deleted by Google.

Google later reinstated the blog, which had revealed details of the alleged gay sex scandal in Maynooth training college.

The site disappeared for 48 hours but was yesterday back up again, following media reports highlighting its removal in our sister newspaper, the 'Belfast Telegraph'.

In recent weeks, the controversial Larne-based man made claims about students having profiles on the gay dating app, Grindr, and using the site to solicit sex with priests and laymen.

In an email to Buckley at the weekend, the Google-owned platform, Blogger, stated: "Your blog at wisecatholic.blogspot.com has been reviewed and confirmed as in violation of our terms of service for: HATE. In accordance to these terms, we've removed the blog."

Shocked

However, Buckley's blog was reinstated yesterday. Buckley said he was shocked when Google had accused him of spreading hate.

"As a gay man who lives with his husband, and as a cleric who has performed blessings for same-sex couples for 30 years, it was crazy to suggest that I hated gay people," he said.

"I find it all rather mysterious that my blog is taken down without explanation and then is put back up without explanation," he said. "I suspect that the blog got too hot...

"But representations were made on my behalf to Google in America and that, along with the issue being raised by the 'Belfast Telegraph', seems to have done the trick."

He dismissed suggestions that his blog's removal could have been down to "an administrative error" by Google. But, he added: "I am very happy to be back online.

"My blog had a quarter of a million page views last month alone.

"I started out with a few hundred readers and it has taken me years to build it up."

Buckley pledged to "continue telling the truth about Maynooth and shining a light into the darkest corners of the church".

Monday, August 08, 2016

Pat Buckley: If the Moon had churches, Bishop Cahal Daly would have sent me there... it didn't, so Larne it was

Independent Catholic cleric Pat Buckley says he never set out to cause trouble, it came to his door because he is a champion of the downtrodden.

Q. You're a gay Catholic cleric living in loyalist Larne with your husband. What is that like?

A. You might be expecting a tale of horrors, but nothing could be further from the truth. I've never once suffered homophobic abuse in Larne. I've lived in the town for 32 years and there was a lot of sectarianism at the start. But that has disappeared.

People who spat on me when I first arrived today sit and have a coffee and a chat with me. I was elected to Larne Borough Council in 1989, and it was a rough ride. But now when I'm out doing my shopping I meet DUP people who wouldn't speak to me back then, and we smile and laugh about those days.

I'm now part of the furniture. I've bought the plot in the council cemetery where I want to be buried.

Q. How did you end up in Larne?

A. Cahal Daly, who was then Bishop of Down and Connor, deliberately moved me into what he thought was hostile territory. Larne wasn't a desirable parish. It was 83% Protestant and that included a sizeable Free Presbyterian population. I think Bishop Daly thought he wouldn't be hearing from me again (laughs).

Before that, he had proposed a parish in Australia, which he suggested would be happy to have a liberal priest like me. I said: "My name isn't Guinness, I'm not for export." If they'd churches on the Moon, he would have moved me there, but they hadn't, so Larne it was.

Q. Have you always been a mischief-maker?

A. Well, I was born in Tullamore, Co Offaly, the eldest of 17 children. I had no childhood as I was effectively a third parent to my brothers and sisters. So maybe I developed a sense of mischief as an adult to make up for those lost years. But look, I never set out to cause trouble. It came to my door because I championed the cause of the downtrodden and outcasts. I call myself the black shepherd for the black sheep.


My parents strongly influenced the kind of person I am. My dad Jim was a trade union official who went to university late. He was called to the bar in his 50s. He was an admirer of Tony Benn, and I get my fighting spirit from him. My mother Josephine had a huge heart and I get my compassion from her.


Q. When did you first clash with the Catholic hierarchy?


A. After I was ordained I was sent to St Peter's in west Belfast in 1978. There were five priests inhabiting a palatial house in the middle of Divis Flats. We were living in first world accommodation, and working in a Third World community. I had to choose which world I belonged to. I chose the people and that made my life with the other priests, and my superiors, very difficult.


Q. You said Mass in the H-Blocks during the 1981 hunger strike. What was that like?


A. They were traumatic times. One Sunday a prison officer asked me to bring communion to a prisoner in the hospital wing - it was Bobby Sands. I asked him for a chat afterwards and he said: "Only if you're not going to preach at me." I told him I wasn't that type. I got to know him fairly well.


A lot of the other hunger strikers were hostile to the Church, but he ordered them to Mass. I certainly didn't share Bobby Sands' convictions, but he was very genuine in them. I watched the hunger strikers die one by one.


I was forbidden by the hierarchy from going to their funerals - they said it wouldn't look good with the authorities. I went to all 10. Not because I supported the IRA - I most definitely did not. But these were men I had ministered to, I had heard their confessions. I did the Christian thing.

It was the same with British soldiers. Many priests in west Belfast wouldn't talk to them. I always did, and got grief for it. I remember one soldier asking me to bless his miraculous medal. I didn't hesitate. I relate to people as human beings.

Q. You will be 65 next birthday, officially an old-age-pensioner, are you still challenging the Church?

A. Of course I am. I pick my battles more carefully these days, but I remain as committed to truth and justice as ever. I run the Bethany group, which is made up of 120 women who have had failed relationships with priests. I help people who find out - usually late in life - that they're the sons and daughters of priests.

I'm currently involved in a battle with the hierarchy over a big gay scandal in Maynooth seminary. As a result of material that I published on my blog, the Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin, will no longer send student priests to Maynooth. They'll go to Rome instead.

There is a very dominant gay culture in Maynooth, which non-homosexual seminarians find intimidating. A former seminarian is filing a complaint of sexual harassment with gardai against a staff member. Interestingly, the four Northern dioceses are content to keep sending their trainees to Maynooth.

Q. Does the Catholic Church have a big 'gay problem'?

A. In the past we had the 'Jack The Lad' heterosexual priest, having affairs with housekeepers and female parishioners. It still happens - like Father Ciaran Dallat, who got a parishioner pregnant in west Belfast - but that type is a minority now.

Around 60 to 70% of priests ordained today are gay. There are at least 200 Irish priests on the gay dating app Grindr. It's a schizophrenic situation. Imposing compulsory celibacy on priests is disastrous, because it drives them into underground sex.

Q. You were suspended from the priesthood 30 years ago, then excommunicated in 1998. What normal clerical duties do you still perform?

A. They took my membership card away, but they can't stop me working. I run an independent ministry from The Oratory in Larne. I baptise children - mainly from mixed marriages. I baptised a baby girl at Glenoe Waterfall recently.

I married two divorced couples last week. I marry fewer gay people since the legalisation of civil partnerships here and gay marriage in the South.

I used to be only person conducting non-church weddings in the South, but there are now 5,000 others on the register - druids, white witches, black witches and humanists - so I do less of that too.

Now, I marry a lot of couples from the Travelling community. You can't get married in the South until you're 18 but, with parental permission, it's 16 in the North, so they come up to me in Larne.

Q. What are the Traveller weddings like?

A. Exactly as you see on TV. Girls arrive in the snow with skirts the width of belts. I tell them they'll get a chill in their kidneys. Brides arrive in Cinderella carriages drawn by four horses. The people of Larne gather at the gates to watch the spectacle. The bridal limousine and all the Mercs bring the traffic on Main Street to a standstill.

When The Oratory was being renovated, the bride and bridesmaids at one wedding couldn't change there. So they just stripped to their undies in the street. The builders' eyes were out on stalks. They told me that watching that scene was better than any big bonus in their pay packets.

But fights can start at these weddings. I've had occasion to call both police and ambulances. I've taken the odd knock myself from a drunken father of the bride. So when I'm doing a Traveller wedding, I always keep my mobile phone in my pocket in case I need to dial 999.

Q. You came out as gay in 1999. Did you march in the Pride parade on Saturday?

A. No, it's not for me. For those in the gay community who like the parade and its colourfulness, that's fine. But there are lots of others who are quietly gay and aren't into parades. We all express ourselves differently.

Q. Did you support the campaign against Ashers bakery for refusing to make a pro-gay marriage cake?

A I have mixed feelings on Ashers. I don't buy their produce instinctively. Yet I do feel that too much was made of the situation with Ashers, it was definitely overdone.

I dislike fundamentalism of any kind and I detect a creeping fundamentalism among some gay rights campaigners. I don't see the need for it. There is strong legislation protecting gay people now. We have civil partnerships in the North and it's only a matter of time before gay marriage is legalised here too.

The battle for equality is almost over. But I am concerned about an Animal Farm situation developing, where those who were once marginalised end up becoming as intolerant as the dictators they despised.

Q. In 2010 you married Eduardo Yango, a Filipino chef 23 years your junior. How is married life?

A. We are very happy. We have the same sense of humour, which helps. We share the housework and the cooking. We travel a good bit. We went to Bulgaria recently and enjoyed some sight-seeing and visiting museums.

Our life is very ordinary. We go out for a bite to eat now and again. If we're in Belfast we call into the Union Bar for half-an-hour. But we are not part of the whole gay scene. It doesn't appeal to me. It can be very concentrated on sex, alcohol and loud music. That may be attractive to young people, but it's not, and never was, my style.

Q. In 2013 you were convicted of involvement in 14 sham marriages which flouted immigration laws. Why did you commit these crimes?

A. I've always had a natural sympathy for immigrants, but the couples were referred to me by a solicitor, Ho Ling Mo. She was an officer of the court and licensed by the Law Society of Northern Ireland. I trusted her, and I was wrong.

She was paid thousands by these couples. I didn't profit. I got my normal £300 a wedding. I co-operated fully with the police and handed over all my documentation to them. I have married 3,000 couples. At issue here were 14 weddings over three years - a tiny percentage of the marriages I've conducted.

Q. Are you not ashamed of your actions?

A. I was charged with conspiracy to defraud the British Home Secretary. Some people told me that any Irishman worth his salt should be doing exactly that. But I am not proud that I fell foul of the law and now have a criminal record. It also gives my enemies ammunition against me.

Q. What affect did the trial have on you?

A. It was one of the worst times of my life. To sit in the dock between two prison officers at 61 years of age is deeply unpleasant. Once, I was placed in handcuffs and taken to the cells in the bowels of the court - that was scary. The trial had a major effect on my health. I have Crohn's disease and I developed bad cramps and bleeding. Three times walking to court I had "accidents" on the street. I was worried that I'd be sent to jail, although I'd have just had to make the best of it. Thankfully, I received a three-year suspended sentence.

Q. During your trial it was revealed that you were HIV-positive. How does that illness impact on your daily life?

A. It doesn't. When I was diagnosed in 2001, it was a shock. But HIV is no longer a death sentence. I'm looked after wonderfully well at the Royal Victoria Hospital, and I take my medication. It's only one tablet a day. HIV is easier to live with than diabetes.

People can survive into their 80s or 90s and die of heart attacks and strokes.

I was very annoyed when my diagnosis was revealed in court, but it gave people with their own secrets the courage to share them with me.

Two priests with HIV contacted me. Another priest I'd known for many years confided to me that he had gender dysphoria.

He was born with ambiguous genitalia and was still unsure whether he was male or female. So I look upon my HIV diagnosis being made public as positive now. I always try to see the silver lining in the clouds.

Q. The man who infected you with HIV knew he had the virus, but never told you. Do you hate him?

A. Absolutely not. I was in love with him at the time and I believe that real love never dies. I still love him, although I haven't seen him for many years and I wouldn't want to.

Q. A fortnight ago, 86-year-old Father Jacques Hamel was beheaded while saying Mass in Normandy. What is your response to the attack?

A. I've been in those little picturesque churches dotted across the French countryside and I can just see the old priest celebrating Mass with his congregation of elderly women. It was a hideous act by fundamentalists of the Islamic variety.

All it takes is for one person in Northern Ireland watching that, aligned to Isis, to go out and do the same here. It's impossible to prevent, as you just can't put armed guards on every church.

But while we mourn the dead in France and Germany, we shouldn't forget that hundreds of thousands of people have been killed in the Middle East since George Bush and Tony Blair invaded Iraq.

They have brought a lot of this upon us and I hope Parliament impeaches Blair.

Q. Pope Francis has been hailed as the great reformer. Do you think he can save the Catholic Church?

A. I doubt it. The Church is in meltdown. The damage from child abuse scandals has been colossal. Forty years ago there were 700 trainee priests in Ireland, now there are 60. The Church needs to change, but that's very hard for a massive 2,000-year-old organisation. It's like trying to turn an oil tanker in a small harbour.

I like Pope Francis. He's not judgmental, he's friendly, and he has the common touch. He tells mother-in-law jokes. You couldn't imagine any of his predecessors doing that. I hope he's genuine, but I fear it's just a PR trick. And, even if he is sincere, the Vatican mafia are all around him like sharks.

Q. Can you ever imagine yourself back in the Catholic Church?

A. I occasionally have that nightmare! It would be very hard to see, though. I regard myself now as a Free Catholic rather than a Roman Catholic. But, as a Christian, I am of course open to reconciliation with those from whom I am estranged.

Pat Buckley: If the Moon had churches, Bishop Cahal Daly would have sent me there... it didn't, so Larne it was

Independent Catholic cleric Pat Buckley says he never set out to cause trouble, it came to his door because he is a champion of the downtrodden.

Q. You're a gay Catholic cleric living in loyalist Larne with your husband. What is that like?

A. You might be expecting a tale of horrors, but nothing could be further from the truth. I've never once suffered homophobic abuse in Larne. I've lived in the town for 32 years and there was a lot of sectarianism at the start. But that has disappeared.

People who spat on me when I first arrived today sit and have a coffee and a chat with me. I was elected to Larne Borough Council in 1989, and it was a rough ride. But now when I'm out doing my shopping I meet DUP people who wouldn't speak to me back then, and we smile and laugh about those days.

I'm now part of the furniture. I've bought the plot in the council cemetery where I want to be buried.

Q. How did you end up in Larne? 

A. Cahal Daly, who was then Bishop of Down and Connor, deliberately moved me into what he thought was hostile territory. Larne wasn't a desirable parish. It was 83% Protestant and that included a sizeable Free Presbyterian population. I think Bishop Daly thought he wouldn't be hearing from me again (laughs).

Before that, he had proposed a parish in Australia, which he suggested would be happy to have a liberal priest like me. I said: "My name isn't Guinness, I'm not for export." If they'd churches on the Moon, he would have moved me there, but they hadn't, so Larne it was.

Q. Have you always been a mischief-maker?

A. Well, I was born in Tullamore, Co Offaly, the eldest of 17 children. I had no childhood as I was effectively a third parent to my brothers and sisters. So maybe I developed a sense of mischief as an adult to make up for those lost years. But look, I never set out to cause trouble. It came to my door because I championed the cause of the downtrodden and outcasts. I call myself the black shepherd for the black sheep.

My parents strongly influenced the kind of person I am. My dad Jim was a trade union official who went to university late. He was called to the bar in his 50s. He was an admirer of Tony Benn, and I get my fighting spirit from him. My mother Josephine had a huge heart and I get my compassion from her.

Q. When did you first clash with the Catholic hierarchy?

A. After I was ordained I was sent to St Peter's in west Belfast in 1978. There were five priests inhabiting a palatial house in the middle of Divis Flats. We were living in first world accommodation, and working in a Third World community. I had to choose which world I belonged to. I chose the people and that made my life with the other priests, and my superiors, very difficult.

Q. You said Mass in the H-Blocks during the 1981 hunger strike. What was that like?

A. They were traumatic times. One Sunday a prison officer asked me to bring communion to a prisoner in the hospital wing - it was Bobby Sands. I asked him for a chat afterwards and he said: "Only if you're not going to preach at me." I told him I wasn't that type. I got to know him fairly well.

A lot of the other hunger strikers were hostile to the Church, but he ordered them to Mass. I certainly didn't share Bobby Sands' convictions, but he was very genuine in them. I watched the hunger strikers die one by one.

I was forbidden by the hierarchy from going to their funerals - they said it wouldn't look good with the authorities. I went to all 10. Not because I supported the IRA - I most definitely did not. But these were men I had ministered to, I had heard their confessions. I did the Christian thing.

It was the same with British soldiers. Many priests in west Belfast wouldn't talk to them. I always did, and got grief for it. I remember one soldier asking me to bless his miraculous medal. I didn't hesitate. I relate to people as human beings.

Q. You will be 65 next birthday, officially an old-age-pensioner, are you still challenging the Church?

A. Of course I am. I pick my battles more carefully these days, but I remain as committed to truth and justice as ever. I run the Bethany group, which is made up of 120 women who have had failed relationships with priests. I help people who find out - usually late in life - that they're the sons and daughters of priests.

I'm currently involved in a battle with the hierarchy over a big gay scandal in Maynooth seminary. As a result of material that I published on my blog, the Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin, will no longer send student priests to Maynooth. They'll go to Rome instead.

There is a very dominant gay culture in Maynooth, which non-homosexual seminarians find intimidating. A former seminarian is filing a complaint of sexual harassment with gardai against a staff member. Interestingly, the four Northern dioceses are content to keep sending their trainees to Maynooth.

Q. Does the Catholic Church have a big 'gay problem'?

A. In the past we had the 'Jack The Lad' heterosexual priest, having affairs with housekeepers and female parishioners. It still happens - like Father Ciaran Dallat, who got a parishioner pregnant in west Belfast - but that type is a minority now.

Around 60 to 70% of priests ordained today are gay. There are at least 200 Irish priests on the gay dating app Grindr. It's a schizophrenic situation. Imposing compulsory celibacy on priests is disastrous, because it drives them into underground sex.

Q. You were suspended from the priesthood 30 years ago, then excommunicated in 1998. What normal clerical duties do you still perform?

A. They took my membership card away, but they can't stop me working. I run an independent ministry from The Oratory in Larne. I baptise children - mainly from mixed marriages. I baptised a baby girl at Glenoe Waterfall recently.

I married two divorced couples last week. I marry fewer gay people since the legalisation of civil partnerships here and gay marriage in the South.

I used to be only person conducting non-church weddings in the South, but there are now 5,000 others on the register - druids, white witches, black witches and humanists - so I do less of that too.

Now, I marry a lot of couples from the Travelling community. You can't get married in the South until you're 18 but, with parental permission, it's 16 in the North, so they come up to me in Larne.

Q. What are the Traveller weddings like?

A. Exactly as you see on TV. Girls arrive in the snow with skirts the width of belts. I tell them they'll get a chill in their kidneys. Brides arrive in Cinderella carriages drawn by four horses. The people of Larne gather at the gates to watch the spectacle. The bridal limousine and all the Mercs bring the traffic on Main Street to a standstill.

When The Oratory was being renovated, the bride and bridesmaids at one wedding couldn't change there. So they just stripped to their undies in the street. The builders' eyes were out on stalks. They told me that watching that scene was better than any big bonus in their pay packets.

But fights can start at these weddings. I've had occasion to call both police and ambulances. I've taken the odd knock myself from a drunken father of the bride. So when I'm doing a Traveller wedding, I always keep my mobile phone in my pocket in case I need to dial 999.

Q. You came out as gay in 1999. Did you march in the Pride parade on Saturday?

A. No, it's not for me. For those in the gay community who like the parade and its colourfulness, that's fine. But there are lots of others who are quietly gay and aren't into parades. We all express ourselves differently.

Q. Did you support the campaign against Ashers bakery for refusing to make a pro-gay marriage cake?

A I have mixed feelings on Ashers. I don't buy their produce instinctively. Yet I do feel that too much was made of the situation with Ashers, it was definitely overdone.

I dislike fundamentalism of any kind and I detect a creeping fundamentalism among some gay rights campaigners. I don't see the need for it. There is strong legislation protecting gay people now. We have civil partnerships in the North and it's only a matter of time before gay marriage is legalised here too.

The battle for equality is almost over. But I am concerned about an Animal Farm situation developing, where those who were once marginalised end up becoming as intolerant as the dictators they despised.

Q. In 2010 you married Eduardo Yango, a Filipino chef 23 years your junior. How is married life?

A. We are very happy. We have the same sense of humour, which helps. We share the housework and the cooking. We travel a good bit. We went to Bulgaria recently and enjoyed some sight-seeing and visiting museums.

Our life is very ordinary. We go out for a bite to eat now and again. If we're in Belfast we call into the Union Bar for half-an-hour. But we are not part of the whole gay scene. It doesn't appeal to me. It can be very concentrated on sex, alcohol and loud music. That may be attractive to young people, but it's not, and never was, my style.

Q. In 2013 you were convicted of involvement in 14 sham marriages which flouted immigration laws. Why did you commit these crimes?

A. I've always had a natural sympathy for immigrants, but the couples were referred to me by a solicitor, Ho Ling Mo. She was an officer of the court and licensed by the Law Society of Northern Ireland. I trusted her, and I was wrong.

She was paid thousands by these couples. I didn't profit. I got my normal £300 a wedding. I co-operated fully with the police and handed over all my documentation to them. I have married 3,000 couples. At issue here were 14 weddings over three years - a tiny percentage of the marriages I've conducted.

Q. Are you not ashamed of your actions?

A. I was charged with conspiracy to defraud the British Home Secretary. Some people told me that any Irishman worth his salt should be doing exactly that. But I am not proud that I fell foul of the law and now have a criminal record. It also gives my enemies ammunition against me.

Q. What affect did the trial have on you?

A. It was one of the worst times of my life. To sit in the dock between two prison officers at 61 years of age is deeply unpleasant. Once, I was placed in handcuffs and taken to the cells in the bowels of the court - that was scary. The trial had a major effect on my health. I have Crohn's disease and I developed bad cramps and bleeding. Three times walking to court I had "accidents" on the street. I was worried that I'd be sent to jail, although I'd have just had to make the best of it. Thankfully, I received a three-year suspended sentence.

Q. During your trial it was revealed that you were HIV-positive. How does that illness impact on your daily life?

A. It doesn't. When I was diagnosed in 2001, it was a shock. But HIV is no longer a death sentence. I'm looked after wonderfully well at the Royal Victoria Hospital, and I take my medication. It's only one tablet a day. HIV is easier to live with than diabetes.

People can survive into their 80s or 90s and die of heart attacks and strokes.

I was very annoyed when my diagnosis was revealed in court, but it gave people with their own secrets the courage to share them with me.

Two priests with HIV contacted me. Another priest I'd known for many years confided to me that he had gender dysphoria.

He was born with ambiguous genitalia and was still unsure whether he was male or female. So I look upon my HIV diagnosis being made public as positive now. I always try to see the silver lining in the clouds.

Q. The man who infected you with HIV knew he had the virus, but never told you. Do you hate him?

A. Absolutely not. I was in love with him at the time and I believe that real love never dies. I still love him, although I haven't seen him for many years and I wouldn't want to.

Q. A fortnight ago, 86-year-old Father Jacques Hamel was beheaded while saying Mass in Normandy. What is your response to the attack?

A. I've been in those little picturesque churches dotted across the French countryside and I can just see the old priest celebrating Mass with his congregation of elderly women. It was a hideous act by fundamentalists of the Islamic variety.

All it takes is for one person in Northern Ireland watching that, aligned to Isis, to go out and do the same here. It's impossible to prevent, as you just can't put armed guards on every church.

But while we mourn the dead in France and Germany, we shouldn't forget that hundreds of thousands of people have been killed in the Middle East since George Bush and Tony Blair invaded Iraq.

They have brought a lot of this upon us and I hope Parliament impeaches Blair.

Q. Pope Francis has been hailed as the great reformer. Do you think he can save the Catholic Church?

A. I doubt it. The Church is in meltdown. The damage from child abuse scandals has been colossal. Forty years ago there were 700 trainee priests in Ireland, now there are 60. The Church needs to change, but that's very hard for a massive 2,000-year-old organisation. It's like trying to turn an oil tanker in a small harbour.

I like Pope Francis. He's not judgmental, he's friendly, and he has the common touch. He tells mother-in-law jokes. You couldn't imagine any of his predecessors doing that. I hope he's genuine, but I fear it's just a PR trick. And, even if he is sincere, the Vatican mafia are all around him like sharks.

Q. Can you ever imagine yourself back in the Catholic Church?

A. I occasionally have that nightmare! It would be very hard to see, though. I regard myself now as a Free Catholic rather than a Roman Catholic. But, as a Christian, I am of course open to reconciliation with those from whom I am estranged.

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

Priests Removed From Maynooth Amid Grindr Allegations

Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmaid Martin, will not be sending trainee priests to the seminary in Maynooth, instead choosing to send them to the training facility in Rome.

Three priests are confirmed to be moving to Rome this September to continue their training, instead of being sent to the Kildare seminary which has sixty seminarians studying there.

Archbishop Martin alludes that his reasoning behind sending priests to Rome over Kildare are not related to the reported crisis facing the seminary in Maynooth: “I have my own reasons for doing this,” Archbishop Martin said.

Crisis In Maynooth

Dr. Martin explains in The Tablet, the international Catholic journal, that his decision was made prior to the reports of a crisis in the Maynooth seminary which emerged earlier this year.

The crisis refers to the allegations of inappropriate behaviour of certain members of the seminary. The claims that some within Maynooth have been using Grindr were brought to light in May this year by an anonymous letter.

Monsignor Hugh Connolly told The Irish Catholic that the church intended to “thoroughly deal” with any concerns regarding such behaviour.

Reports of a second bishop sending his priests to Rome for training have emerged, but have yet to be confirmed as the bishop in charge of the Catholic Communications Office in Maynooth is currently unavailable for comment since he is attending World Youth Day in Poland.

Testing The Waters

Reports of Catholic priests using Grindr continue to crop up, as a Northern Irish priest was discovered using Grindr earlier this year. 

Following Fr. Rory Coyle’s outing on Grindr in Armagh, the priest took a leave of absence from his clerical duties in early March to “obtain personal and spiritual support”.

A new group called Voices Against Maynooth Abuse (VAMA) was formed by gay Bishop Pat Buckley, who is in a civil-partnership with a man. 

The group is inviting seminarians to disclose ‘unorthodox’ behaviour the have witnessed in Maynooth.

President says that there is a 'wholesome, healthy' atmosphere at the college

The president of Maynooth has emphasised there is a "healthy, wholesome" atmosphere at the college despite the controversy currently engulfing the national seminary.

Monsignor Hugh Connolly was commenting following on from Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's decision to pull ­trainee priests under his charge from St Patrick's College due to a "an ­atmosphere of strange ­goings-on there".

Msgr Connolly admitted that he was "worried" about the allegations that some seminarians had been listed on a gay dating app, but there was no "concrete detail" to back it up.

But he emphasised that there was a good atmosphere at the college.

"The broader atmosphere is, I think, actually quite a wholesome, healthy one because there are a lot of interplay between students of many, many disciplines, lay students and clerics, male and female, people who are engaged pastorally," he told RTÉ's 'Drivetime'.

"I do have to acknowledge what the Archbishop said today in response to and referencing in particular some of the anonymous correspondence, which we have been in receipt of in recent times, has been difficult and is a less-than-satisfactory atmosphere in which to conduct formation."

Msgr Connolly said that he was concerned about the ­allegations. "I think that [the use of gay dating apps] certainly worries me as much as it worries the Archbishop," he said.

"First and foremost it has to be said that we expect all our seminarians to live celibately here. Celibately means preparing for celibate priesthood. There can't be any compromise around that for seminarians.

"A seminarian has to know very clearly and honestly that he is preparing for a lifetime of celibacy - that's part and parcel of what it means to be a priest.

"And that's non-negotiable. So clearly anything that compromises that in any way which involves sexual activity, or inappropriate social media apps or any of that particular domain, is simply wrong and simply is incompatible with life in a seminary. So yes I am very, very unhappy when I hear reference to that kind of activity."

"We don't have any concrete detail on any of that [usage of gay dating apps]."

Msgr Connolly emphasised that there was an independent panel to investigate any allegations.

A number of ex-­seminarians have backed a call by the controversial cleric, Bishop Pat Buckley, for the trustees of Maynooth to stand down over their handling of the controversy currently engulfing the national seminary.

Bishop Buckley, who is in a long-running dispute with the diocese of Down and Connor, told the Irish Independent that the four archbishops who act as trustees and the Irish hierarchy generally had "proven themselves to be incompetent" in dealing with complaints about inappropriate behaviour and allegations concerning the use of the dating app Grindr.

However, Bishop Buckley's call was rejected by a spokesman for the trustees of Maynooth who stated they "will continue to do their work and exercise their responsibilities".

Asked if the bishops were planning to meet to discuss the situation, he told the Irish Independent that Irish seminaries are discussed at each bishops' meeting. The next such meeting is due to take place in October.

In a letter sent on Tuesday to Archbishops Eamon ­Martin, ­Diarmuid Martin, Michael Neary and Kieran O'Reilly, Bishop Buckley also formally requested that the trustees stand down the priest alleged to have behaved inappropriately towards a one-time seminarian whose story the Irish Independent reported yesterday.

Support for Maynooth was expressed by the Association of Catholic Priests (ACP), which represents more than 1,000 Irish priests and said in a statement that the response to the crisis demanded "more than moving a few students to Rome and offering a few unconvincing reasons for the decision".

Damage

The damage this controversy will do to Maynooth is not in the best interest of the Irish Church, the ACP added, and stressed that Irish priests should be educated in Ireland.

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's decision to send his ­seminarians to study in Rome was also criticised by Bishop Buckley who said Dr Martin could not "be allowed to do a 'Pontius Pilate' on Maynooth".

"He thinks sending his seminarians to Rome is the end of his responsibility. But he is the Primate of Ireland and a trustee of Maynooth and the seminary is situated in his diocese," he said.

The ACP also expressed alarm that conservative commentators who had a gripe with Maynooth for not facilitating the concerns of very traditional candidates, "notably their interest in Latin Masses and traditional clerical dress" were behind the whole crisis, as well as some former students who were deemed unsuitable for priesthood by the seminary authorities.

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Larne Bishop Pat Buckley caught up in IS bombing in Turkey

Larne cleric Pat Buckley has spoken of the moment a suicide bomber killed at least 10 people in the Turkish city of Istanbul.

Independent Bishop Buckley had been taking photos in Sultanahmet Square shortly before the blast today and had moved on into the famous Blue Mosque.

Speaking to the BBC, Bishop Buckley said: “I have lived in Northern Ireland since the 70s, and I have heard explosions, and this was incredibly loud. I saw dust through the doorway of the mosque and I could smell the explosives.”

He added: “I am slightly worried because there is talk here that they are expecting further trouble and we have been warned to avoid crowds.”

Monday, April 20, 2015

Are Iona, Breda O’Brien, and John Waters homophobic? Was Rory O’Neill Right? (Contribution)

This was published on this blogspot at the time and left there for over a year but then Iona, via Ms O Brien and Mr Quinn made a formal complaint to Google stating that the publication of this on the blogspot was a violation and falsely asserted this under the DMCA Millemmium Copyright Act so as to ensure it was removed....therefore Iona have blatantly lied so as to have this posting removed as it may put them in a bad light.....

Thanks to the Streisand effect, by now, everyone has heard how Rory O’Neill’s (aka Panti Bliss) interview on the Saturday Night Show was censored after a legal challenge made by John Waters who objected to being described as a homophobe. He clearly felt this was libel and RTE duly folded quicker than you could say “spineless”. 

Also discussed were Breda O’Brien and the Iona institute who were described in similar terms. You can read the full transcript here. 

As you can imagine both the censorship and the terminology used to describe these people caused quite a stir. With one side crying censorship as Rory simply stated something what is believed to be true, and the other side arguing that it was ridiculous to libel people simply because they believe in “traditional” marriage. 

So I have decided to analyse the opinions of these individuals regarding homosexuals and marriage equality to ascertain whether or nor the “homophobic” label is warranted.

Iona

The Iona institute, to which O’Brien is a patron, has long lobbied against equal marriage. During the Constitutional Convention Iona made  a submission arguing against equal marriage, in which they made this rather audacious claim;
The social sciences confirm what every known society in the world has known instinctively, namely that marriage between a man and a woman is uniquely beneficial to society and to children. This is the case even though some individual marriages may be dysfunctional and harmful to children (as can any other type of family).
There are two major flaws with this statement, the first being that it is a total fabrication. The social sciences do not say this, in fact, almost every paper which studied children of same sex parents showed no differences in outcomes when compared to children of heterosexual parents. Secondly, there is a caveat in big blue lettering on the front page which explicitly states that same-sex parents were not researched in this study therefore no conclusions about same-sex parents can be drawn from this study. 

Yet here we have Iona trying to use it to argue against equal marriage. Of course the folks at Iona were called up on this and they attempted to backtrack. They claimed that they meant heterosexual families are the “most beneficial family form that we know of from the point of view of children” as “there are no large national surveys that allows us to draw reliable conclusions about the children of same-sex couples”. These two little caveats were wholly absent in the submission, so this is simply moving the goalposts after being caught red handed. 

Also, the “that we know of ” line is again untrue for reasons stated above, we know children of homosexual parents do just fine. Finally, that last sentence true, there were no large national surveys done at the time Child Trends completed their research, however, that was a decade ago, there have been many completed since. So Iona ignored a decade of research in an attempt to make their point.

The only piece of research which Iona seem to get right was that there are no large scale studies done, and this is something members of Iona have been saying continuously to negate the research which has been completed thus far.  

However, in the words of Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, two sociologists;
research based on statistically representative national samples, are rarely employed by scholars who publish in Child Development and Developmental Psychology. There is a simple explanation for this. Large-scale survey research methods are too blunt and rigid to adequately address the complex and nuanced questions that are generally at issue when scholars attempt to assess and compare child development under different forms of parenting or adult intervention. Most child development studies profit from having in-depth observations of children with multiple reporters (parents, teachers, clinicians, researchers, etc.) and instruments. Research often benefits when rapport develops between the researcher, the observer, the parents and the children
They go on further to say that if it was reasonable to dismiss studies researching children of same-sex parents then we
would have to dismiss virtually the entire discipline of psychology. The vast majority of research in child development, and in the field of psychology more broadly, would be invalidated as unscientific.
In essence, if David Quinn and the patrons of Iona, none of whom are credited scientists let alone sociologists or psychologists, think they can categorise studies as flawed based on sample size then may I suggest they write a paper telling the thousands of sociologists and psychologists that they have been doing it wrong all these years. They will surely be greatly rewarded for revolutionising these two academic fields.

Iona’s disastrous employment of research doesn’t stop there. After casting such a critical eye on the dozens of studies which all portray homosexual parenting in a positive manner, they seemingly accept any paper which tells a different tale without a moment’s hesitation, regardless of  how flawed it is.

The now infamous Regnerus study was published in 2012 and was promptly promoted by Iona. To say the study was flawed is an understatement. Regnerus was paid by the Witherspoon institute to design a paper which could be used in two upcoming Supreme Court cases: Windsor v. U.S. and Hollingsworth v. Perry. To achieve this Regnerus used skewed methodology. If one is to accurately compare the outcomes of children of heterosexual and homosexual parents then like versus like must be compared. 

Therefore, long term homosexual households should be compared to long term heterosexual households. Regnerus did not do this. He compared stable heterosexual households against single parents, many of whom weren’t even homosexual but simply were reported as having a same-sex relationship at some point. In fact, there were only two stable homosexual households used in the whole study. There are many more flaws which you can read here

You might forgive Iona for originally supporting it but they have never redacted their support and David Quinn, Iona’s Director, tweeted an article in support of the article only last month. How can they honestly support an article which was not only flawed, but intentionally so.

Imagine a researcher was paid to portray a racial minority as worse parents than white people. And the researcher did so by intentionally using a methodology he knew would give him the results required. Then organisations used this research to limit the rights of the racial minority. Pretty darn racist I would say, so how would characterise the behaviour above?

John Waters

John Waters hasn’t written much about homosexuality or equal marriage but the little he has written I find quite disturbing.
This is really a kind of satire on marriage which is being conducted by the gay lobby. It’s not that they want to get married; they want to destroy the institution of marriage because they’re envious of it;
This is really an attempt to discredit an institution, the nominative institution on which society and human civilization is founded. If you do that there will be consequences, and one of them is that marriage will become a nothing;
It is a deliberate sabotage of the culture”, continues Waters, “and the relishing of the destruction as a result. Gay marriage is a satire…. But sometimes you have to allow things to happen for the consequences to become obvious.
Waters negates the possibility that homosexuals want marriage equality simply because it is equality and it will help them be happier. He then attaches ulterior, malicious motivations. He believes that homosexuals don’t actually want equality but they are simply out to destroy. This is propagandist fear-mongering at its best: applying malicious intent to a group of people for benign actions. This is active irrational fear and hatred of homosexuals. It’s homophobia, even in its strictest form.

Breda O’Brien

Breda O’Brien’s opposition to equal marriage (much like David Quinn’s and Iona’s) is the belief that children should be raised by a mother and a father, more precisely their biological mother and father, as she states here;
for a long time, I hesitated to write about gay marriage, simply because gay people have been so discriminated against. What then, tipped the balance for me? It is the belief that wherever possible, a child should be reared by a mother and a father, and that children have the right to know and have a relationship with their biological parents.
For the purposes of this article I will not argue against this logic, in fact, I will accept it. The reason being is to show how this logic is flawed and is no reason to object to equal marriage, which leads me to belief there is an ulterior motive behind their opposition.

Same-sex couples have four methods available to them in order to have children: surrogacy, sperm donation, adoption, previous heterosexual relationship. I will immediately remove children from a previous relationship as just like any other split relationship they have a biological mother and father. This leaves surrogacy, sperm donation, and adoption. These options are and will be legislated completely independently of equal marriage. 

And let’s assume Iona get their way and surrogacy, sperm donation are banned and only heterosexual couples can adopt. 

Will homosexuals still want to get married? Yes. 

This shows how they are two different issues, yet Iona treats them synonymously. Worse again is the fact Iona is against surrogacy and (anonymous) sperm donation, this overwhelmingly effects heterosexual people far more than it does homosexual couples. Yet Iona invests far more time arguing against equal marriage, even though it’s a totally separate issue, than they do arguing against surrogacy and sperm donation. Surely they would be better off targeting the issue as a whole rather than sacrificing the happiness of homosexuals to simply stop a mere portion of what they are against. 

But would they even achieve that? Would homosexuals be prevented from having children if they can’t get married? No. Because, a I said previously, legislation for surrogacy, sperm donation, and adoption is totally separate from equal marriage as those issues overwhelming effect heterosexual couples.

So why does Iona argue against equal marriage when their objection a) is totally separate from equal marriage, b) even with their objection realised homosexuals will still want to get married and c) can still achieve objectives without having to deny equal marriage to homosexuals?

The answer to that question is unknown to me, but to deny homosexuals equality and happiness for objections which effect heterosexuals more and can be achieved without refusing equal status is, without a doubt, homophobic.

Conclusion

In short, the below points are homophobic tendencies which have displayed by Iona, Breda O’Brien and John Waters.
  • Blatantly misrepresent research to portray homosexual parenting as inferior to heterosexual parenting;
  • Ignore decades of scientific research;
  • Invent reasons to negate the studies such as “small sample-size” as this is the preferred methodology;
  • Accept and promote research by somebody who was paid to ensure a preset conclusion to use in an argument against equal marriage;
  • Ignoring the true intentions for why homosexuals want to get married;
  • Attach malicious motivations;
  • Fear-monger by saying homosexuals only want to destroy marriage;
  • Employ rationale against equal marriage when even if realised still wouldn’t stop homosexuals wanting to get married;
  • Ignore the fact that these issues effect heterosexuals more;
  • Using the issue of equal marriage in a vain attempt to achieve part of their goal instead of tackling the issue as a whole;
  • Sacrificing the happiness of homosexuals in an attempt to achieve objectives which could be achieved without denying equality.
All the above are homophobic, some more than others but they are certainly homophobic. 

This isn’t simply “opinion” or “ethos” or “tradition”, this is research manipulation, this fear-mongering, this is mistrust, this is using homosexuals as patsies to achieve wider aims, this is homophobia.

So, yeah, I think Rory O’Neill got it right. If anything he was probably a bit too nice.

Source : Click Here