Pro-family and parental rights groups are saying a new California law
banning therapy for minors who struggle with same-sex attraction is
disrespectful of both personal choice and parents' rights.
“Parents have the best interests of their children in mind, and if they
determine that particular types of therapies or interventions are
needed, that's certainly their right, and this law doesn't respect
that,” Ned Dolejsi, director of the California Catholic Conference told
CNA Oct. 2.
“The attack on parental rights is exactly the whole point of the bill,
because we don't want to let parents harm their children,” the bill's
sponsor Ted Lieu has said.
He compared reparative therapy to minors' use of tobacco and alcohol,
and stated,
“reparative therapy hurts children, so this bill allows us
to stop parents from hurting their children.”
But Dolejsi asserted that “for the legislature to step in and assume
that they need to protect children from their parents and or therapists
is in my opinion arrogant and presumptuous.”
The bill was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown on Sept. 29. It will come into effect on Jan. 1, 2013.
The law is broadly worded, and prohibits any therapy “to change
behaviors or gender expressions, or to eliminate or reduce sexual or
romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the same sex”
among minors.
Passage of the law means California minors who have unwished-for
homosexual behavior or attraction will be unable to pursue medical
avenues to address those issues. The therapies prohibited are much
broader than solely “conversion” to heterosexuality, barring even
therapy to change homosexual behavior among minors.
The bill was supported by both gay rights activists and mental health
groups, who claim that reparative therapy may increase the risk of
depression and suicide.
However, Bill May, president of Catholics for the Common Good, is concerned about the law's effect on youths' well-being.
"This bill not only violates parental rights but the rights of the
child to know the truth about true love, true friendship, marriage, and
healthy use of human sexuality,” May said.
The law also raises concerns about religious freedom.
“It would prohibit Catholic, licensed counselors – including some
priests, nuns and counselors in Catholic schools – from treating the
whole person according to Catholic teaching. In counseling they can only
affirm same-sex attraction or gender confusion, or put their licenses
in jeopardy,” he said.
Governor Brown claimed that conversion therapy has “no basis in science
or medicine” and “will now be relegated to the dustbin of quackery,” in
a statement after signing the law.
Dolejsi added that the California Catholic Conference doesn't “have a
position reparative therapy” but emphasized that “the legislature has
banned this for minors to the exclusion of their parents’ desires and
wishes.”
Legislatures “don't have the competence to make a decision about which
therapies are appropriate,” and that decision should be left to
psychiatric professionals, he stated.
A 2009 American Psychiatric Association task force recommended that the
appropriate response to those with same-sex attraction involves
“therapist acceptance, support, and understanding of clients … without
imposing a specific sexual orientation identity outcome,” and that
efforts to change orientation “involve some risk of harm.”
The American Psychiatric Association considered homosexuality to be a
mental disease until 1973. A former president of the APA said in a 2012
video interview that within the organization, political stances
“override any scientific results.”
Both the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
and the Pacific Justice Institute intend to legally challenge the
California law on First Amendment grounds.