The Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams and other Anglican leaders are to decide on whether a draft covenant aimed at uniting the worldwide Anglican Communion is ready to be sent to member churches for approval. Anglican leaders are to make the decision on the third ‘Ridley-Cambridge’ draft during the 14th Anglican Consultative Council meeting, which began on Friday.
Secretary General of the Anglican Communion Canon Kenneth Kearon told press: “The hope is that the ACC will feel that it’s mature enough to go to the provinces.”
He stressed that it was not the role of any instrument of the Anglican Communion to decide whether to adopt the covenant but rather up to the member churches.
“I think the Covenant Design Group thinks that it has done what it can with the text and feels that it is now mature enough to be handed out to the provinces,” he said.
Mr Kearon went on to reaffirm the voluntary nature of the covenant, saying that churches would not be made to forfeit their membership in the Anglican Communion if they decided not to sign on to it, reports Anglican Journal.
“The covenant will only be operative for those who agree to sign the covenant. It becomes operative for any church soon as that church signs on to it,” said Mr Kearon.
“We’re not looking for a substantive majority – the covenant will only ever apply to those churches of the communion which decide (to sign on to it).”
Speaking at the opening plenary on Saturday, Dr Rowan Williams told the ACC meeting that he wanted them to get through “the difficult business” of the Communion’s structures so that they could move “towards a proper focus on theology and mission”.
“A proper focus on mission is one of the elements that most securely and profoundly binds us together as a Communion,” he said. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Source (CT)
SV (ED)