A leading canon lawyer has called for further reflection on the
German Church’s decision to refuse the sacraments and Christian burial
to Catholics who do not pay the country’s Church tax.
Dr. Edward Peters, a canon lawyer and the first layman to serve as a
consultant to the Church’s highest court, explained that excommunication
is invoked today “only against the gravest ecclesiastical offenses,
things like abortion, desecration of the Eucharist, or certain illegal
conferrals of Holy Orders.”
“To invoke the consequences of excommunication, even if that term is
not used, against those who object to paying a civil Church tax, raises
some very serious questions about justice toward the faithful,” Peters
said.
At present, all Germans who officially register themselves as Catholic
pay a religious tax of 8 to 9 percent of their annual income tax bill.
Therefore, if a German Catholic has a tax bill of 10,000 euros per year,
they will also incur an extra 800-900 euros in Church tax.
The money is
used to by the Catholic Church to help run its network of parishes,
schools, hospitals and welfare projects.
In recent years, however, some Catholics have stopped paying the tax,
saying they’re disillusioned with the Church over issues such as
clerical abuse.
Meanwhile, the German bishops have become increasingly
concerned at the number of Catholic immigrants to Germany, including
many Polish workers, who also do not pay the tax.
“At issue …is the credibility of the church’s sacramental nature. One
cannot be half a member or only partly a member. Either one belongs and
commits – or one renounces this,” Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, President
of the Germans Bishops’ Conference, said Sept. 24.
Dr. Peters says the issue is “very complex” and “needs to be thought
through by both sides very carefully,” since “the obligation of
Catholics to contribute to the support of the Church is itself a serious
one.”
Peters, who was recently appointed by Pope Benedict XVI as a canon law
expert for the forthcoming synod on the New Evangelization, suggests
that all sides should continue further discussion while avoiding hasty
decisions or actions.
“Long-standing civil-canonical mechanisms for rendering that support –
even if those mechanisms are in need of reform – should not be
challenged piecemeal, lest greater confusion about the duties of the
faithful and the proper role of the state in regard to religion be
spread thereby,” he said.