The sister's voice cracked with emotion as she explained her
disappointment. She and the sisters in her community were "sad, so sad"
when they heard the news from the Vatican April 15 that Pope Francis had
"reaffirmed" the conclusions of the doctrinal assessment of the
Leadership Conference of Women Religious and the program of reform
ordered last year by the Congregation for the Doctrine for the Faith.
Was this the dose of cold reality -- the other shoe falling -- that
would signal that despite all the lovely symbolism of this young papacy,
over the long haul the status quo would prevail?
We fully understand
the sadness the sister who called NCR expressed. Women
religious in the United States have been ill-treated over the last four
years, targets of a humiliating and, in the end, unjust takeover of
their leadership organization. The Vatican has attempted to place their
fate in the hands of three men, none of whom has experienced life in a
religious community. Their dioceses have only benefited from the work of
sisters who increasingly are the last vestige of Catholic presence in
some of the most neglected corners of our cities. They stay where others
-- priests and bishops among them -- have fled.
We also know the LCWR leadership has spent many hours and considerable
resources to convey the nature of their organization and the work and
lives of the women religious so that church figures better understand
why the women feel they have been so unjustly treated.
Before drawing conclusions about what the latest word from the
congregation means, we would do well to determine what it is that we
know. We know Archbishop Gerhard Müller said he talked with Francis
about the doctrinal assessment of LCWR. We don't know what Müller said
to the pope or how detailed a discussion they had. We don't know if this
was their sole topic of discussion or one topic among many, or of its
importance in that conversation. We don't know, finally, whether
Müller's leadership of the congregation is now a temporary matter.
The April 15 meeting with Müller, the LCWR leadership and Archbishop J.
Peter Sartain, the Vatican-appointed delegate overseeing the reform of
LCWR, was the first time this group has met. The doctrinal assessment is
an inherited problem for Müller, who was named prefect of the doctrinal
congregation only in July.
As this editorial was being written, LCWR had not yet met with the
Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of
Apostolic Life, which has been dealing with a parallel "apostolic
visitation" of U.S. women religious. That investigation began under the
auspices of leaders in that congregation who have since left. Cardinal
João Bráz de Aviz and his former secretary, Joseph Tobin -- now
archbishop of Indianapolis -- showed they were working for a way to
resolve that confrontation amicably and respectfully. The hope still
remains that the doctrinal congregation will take an approach akin to
Bráz de Aviz. We don't know.
Francis' first high-level appointment was
Franciscan Fr. José Rodríguez Carballo as the new No. 2 at the
congregation for religious, an appointment that has been well-received.
The unanswered questions extend to exactly what Francis said to Müller
or what he might have said to Bráz de Aviz about the American sisters,
for that matter. He has been meeting with all dicastery heads in the
days since his election. We also don't know what will result from the
"reflection, prayer and dialogue" he said he would undertake "before any
definitive nominations or confirmations" are made to the Curia. And yet
unknown is what will result from the work of the eight cardinals from
around the world he appointed to "advise him on the government of the
universal church" and "to study a project of revision" of the Roman
Curia.
More than a few experienced Vatican watchers have advised caution in
jumping to conclusions, reasoning that a new pope would never abruptly
end a process that has been underway for several years. They suggest the
Vatican has other ways to bring things to a salutary end.
Perhaps. But even in that instance, the women are left captive to the
machinations of an all-male secret culture with its own rules that
remain unknown to the rest of the world. The simple fact is that the
women have never been able to talk with the pope directly. Why must they
rely on Müller or Bráz de Aviz to convey their case?
In a few weeks, Francis will have another opportunity to show he intends to move beyond the status quo.
Nearly 600 members of the International Union of Superiors General, the
international assembly of women religious leaders, will be in Rome for
their triennial meeting May 3-7. If Francis wants to escape the stale
air of the sacristy and breathe the healthy fresh air of the church in
the streets, we can think of no better group to spend time with than
these women.
Last time the International Union of Superiors General met,
Pope Benedict XVI did not see them. Francis should. It would be an
overdue and encouraging sign of respect, a first step.