The Bishop of Guildford has called upon the Government to uphold freedom of religion and conscience in the UK and abroad.
Introducing a debate on the issue in the House of Lords this week,
the Right Reverend Christopher Hill raised concerns about encroachments
on religious freedom around the world, including a rise in anti-Semitism
and increasing pressures on minority religious groups.
He raised particular concern about the "tragic" increase in violence
in Nigeria, where Islamist militant group Boko Haram has bombed churches
and vowed to eradicate Christians from the north of the country.
"My point, however, is not to indulge in a tit-for-tat debate about
who is persecuted most but to emphasise that no one should be
discriminated against on grounds of religion or conscience, for the sake
of the stability of societies and their common good in a multicultural
and multifaith world," he said.
Reflecting on the court judgement from Strasbourg supporting airline
worker Nadia Eweida's right to wear a cross, Bishop Hill said a balance
of rights was "indicative of religious freedom as a real and not only a
nominal human right".
"Nor is religious freedom ultimately in opposition to other rights,
such as freedom of expression, non-discrimination, women's rights and
gay rights," he said.
The bishop said it was "essential" that religious communities not
only speak out on behalf of their own adherents but those of other
faiths too.
"Faith communities should not be slow in condemning behaviour within
their own communities which is discriminatory to others," he said.
While the Foreign Secretary has an advisory group on human rights, he
recommended the creation of a second group to work "holistically" on
religious freedom issues.
The bishop also urged the Government to support the United Nations in
drafting a convention on the freedom of religion and belief.
"For 45 years the aspiration of drafting a convention on the freedom
of religion or belief has been on ice. Surely now its time has come," he
said.
The Bishop of Ripon and Leeds, the Right Reverend John Packer
contributed to the debate with a special note of concern about the
increasing abuse of blasphemy laws, especially in Pakistan, where they
have been used to persecute Hindus and Christians, and prevent Muslims
from changing faiths.
"Although it is perfectly appropriate to deprecate the insulting of
any religion, it is a denial of human rights to prevent anyone from
changing or abandoning their faith stance," he said.
"In principle, Pakistan continues to uphold the rights of religious
minorities but, in practice, the existence of the blasphemy laws
encourages illegal persecution and rejection."
Bishop Packer said the Government had a responsibility to make clear
its rejection of religious bullying "by providing proper protection for
those who flee here having suffered from it".
"My experience is that freedom of religion, conscience and
non-religion is not taken as seriously as a human right in this country
as is political persecution," he said.
"Those who change their religion in particular are regarded with
suspicion by tribunals and find that their faith is not taken seriously.
"What I ask for is for it to be stressed by the Government that those
who flee persecution in their country must and will receive an
equivocal welcome here."