POPE BENEDICT XVI is not as well informed as he should be and is also
manipulated easily by those around him, according to his former butler
Paolo Gabriele.
Mr Gabriele was giving evidence yesterday at the
second hearing of a Vatican City trial in which he stands accused of
stealing an enormous quantity of confidential documents from the
pontifical apartment in St Peter’s.
The pope’s former butler,
while indicating he had carried out the theft of documents on his own,
said his action was the expression of an overall malaise in certain Holy
See quarters.
He suggested that no lay person was closer to the
pope, in that he not only looked after the pontiff’s wardrobe but also
served him daily at table as well as accompanying him on all trips.
The
former butler claimed that on those occasions when he had exchanged
words with the pope, he concluded that the pontiff was not fully
informed: “The pope asked questions about matters that he should have
known about.”
Mr Gabriele admitted he was in a “privileged”
position working inside the Holy See and claimed that he could
experience many delicate church questions from “both” sides, that of the
“people ” and that of the Holy See.
Significantly, when the court
discussion turned to the question of “collaborators” and “motivation”
behind Mr Gabriele’s theft, presiding judge Giuseppe Della Torre was
quick to intervene, noting that such issues were not strictly pertinent
to the courtroom debate, in that the trial is concerned exclusively with
the crime of theft.
Mr Gabriele (46) pleaded that he was
“innocent” of the crime of aggravated theft, adding: “I am, however,
guilty of having betrayed the trust of the Holy Father, whom I love as a
son.”
He continues to claim that he acted as a whistleblower,
keen to draw the pope’s attention to the climate of internecine rivalry,
occasional corruption and naked politicising that reigns in the Holy
See.
Mr Gabriele said his concerns were shared by others in the
Holy See, but insisted he had acted alone when it came to stealing the
documents.
The other key witness on the second day was the pope’s
private secretary, Msgr Georg Gaenswein, who claimed that in the years
he had worked alongside the accused, he had never any doubts about the
man.
Msgr Gaenswein admitted that his initial suspicions about Mr
Gabriele were prompted by the publication of the book, His Holiness: The
Secret Papers of Benedict XVI which contained photocopies of two
documents which had remained in the papal apartment, rather than doing
the rounds of Vatican departments.
At that point, the pontiff’s
secretary became convinced that the “leak” contained in the the book had
come from the papal household, probably Mr Gabriele.
In an
unexpected twist, Mr Gabriele’s lawyer complained about the conditions
under which he had been detained in Vatican City, at least for the first
20 days. She said he had been held in a cell so small that he could not
stretch his arms and in which the lights burned 24 hours a day.
Vatican
spokesman Fr Federico Lombardi said that the Vatican City’s chief
prosecutor had opened an investigation into the charges.
The
trial, which resumes today, is expected to finish on Friday or Saturday.
Should the court find Mr Gabriele guilty, he could face a four-year
jail sentence.
Many observers, however, believe the pope would intervene
at that point and issue a papal pardon.