The book, “Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology
of God,” examines different understandings of God through experiences of
the poor and oppressed, Holocaust victims, Hispanics, women and people
of religions other than Catholicism.
Among the chapter titles are “God
Acting Womanish” and “Accompanying God of Fiesta.”
The bishops’ committee on doctrine said in a statement: “The book does
not take the faith of the Church as its starting point. Instead, the
author employs standards from outside the faith to criticize and to
revise in a radical fashion the conception of God revealed in Scripture
and taught by the Magisterium,” the church’s teaching authority
according to the popes and bishops.
Sister Johnson declined an interview, but said in a statement that the
bishops never invited her to discuss the book and that she was unaware
that the bishops were assessing it until they had already decided to
issue a condemnatory statement.
“One result of this absence of dialogue is that in several key instances
this statement radically misinterprets what I think, and what I in fact
wrote,” she said.
“The conclusions thus drawn paint an incorrect
picture of the fundamental line of thought the book develops. A
conversation, which I still hope to have, would have very likely avoided
these misrepresentations.”
The president of Fordham, the Rev. Joseph M. McShane, said in a
statement that Sister Johnson is a “revered member of the Fordham
community,” who regards the bishops’ action as “an invitation to
dialogue.”
Sister Johnson is a prominent feminist theologian and a former president
of both the Catholic Theological Society of America and the American
Theological Society. She belongs to a religious order in New York, the
Sisters of St. Joseph of Brentwood.
The Rev. Thomas Weinandy, executive director of the bishops’ Secretariat
for Doctrine, said, “The primary concern was not over feminism or
nonfeminism. The bishops are saying that the book does not adequately
treat a Catholic understanding of God.”
He said the doctrine committee had no authority to mandate that the book
be removed from Catholic educational institutions or to discipline
Sister Johnson.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican’s enforcer of doctrine, has disciplined several theologians during the papacy of Benedict XVI, who was in charge of that office before he became pope in 2005.
Father Weinandy said the impetus for reviewing Sister Johnson’s book did
not come from the Vatican.
He said several American bishops who did not
serve on the doctrine committee had raised concerns about the book.
Theology professors at Catholic universities said they did not see a
theological cause for the bishops to condemn Sister Johnson’s work.
Stephen J. Pope, a theologian at Boston College,
said: “The reason is political. Certain bishops decide that they want
to punish some theologians, and this is one way they do that. There’s
nothing particularly unusual in her book as far as theology goes. It’s
making an example of someone who’s prominent.”
Sister Mary Catherine Hilkert, a theologian at the University of Notre Dame, said, “She is deeply rooted in the Catholic tradition and committed to her vocation as a theologian.”
Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, the committee chairman, said in a
statement that Sister Johnson might have avoided problems if she had
sought a bishop’s approval, known as an “imprimatur,” and made revisions
before publishing her book.
The hardcover was published in 2007 by
Continuum, a company based in New York.
The paperback is due in July.
Father Weinandy said that while imprimaturs are recommended under canon
law, they are not required, and that while they were once common, few
theologians now request them.