Tuesday, January 01, 2013

The Pope to John X, "United in building peace and reconciliation between peoples"


The Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch"At a time when the Middle East is so unstable and prone to violence, it is increasingly urgent that the disciples of Christ offer an authentic witness of their unity, so that the world may believe the Gospel message of love, peace and reconciliation".

This is what Benedict XVI has written in a greeting, published by Vatican Radio, to the new Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch and all the East, John X, elected on the 17th of December of last year by the Holy Synod which met at the monastery of Our Lady of Balamand, North of Beirut. 

He succeeds Patriarch Ignatius IV Hazim, who passed away on the 5th of December at 92 years of age.
    
"We have a responsibility,” says the Pope, “to continue together along our path to show in a more visible way the spiritual reality of communion which, although still incomplete, already unites us.”
 
Benedict XVI expresses his hope that the relationship between Greek-Orthodox Patriarchate and the Catholic Church might continue to develop through forms of fruitful cooperation and ongoing efforts to resolve the issues that still divide the two communities. He especially recommended active and constructive participation in the work of the Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue Between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church as a whole."
 
Lastly, the Pope "assuring his prayers to the new Patriarch, elevates his invocation to Christ to bring consolation to those who are the victims of violence in the Middle East and to inspire gestures of peace".

Russia: Falun Gong literature banned

Falun Gong practitionersFalun Gong’s practitioners (who have already been harshly persecuted in China) have appealed to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg after their core texts were declared ‘extremist’ in Russia.

The appeal to Strasbourg came after the court in Krasnodar did not overturn a previous unfavourable sentence; which in turn contradicted an earlier favourable decision because ‘expert analyses’ were ‘unfounded’ and ‘one-sided’.

Falun Gong has been a popular spiritual practice in China since the early 1990s. At first it was looked upon with a certain level of approval by the Communist regime but its growing influence led to a harsh crackdown by Beijing in 1999. 

This repression continued until 2004. 

Once something is judged as ‘extremist’ in Russia and it appears on a special list, it is banned throughout the country and whoever is found in possession of such material is liable to criminal prosecution. 

Falun Gong’s practitioners believe that the motives behind the rulings are political – like the repeated refusal to grant an entrance visa to the Dalai Lama – and are intended to please China.

One of the four texts defined as ‘extremist’ is the translation of Zhuan Falun by Falun Gong’s founder, Li Hongzhi. Written in 2006, it consists of nine lectures where Li Hongzhi praises Truth, Compassion and Endurance as essential qualities for spiritual progress. 

The text asserts that good practice can generate paranormal abilities such as clairvoyance and levitation, but Li stresses that these abilities should not be used for evil purposes. 

‘Nobody is allowed to casually undermine the state of our ordinary human society.’ 

Violence and even animosity are also rejected.

Nevertheless, other texts accuse the Chinese government, partly because there have been controversial accusations in the past of organ transplants taken from Falun Gong practitioners by the authorities – during these operations, some victims of these forced ‘organ donations’ were allegedly killed – and partly because there is a brief passage on the boycotting of the Beijing Olympics in support of human rights.

There there’s the problem of the Swastika. This ancient Buddhist symbol was used a long time before Hitler made it the Nazi symbol par excellence. Moreover, the Buddhist Swastika is turned in the opposite direction to the Nazi version. 

The promotion or public display of Nazi symbols, including symbols that are so similar to Nazi symbols that they could be mistaken for them, is one of the founding principles of the law against extremism.

It seems that the tribunal was convinced by the conclusions arrived at by the prosecution’s psychologist, Albina Rogoza. 

This expert witness felt that Russians could easily mistake the Falun Gong symbol for a Nazi Swastika if they do not have ‘special knowledge in the spheres of religion, history, culture and art’ and a certain level of familiarity with Falun Gong literature. 

Other experts have accused members of Falun Gong of feeling superior to other human beings. 

Strasbourg will rule on all of this sooner or later; but Li Hongzhi’s followers remain convinced that the ruling is political and pro-Beijing.

Vatican: 12 pastoral workers killed in 2012

They lived their faith with humility and courage, without fanfare, often in contexts of extreme poverty. 

According to the data compiled by Fides news agency the 12 pastoral workers killed in 2012 include 10 priests, one religious and one lay person.

For the fourth consecutive year, the place most affected, with an extremely elevated number of pastoral workers killed is America, where six priests were killed. 

Following is Africa, where three priests and a religious sister were killed. 

Then, Asia where a priest and a lay woman were killed.

Most of these men and women were killed in robbery attempts. Others were attacked in the street. There is also the case of Don Anastasius Nsherenguzi who was killed, in Tanzania in an attempt to divide young people involved in a heated fight. 

Or the case of the lay woman Conchita Francisco, who was shot to death in front of the cathedral of Bongao, in the southern Philippines, a heartland of Islamic rebels, terrorists and criminals.

Added to this sad and provisional list drawn up annually by Fides, are the many unknown victims in every corner of the planet who suffer and pay for their faith in Christ with their lives, the "cloud of unknown soldiers of the great cause of God "in the words of Blessed John Paul II. Fides also points out that from 2001 to 2011 281 pastoral workers were killed, while in the previous decade 604 missionaries were killed.

Pope attends ecumenical gathering of 40,000 young Christians

Pope Benedict XVI attends an ecumenical gathering of around 40,000 young people in Rome's St Peter's Square on December 29, 2012. The young Christians came to the city as part of a European meeting of the Taize community.Pope Benedict XVI on Saturday attended an ecumenical gathering of around 40,000 young people in Rome's St Peter's Square.
 
The young Christians -- Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox -- came to Rome as part of a European meeting of the Taize community, an ecumenical monastic order in Taize in eastern France.

"To meet 40,000 young people from across Europe is extraordinary," said a 26-year-old participant from the Paris region. "I came for that, not to see the pope."

Attendants were between 16 and 35 years old, many from Poland.

The gathering was part of a six-day meeting in Rome which ends on Wednesday.

Previous gatherings have taken place in the city in 1980, 1982 and 1987.

Is Pope Benedict a homophobe? (Opinion)

The Pope’s speech to the members of the Roman Curia on December 21 brought with it accusations that the Pope is a homophobe.

It is not the first time that he had been so accused; in my opinion, mistakenly.

It is said that the word homophobe was coined by George Weinberg, a psychologist, in the 1960s. It describes a person who fears or hates homosexuals and homosexuality. 

It includes an attitude of contempt for homosexuals and is evidenced in hostile behaviour such as discrimination and violence.  

Some say that homophobes are closet gays.

The attribution of the above to Pope Benedict is totally amiss. One of the subjects addressed by the Pope in the above mentioned speech was the family. 

During this part of the speech he made a philosophical argument, based on a study by the Chief Rabbi of France, Gilles Berheim, in favour of the concept of family made up of father, mother and child. 

Among other things he strongly criticised the theory that describes gender as a cultural construct and not a natural one. 

Benedict also outlines some of the negative consequences, which in his opinion, would naturally flow that that position.  His words apply to all adherents to this theory independently of their sexual orientation.

Are we to understand that everyone except the Pope is entitled to an opinion? 

Are we to believe that all movements and organisations, barring the Catholic Church, can lobby for different positions?

Quite naturally it is perfectly legitimate for other people to hold radically different points of view from his. Is this not what free speech, pluralism and democracy are all about? 

But these concepts should be applicable for the ecclesiastical goose as much as they are applicable for the secular gander. 

Consequently while counter arguments are totally acceptable, the vitriolic slurs against the Pope are inappropriate. 

Those who say that their position can only be defended by insulting those of a different opinion are demeaning their position much more that it can be demeaned by those of an opposing opinion.

I will reproduce in full the words of the Pope on the subject hoping, perhaps against hope, that there can be a rational and intelligent discussion.

The position of the Pope

Pope Benedict said the following:

"The great joy with which families from all over the world congregated in Milan indicates that, despite all impressions to the contrary, the family is still strong and vibrant today. But there is no denying the crisis that threatens it to its foundations – especially in the western world. ... The challenges involved are manifold. First of all there is the question of the human capacity to make a commitment or to avoid commitment. ... Man's refusal to make any commitment – which is becoming increasingly widespread as a result of a false understanding of freedom and self-realization as well as the desire to escape suffering – means that man remains closed in on himself and keeps his 'I' ultimately for himself, without really rising above it. ... When such commitment is repudiated, the key figures of human existence likewise vanish: father, mother, child – essential elements of the experience of being human are lost".

"The Chief Rabbi of France, Gilles Bernheim, has shown in a very detailed and profoundly moving study that the attack we are currently experiencing on the true structure of the family, made up of father, mother, and child, goes much deeper. While up to now we regarded a false understanding of the nature of human freedom as one cause of the crisis of the family, it is now becoming clear that the very notion of being – of what being human really means – is being called into question. He quotes the famous saying of Simone de Beauvoir: 'one is not born a woman, one becomes so' (on ne naĆ®t pas femme, on le devient). These words lay the foundation for what is put forward today under the term 'gender' as a new philosophy of sexuality. According to this philosophy, sex is no longer a given element of nature,  that man has to accept and personally make sense of: it is a social role that we choose for ourselves, while in the past it was chosen for us by society. ... People dispute the idea that they have a nature, given by their bodily identity that serves as a defining element of the human being. They deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves. According to the biblical creation account, being created by God as male and female pertains to the essence of the human creature. This duality is an essential aspect of what being human is all about, as ordained by God. This very duality as something previously given is what is now disputed. ... Man calls his nature into question. From now on he is merely spirit and will. The manipulation of nature, which we deplore today where our environment is concerned, now becomes man's fundamental choice where he himself is concerned. ... But if there is no pre-ordained duality of man and woman in creation, then neither is the family any longer a reality established by creation. Likewise, the child has lost the place he had occupied hitherto and the dignity pertaining to him. Bernheim shows that now, perforce, from being a subject of rights, the child has become an object to which people have a right and which they have a right to obtain. When the freedom to be creative becomes the freedom to create oneself, then necessarily the Maker Himself is denied and ultimately man too is stripped of his dignity as a creature of God, as the image of God at the core of his being".

Irish Sacred Heart Messenger is 125 years old

http://messenger.ie/App_Themes/default/img/logo-messenger.pngThe Irish Sacred Heart Messenger is celebrating its 125th birthday with a special edition. 

The January issue features the cover of the very first magazine, published in January 1888, and inside there are photographs from the past. 

It also includes the story of the central role played by the promoters of the magazine by Donal Neary SJ and the first of a series of 30 articles by Brian Grogan SJ, on the life of the world to come, based on his recently published book; 'Where to From Here? The Christian Vision of Life After Death.'

"125 years ago Fr James Cullen, a Jesuit, wished that the minds and heart of the people of 1888 could be touched, just as Jesus touched minds and hearts back in Galilee. Maybe he got the idea after Ireland was consecrated to the Sacred Heart on Palm Sunday 1873. We may even have been the first country to be dedicated... And we are proud to say that it has been published in an unbroken series ever since, and in the same spirit in which it was founded." said John Looby SJ, Messsenger editor. 

Fr Cullen put his whole heart into founding The Messenger, and as he wanted it to be available to everyone it only cost a penny, and it has remained inexpensive ever since according to Fr Looby.

The circulation target in the first year was 7000 and it was 9,000. "Now with a world-wide readership, it celebrates its 125th birthday thanks to new generations of promoters and the creative spirit of God who wished it into being and has sustained it to this day," said Fr Looby.

Today the circulation is around 120,000, making the Messenger one of the best selling publications produced in Ireland. Most readers are in Ireland but some are also in Britain, the US , Canada , Australia, Africa and the Far East. 

It seems that wherever the Irish went, whether as missionaries or as economic migrants, they brought the Messenger with them. The magazine's production team receives over 50,000 letters per year, from all corners of the world but only a handful can be published each month.

The Messenger has also moved with the times. 

In October 2009 it temporarily abandoned its traditional trademark red colour for the first time ever and went  pink to mark Breast Cancer Awareness month. The pink edition had a special focus on breast cancer and includes a feature article by Carita Kerr entitled “Me and My Cancer: A Personal Journey.” 

Ten percent of all new postal subscriptions taken out in the month of October were donated to the charity Action Breast Cancer. 

“The Messenger receives thousands of letters every month and many of those letters leave us in no doubt about the prevalence of cancer and in particular breast cancer in Ireland. So we wanted to signal our concern and show our readiness to help,” said  John Looby, S.J, at the time. 

The magazine has been gradually modernizing appearance over the last few years with a revamped logo, and a fresher more accessible design to match the more contemporary tone of the articles. 

Other new features have included articles by celebrity chef Clodagh McKenna, and  Children’s Art Competition to design The Messenger’s Christmas card.

The Messenger has its own in-house publishing facilities and publishes magazines such as An Timire, in the Irish language, as well as other books including prayer books for schools. 

It manages its entire print process from design conception to published product, including advice on all aspects of print production down to suitable paper stocks, weights and binding, with an eye on the target audience. 

It also has its own website:  www.messenger.ie

In work with poor, Little Sisters trust in providence this winter

As the winter season continues, the Little Sisters of the Poor are relying on God's providence to help their care for the elderly poor, as they always have.
“One of the foundational virtues of our congregation,” Sister Constance Veit told CNA Dec. 20, is “trust in providence.”

The Little Sisters of the Poor were founded by Saint Jeanne Jugan in France the 1830s to take care of the elderly poor, who had no one else to look after them. They now operate homes throughout the world, with 30 in the U.S. serving some 2,500 persons.

“There is a line from our Constitutions that keeps coming to mind, Jeanne Jugan's 'realistic attitude to events in no way prevented her from discovering in them the action of God,” Sr. Constance said.

“Difficulties never made her doubt his loving solicitude: 'That seems impossible, but if God is with us, it will be accomplished.' With serene confidence, she found her support in this certitude.'”

Each of the group's apostolates has a designated “collecting sister” who visits local businesses, begging for the food, clothing, and other needs of the elderly poor whom the Little Sisters serve.

Sr. Constance said that the Little Sisters' reliance on providence will get them through the approaching HHS contraception mandate crisis.

“This is how we are trying to approach this issue at this point, praying that God will resolve this in his time.”

“We are constantly dependent on Providence and the kindness of others to support us.”

Another sister said that this is how the order has always faced its challenges.

Sister Cornelia, the superior at the Sisters' Mullen Home apostolate in Denver, related a story of St. Jeanne Jugan's first home for the elderly.

The saint secured a house in which to care for the elderly, but had no supplies to go along with it. Her benefactor asked her how she was going to feed so many people.

Saint Jeanne Jugan replied, “If God fills the house, he will not abandon it.”

“She always prayed for the benefactors, and made sure the residents prayed for them too,” said Sister Cornelia.

“So we have a Mass said every month, and everyday the sisters and the residents pray for our benefactors, all those who help us in any way.”

Sister Cornelia said that the generosity provided by God at Christmas time “really helps us throughout the year.”

In addition to the donations made to sustain the apostolate throughout the year, the residents at the home receive visits and presents from surrounding parishes and schools.

Three parishes, Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Littleton, Risen Christ in Denver, and St. Joan of Arc in Arvada, put up “giving trees” at their parishes. Parishioners get gifts, which the residents requested on the giving tree. Then there are a series of parties for the residents.

Also this week, school children came to visit the residents at Mullen Home. Today kids from Our Lady of the Visitation brought Christmas ornaments, and on Dec. 18 the children from Our Lady of Lourdes came Christmas caroling at the home.

“We loved bringing the joy of the coming season to all the residents,” said Our Lady of Lourdes teacher Morgan McGinn.

Polish bishop who built secret communist-era churches dies at 94

Retired Polish Archbishop Ignacy Tokarczuk, who built churches in secret in defiance of the communist authorities, becoming a folk hero for many, has died at the age of 94, PAP news agency said on Saturday.

One of the Soviet bloc's more colourful anti-communist clerics, Tokarczuk clandestinely built hundreds of churches under the noses of the officially atheist government in the 1960s and 1970s.

"While Ignacy Tokarczuk was bishop of Przemysl, more than 400 churches and chapels were built in the diocese despite the lack of building permits from the communist authorities," Episcopate Chairman Archbishop Jozef Michalik said on the website of the Przemysl Archdiocese.

"He will be remembered for his uncompromising stance in defence of the institution of the Catholic Church despite frequent harassment by the security service of the Polish People's Republic."

Retired Polish Archbishop Ignacy Tokarczuk, who built churches in secret in defiance of the communist authorities, becoming a folk hero for many, has died at the age of 94, PAP news agency said on Saturday.

One of the Soviet bloc's more colourful anti-communist clerics, Tokarczuk clandestinely built hundreds of churches under the noses of the officially atheist government in the 1960s and 1970s.

"While Ignacy Tokarczuk was bishop of Przemysl, more than 400 churches and chapels were built in the diocese despite the lack of building permits from the communist authorities," Episcopate Chairman Archbishop Jozef Michalik said on the website of the Przemysl Archdiocese.

The typical ruse was for a parishioner in the staunchly Catholic Przemysl region, in south-eastern Poland, to get a building permit from the authorities to build a farmhouse, whose interior was then secretly fitted out as a house of worship.

When volunteer builders from the parish had everything in place, they would affix a small steeple to the roof under the cover of darkness, and a new church was created.

Communist security troops were routinely sent to the churches after they were discovered but, faced with the embarrassing prospect of demolishing a structure built by local volunteers, the authorities frequently gave in.

Despite constant surveillance and harassment, including visa denials preventing trips to Rome, Tokarczuk actively supported anti-communist dissident groups in the 1970s and the Solidarity movement that emerged in 1980.

The Soviet bloc's first independent trade union, Solidarity evolved into a 10-million-strong pro-democracy movement which the communists tried to crush.

Tokarczuk died on Friday in Przemysl.

Teacher sues church over pregnancy firing

A former first-grade teacher at Kettering’s Ascension Catholic School is suing the school, Ascension Church and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Cincinnati in federal court, saying officials discriminated against her a year ago when they fired the unmarried woman after she told the principal about her pregnancy.

Kathleen Quinlan of Kettering, who has since delivered twin girls, said in the Dec. 14 lawsuit that her firing for moral reasons was discriminatory because male employees who engage in premarital sex don’t face the same consequences “insomuch as they do not show outward signs of engaging in sexual intercourse (i.e., pregnancy).”

Quinlan was hired on July 25, 2011, and started work on Aug. 11, 2011. She became pregnant that fall, according to the lawsuit in U.S. District Court.

On Dec. 29, 2011, as her pregnancy was becoming apparent, she met with Principal Brett Devitt, told him about her pregnancy and offered to “take a ‘behind the scenes’ role at Ascension until she gave birth,” the lawsuit said. 

Devitt told her that “Ascension would do everything possible to support her,” the suit said, but that he needed to confer with Ascension Pastor Chris Worland and officials of the 19-county archdiocese, which runs the Catholic school system.

In a second meeting later that day, Worland and Devitt “told Ms. Quinlan that, after relating her pregnancy to the archdiocese, it was decided she could no longer work for Ascension School,” according to the lawsuit. She was told to clean out her classroom within three days, so her replacement could begin on Jan. 3. Her firing was effective Dec. 31, 2011, and she consequently lost her medical insurance in January.

A Dec. 31 termination letter told Quinlan she was fired for violating a section of her employment contract that requires employees to “comply with and act consistently in accordance with the stated philosophy and teachings of the Roman Catholic Church,” the lawsuit said. 

Quinlan’s attorney argued that, “as a non-ministerial employee, (she) was not subject to a ‘morality clause.’”

Worland referred a request for comment to the archdiocese whose spokesman, Dan Andriacco, said he couldn’t comment because legal counsel was unavailable for consultation this week. Quinlan and Devitt did not respond to requests for comment.

Quinlan is seeking back pay, compensatory damages for emotional distress and punitive damages “to punish and deter Ascension School and Archdiocese of Cincinnati from engaging in discriminatory activity,” plus attorney fees.

“Pregnancy discrimination is illegal,” said James Hardiman, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio. “The issue is clouded somewhat because this is a religious institution.”

The ACLU was involved in a 1986 case against Dayton Christian Schools that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case set precedent allowing government investigation of discrimination cases by religious institutions.

Quinlan isn’t the only Catholic school teacher to sue a diocese in recent times over a reproductive issue.

The Cincinnati archdiocese is facing a pending federal lawsuit similar to Quinlan’s, filed by former parochial teacher Christa Dias of Clermont County. 

The 2011 lawsuit claims the single woman was fired after she became pregnant through artificial insemination.

Dias was fired by the Rev. James Kiffmeyer, who was suspended from 2002-2006 on allegations of sexual misconduct against two male students in separate incidents while he was a teacher at Middletown’s Fenwick High School. 

The complainants were 18 when the incidents occurred, and Kiffmeyer was reinstated. The archdiocese reached a financial settlement with one of the accusers.

In Indiana, Emily Herx made national headlines in April when she sued the Diocese of Ft. Wayne-South Bend in federal court, saying the diocese discriminated against the married teacher when officials fired her for having in vitro fertilization treatments. Diocesan officials say the procedure is “gravely immoral.” 

She said other employees violate Catholic teachings without consequence. 

The lawsuit is pending.

Holy Family Church Relics: Chicago Church Claims To Have Rare Relics From Jesus' Birth

Holy Family Church Chicago Jesus Birth Relics
Tiny fragments said to be from the manger that held the infant Jesus, the veil of his mother, Mary, and a thread from the cloak of St. Joseph will be displayed by a Roman Catholic church in Chicago when it celebrates its 155th anniversary on Sunday.
The fragments, released by the Vatican in 1972, were a gift to the Holy Family Church from the Shrine of Our Lady of Pompeii, also in Chicago. 


 Displaying them now has particular significance because of their association with Christmas, which marks the birth of Jesus.
The Rev. Jeremiah J. Boland, administrator of the church, said on Friday that he is "not that interested" in carbon testing the items to see if they are from the beginning of the Christian Era.

"The Vatican has its own process to determine the authenticity of things," Boland said. "I'm more concerned with it as an object of faith."

The manger relic has "more authenticity" since it was brought from the Holy Land to the Vatican in the 5th century, Boland said.

"One could argue how real the relics of Mary or Joseph are, but there were all sorts of objects over the centuries that have been venerated and are based on faith rather than on scientific explanation," he said.

Holy Family, built in 1857-1860, is the city's second-oldest church and one of only five public buildings that survived the 1871 Great Chicago Fire.

The fragments will be on display in a crystal reliquary, a vessel in which relics of saints are preserved.

Boland said that Our Lady of Pompeii had been founded as an Italian parish, while Holy Family had been an Irish parish. In the past in Chicago as in other U.S. cities, immigrant Catholics tended to stay in parishes that reflected their ethnic backgrounds.

"In the history of the neighborhood there was a lot of tension between groups," said Boland. "The parishes weren't immune to some of these difficulties." The gift of the relics, he said, "is a healing gesture."

The mass celebrating the transfer of the relics will be held on Sunday morning, and the relics will be displayed during the afternoon.

The church will also exhibit manger scenes from around the world, including Kenya, Ireland, Italy, France, Poland, Peru, Vatican City, Mexico, Egypt and Jerusalem.

Church fatally overplayed hand in 1983 abortion poll

OPINION: What is the politest way to address a Catholic bishop?

This was one of the questions taoiseach Charles Haughey and senior civil servants were grappling with in 1982, as shown by State papers released this week.

The file on their deliberations provides a window onto Ireland 30 years ago, with one senior official recommending “My dear Lord Bishop” rather than plain old “Dear Bishop”. 

Another official felt this “formal approach . . . has been overtaken by more informal usage”.

Haughey himself was undecided on this point but a memo notes that he “agreed generally with the more intimate form of signing his name on a letter to a member of the hierarchy without the word “Taoiseach” typed under it.

It’s a long way from the Pat Rabbitte school of communications.

Today, politicians question whether churchmen have a right to stick their nose into State affairs. This would have been incomprehensible, or simply impractical, 30 years ago, given the sheer breadth of the Catholic Church’s involvement in Irish society.

From today’s vantage point such “interference” is generally perceived as a negative, but the positives are highlighted too in the documents. 

In a dark period for the North, Catholic priests working in nationalist, no-go areas were key intermediaries, trying to negotiate their constituency away from extreme positions. 

Even Margaret Thatcher gave them credit. 

When Rev Ian Paisley started badmouthing the Catholic Church at a meeting in June 1981, in the midst of the hunger strikes, the British prime minister commended the bishops for their bravery.

The church’s multifaceted role in education, community activism and social affairs was already well documented, but what shines through the files is the level of respect the church then received at official level and in the community at large. 

The department of foreign affairs dossier on the developing world, for example, consisted almost entirely of reports from priests and nuns in the missions.

A file on women’s equality saw feminists mobilised over the dropping of Sr Stanislaus Kennedy from a health board in July 1982. When the same activists proposed a “national women’s talent bank”, one of the first names put forward was a nun from Co Clare.

But the State papers also shine a light on abuses of power – small but insidious ones. Like when archbishop of Dublin Dermot Ryan used an Easter meeting with Haughey to request (successfully, as it turned out) that a number of bills owing to government departments – including Posts and Telegraphs – be cancelled, and that pressure be put on a couple of State agencies to “reduce their accounts”. 

(You’d like to see Diarmuid Martin try that one with the Minister for Communications.)

Or when a Catholic-run school in Co Mayo bombarded its local TD Enda Kenny with letters from pupils demanding a “pro-life” referendum – even though the students were too young to vote themselves. The wording on each letter was so similar it had all the hallmarks of a homework exercise.

This was, of course, part of a bigger show of strength by the Irish church. The “pro-life” amendment campaign was largely driven by lay Catholics, but would not have got off the ground without the hierarchy’s approval.

Many people who are strongly opposed to abortion admit today the campaign was ill-conceived. More broadly, it can be seen as the Irish Catholic Church – buoyant after the recent visit of Pope John Paul II – fatally overplaying its hand.

All the evidence points to the fact that both Haughey and Garret FitzGerald were staunchly anti-abortion, as were their parties, and the issue mattered politically only to the extent to which it could be used as a stick to beat the other. 

But the bitter nature of the 1983 referendum campaign, and the way “the abortion issue” contaminated the general elections surrounding it, made politicians a lot warier of church involvement in politics thereafter.

In another way, 1982 could be seen as a fatal turning point for the church because Catholic morality, in the remainder of that decade, became increasingly associated with a particular type of sexual morality.

The files shed some light on that evolution – as much of the correspondence on the abortion issue to the Department of the Taoiseach carried a hysterical tone, typically conveying sweeping allegations and innuendo. 

All were dealt with reverentially – backbench TD Enda Kenny dutifully forwarded his mailbag to the highest office in the land – but whether that would happen today is debatable.

What else do the papers tell us about 1982? Money was scarce (like today), the State was deep in debt (ditto) and we were super-sensitive about our image overseas (nothing changes).

In a year of high political intrigue, there was little recorded about phone-tapping or financial skulduggery – but that was somewhat inevitable. 

The paper trail that was left behind hints nonetheless at a political system based on wheeling and dealing, and a flexible moral code.

Viewed against the backdrop of more recent political events, including the various tribunals, the overwhelming impression from the papers is of a Republic with no particular sense of direction.

One rare instance of forward thinking from that era – relating to the “pro-life” amendment – was the decision of FitzGerald’s government to publish the advice of its attorney general Peter Sutherland in advance of the 1983 referendum. This was an unprecedented initiative, and whether or not you agreed with his opinion (he was against the amendment), its availability helped to inform public debate.

The electorate would have been better informed had it been able to compare Sutherland’s opinion to the quality of advice offered by the two other attorneys general who worked on the amendment. Instead, we can read this advice only 30 years later – but why?

There is a strong case for allowing greater public scrutiny of the advice of the Office of the Attorney General, especially in the case of referendums but perhaps also for other important matters of public policy. 

Labour should be reminded of its pre-election pledge for greater transparency in this area, saying in its manifesto it “will publish the attorney general’s advice to government when it is appropriate to do so”.

Thirty years after this was first trialled, it is appropriate to let in further light.

JOE HUMPHREYS is an Irish Times journalist covering the 1982 State papers released this week

MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE BENEDICT XVI FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE WORLD DAY OF PEACE 1 JANUARY 2013

BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS
 
1. EACH NEW YEAR brings the expectation of a better world. In light of this, I ask God, the Father of humanity, to grant us concord and peace, so that the aspirations of all for a happy and prosperous life may be achieved. 

Fifty years after the beginning of the Second Vatican Council, which helped to strengthen the Church’s mission in the world, it is heartening to realize that Christians, as the People of God in fellowship with him and sojourning among mankind, are committed within history to sharing humanity’s joys and hopes, grief and anguish, [1] as they proclaim the salvation of Christ and promote peace for all. 

In effect, our times, marked by globalization with its positive and negative aspects, as well as the continuation of violent conflicts and threats of war, demand a new, shared commitment in pursuit of the common good and the development of all men, and of the whole man.

It is alarming to see hotbeds of tension and conflict caused by growing instances of inequality between rich and poor, by the prevalence of a selfish and individualistic mindset which also finds expression in an unregulated financial capitalism. 

In addition to the varied forms of terrorism and international crime, peace is also endangered by those forms of fundamentalism and fanaticism which distort the true nature of religion, which is called to foster fellowship and reconciliation among people.

All the same, the many different efforts at peacemaking which abound in our world testify to mankind’s innate vocation to peace. In every person the desire for peace is an essential aspiration which coincides in a certain way with the desire for a full, happy and successful human life. 

In other words, the desire for peace corresponds to a fundamental moral principle, namely, the duty and right to an integral social and communitarian development, which is part of God’s plan for mankind. Man is made for the peace which is God’s gift.

All of this led me to draw inspiration for this Message from the words of Jesus Christ: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” (Mt 5:9).

Gospel beatitude

2. The beatitudes which Jesus proclaimed (cf. Mt 5:3-12 and Lk 6:20-23) are promises. In the biblical tradition, the beatitude is a literary genre which always involves some good news, a “gospel”, which culminates in a promise. Therefore, the beatitudes are not only moral exhortations whose observance foresees in due time – ordinarily in the next life – a reward or a situation of future happiness. Rather, the blessedness of which the beatitudes speak consists in the fulfilment of a promise made to all those who allow themselves to be guided by the requirements of truth, justice and love. In the eyes of the world, those who trust in God and his promises often appear naĆÆve or far from reality. 

Yet Jesus tells them that not only in the next life, but already in this life, they will discover that they are children of God, and that God has always been, and ever will be, completely on their side. They will understand that they are not alone, because he is on the side of those committed to truth, justice and love. Jesus, the revelation of the Father’s love, does not hesitate to offer himself in self-sacrifice. Once we accept Jesus Christ, God and man, we have the joyful experience of an immense gift: the sharing of God’s own life, the life of grace, the pledge of a fully blessed existence. Jesus Christ, in particular, grants us true peace, which is born of the trusting encounter of man with God.

Jesus’ beatitude tells us that peace is both a messianic gift and the fruit of human effort. In effect, peace presupposes a humanism open to transcendence. It is the fruit of the reciprocal gift, of a mutual enrichment, thanks to the gift which has its source in God and enables us to live with others and for others. The ethics of peace is an ethics of fellowship and sharing. It is indispensable, then, that the various cultures in our day overcome forms of anthropology and ethics based on technical and practical suppositions which are merely subjectivistic and pragmatic, in virtue of which relationships of coexistence are inspired by criteria of power or profit, means become ends and vice versa, and culture and education are centred on instruments, technique and efficiency alone. 

The precondition for peace is the dismantling of the dictatorship of relativism and of the supposition of a completely autonomous morality which precludes acknowledgment of the ineluctable natural moral law inscribed by God upon the conscience of every man and woman. Peace is the building up of coexistence in rational and moral terms, based on a foundation whose measure is not created by man, but rather by God. As Psalm 29 puts it: “May the Lord give strength to his people; may the Lord bless his people with peace” (v. 11).

Peace: God’s gift and the fruit of human effort

3. Peace concerns the human person as a whole, and it involves complete commitment. It is peace with God through a life lived according to his will. It is interior peace with oneself, and exterior peace with our neighbours and all creation. Above all, as Blessed John XXIII wrote in his Encyclical Pacem in Terris, whose fiftieth anniversary will fall in a few months, it entails the building up of a coexistence based on truth, freedom, love and justice.[2] 

The denial of what makes up the true nature of human beings in its essential dimensions, its intrinsic capacity to know the true and the good and, ultimately, to know God himself, jeopardizes peacemaking. Without the truth about man inscribed by the Creator in the human heart, freedom and love become debased, and justice loses the ground of its exercise.

To become authentic peacemakers, it is fundamental to keep in mind our transcendent dimension and to enter into constant dialogue with God, the Father of mercy, whereby we implore the redemption achieved for us by his only-begotten Son. In this way mankind can overcome that progressive dimming and rejection of peace which is sin in all its forms: selfishness and violence, greed and the will to power and dominion, intolerance, hatred and unjust structures.
The attainment of peace depends above all on recognizing that we are, in God, one human family. This family is structured, as the Encyclical Pacem in Terris taught, by interpersonal relations and institutions supported and animated by a communitarian “we”, which entails an internal and external moral order in which, in accordance with truth and justice, reciprocal rights and mutual duties are sincerely recognized. Peace is an order enlivened and integrated by love, in such a way that we feel the needs of others as our own, share our goods with others and work throughout the world for greater communion in spiritual values. It is an order achieved in freedom, that is, in a way consistent with the dignity of persons who, by their very nature as rational beings, take responsibility for their own actions.[3]

Peace is not a dream or something utopian; it is possible. Our gaze needs to go deeper, beneath superficial appearances and phenomena, to discern a positive reality which exists in human hearts, since every man and woman has been created in the image of God and is called to grow and contribute to the building of a new world. God himself, through the incarnation of his Son and his work of redemption, has entered into history and has brought about a new creation and a new covenant between God and man (cf. Jer 31:31-34), thus enabling us to have a “new heart” and a “new spirit” (cf. Ez 36:26).
 
For this very reason the Church is convinced of the urgency of a new proclamation of Jesus Christ, the first and fundamental factor of the integral development of peoples and also of peace. Jesus is indeed our peace, our justice and our reconciliation (cf. Eph 2:14; 2 Cor 5:18). The peacemaker, according to Jesus’ beatitude, is the one who seeks the good of the other, the fullness of good in body and soul, today and tomorrow. 

From this teaching one can infer that each person and every community, whether religious, civil, educational or cultural, is called to work for peace. Peace is principally the attainment of the common good in society at its different levels, primary and intermediary, national, international and global. Precisely for this reason it can be said that the paths which lead to the attainment of the common good are also the paths that must be followed in the pursuit of peace. 

Peacemakers are those who love, defend and promote life in its fullness

4. The path to the attainment of the common good and to peace is above all that of respect for human life in all its many aspects, beginning with its conception, through its development and up to its natural end. True peacemakers, then, are those who love, defend and promote human life in all its dimensions, personal, communitarian and transcendent. 

Life in its fullness is the height of peace. Anyone who loves peace cannot tolerate attacks and crimes against life.

Those who insufficiently value human life and, in consequence, support among other things the liberalization of abortion, perhaps do not realize that in this way they are proposing the pursuit of a false peace. The flight from responsibility, which degrades human persons, and even more so the killing of a defenceless and innocent being, will never be able to produce happiness or peace. 

Indeed how could one claim to bring about peace, the integral development of peoples or even the protection of the environment without defending the life of those who are weakest, beginning with the unborn. Every offence against life, especially at its beginning, inevitably causes irreparable damage to development, peace and the environment. Neither is it just to introduce surreptitiously into legislation false rights or freedoms which, on the basis of a reductive and relativistic view of human beings and the clever use of ambiguous expressions aimed at promoting a supposed right to abortion and euthanasia, pose a threat to the fundamental right to life. 

There is also a need to acknowledge and promote the natural structure of marriage as the union of a man and a woman in the face of attempts to make it juridically equivalent to radically different types of union; such attempts actually harm and help to destabilize marriage, obscuring its specific nature and its indispensable role in society.

These principles are not truths of faith, nor are they simply a corollary of the right to religious freedom. They are inscribed in human nature itself, accessible to reason and thus common to all humanity. The Church’s efforts to promote them are not therefore confessional in character, but addressed to all people, whatever their religious affiliation. 

Efforts of this kind are all the more necessary the more these principles are denied or misunderstood, since this constitutes an offence against the truth of the human person, with serious harm to justice and peace.

Consequently, another important way of helping to build peace is for legal systems and the administration of justice to recognize the right to invoke the principle of conscientious objection in the face of laws or government measures that offend against human dignity, such as abortion and euthanasia.

One of the fundamental human rights, also with reference to international peace, is the right of individuals and communities to religious freedom. At this stage in history, it is becoming increasingly important to promote this right not only from the negative point of view, as freedom from – for example, obligations or limitations involving the freedom to choose one’s religion – but also from the positive point of view, in its various expressions, as freedom for – for example, bearing witness to one’s religion, making its teachings known, engaging in activities in the educational, benevolent and charitable fields which permit the practice of religious precepts, and existing and acting as social bodies structured in accordance with the proper doctrinal principles and institutional ends of each. 

Sadly, even in countries of long-standing Christian tradition, instances of religious intolerance are becoming more numerous, especially in relation to Christianity and those who simply wear identifying signs of their religion. 

Peacemakers must also bear in mind that, in growing sectors of public opinion, the ideologies of radical liberalism and technocracy are spreading the conviction that economic growth should be pursued even to the detriment of the state’s social responsibilities and civil society’s networks of solidarity, together with social rights and duties. 

It should be remembered that these rights and duties are fundamental for the full realization of other rights and duties, starting with those which are civil and political.

One of the social rights and duties most under threat today is the right to work. The reason for this is that labour and the rightful recognition of workers’ juridical status are increasingly undervalued, since economic development is thought to depend principally on completely free markets. 

Labour is thus regarded as a variable dependent on economic and financial mechanisms. 

In this regard, I would reaffirm that human dignity and economic, social and political factors, demand that we continue “to prioritize the goal of access to steady employment for everyone.”[4] If this ambitious goal is to be realized, one prior condition is a fresh outlook on work, based on ethical principles and spiritual values that reinforce the notion of work as a fundamental good for the individual, for the family and for society. Corresponding to this good are a duty and a right that demand courageous new policies of universal employment.

Building the good of peace through a new model of development and economics
 
5. In many quarters it is now recognized that a new model of development is needed, as well as a new approach to the economy. Both integral, sustainable development in solidarity and the common good require a correct scale of goods and values which can be structured with God as the ultimate point of reference. It is not enough to have many different means and choices at one’s disposal, however good these may be. Both the wide variety of goods fostering development and the presence of a wide range of choices must be employed against the horizon of a good life, an upright conduct that acknowledges the primacy of the spiritual and the call to work for the common good. Otherwise they lose their real value, and end up becoming new idols. 

In order to emerge from the present financial and economic crisis – which has engendered ever greater inequalities – we need people, groups and institutions which will promote life by fostering human creativity, in order to draw from the crisis itself an opportunity for discernment and for a new economic model. The predominant model of recent decades called for seeking maximum profit and consumption, on the basis of an individualistic and selfish mindset, aimed at considering individuals solely in terms of their ability to meet the demands of competitiveness. 

Yet, from another standpoint, true and lasting success is attained through the gift of ourselves, our intellectual abilities and our entrepreneurial skills, since a “liveable” or truly human economic development requires the principle of gratuitousness as an expression of fraternity and the logic of gift.[5] Concretely, in economic activity, peacemakers are those who establish bonds of fairness and reciprocity with their colleagues, workers, clients and consumers. They engage in economic activity for the sake of the common good and they experience this commitment as something transcending their self-interest, for the benefit of present and future generations. Thus they work not only for themselves, but also to ensure for others a future and a dignified employment. 

In the economic sector, states in particular need to articulate policies of industrial and agricultural development concerned with social progress and the growth everywhere of constitutional and democratic states. The creation of ethical structures for currency, financial and commercial markets is also fundamental and indispensable; these must be stabilized and better coordinated and controlled so as not to prove harmful to the very poor. 

With greater resolve than has hitherto been the case, the concern of peacemakers must also focus upon the food crisis, which is graver than the financial crisis. The issue of food security is once more central to the international political agenda, as a result of interrelated crises, including sudden shifts in the price of basic foodstuffs, irresponsible behaviour by some economic actors and insufficient control on the part of governments and the international community. To face this crisis, peacemakers are called to work together in a spirit of solidarity, from the local to the international level, with the aim of enabling farmers, especially in small rural holdings, to carry out their activity in a dignified and sustainable way from the social, environmental and economic points of view. 

Education for a culture of peace: the role of the family and institutions

6. I wish to reaffirm forcefully that the various peacemakers are called to cultivate a passion for the common good of the family and for social justice, and a commitment to effective social education. 

No one should ignore or underestimate the decisive role of the family, which is the basic cell of society from the demographic, ethical, pedagogical, economic and political standpoints. 

The family has a natural vocation to promote life: it accompanies individuals as they mature and it encourages mutual growth and enrichment through caring and sharing. The Christian family in particular serves as a seedbed for personal maturation according to the standards of divine love. The family is one of the indispensable social subjects for the achievement of a culture of peace. 

The rights of parents and their primary role in the education of their children in the area of morality and religion must be safeguarded. It is in the family that peacemakers, tomorrow’s promoters of a culture of life and love, are born and nurtured.[6]

Religious communities are involved in a special way in this immense task of education for peace. The Church believes that she shares in this great responsibility as part of the new evangelization, which is centred on conversion to the truth and love of Christ and, consequently, the spiritual and moral rebirth of individuals and societies. Encountering Jesus Christ shapes peacemakers, committing them to fellowship and to overcoming injustice. 

Cultural institutions, schools and universities have a special mission of peace. They are called to make a notable contribution not only to the formation of new generations of leaders, but also to the renewal of public institutions, both national and international. They can also contribute to a scientific reflection which will ground economic and financial activities on a solid anthropological and ethical basis. 

Today’s world, especially the world of politics, needs to be sustained by fresh thinking and a new cultural synthesis so as to overcome purely technical approaches and to harmonize the various political currents with a view to the common good. The latter, seen as an ensemble of positive interpersonal and institutional relationships at the service of the integral growth of individuals and groups, is at the basis of all true education for peace.

A pedagogy for peacemakers

7. In the end, we see clearly the need to propose and promote a pedagogy of peace. This calls for a rich interior life, clear and valid moral points of reference, and appropriate attitudes and lifestyles. Acts of peacemaking converge for the achievement of the common good; they create interest in peace and cultivate peace. Thoughts, words and gestures of peace create a mentality and a culture of peace, and a respectful, honest and cordial atmosphere. There is a need, then, to teach people to love one another, to cultivate peace and to live with good will rather than mere tolerance. 

A fundamental encouragement to this is “to say no to revenge, to recognize injustices, to accept apologies without looking for them, and finally, to forgive”,[7] in such a way that mistakes and offences can be acknowledged in truth, so as to move forward together towards reconciliation. This requires the growth of a pedagogy of pardon. Evil is in fact overcome by good, and justice is to be sought in imitating God the Father who loves all his children (cf. Mt 5:21-48). This is a slow process, for it presupposes a spiritual evolution, an education in lofty values, a new vision of human history. 

There is a need to renounce that false peace promised by the idols of this world along with the dangers which accompany it, that false peace which dulls consciences, which leads to self-absorption, to a withered existence lived in indifference. The pedagogy of peace, on the other hand, implies activity, compassion, solidarity, courage and perseverance. 

Jesus embodied all these attitudes in his own life, even to the complete gift of himself, even to “losing his life” (cf. Mt 10:39; Lk 17:33; Jn 12:25). He promises his disciples that sooner or later they will make the extraordinary discovery to which I originally alluded, namely that God is in the world, the God of Jesus, fully on the side of man. Here I would recall the prayer asking God to make us instruments of his peace, to be able to bring his love wherever there is hatred, his mercy wherever there is hurt, and true faith wherever there is doubt. 

For our part, let us join Blessed John XXIII in asking God to enlighten all leaders so that, besides caring for the proper material welfare of their peoples, they may secure for them the precious gift of peace, break down the walls which divide them, strengthen the bonds of mutual love, grow in understanding, and pardon those who have done them wrong; in this way, by his power and inspiration all the peoples of the earth will experience fraternity, and the peace for which they long will ever flourish and reign among them.[8]

With this prayer I express my hope that all will be true peacemakers, so that the city of man may grow in fraternal harmony, prosperity and peace. 

From the Vatican, 8 December 2012
  
BENEDICTUS PP XVI

Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013

Pope Benedict's general prayer intention for January 2013 is: "That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him".

His mission intention is: "That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance".

New Year Prayer

 
A New Year Prayer
 
Holy Father,
God of our yesterdays, our today, and our tomorrows.

We praise You for Your unequaled greatness.

Thank You for the year behind us and for the year ahead.

Help us in Your new year, Father, to fret less and laugh more.

To teach our children to laugh by laughing with them.

To teach others to love by loving them.

Knowing, when Love came to the stable in Bethlehem, He came for us.

So that Love could be with us, and we could know You.

That we could share Love with others.

Help us, Father, to hear Your love song in every sunrise,
in the chriping of sparrows in our backyards,
in the stories of our old folks, and the fantasies of our children.

Help us to stop and listen to Your love songs,
so that we may know You better and better.

We rejoice in the world You loved into being.

Thank You for another new year and for new chances every day.

We pray for peace, for light, and for hope, that we might spread them to others.

Forgive us for falling short this past year.

We leave the irreparable past in your hands, and step out into the unknown new year knowing You will go with us.

We accept Your gift of a new year and we rejoice in what's ahead, depending on You to help us do exactly what You want..

I say it again, we rejoice!

In Jesus name,

Amen.