Children will benefit from a recognition of marriage within the tax
system and there needs to be a "cultural change" in the way that
children are viewed, said the Bishop of Chester.
In a debate he secured in the House of Lords, Dr Peter Forster
emphasised the importance of marriage for children’s wellbeing and the
desire of children to have relationships which "surround and nurture
them".
He also paid tribute to the challenging task that single parents
undertake.
"Marriage has to be seen as part of a broader context of
relationships in the extended family, or too much stress and pressure
will be placed on individual marriages. But we can look at it from the other side too: good marriages are
not just a benefit for the couple themselves, and their children, but
serve to strengthen the wider society of which they are a part. A strong respect for marriage will actually support single parents, and others who have the care of children."
The bishop reiterated the point made by the Prime Minister in 2008,
when he said: "I want to see more couples stay together, and we know
that the best way to ensure this is to support marriage. Not because it
matters how adult men and women conduct their relationships. But
because it matters how children are brought up. Nothing matters more
than children."
The bishop also talked of the Judeao-Christian view that children are
to be seen as "a precious gift from God", arguing that this needed to
be rediscovered.
Seeing them as mini adults damages this tradition, he said, as he warned against the early sexualisation of children.
He then went on to acknowledge that the role of government in
promoting marriage, and stable relationships and good parenting was
"limited".
"But there are certain things which only government can do, and in
the Coalition Agreement there is a commitment to recognise marriage in
the tax system through the introduction of transferable allowances
between partners," he said.
To criticise a transferable tax allowance on the grounds that it
shouldn’t be necessary to offer financial incentives for couples to
marry is to miss the point, he suggested.
A recognition for marriage in the tax system would send a powerful
symbolic message from Government about the wider importance of marriage
to society, the bishop said.
The two and a half hour balloted debate on the wellbeing of children
also featured Lord Browne of Belmont, who supported the bishop’s call
for improvements in the tax system, saying that, unlike most developed
countries, our tax system does not recognise marriage or indeed family
responsibility.
The Bishop of Chester, Lord Browne and Lord Mackay of Clashfern all
commended the Government to take action on their Coalition Agreement
pledge.
In his closing remarks the bishop thanked his fellow peers for their
contributions to the debate and asked the Government to write to him and
others concerned about the seeming lack of action on the transferable
tax allowance pledge, asking them to clarify their position on
recognising marriage in the tax system.
Dr Daniel Boucher, Director of Parliamentary Affairs for CARE, said:
"Today’s debate in the House of Lords raised immensely important issues
in relation to the wellbeing of children. CARE wholeheartedly supports the value of marriage and its role in
providing a stable family environment for children to safely develop and
prosper within. The transferable tax allowance forms one part of the bigger picture
of promoting stable family relationships and we call upon the Government
to deliver on its pledge to implement this."