Well after the close of the Second Vatican Council, the U.S. bishops
wrote that “an important issue for women is how to have a voice in the
governance of the church.”
The best way to make that happen is to
restore the ancient practice of ordaining women as deacons.
It is
painfully obvious throughout the world that the church could benefit
from including women in positions of power and authority. Not only would
adding women to formal church governance enhance the church’s standing
among half the people of God, such a step would bring a wholly different
perspective to questions raised and challenged by the gospel.
The
vexed question of lay authority in the church often circles around
other questions regarding women, who make up the majority of lay
ministers and other diocesan employees.
The bottom line is that today
authority in the church - when interpreted as governance of and within its
structures - is always exercised by ordained persons. For the present at
least, in the Roman Catholic Church all ordained persons are male.
There are two ways of asking the question: First, can and should the power of governance be shared with the laity? And second, can and should women be ordained?
1. Can and should the power of governance be shared with the laity?
During
the preparation for the 1983 revision of the Code of Canon Law two
schools of thought considered the question of lay governance.
The “Roman school” argued that the Second Vatican Council (especially in Lumen Gentium)
spoke only about the authority of bishops, not about lay jurisdiction
or governance. They demonstrated historical examples of laity exercising
jurisdiction, and argued that the council would not want to detour from
historical precedents.
The “Munich school,” on the other hand,
saw the authority of the church resting solely in the bishops and by
extension only in the ordained.
When the canon on exercise of the
power of governance came up for revision, discussion turned on whether
laypeople could “participate” in governance, as was expressed in two
earlier drafts, or whether they could only “cooperate” with it, as the
final language in the code puts it.
The “strict constructionist” Munich
school insisted on the term cooperate, which failed in a 52-9 vote of the plenary preparing the revisions.
But
when a smaller committee of experts, including then-Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, made the final revisions, his wording won the day, and the
new code’s Canon 129 affirmed that the ordained are qualified to
exercise governance - also called the “power of jurisdiction” - while the
laity may only “cooperate.”
What that means is that in today’s
Catholic Church women - laypeople all - cannot participate in governance.
They may only be consulted.
Many observers believe adding
laypeople to formal governance would help forestall even greater
financial and sexual scandals than the church has already suffered.
However,
as long as the law remains that laypeople may not exercise
jurisdiction, women’s only path to formal participation in the
governance of the church - outside women’s religious institutes and
orders - is ordination.
2. Can and should women be ordained?
At
Vatican II at least two bishops suggested ordaining women as deacons.
Others have joined the recommendation since then. The church today
teaches that it does not possess the authority to ordain women as
priests (and, by inference, as bishops), but it has made no contemporary
determination regarding women as deacons. So the matter of women
deacons remains an open question.
Early church councils - Nicaea
(325) and Chalcedon (451) - gave direction to the practice of ordaining
women as deacons. Women were ordained in the West up until at least the
12th century, and even later in the East. We have several liturgies for
ordaining women as deacons and even an 11th-century papal letter
affirming a bishop’s ability to do so.
What the church has done,
the church can do again. The restoration of the diaconate of women
would allow women to be included in formal church governance, maintain
the provisions of law that restrict actual governing authority to the
ordained, and not disturb the restrictions against women as priests.
Will
the church ever include women in the exercise of governance?
When he
was asked this question in 2006 by a priest of the Diocese of Rome - the
diocese he heads as bishop of Rome - Pope Benedict XVI seemed to say that
yes, women should be able to exercise governance, although they cannot
be priests.
Benedict said women “participate” in the governance of the
church through their ministries, and he said, “It is proper to ask
whether in this ministerial service . . . it is not possible to offer
more space, more positions of responsibility to women.”
Lay
governance is so rare that it is virtually non-existent. It would seem
that the best way to reconcile both Ratzingers - the curial cardinal who
ensured that only the ordained could exercise governance and the pope
who offered the opinion that women’s “participation” in governance could
be extended - is the restoration of women to the order of deacons.
At
this point in church history, ordaining women as deacons is the best
way to address the key challenge facing the church today: how to best
announce the good news that all are made in the image and likeness of
God.