The Health Service Executive (HSE) has recommended that the State
intervene and work with all Catholic dioceses in the Republic to ensure
children are properly protected in each.
It recommends “that the
State applies its resources to intervene and work with all dioceses in a
systematic way to address the shortcomings outlined” in an audit it
published last Thursday afternoon.
The Audit of Safeguarding Arrangements
in the Catholic Church in Ireland, deals with 24 Catholic dioceses
which, wholly or in part, are in the Republic. Two further Catholic
dioceses are entirely in Northern Ireland.
Today’s publication is
Volume I of the audit.
Another volume, dealing with the religious
congregations, will be published at a later date.
Covering the
period to the end of November 2011, it found “significant weaknesses” in
a number of dioceses in the State in the area of child protection.
While
there had been “significant improvement in their safeguarding
arrangements” there was “considerable variation in the approaches
adopted by the dioceses” also.
Such State intervention as it
recommends, it says, might be achieved by “putting all necessary
resources in place to achieve closer monitoring by the State of the
dioceses”.
This would “include a requirement for them to report
regularly on matters such as the progress being made in achieving an
acceptable standard of compliance with agreed safeguarding standards and
practices, as well as a requirement to report on the number of
allegations made and the actions by the Church in relation to them”.
It
continues that “an initial 'hands on' approach of proportionate
intervention on the part of the State is envisaged until such time as
there has been a substantial and demonstrable improvement in child
protection practices across all dioceses”.
The audit further recommended “that Church resources be devoted to this developmental activity”.
It
recommended that the Church’s own child protection watchdog, its
National Board for Safeguarding Children (NBSC), “continues its work
with the dioceses” to ensure child-protection criteria in each “are
fully satisfied to an adequate standard by all”.
It also
recommends that “a single child protection policy should be provided for
all dioceses and maintained by a single body such as the NBSC. All
dioceses would sign up to and commit to following such a policy and
procedure”.
In the inter-agency context of the Garda, the HSE and
the dioceses, it recommends as “imperative” that dioceses are advised of
allegations coming to the attention of the gardaí and/or HSE. This is
so that the relevant individual can be appropriately managed,
particularly in relation to his/her access to children.
“Any legal
impediments to such a strategty . . . must be addressed to ensure the
safety of children,” it says.
Where the three agencies are
concerned it also recommends that their records be revised “to
facilitate better co-ordination between all three”.
It also
recommends that “the policies and procedures of the Church should be
extended from the safeguarding of children to include the safeguarding
of vulnerable adults who are in contact with the Church, including the
elderly or persons with mental health and intellectual disabilities who
live in care settings or in the community”.
Audit's main findings:
The
HSE audit involved voluntary co-operation by Church authorities in each
diocese.
Diocesan files were not physically examined by HSE personnel.
The
bishops completed questionnaires provided by the HSE with follow-up
engagement by HSE child care managers as well as cross-referencing of
information provided with the gardaí.
The purpose of the audit,
which dealt with allegations received up to November 31st last year, was
to assess whether the dioceses were complying with Church guidance and
best practice when it came to child protection, including the reporting
of allegations to the civil authorities.
Overall it found that a
total of 579 child abuse allegations had been against 189 priests in the
24 dioceses that are wholly or partially in the Republic.
Of those
accused priests, 31 diocesan priests have been convicted in the courts.
Dioceses
that performed well when it came to child safeguarding included Armagh,
Waterford & Lismore, Clonfert, Elphin, and Dublin.
“Significant
improvement” had been found in Kilmore and Killala, with Limerick and
Kerry “making steady progress”.
Kildare & Leighlin was found to have
demonstrated “examples of good practice over a consistent period.”
Some
dioceses, however, “did not perform satisfactorily” across key areas.
Their shortcomings were “not numerous” and did “not reflect any
unwillingness . . . to put good safeguarding systems in place.”
For
instance, three dioceses - Meath, Raphoe, and Ossory - were found to
have “inadequate collection and retention of data . . . whilst
improving.”
The audit also found that the Ferns report (2005) “did
not immediately result in the diocese adapting its policies and
procedures to keep up to date with current Church guidance as expected”.
Similarly,
it found that it took 12 months following publication of the Murphy
report (2009) “before a comprehensive child protection policy and
reporting procedure was fully implemented” in the Dublin archdiocese.
Of
those allegations that should have been reported by the dioceses to the
civil authorities the audit found that just 15 per cent had been
reported “with immediacy”.
It also found that some dioceses, which
had responded with an unqualified Yes to a question in the 2006 HSE
audit as to whether they reported allegations without delay (within a
day), had not done so.
Some cases were not reported to the civil
authorities as this was done by complainants themselves.
However, “in
many other instances, the time taken to report was determined at the
complainants’ request.”
Further “anonymous allegations were, in general,
not reported to the civil authorities”.
The audit also found that
“some allegations came to the attention of the diocese through
admissions by priests and were not notified (to civil authorities) for
some time due to the confidential nature of the submission, for example,
during a submission for laicisation from the priesthood,”
In some
cases “the allegation was not deemed credible, or not serious enough to
constitute abuse” and so was not notified to civil authorities.
And
where dioceses were notified about allegations by solicitors “often the
diocese did not notify the civil authorities”.