Fr. Roy Bourgeois, who faces expulsion from the Maryknoll Order for his support of the ordination of women, gave this reason for refusing to recant:
After much reflection, study, and prayer, I believe that our Church's teaching that excludes women from the priesthood defies both faith and reason and cannot stand up to scrutiny. This teaching has nothing to do with God, but with men, and is rooted in sexism. Sexism, like racism, is a sin. And no matter how hard we may try to justify discrimination against women, in the end, it is not the way of God, but of men who want to hold on to their power…. I will not recant. I firmly believe that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is a grave injustice against women, against our Church, and against our God.
One wonders what Fr. Bourgeois has reflected on, studied, and prayed
about. Apparently this examination did not include the question of how
one can know for certain whether a particular viewpoint comes from God
or from men.
Fr. Bourgeois seems to be unaware that what he has been personally
led to believe makes no difference to the resolution of such a question.
Either God has revealed things or He has not.
Either the Church has the
authority to state definitively what God has and has not revealed,
or she has not.
It ought to be obvious that we cannot know whether God has provided
for the priestly ordination of women unless God tells us, any more than
we can know whether there is such a state as Hell or whether the
Eucharist is the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ.
These
things are matters of the deposit of Faith, which we believe wholly on
the authority of God revealing, Who can neither deceive nor be deceived.
This deposit of Faith is contained in Scripture and Tradition, and it
is safeguarded (including its correct explication) only by the authority
of Peter and his successors, for whom Christ prayed, that they might
confirm their brothers in the Faith.
Now it just so happens that the Church has never ordained women, and
this is because she has not been given the authority to do so.
The
presumption has always been that this is not a mere human tradition but
part of that Tradition which in turn is part of the Deposit of Faith.
Moreover, on May 22, 1994—well within Fr. Bourgeois’ lifetime and
attracting immense media attention at the time—Pope John Paul II,
perceiving growing confusion on this matter, issued an apostolic letter
to repeat and clarify the Church’s perennial position:
Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church's divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful. (Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, #4)
But, as I said, the reflection, prayer and study of Fr. Bourgeois (so
easily claimed but so poorly executed) did not include the one thing
needful, that is, sitting at the feet of Christ and listening to His
voice through the Magisterium of His Church.
That is a very good way to
learn if something offends God! To do otherwise, for a Catholic who is
supposed to understand how Revelation came about and how alone it can be
rightly interpreted, is very much like saying: “I reflected that I want
women to be ordained; I studied all the arguments that attracted me
from modern egalitarianism and feminism; and I prayed that my will would
be done.”
No doubt Fr. Bourgeois consulted widely as well, as the
disobedient always claim to do, with the notable exception of consulting
God.
Dare I risk stating the obvious?
This attitude does not come from
transcending ourselves and listening to God.
Instead, it is the attitude
of “a person whose political, economic, and social opinions are
determined mainly by conventional respectability.”
Ironically, this is
the definition of bourgeois.