It's "indispensable" to create with the collaboration of scientists
"a normative system that includes inviolable limits and ensures the
protection of ecosystems, before the new forms of power deriving from
the techno-economic model causes irreversible harm not only to the
environment, but also to our societies, to democracy, to justice and
freedom", Pope Francis said in his address today to the Plenary Assembly
of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on the theme Science and
Sustainability: The impact of scientific knowledge and technology on
human society and its environment.
In his speech Francis is also returned to highlight how "the
submission of politics to a technology and an economy which seek profit
above all else, is shown by the “distraction” or delay in implementing
global agreements on the environment, and the continued wars of
domination camouflaged by righteous claims, that inflict ever greater
harm on the environment and the moral and cultural richness of peoples”.
“Never before – he continued - has there been such a clear need for
science to be at the service of a new global ecological equilibrium. At
the same time we are seeing a renewed partnership between the scientific
and Christian communities, who are witnessing the convergence of their
distinct approaches to reality in the shared goal of protecting our
common home, threatened as it is by ecological collapse and consequent
increase of poverty and social exclusion. I am pleased that you perceive
so deeply the solidarity which joins you to the humanity of both today
and tomorrow, in a sign of great care for mother earth. Your commitment
is all the more admirable in its orientation towards the full promotion
of integral human development, peace, justice, dignity and human
freedom. Proof of this, in addition to the accomplishments of the past,
is evident in the many topics you seek to examine in this plenary
session; these range from great discoveries in cosmology, to sources of
renewable energy, to food security, and even a passionate seminar on
power and the limits of artificial intelligence”.
“In the Encyclical Laudato Si’ I stated that “we are called
to be instruments of God our Father, so that our planet might be what he
desired when he created it and correspond with his plan for peace,
beauty and fullness” (53). In our modern world, we have grown up
thinking ourselves owners and masters of nature, authorized to plunder
it without any consideration of its hidden potential and laws of
development, as if subjecting inanimate matter to our whims, with the
consequence of grave loss to biodiversity, among other ills. We are not
custodians of a museum or of its major artefacts to be dusted each day,
but rather co-operators in protecting and developing the life and
biodiversity of the planet and of human life present there. An
ecological conversion capable of supporting and promoting sustainable
development includes, by its very nature, both the full assuming of our
human responsibilities regarding creation and its resources, as well as
the search for social justice and the overcoming of an immoral system
that produces misery, inequality and exclusion.
Very briefly, I would say that it falls to scientists, who work free
of political, economic or ideological interests, to develop a cultural
model which can face the crisis of climatic change and its social
consequences, so that the vast potential of productivity will not be
reserved only for the few. Just as the scientific community, through
interdisciplinary dialogue, has been able to research and demonstrate
our planet’s crisis, so too today that same community is called to offer
a leadership that provides general and specific solutions for issues
which your plenary meeting will confront: water, renewable forms of
energy and food security. It has now become essential to create, with
your cooperation, a normative system that includes inviolable limits and
ensures the protection of ecosystems, before the new forms of power
deriving from the techno-economic model causes irreversible harm not
only to the environment, but also to our societies, to democracy, to
justice and freedom”.
“Within this general picture, it is worth noting that international
politics has reacted weakly – albeit with some praiseworthy exceptions –
regarding the concrete will to seek the common good and universal
goods, and the ease with which well-founded scientific opinion about the
state of our planet is disregarded. The submission of politics to a
technology and an economy which seek profit above all else, is shown by
the “distraction” or delay in implementing global agreements on the
environment, and the continued wars of domination camouflaged by
righteous claims, that inflict ever greater harm on the environment and
the moral and cultural richness of peoples”.
“Despite this, we do not lose hope and we endeavour to make use of
the time the Lord grants us. There are also many encouraging signs of a
humanity that wants to respond, to choose the common good, and
regenerate itself with responsibility and solidarity. Combined with
moral values, the plan for sustainable and integral development is well
positioned to offer all scientists, in particular those who profess
belief, a powerful impetus for research”.