Now that the street clashes and violence are over –
for the time being at least – Sharia law tops the list of issues to be
debated in post-Morsi Egypt.
Egypt’s interim president, Judge
Adli Mansour, – who was appointed by the military in July – announced
the names of the 50 members that are to form part of the committee
tasked with amending the Islamist-dominated Constitution.
The committee
will have 60 days to discuss the amendments.
The Muslim Brotherhood
managed to get the Constitution approved last November but the content
is strongly criticised by the liberal opposition and representatives of
Christians Churches who stopped the work they were doing for the
committee in protest against the radical ideology of the Islamists. The
generals held a referendum on the text after its revision.
The committee – which is made up of
representatives of political parties, religious communities and
confessions - announced that three of its members are Christians: Bishop
Paul, of the Coptic Orthodox Diocese of Tanta, the Coptic Catholic Bishop of Giza, Antonious
Aziz Mina and the President of the Protestant Churches of Egypt, Safwat
El-Bayyady.
The committee also has three representatives from al-Azhar
University (including Egypt’s Grand Mufti Shawky Allam) and two Islamist
figures: Kamal El-Helbawy, a former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood
who has disagreed with the movement for a while and Bassam El-Zarqa,
Vice-President of the Salafist Nour party.
Bassam El-Zarqa is sending out early signs of potential further clashes over Sharia law. Indeed,
Nour has threatened to boycott the committee’s work, claiming the group
is dominated “by leftist forces”. The party has already announced it
intends to uphold article 219, the point most hotly contested by
Christians because the text drafted by the Muslim Brotherhood has given
more weight to Sharia law in the country.
Article 2 of the previous Constitution - which
dates back to the Sadat era – referred to Sharia law as the main source
of legislation in Egypt. But this was considered too vague by Islamists,
so article 219 was inserted into the text approved in 2012. This
article stressed the link between State law and Islamic law.
“The
principles of Sharia law include commonly accepted interpretations of
it, the foundations, jurisprudential rules and sources passed down by
the Sunnah and al-Gama'a schools,” the current text
reads. The law as described here is far more binding and explicitly
targets Shiites as well, who do not follow the Islamic doctrines
mentioned.
One of the amendments proposed by the committee of
ten experts which drafted the text which the 50-meber committee will
now debate on, is the abrogation of article 219 and a return to a more
generic form of Islamic law.
This is why Salafists have protested. But
the military and the transitional government believe it is essential to
keep Nour in the Constitutional revision process (partly to prevent
friction with Saudi Arabia which has openly sided against ousted
President Mohammed Morsi). So the debate surrounding Sharia law appears
far from over and it looks like it will be the real litmus test for
judging Egypt’s new path.