They call themselves Catholic Whistleblowers, a newly formed cadre of priests and nuns who say the Roman Catholic Church is still protecting sexual predators.
Although they know they could face repercussions, they have banded
together to push the new pope to clean house and the American bishops to
enforce the zero-tolerance policies they adopted more than a decade
ago.
The group began organizing quietly nine months ago without the knowledge
of their superiors or their peers, and plan to make their campaign
public this week.
Most in the steering group of 12 have blown the
whistle on abusers in the past, and three are canon lawyers who once
handled abuse cases on the church’s behalf. Four say they were sexually
abused as children.
Their aim, they say, is to support both victims and fellow
whistle-blowers, and identify shortcomings in church policies. They hope
to help not just minors, but also adults who fall prey to clergy who
exploit their power for sex. They say that their motivation is to make
the church better and safer, and to show the world that there are good
priests and nuns in the church.
“We’ve dedicated our lives to the church,” the Rev. John Bambrick, a
priest in the Diocese of Trenton, said at a meeting of the group last
week in New York. “Having sex offenders in ministry is damaging to our
ministry.”
The group has sent a letter
to Pope Francis asking him to take several significant steps to heal
victims and restore the church’s credibility: revoke all oaths of
secrecy, open the files on abuse cases, remove from office any bishops
who obstructed justice and create an international forum for dialogue
between survivors and church leaders.
The Catholic Church in the United States put in place a zero-tolerance
policy and a host of prevention programs after the abuse scandal peaked
in 2002. Each year the bishops commission an audit of abuse cases, and
this year’s survey, released May 9, found the fewest allegations and
victims since the audits began in 2004.
But the whistle-blowers’ group contends that vigilance is necessary
because some bishops are violating the zero-tolerance policies, and
abusive clergy (who now number 6,275, according to the bishops’ count of
those accusations that they deem credible) still have access to
children.
They point to the revelations in the last month that a priest
in Newark who was a convicted sex offender restricted by a court order
from working with children had been ministering in a Catholic parish in
Trenton, taking confessions from children and going on weekend youth
retreats.
Several of the whistle-blowers have been vocal about that priest, the
Rev. Michael Fugee.
Along with some New Jersey politicians, they have
called for the resignation of the archbishop of Newark, John J. Myers.
They fault Archbishop Myers not only for failing to restrict Father
Fugee, but also for appointing him to help direct the education of
priests in the archdiocese.
Archbishop Myers’s spokesman said the archbishop was unaware of the
priest’s activities, and is cooperating with an investigation by the
Bergen County prosecutor. Father Fugee left the ministry, and on Monday
was arrested on charges that he violated a judicial order by having
contact with minors.
The bishop of Trenton, David M. O’Connell, removed
another priest and two youth ministers from the parish in Trenton where
Father Fugee worked with youth.
The Newark case, as well as the release of personnel records on priests by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles
and convictions of church officials in Philadelphia and Kansas City,
convinced the whistle-blowers’ group that they have work to do despite
the optimistic picture in the bishops’ audits. They do not consider the
bishops’ audits credible because they are based on self-reporting.
The group discussed the latest scandal in Newark at a meeting last week in Manhattan. At that meeting, Sister Sally Butler traveled from Brooklyn; Sister Maureen Paul Turlish from Delaware; the Rev. Ronald Lemmert from
Peekskill, N.Y.; and Father Bambrick, Msgr. Kenneth E. Lasch and Robert
Hoatson, a former priest, came from New Jersey.
The Rev. James Connell
joined in by speakerphone from Sheboygan, Wis. (The Rev. Thomas P. Doyle
— perhaps the church’s most famed whistle-blower — recently joined the
group but could not attend.) They had been conducting their weekly
meetings by conference calls, and it was only the second time most of
them had met face to face.
Each member has a history of standing up publicly on behalf of abuse
victims, but until last year most of them did not know of one another. A
Catholic laywoman, Anne Barrett Doyle, who lives in Boston, suggested
they should meet. She is the co-director of BishopAccountability.org,
a Web site and advocacy group that is building a database of documents
on clergy abuse cases, and a co-worker, Suzy Nauman, had been keeping a running list of priests and nuns who had helped expose predators or had spoken out.
Last year Ms. Doyle spoke with Father Lemmert about the backlash he
experienced after exposing a case in New York, and he later told her
that talking about his experiences was “very therapeutic.”
The group was
initially conceived more as a confidential support group for the
whistle-blowers themselves.
“I joined the group,” said Father Lemmert, “because I had been badly
ostracized because I blew the whistle. There was no support out there,
and this group has been a lifeline.”
Until last week, he intended to keep his involvement in the group under
wraps for fear of repercussions. But at the meeting Father Lemmert
announced, “I just decided to stand up and be counted.”
The group has evolved to take on a more policy-oriented role, drafting
the letter to the new pope with six suggestions for action. They sent
the letter in late April to the pope and several Vatican officials, but
have not received any response yet.
They expressed varying degrees of optimism about whether Pope Francis
will follow through on the goal first articulated by Pope John Paul II
that there is no room for sexual abusers in the priesthood. They noted
that Pope Francis recently said that all human beings must be protected
with “clarity and courage” — especially children, “who are the most
vulnerable.”
Monsignor Lasch said to the group, “The pope has asked us to speak with
clarity and courage, and that’s what we’ve done with him.” Mr. Hoatson
added, “It’s time that clarity and courage are rewarded rather than
harassed and dismissed.”
Mr. Hoatson and Monsignor Lasch founded Road to Recovery, a group that
assists abuse victims, but Mr. Hoatson left the priesthood in 2011 after
a series of run-ins with Archbishop Myers. He said he has found the
recent spotlight trained on the Newark archbishop very encouraging.
The whistle-blowers’ group plans to hold its first news conference this
week in New York, and some members are bracing for the reaction. They
said they know priests who spoke up and were removed from their
parishes, hustled into retirement or declared “unstable” and sent to
treatment centers for clergy with substance-abuse problems or sexual
addictions.
As for what they hope to accomplish, the whistle-blowers had very different answers.
“That all the children in our church would be safe,” said Father Bambrick.
“That the people who covered up would go to jail,” said Sister Butler.
“That’s not what I’m in this for,” said Monsignor Lasch. “I’m in this for justice and mercy and truth and compassion.”