Education Minister Ruairi Quinn has said he has no
intention of implementing a controversial recommendation to abolish Rule
68 for National Schools.
The rule recognises religious instruction as a fundamental part of
the school day and permits a religious spirit to, "inform and vivify the
whole work of the school.”
Its abolition was recommended last year by
the Minister's Forum on Patronage and Pluralism, a recommendation that
has been criticised by Church figures.
The Minister was responding to remarks made on RTÉ's Beyond Belief
programme last week by Fr Michael Drumm, the chairman of the Catholic
Schools Trust in response to a question by presenter Mick Peelo.
Fr Drumm was asked about concerns among Catholic bishops as regards
proposals to remove Rule 68. He said that it would be a mistake for the
Minister to implement such a proposal, but that Rule 68 needs to be
rewritten.
He said, “If the Minister tomorrow, and he could by a
Ministerial act, he wouldn't need to go through the Oireachtas, he could
delete Rule 68. In my view he shouldn't.”
Mr Quinn responded that he has, “no intention of doing that.”
Fr
Drumm acknowledged this, but said that such a deletion would, “appear as
a very strong criticism of the whole spirit of Catholic and Church of
Ireland schools. It would be completely the wrong way to go.”
Mr Quinn also denied that he or his Labour colleagues had an, “aggressive secularist agenda.”
He said, “Some of the Labour Party's opponents have regarded, have
described myself and others as having a secular, aggressive secular
agenda. Nothing could be further from the truth. I don't think you can
be educated without understanding religion. We are pluralist in our
approach to this matter and I think that pluralism which respects
difference and accommodates difference is common ground that we can all
share and share comfortably.”
Fr Drumm agreed that the Minister doesn’t have a secularist agenda,
but he expressed concern about the recommendation made by the Forum that
that, “religion would be the only bit of the curriculum that would not
be integrated.”
He said, “From our point of view, that would be terribly difficult,
because you can opt out, as Siobhán was describing earlier, you can opt
out of religious education per se, as a subject ... but you cannot opt
out of the ethos, of the characteristic spirit of the school. We would
have to reverse everything we've done over the last 30 years which was
actually to get schools to be better at expressing their ethos. All the patron bodies, Educate Together, the Community National
Schools everyone will have an ethos they want to give expression to and
we want them to do that. Otherwise we'll have a monochrome system,
which I don't think anyone is arguing for.”