I’m thinking deeply about where religion and, in particular, the Catholic Church are heading.
There comes a time when sitting on the fence is not just cowardly but also sinful.
There are many complex issues facing the Catholic Church. One is the crass abuse of women. It is no longer defensible to deny women their full voice and their legitimate role in the pastoral work of spreading the Good News.
This is a human rights issue and is spiritual abuse.
The recent decision not to decide on the possibility of ordaining women as deacons is plainly demeaning.
The Catholic Church needs to wake up to the need for women deacons and women priests.
Many theologians and scripture experts are convinced that women were ordained deacons in the early church.
If that is true, it is not a question of introducing the practice but of restoring it. They tell us that St Paul’s Letter to the Romans identifies Phoebe as a deacon and not just St Paul’s dedicated assistant.
“Receive her in the Lord” is St Paul’s command.
Many Church history scholars are convinced that in the early centuries of the Church’s existence, women served their community and church in a deep, essential way — as thousands of women worldwide wish to do now.
Personally, I can see no primary theological reasons why women should not be ordained as priests either.
But let’s stick to deacons for today.
CLERICS
Male deacons make a real contribution to the life of the Church in many areas of the world. In these countries, their contribution is limited by the clergy.
America has a longer experience, as do the missionary areas of Africa. I know that from personal experience.
But, like the clerics, these male deacons are becoming old and grey. Eighty per cent of deacons in the United States are over 60 years of age.
Two positives still exist in the Church.
Many women are willing to serve as deacons (and priests, too).
Secondly, there is a vast need for their talents to minister to hurting, suffering human beings in need of care and direction.
We do not have the right to deprive the church of their services. The women are talented, willing and able.
The people in need are crying out for their help.
Masses of people are deprived of healing because women are cast aside just because they are women.
There are hospitals, parishes, prisons, schools, etc abandoned because men ministers can no longer serve them and women’s vocations are turned away.
Think of the impact that talented women from all sections of our community could have, compared to that of good but elderly, greyhaired men.
I can think of no sustainable argument against the ordination of women to the diaconate. Some of the arguments often used are pathetic. They say Phoebe wasn’t ordained.
How can we be sure? Do we know if Paul, Peter, or Apollos were ordained?
It is often proposed that women have other ways to serve. So what? So do men; what’s the point of being a male deacon or a priest then?
The most confusing argument of all is that God called only men to the priesthood. How come, then, that God used a woman to give birth to His Son?
Or that he gave his women companions respect, dignity and responsibility? Or that He chose a woman, Mary Magdalene, to announce His Resurrection? She is the apostle to the Apostles.
He sternly reminded guests in Bethany that a woman who anointed his feet would be remembered forever for doing the right thing (Mark 14:9). There are numerous other examples.
SALVATION
The authorities now claim that this tradition cannot be changed. Hold on a moment.
Priests were allowed to marry for a thousand years, yet that was changed — for better or worse.
The Second Vatican Council insisted that the church needs constant reformation, i.e. constant change.
When I was young, we received the Eucharist a few times a year at most. That changed.
For centuries, it was said that outside the church, there is no salvation. The Council, in Lumen Gentium, proposed another view.
The Church must change to meet the needs of each generation; otherwise, we culpably fail to spread the Good News of God’s Love.
Across the world, Catholic women who discern that their church rejects them have moved to other Christian churches that welcome women’s ordination.
There, they fulfil their vocation to serve God as deacons and priests. Their (different religions) gain is our loss.
For decades, we have asked the faithful to pray for vocations, yet continue to reject women’s rightful vocations. It doesn’t make sense.
The latest document from the Vatican concluded, “there is still no room for a positive decision” on women’s ordination.
In my view, it is long past time they abandoned their prejudices and opened the way for women to serve the church they love as God calls them.
