Thursday, January 01, 2026

MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE LEO XIV FOR THE 59th WORLD DAY OF PEACE - 1st JANUARY 2026

Peace be with you all:
Towards an “unarmed and disarming” peace

--------------------------------------------------- 

“Peace be with you!”

This ancient greeting, still in use today in many cultures, was infused with new life on the evening of Easter on the lips of the risen Jesus.  “Peace be with you” ( Jn 20:19, 21) is his Word that does not merely desire peace, but truly brings about a lasting transformation in those who receive it, and consequently in all of reality.  For this reason, the Apostles’ successors give voice every day throughout the world to the most silent of revolutions: “Peace be with you!”  From the very evening of my election as Bishop of Rome, I have wanted to join my own greeting to this universal proclamation. And I would like to reiterate that this is the peace of the risen Christ – a peace that is unarmed and disarming, humble and persevering.  It comes from God who loves us all unconditionally. [1]

The peace of the risen Christ

The Good Shepherd, who gives his life for the flock and has other sheep not of this fold (cf. Jn 10:11,16), is Christ, our peace, who has conquered death and broken down the walls of division that separate humanity (cf. Eph 2:14). His presence, his gift and his victory continue to shine through the perseverance of many witnesses through whom God’s work carries on in the world, becoming even more visible and radiant in the darkness of our times.

The contrast between darkness and light is not only a biblical image describing the labor pains of a new world being born; it is also an experience that unsettles us and affects us amid the trials we face in our historical circumstances. In order to overcome the darkness, it is necessary to see the light and believe in it. This is a call that Jesus’ disciples are invited to live in a unique and privileged way; yet it also finds its way into every human heart. Peace exists; it wants to dwell within us.  It has the gentle power to enlighten and expand our understanding; it resists and overcomes violence. Peace is a breath of the eternal: while to evil we cry out “Enough,” to peace we whisper “Forever.”  Into this horizon the Risen One has led us. Sustained by this conviction, even amid what Pope Francis called “a third world war fought piecemeal,” peacemakers continue to resist the spread of darkness, standing as sentinels in the night.

Sadly, it is also possible to forget the light. When this happens, we lose our sense of realism and surrender to a partial and distorted view of the world, disfigured by darkness and fear. Many today call “realistic” those narratives devoid of hope, blind to the beauty of others and forgetful of God’s grace, which is always at work in human hearts, even though wounded by sin.  Saint Augustine urged Christians to forge an unbreakable bond with peace, so that by cherishing it deeply in their hearts, they would be able to radiate its luminous warmth around them.  Addressing his community, he wrote: “If you wish to draw others to peace, first have it yourselves; be steadfast in peace yourselves.  To inflame others, you must have the flame burning within.” [2]

Dear brothers and sisters, whether we have the gift of faith or feel we lack it, let us open ourselves to peace! Let us welcome it and recognize it, rather than believing it to be impossible and beyond our reach. Peace is more than just a goal; it is a presence and a journey. Even when it is endangered within us and around us, like a small flame threatened by a storm, we must protect it, never forgetting the names and stories of those who have borne witness to it. Peace is a principle that guides and defines our choices. Even in places where only rubble remains, and despair seems inevitable, we still find people who have not forgotten peace. Just as on the evening of Easter Jesus entered the place where his disciples were gathered in fear and discouragement, so too the peace of the risen Christ continues to pass through doors and barriers in the voices and faces of his witnesses. This gift enables us to remember goodness, to recognize it as victorious, to choose it again, and to do so together.

An unarmed peace

Shortly before being arrested, in a moment of intimate confidence, Jesus said to those who were with him: “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you.  I do not give to you as the world gives.”  And he immediately added: “Do not let your hearts be troubled, and do not let them be afraid” (Jn 14:27). Their distress and fear were certainly connected to the violence soon to befall him. But, more deeply, the Gospels do not hide the fact that what troubled the disciples was his nonviolent response: a path that they all, Peter first among them, contested; yet the Master asked them to follow this path to the end. The way of Jesus continues to cause unease and fear. He firmly repeats to those who would defend him by force: “Put your sword back into its sheath” (Jn 18:11; cf. Mt 26:52). The peace of the risen Jesus is unarmed, because his was an unarmed struggle in the midst of concrete historical, political and social circumstances. Christians must together bear prophetic witness to this novelty, mindful of the tragedies in which they have too often been complicit. The great parable of the Last Judgment invites all Christians to act with mercy in this awareness (cf. Mt 25:31-46). In doing so, they will find brothers and sisters at their side who, in different ways, have listened to the pain of others and freed themselves inwardly from the deception of violence.

Although many people today have hearts ready for peace, they are often overcome by a great sense of powerlessness before an increasingly uncertain world.  Saint Augustine had already pointed out this particular paradox: “It is not difficult to possess peace; it is, perhaps, more difficult to praise it. To praise peace, we may find that we lack the necessary talent; we search for the right ideas and weigh our words. But to have peace, it is there, within reach, and we can possess it without effort.” [3]

When we treat peace as a distant ideal, we cease to be scandalized when it is denied, or even when war is waged in its name. We seem to lack those “right ideas,” the well-considered words and the ability to say that peace is near. When peace is not a reality that is lived, cultivated and protected, then aggression spreads into domestic and public life. In the relations between citizens and rulers, it could even be considered a fault not to be sufficiently prepared for war, not to react to attacks, and not to return violence for violence. Far beyond the principle of legitimate defense, such confrontational logic now dominates global politics, deepening instability and unpredictability day by day. It is no coincidence that repeated calls to increase military spending, and the choices that follow, are presented by many government leaders as a justified response to external threats.  The idea of the deterrent power of military might, especially nuclear deterrence, is based on the irrationality of relations between nations, built not on law, justice and trust, but on fear and domination by force. 

“Consequently,” as Saint John XXIII had already written in his day, “people are living in the grip of constant fear. They are afraid that at any moment the impending storm may break upon them with horrific violence. And they have good reasons for their fear, for there is certainly no lack of such weapons. While it is difficult to believe that anyone would dare to assume responsibility for initiating the appalling slaughter and destruction that war would bring in its wake, there is no denying that the conflagration could be started by some chance and unforeseen circumstance.” [4]

Moreover, it should be noted that global military expenditure increased by 9.4% in 2024 compared to the previous year, confirming the trend of the last ten years and reaching a total of $2718 billion (or 2.5% of global GDP). [5] Furthermore, the response to new challenges seems to involve not only enormous economic investment in rearmament, but also a shift in educational policies. Rather than fostering a culture of memory that preserves the hard-won awareness of the twentieth century and the millions of victims, we now see communication campaigns and educational programs – at schools, universities and in the media – that spread a perception of threats and promote only an armed notion of defense and security.

And yet, “those who truly love peace also love the enemies of peace.” [6]  Saint Augustine thus advised not to burn bridges or persist in reproach, but to prefer listening and, where possible, engaging in discussions with others. Sixty years ago, the Second Vatican Council concluded with a renewed awareness of the pressing need for dialogue between the Church and the contemporary world.  In particular, the Constitution Gaudium et Spes drew attention to the evolution of warfare: “The hazards peculiar to modern warfare consist in the fact that they expose those possessing recently developed weapons to the risk of perpetrating crimes like these and, by an inexorable chain of events, of urging people to even worse acts of atrocity. To obviate the possibility of this happening at any time in the future, the bishops of the world gathered together to implore everyone, especially government leaders and military advisors, to give unceasing consideration to their immense responsibilities before God and before the whole human race.” [7]

Reiterating the appeal of the Council Fathers, and considering dialogue to be the most effective approach at every level, we must acknowledge that further technological advances and the military implementation of artificial intelligence have worsened the tragedy of armed conflict. There is even a growing tendency among political and military leaders to shirk responsibility, as decisions about life and death are increasingly “delegated” to machines. This marks an unprecedented and destructive betrayal of the legal and philosophical principles of humanism that underlie and safeguard every civilization. It is necessary to denounce the enormous concentrations of private economic and financial interests that are driving States in this direction; yet that alone would not be enough, unless we also awakened conscience and critical thought. The Encyclical Fratelli Tutti presents Saint Francis of Assisi as a model of such awakening: “In the world of that time, bristling with watchtowers and defensive walls, cities were a theater of brutal wars between powerful families, even as poverty was spreading through the countryside. Yet there Francis was able to welcome true peace into his heart and free himself of the desire to wield power over others. He became one of the poor and sought to live in harmony with all.” [8] This is a narrative that we are called to continue today, and that means joining forces to contribute to a disarming peace, a peace born of openness and evangelical humility.

A disarming peace

Goodness is disarming. Perhaps this is why God became a child. The mystery of the Incarnation, which reaches its deepest descent even to the realm of the dead, begins in the womb of a young mother and is revealed in the manger in Bethlehem. “Peace on earth,” sing the angels, announcing the presence of a defenseless God, in whom humanity can discover itself as loved only by caring for him (cf. Lk 2:13-14). Nothing has the power to change us as much as a child. Perhaps it is precisely the thought of our children and of others who are equally fragile, that cuts to the heart (cf. Acts 2:37). In this regard, my venerable predecessor wrote that “human fragility has the power to make us more lucid about what endures and what passes, what brings life and what kills. Perhaps for this reason, we so often tend to deny our limitations and avoid fragile and wounded people: they have the power to question the direction we have chosen, both as individuals and as a community.” [9]

John XXIII was the first pope to advocate “integral disarmament,” which can only be achieved through renewal of the heart and mind.  In Pacem in Terris, he wrote: “Everyone must realize that, unless this process of disarmament be thoroughgoing and complete, and reach people’s very souls, it is impossible to stop the arms race, or to reduce armaments, or — and this is the main thing — ultimately to abolish them entirely. Everyone must sincerely co-operate in the effort to banish fear and the anxious expectation of war from our minds. But this requires that the fundamental principles upon which peace is based in today’s world be replaced by an altogether different one, namely, the realization that true and lasting peace among nations cannot consist in the possession of an equal supply of armaments but only in mutual trust. And we are confident that this can be achieved, for it is a thing which not only is dictated by common sense, but is in itself most desirable and most fruitful of good.” [10]

An essential service that religions must render to a suffering humanity is to guard against the growing temptation to weaponize even thoughts and words. The great spiritual traditions, as well as right reason, teach us to look beyond blood ties or ethnicity, beyond associations that accept only those who are similar and reject those who are different. Today, we see that this cannot be taken for granted. Unfortunately, it has become increasingly common to drag the language of faith into political battles, to bless nationalism, and to justify violence and armed struggle in the name of religion. 

Believers must actively refute, above all by the witness of their lives, these forms of blasphemy that profane the holy name of God. Therefore, alongside action, it is more necessary than ever to cultivate prayer, spirituality, and ecumenical and interreligious dialogue as paths of peace and as languages of encounter within traditions and cultures. Throughout the world, it is to be hoped that “every community become a ‘house of peace,’ where one learns how to defuse hostility through dialogue, where justice is practiced and forgiveness is cherished.” [11] Now more than ever, we must show that peace is not a utopia by fostering attentive and life-giving pastoral creativity.

At the same time, this should in no way detract from the importance of the political dimension. Those entrusted with the highest public responsibility must “give serious thought to the problem of achieving more humane relations between States throughout the world. This adjustment must be based on mutual trust, sincerity in negotiations and the faithful fulfilment of obligations. Every aspect of the problem must be examined, so that, eventually, a point of agreement may emerge from which sincere, lasting, and beneficial treaties can be initiated.” [12] 

This is the disarming path of diplomacy, mediation and international law, which is sadly too often undermined by the growing violations of hard-won treaties, at a time when what is needed is the strengthening of supranational institutions, not their delegitimization.

In today’s world, justice and human dignity are at an alarming risk amid global power imbalances. How can we live in this time of destabilization and conflict, and free ourselves from evil? We need to encourage and support every spiritual, cultural and political initiative that keeps hope alive, countering the spread of “fatalistic terms, as if the dynamics involved were the product of anonymous impersonal forces or structures independent of the human will.” [13] 

For, as has been suggested, “the best way to dominate and gain control over people is to spread despair and discouragement, even under the guise of defending certain values.” [14]  

Against this strategy, we must promote self-awareness in civil societies, forms of responsible association, experiences of nonviolent participation, and practices of restorative justice on both a small and large scale. Leo XIII had already made this clear in his Encyclical Rerum Novarum: “The consciousness of his own weakness urges the human person to call in aid from without. We read in Scripture: ‘Two are better than one, for they have the advantage of their society. For if they fall, one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up’ ( Eccles 4:9-10). And further: ‘A brother that is helped by his brother is like a strong city’ ( Prov 18:19).” [15]

May this be one of the fruits of the Jubilee of Hope, which has moved millions of people to rediscover themselves as pilgrims and to begin within themselves that disarmament of heart, mind and life. God will surely respond to this by fulfilling his promises: “He shall judge between the nations, and shall decide for many peoples; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.  O house of Jacob, come, let us walk in the light of the Lord” (Is 2, 4-5).

From the Vatican, 8 December 2025

LEO PP. XIV

____________________________________

[1] Cf. Apostolic Blessing “Urbi et Orbi,” Central Loggia of the Vatican Basilica (8 May 2025).

[2] Saint Augustine of Hippo, Serm. 357, 3.

[3] Ibid., 1.

[4] John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Pacem in terris (11 April 1963), 111.

[5] Cf. SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (2025).

[6] Saint Augustine of Hippo, Serm. 357, 1.

[7] Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et Spes, 80.

[8] Francis, Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti (3 October 2020), 4.

[9] Francis, Letter to the Directors of “Corriere della Sera” (14 March 2025).

[10] John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris (11 April 1963), 113.

[11] Leo XIV Address to the Bishops of the Italian Episcopal Conference (17 June 2025).

[12] John XXIII, Encyclical Letter Pacem in Terris (11 April 1963), 118.

[13] Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 42.

[14] Francis, Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti (3 October 2020), 15.

[15] Leo XIII, Encyclical Letter Rerum Novarum (15 May 1891), 50.

Brendan Hoban: Christmas helps us to recall a deeper truth

For Christians everywhere, Easter is reputed to be the most important feast of the year. 

And, officially it is, but, truth to tell, in the public consciousness, Christmas wins hands down. 

Because Christmas is full of memories that catch, even demand our attention. 

And even when the memory becomes faded through time or circumstance, for no apparent reason at all we find ourselves immersed in flashbacks of Christmas past that insist on forcing their way to the surface.

John McGahern, in his novel, Amongst Women, in his characteristic limpid stylecaptures the atmosphere of Christmas times in rural Ireland in his focus on the Moran sisters ‘coming home for Christmas’: 

Once the Moran girls crossed the bridge the church appeared like an enormous lighted ship in the night. There was something wonderful and moving about leaving the car by the roadside and walking together in the cold and darkness towards the great lighted church. The girls clasped hands in silence and drew closer together as they walked. Once they passed through the church-gates several people came over to them to welcome them home and to wish them a happy Christmas, whispering how well they looked and they bowed away with little nods and smiles. The church itself was crowded and humming with excitement. There were many others like the Moran girls who had come home for Christmas. They would all be singled out as they came away from the altar rail after receiving Communion and discussed over hundreds of dinners the next day: who was home and where they were living and what they worked at and how they looked and who they got their looks from and what they wore last night as they came away from the rail. As good-looking girls in their first flowering, the three Morans were among the stars of the Communion rail that Christmas night. 

The Christmas story has been told so often and the simple message so often rehearsed that we need poets to present it time and again in all its stark beauty, as the poet Pádraig J. Daly, does in his love-poem ‘Christmas’:


We listen to the story again:

An exotic visitor

Comes to a countrygirl

In a mountain town

And nine months afterwards

God’s wisdom is a footling child.

Shepherds arrive at the place,

Summoned by music;

And scholars from some distant part,

Tracking a light.

But why did not the sun, for awe,

Lose its footing in the sky?

Why did seas not charge across the astonished land?

Why did every horse in every paddock everywhere

Not break into delirious chase?

By what foul means were linnets stilled?

And how can we,

Loving so little,

Fettered by knowledge,

Believe in such excessive love?

That’s the miracle of Bethlehem – that at a human level, the wonder is that the birth of the Christ-child ushered in ‘such excessive love’ 2,000-plus years ago that, more than twenty centuries later, the word Christmas (Christ-mas) still rings that joyful bell of faith and hope and love.

In his ‘First Coming’ into our world Jesus opened up for us the prospect of ‘a kingdom of truth and life, a kingdom of justice and peace’. And even though his Second Coming which marked the end of times is awaited by the faithful, William Butler Yeats in his poem ‘Second Coming’ predicts first that a period of tribulation and moral decline can be expected as evil stalks our world – in Yeats’ words, as ‘things fall apart, the centre cannot hold’ and ‘mere anarchy is loosed upon the world’ as ‘the best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity’, and a ‘rough beast slouches towards Bethlehem to be born’.

In the present chaotic and apocalyptic state of the world, commentators sometimes point to the present breakdown in morality and to a world on the brink of imminent war as a disintegration in cosmic communication – in Yeats’s telling image ‘the falcon cannot hear the falconer’ – representing as it does a fundamental loss of contact with the true sources of life.

It’s as if with Trump and Putin holding the world to ransom and more often than not when truth and falsehood and right and wrong are for so many seemingly impossible to distinguish, so many too seem to identify more easily with the ‘rough beast’ slouching towards Bethlehem rather than the love ushered into our world by the baby born in a Bethlehem stable.

Christmas helps us to recall a deeper truth. God so loved the world that he sent his son amongst us to remind us of that overarching and compelling truth that God loves each one of us beyond all our imagining or expectation. The difficulty is with the question Pádraig J. Daly poses – how can we, / Loving so little / Fettered by knowledge / Believe in such excessive love? – that our divided and misfunctioning world and our personal failures can blind us to the vibrant presence of a God who loves us regardless of anything we have done or failed to so – how can we, / Loving so little / Fettered by knowledge / Believe in such excessive love?

And yet and yet, we can, because of the promise represented by Bethlehem and the child once wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger, the child who grew up to become our Saviour and who died on a cross on Calvary. That’s the extraordinary belief that is ours and once again we savour its truth by visiting the Crib and mulling over yet again and again, year after year, the unremitting truth that God loves us.

The words of poet, John Betjeman, in his celebrated poem, brings us to the heart of Christmas:

And is it true? For if it is . . .
No love that in a family dwells,
No carolling in frosty air,
Nor all the steeple-shaking bells
Can with this single Truth compare –
That God was man in Palestine
And lives today in Bread and Wine.

Cardinal Sako Reports Threats and Criticizes State Silence

Cardinal Louis Raphael Sako, the Patriarch of the Chaldean Church in Iraq and the World, announced that he has been subjected to threats and significant harassment following public controversy regarding his comments on diplomatic relations and the status of the Christian minority in the country.

In a televised interview with Iraqi Dijlah TV, the Cardinal disclosed that despite the severity of the intimidation he faces, the supreme authority in Iraq has yet to adopt a formal stance on the matter, a silence that underscores the precarious position of one of the nation’s oldest religious communities.

The recent wave of hostility directed at the Patriarch appears linked to the sensitive political issue of relations between Iraq and Israel. During the interview, Cardinal Sako addressed allegations that he had advocated for the normalization of ties with Israel, a subject that remains legally and socially prohibited in Iraqi politics.

The Cardinal categorically rejected the claim that he used the term "normalization," asserting instead that he had merely presented a personal idea which was subsequently distorted and interpreted differently by detractors to fuel a campaign against him.

To bolster his defense against accusations of sympathizing with Israeli state policy, Cardinal Sako revealed a significant diplomatic detail regarding his past travels with Pope Francis. He noted that while he accompanied the Pontiff during his visit to Jordan, he explicitly refused to accompany him on the subsequent leg of the journey to Israel. This decision, he argued, serves as evidence of his alignment with national sentiments, contradicting the narrative used by those currently threatening him.

Despite the localized nature of the threats, Cardinal Sako emphasized that his position is fortified by a global constituency.

He stated that he is "not alone," reminding his detractors that he represents a worldwide community of one billion and 400 million people.

Simultaneously, he sought to anchor his legitimacy in Iraqi soil, rejecting any characterization of Christians as outsiders. He declared himself an indigenous citizen of the country, noting that his ancestors are buried in Kufa, a city in central Iraq with deep historical and religious significance.

The Cardinal’s comments regarding his personal security were set against a backdrop of grim statistics detailing the exodus and persecution of Iraq’s Christian population.

He indicated that the demographic collapse of the community is ongoing, with data showing that one million Christians have migrated from the country. Beyond displacement, the violence has been lethal; the Cardinal cited figures indicating that 1,500 Christians have been killed.

Economic dispossession has accompanied this violence. Cardinal Sako reported that 1,200 properties belonging to Christians have been seized, a practice that has stripped the community of its wealth and historical footprint in cities like Baghdad. On this issue, the Patriarch highlighted a disparity in the response from Iraq’s political leadership.

He revealed that he had sent letters regarding the return of these seized assets, but the only response he received came from Muqtada al-Sadr, the influential Shia cleric and political leader.

As a direct result of Sadr’s intervention, the Cardinal noted, 100 of the seized properties were successfully returned to their owners. The lack of engagement from other political factions on the property issue remains a point of contention.

The current tensions are the latest chapter in a protracted crisis between the Chaldean Patriarchate and the Iraqi political establishment that began in July 2023.

The conflict was precipitated when the President of Iraq, Latif Rashid, revoked a republican decree originally issued in 2013 by the late former President Jalal Talabani. The 2013 decree had granted official state recognition to Sako as the Patriarch of the Chaldean Church and formally acknowledged him as the custodian of the church's property and assets.

The revocation of this decree in 2023 caused profound concern among Christians both within Iraq and globally, who interpreted the move as a deliberate step toward the further marginalization of the Christian component of Iraqi society.

The political fallout was immediate and severe. In a dramatic act of protest, Cardinal Sako relocated the headquarters of the Patriarchate from Baghdad to Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region. He announced at the time that he would not return to his traditional seat in the Iraqi capital until the official recognition of his position was fully restored.

The standoff lasted for nearly a year, creating a significant rift between the church and the federal government. Resolution efforts involved various domestic and international parties working behind the scenes to bridge the divide.

These efforts culminated in April 2024, when Cardinal Sako returned to Baghdad following an official invitation extended by the Iraqi Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani.

The reconciliation process was formalized months later in June 2024, when the Prime Minister issued a new decree that reinstated the recognition of Cardinal Louis Sako as the Patriarch of the Chaldeans in Iraq and the world, effectively reversing the administrative action that had sparked the crisis.

However, the restoration of the Cardinal’s legal status has not arrested the broader decline of the Christian presence in the country. Despite the new decree and the return of the Patriarch to Baghdad, threats to the existence and future of the community persist.

According to statistics cited in the context of the Cardinal's recent remarks, the Christian population has plummeted since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. The numbers have dropped from more than 1.5 million people to nearly 250,000 today.

The primary drivers of this demographic collapse remain consistent: violence, displacement, and the systematic seizure of properties and assets. As Cardinal Sako’s latest statements reveal, even the highest ecclesiastical authority in the country is not immune to the intimidation tactics that have driven hundreds of thousands of his followers into exile.

While the church has regained its legal footing through the Prime Minister’s decree, the Cardinal’s revelation of "headaches" and threats suggests that the security environment for Iraq’s indigenous Christians remains volatile, with the state’s supreme authority yet to intervene decisively in their defense.

Archbishop of York accepts new witness statement in case against Bishop Mullally

THE Archbishop of York opted to accept a new witness statement from a male complainant, known as Survivor N, in a Clergy Discipline Measure (CDM) case against the Bishop of London, the Rt Revd Sarah Mullally, in a preliminary judgment, dated 22 December. 

But Archbishop Cottrell said that he would not consider statements from four other individuals.

Survivor N’s complaint relates to Bishop Mullally’s handling of allegations that he made against a priest in the diocese. 

In early December, it emerged that the complaint, which was filed in 2020, had not been taken further owing to the diocesan registrar’s mistakenly thinking that Survivor N did not wish to proceed.

Archbishop Cottrell is now considering whether to progress the complaint, after requesting, and receiving, a formal response from Bishop Mullally, who is Archbishop of Canterbury-elect.

He was also asked by Survivor N to consider an updated witness statement and witness statements written by four other individuals. In a judgment, which has been seen by the Church Times, Archbishop Cottrell opted to accept the updated statement from Survivor N, citing a mechanism in the CDM rules which allows him to seek “points of clarification” after a complaint has been received.

But the statements from the four other individuals did not relate to specifics of the complaint, Archbishop Cottrell wrote, and, as such, were not admissible as “points of clarification”.

Bishop Mullally had until 29 December to make any further clarifications in light of the new statement.

The judgment quotes from Survivor N’s updated statement: “I have more to say and will be saying it in a further Statement of Witness in due course.”

In his judgment, however, Archbishop Cottrell wrote that he “must make clear” to Survivor N that “no further evidence may now be submitted” before he made a decision, which he is obliged to do by 7 January.

If Archbishop Cottrell chooses not to take further action or dismisses the case, the complainant can request that this decision be reviewed by the independent President of Tribunals.

A request by Survivor N for the case to be delegated immediately to the President of Tribunals could not be acceded to, Archbishop Cottrell explained, under the legal structure of the CDM.

Of the witness statements from third parties which have been excluded from consideration, Survivor N writes that they “vitally and in the public interest expose the culture in the Diocese of London under Sarah Mullally of her enthusiastic victimisation of complainants as a tool of reputation management”.

When a Bishop Clearly Acts in Bad Faith (Opinion)

With all the church closings, clustering, and twinning, alongside the seemingly endless amount of money in terms of payouts to victims of clerical and religious abuse, it is almost easy to become disillusioned with the leadership of some—many—of the dioceses in the United States at present.

However, occasionally a Local Ordinary will do something so far beyond the pale that to not point it out would be akin to a sin of omission. Regrettably, this happened at our parish, St. Raphael’s in Niagara Falls, New York, at the hands of Buffalo bishop, Michael Fisher.

On October 3, 2023, the aforementioned bishop came to our relatively small church to celebrate the Sacrament of Confirmation for my twins and thirty other young believers from two other parishes. It was literally standing room only; and as always with confirmations, it was a moving ceremony.

However, the following Sunday, our pastor—who was new to our parish and in his first term as a pastor at any parish—said that the bishop, during his brief visit to St. Raphael’s, decreed that our church needed a paint job.

Neither he nor the bishop were wrong: our church, which already suffered from being designed as one of those post-Vatican II washing-machine agitators/floppy beach hat architectural disasters, had been painted a bright lime green. 

Our former pastor, who had spent 15 years at St. Raphael’s and was beloved by all—especially for his being an excellent confessor and let’s-keep-this-brief-and-to-the-point homilist—had saved as much money as he could by not painting the interior. St. Raphael’s, sadly, was ugly, inside and out.

But the bishop had spoken: it needed a fresh coat of paint. 

Our new—and very young—pastor quickly found a painter for the entire interior. It would cost each family $250. Which, in Niagara Falls dollars, is a lot of money. This was in addition to the weekly tithes, insurance premiums, and the extra heating-bill collection.  

In great news, the paint job was done quickly and very well: it was stunning, refreshing, and long overdue.

But almost as soon as it was completed, rumors began that our church was on the chopping block to be shuttered, along with at least two other churches in Niagara Falls. In February of this year, Bishop Fisher said the final Mass at St. Raphael’s, and the building was sold to Baptists. Or, as no less an authority than St. Robert Bellarmine would call them, “heretics.” 

The problem here is obvious: it appears that to raise the value of the sale of St. Raphael’s, Bishop Fisher wanted it painted—not unlike a New York City landlord who paints an apartment before raising the rent and putting it on the market. 

And he got his wish. 

Despite St. Raphael’s being the last parish in Niagara Falls that the faithful could actually walk to, as well as being the only church in the North End of the city, it was summarily closed and sold.

This, of course, shattered our pastor, who, in a gut-wrenching and tear-jerking speech to us said he felt he “had failed us, and misled us.” While it is always somewhat reassuring to witness a priest show that he is indeed one of us, it was also heartbreaking.

But we had all been hoodwinked: Bishop Fisher, who has absolutely no ties to any part of Western New York—indeed, his ecclesiastical career was based in Washington, D.C., under former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and Cardinal Donald Wuerl, and had never reached past the Mason-Dixon Line—had acted in bad faith. 

He took advantage of a young pastor’s obedience and the people of St. Raphael’s parish by having us pay for a paint job he capriciously and arbitrarily ordered, only to close and sell the very same church he had visited exactly twice: once to confirm the faithful (and complain to the pastor) and once to shut it down.

The Diocese of Buffalo went bankrupt in 2020. 

That same year, our Christ the King Seminary—which had been rocked by its own in-house sex scandal—was shuttered. Even the Vincentian Fathers, who run Niagara University and are age-old experts in turning around seminaries, were stymied. 

In a sense, these were portents of what was to happen throughout the rest of the diocese: closing churches under the guise of having to pay out a nearly endless stream of abuse reparations. 

That—all that—to the side: I’m not sure how importing a bishop with no knowledge of Buffalo is supposed to “fix” a problem he cannot begin to understand. While this is not unique to Buffalo, unfortunately, we have been burdened by a bishop who acts more like a medieval monarch than a servant leader. 

His high-handed tactics have recently been called out, and even the Vatican is at least acknowledging the voices of parishioners in those churches in this diocese that are struggling to stay open despite the bishop’s strong-arm/my-way-or-the-highway decretals.

While I do not envy any bishop the job entrusted to him—which now includes coming up with millions of dollars to pay for sex-abuse scandals he inherited (and did not create)—someone should point out to these esteemed churchmen that constantly closing churches is what anyone who has studied at Yale School of Management would call a “non-sustainable business model.” 

There are a limited number of churches that can be closed (and sold). No one seems to have thought through the possibility that there are not enough churches to sell.

When it was announced that St. Raphael’s would close for certain, I asked our pastor if we would be refunded our extra donation of $250 for the paint job that we barely got to enjoy. I was joking in a time of misery, of course. 

But last month, out of nowhere, the residents of New York State received an unexpected “rebate check” from our rather tiresome governor, Kathy Hochul—with her signature seemingly enlarged so we don’t forget whose largesse we are indebted to. 

The least Bishop Fisher could do is send the heartbroken and soul-searching former parishioners of St. Raphael’s our money back—since it’s certain that we are not getting our church back.

Archbishop Eamon Martin’s 2026 New Year message to the people of Ireland

The Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland has encouraged people to be signs of peace for each other, and for the world, during 2026.

Speaking at Mass in Armagh to welcome in the New Year, Archbishop Martin echoed the words of Pope Leo XIV who, in his 1 January message for the 59th World Day of Peace, calls for a peace that is “unarmed and disarming.”

Archbishop Martin observed the custom of offering each other a sign of peace which occurs just before Holy Communion at Mass, normally in the form of a handshake, bow or other gesture. The Primate said,“The Church understands this action as an expression of deep commitment to bringing to life the Peace of our Lord Jesus Christ. By sharing His words, ‘Peace be with you’, with the persons beside us, we are undertaking to spread the peace of Christ in our daily lives – by our thoughts, words and deeds and in our many interactions with others – at home, in the work place, at school, and in social encounters. I urge you to consider making a New Year’s resolution to be a sign of peace wherever you go this year.”

Taking his cue from Pope Leo’s message, Archbishop Martin expressed concern that social media may be influencing people to come to conversations and relationships as if ‘armed for battle’. He said, “I am saddened when I see people of faith online who seem ‘armed to the teeth’, and who persist in “othering” and accentuating difference. It is particularly disappointing when you see this from Christians online who label and dismiss others because of their race, religion or some other perceived difference. This is not of God.”

Archbishop Martin highlighted this point in Pope Leo’s message where the Holy Father writes, “Unfortunately, it has become increasingly common to drag the language of faith into political battles, to bless nationalism, and to justify violence and armed struggle in the name of religion. Believers must actively refute, above all by the witness of their lives, these forms of blasphemy that profane the holy name of God.”

Archbishop Martin said, “Pope Leo prefers a disarmed peace which is not about ‘weaponising thoughts and words’, but about healing, showing mercy and forgiveness, reconciling and bridge-building. This is the peace which Jesus meant when He said to His friends, ‘Peace I leave you; my own peace I give you; a peace the world cannot give – that is my gift to you.'”

Archbishop Martin emphasised that,“This is one of the ways that religions in general, and Christianity in particular, can continue to play a vital role in the public square – by witnessing and being signs of peace, by holding humanity and the world back from the brink of self-destruction, endless conflict, violent displacement of peoples and death.

“Like Pope Leo, I am hopeful that even amid what the late Pope Francis called ‘a Third World War fought piecemeal’, peacemakers can continue to resist the spread of darkness, standing as sentinels in the night.

“They do this by fostering the ‘disarmed and disarming’ peace of Christ which is the answer to the evils that stalk our world. Such peace is achievable. We must reject the spread of despair, the massive investment in rearmament, and those who would talk up threats and the ‘inevitability’ of war. We do not give up on peace.”

Archbishop Martin concluded,“My brothers and sisters, as the New Year 2026 begins, the challenge to speak and live the message of peace remains more important than ever. My wish on this World Day of Peace is that Christians everywhere, who regularly exchange the Sign of the Peace of Christ, will be active ambassadors for peace in the Church and in the world, beginning in their own homes, families, workplaces and neighbourhoods. In this way the Sign of Peace will avoid becoming an empty or meaningless gesture, but will rather be an impulse and driver towards reconciliation and peace building.”

+ Archbishop Eamon martin

Archbishop of Armagh, Primate of All Ireland