In a report on homosexuality, a working party has concluded that the Church of Scotland has been institutionally homophobic for much of its history.
The working group of the Mission and Discipleship Council is set to present the General Assembly with its in-depth report on ‘same-sex partnerships as an issue in theology and human sexuality’ in May.
The report, which is entitled 'A challenge to unity', takes as its starting point an acknowledgement of the strength of feeling that has already been expressed on the issue of same-sex relationships.
It seeks to give a flavour of the wide range of views held within the church, and to identify areas of common ground around which the church might unite.
As a part of its remit, the working group that produced the report listened to gay and lesbian Christians, including two Church of Scotland ministers who have entered into civil partnership with their same-sex partners.
A considerable part of the working group’s discussion focussed on interpretation of the Bible.
Identified in the report are many Christians who would see potential for a gay or lesbian’s sexual life being contained in a 'marriage-like relationship'.
The report however does not give any firm views on whether practising homosexuals can be ministers or elders in the church. Instead, it urges the church to rethink its hostility to active homosexuals in its ranks.
It follows a split in the church which emerged after the general assembly narrowly voted last year to allow ministers to bless same sex couples who had married in a civil ceremony.
The vote was overturned in December when local presbyteries rejected it, by 36 to nine, effectively making it illegal for a Church of Scotland minister to give same sex blessings.
The authors of yesterday's report urged the church to find a middle ground. It suggests the church recognise that many Christians did believe active homosexuality is permissible between a monogamous couple.
A statement from the church warned however that "there is little to be gained, and rather much to be lost, by one set of views being stampeded over, and against the conscience of others."
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce