WHEN you think about it, the really surprising thing is how surprised we all were.
And pleased.
When he was a bishop, the new Pope went to work by bus. He doesn’t like the idea of having a chauffeur.
Isn’t that amazing? Isn’t he an extraordinary man? Isn’t there,
suddenly, new hope in the world? Well yes, maybe there is. When I was
writing (without regret, and as an outsider to the Church) about the
resignation of Pope Benedict a few weeks ago, I said his papacy had
failed to reignite support for the Church, but that we’re all the poorer
for the loss of values. I read all the speculation about who the next
Pope might be — none of it that I can recall predicted the outcome
correctly.
I did feel, and said, that “in all the pen pictures
that have been printed about leading candidates, the words I’ve been
looking for are missing. And that’s terribly sad, for Catholics and
non-Catholics alike. If the influence of the Church is ever to be
restored, the things that must characterise the next papacy are simple
enough. We need a humble, penitent, and loving Pope. Nothing else will
make any difference to us. Nothing else will make us care.”
Maybe, just maybe, we might begin to care now. Of course we don’t know
enough about the new Pope to be sure of anything, and of course
controversies will emerge. But he certainly seems humble. A Pope who
calls himself after the first modern saint (if you can call someone
modern who died in the 13th century) who founded an entire religious
order devoted to the idea of voluntary poverty; a Pope who says that the
Church must reform or become completely irrelevant — surely that’s a
Pope worth paying some attention to. And of course the phrase that has
most resonance — a Church of the poor. The repeated use of that phrase,
allied to all the anecdotes about the man’s own apparent humility, has
an astonishing ring to it in the world in which we live. The week before
the Pope was elected, another man of undoubted commitment to the poor
died. That was Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela.
It’s
hard to imagine that Chavez would ever have regarded himself as having
anything in common with the Pope. Although a practicing Catholic, Chavez
hated the organised Church, regarding it as an enemy of his revolution.
It would be ironic if the first Pope to come from Latin America,
elected in the week Chavez died, became a sort of reincarnation of his
socialist philosophy.
I must be going soft if I’m even
entertaining the notion of a socialist Pope. A Pope who channels his
energies into directing the attention of his Church towards deprivation
and poverty — areas that the Church in recent times has paid lip service
to but no more — would be enough.
But to go back to where I
started, the fact that the Pope prefers to travel by bus, and insists on
paying his hotel bill in person, made world headlines. It was a sign of
a different person, and of course that was welcome in itself, but
perhaps more importantly it was a sign of hunger. Of how hungry the
world is for precisely that type of leadership. When millions of people
the world over struggle to cope with the meaning of austerity in their
own lives, here is a leader who embraces austerity for himself, who sets
out, as far as one can see, to walk the walk.
There’ll be
lots about the Pope we don’t like. There’s no sign in his background
that he has nay intention of setting out to liberalise the Church’s
teachings on same-sex marriage. He’s not going to change the age-old and
shameful attitude of the Church to women. He may wish to tackle the
insidious mentality of too many in his own Church to the abuse of
children, but last weekend’s astonishing statement by the Cardinal
Archbishop of Durban — that paedophiles should not be seen as criminals —
demonstrates how far he has to go there. And his efforts to reform the
mysterious and apparently corrupt workings of the Roman Curia may
require far more energy and time than an elderly man has.
But
just imagine how we’d feel here if our Government had dedicated itself
creating a government of the poor, or if the leaders of Europe were
genuinely committed to following the principles of someone like Francis
of Assisi towards a union of the poor. I know the first time the
Government went up to Áras an Uachtaráin to receive their seals of
office, they went by coach. The memories of fleets of limousines rolling
up to Farmleigh and other luxurious establishments, ferrying the
previous government to various doomed meetings, were still raw then, and
the word went out that this new government was trying to establish a
different, simpler style, more in keeping with the times.
But
all that has faded, hasn’t it? There’s no doubt in my mind that one of
the reasons the Government’s popularity has shrunk, at least for now, is
because there really is no sense of shared sacrifice, or shared
purpose, to any of the things that have been done. The Pope may want to
create a Church of the poor — but in Ireland it is the poor, and
especially women struggling in poverty, that have borne a significant
share of the cutbacks austerity has brought. For us, austerity hasn’t
had a bottom line. There has never been a simple statement to the effect
that some things have to be protected, no matter what.
GOVERNMENTS here, and throughout the world, seem to have an unerring
gift for telling us all that austerity is for other people, but not for
them. There were shots on the news the other night of a Brussels meeting
deciding the immediate fate of the people of Cyprus — among other
things, deciding to take a share of the life savings of thousands of
ordinary Cypriots. Everyone in the news shots was smiling and laughing,
and they all looked entirely pleased with themselves. And then they got
into their limos and went back to their decent hotels, or off to a VIP
lounge in the airport before being ferried home.
Symbolism,
you say, and perhaps you’re right. But when Francis of Assisi gave away
all his clothes, and wrapped himself in a piece of cloth made of the
coarsest hemp, he created a symbol that inspired millions for centuries.
The symbolism of settling for less when you’re in a position of power
is a powerful statement. When it’s backed up by action, that statement
can change the world — or at least the small bit of the world that
matters to us.
I never thought I’d hear myself say it, but I’d
love to see our leaders, at home and throughout Europe, decide to
follow the Pope’s example. Of course I want to see his words followed by
deeds, but I have a funny feeling he’s going to surprise us quite a bit
by the time he’s done. I wonder are our own leaders capable of
surprising us any more?