Christians in Iraq, Egypt and
Nigeria have been killed in churches, in Pakistan a blasphemy law has
become an "excuse to cause injustice and violence”, in China they are
experiencing a "moment of difficulty and trial," in the West they are
object of a "growing marginalization" which evens demands the rejection
of any "reference to religious and moral convictions."
The list of
violations and attacks on religious freedom delivered today by Benedict
XI to the representatives of 180 countries and international
organizations that have diplomatic relations with the Holy See, touches
hundreds of millions of people around the world.
The meeting with the diplomats has become a traditional
occasion for popes to cast their gaze on the situation of the world and
this year Benedict XI focused on the state of religious freedom in an
explicit link with his message for World Day of Peace in which it is
defined as "the fundamental path for the building of peace."
The panorama expressed today by the Pope is one of many
shadows, but also some light, such as the news that Vietnam has agreed
to the appointment of a papal representative, not a permanent one it
seems, but the move puts an end to nearly 60 years without any
diplomatic relations.
Or the siding of some European countries in favour
of the displaying of the crucifix in public places, which also saw the
quoted speech of the Moscow Patriarchate and, in general, the Orthodox
world, or, finally, the adoption a resolution by the Council of Europe
in October that protects the right of medical personnel to conscientious
objection in the face of certain acts that seriously affect the right
to life, such as abortion.
The starting point in Benedict XVI’s speech, is that " The
religious dimension is an undeniable and irrepressible feature of man’s
being and acting, the measure of the fulfilment of his destiny and of
the building up of the community to which he belongs. Consequently,
when the individual himself or those around him neglect or deny this
fundamental dimension, imbalances and conflicts arise at all levels,
both personal and interpersonal.
This primary and basic truth is the reason why, in this year’s
Message for World Day of Peace, I identified religious freedom as the
fundamental path to peace. Peace is built and preserved
only when human beings can freely seek and serve God in their hearts, in
their lives and in their relationships with others.
In view of this, “the conviction that one cannot create a sort of scale of degrees of religious intolerance. Unfortunately,
such an attitude is frequently found, and it is precisely acts of
discrimination against Christians which are considered less grave and
less worthy of attention on the part of governments and public opinion.
At
the same time, there is a need to reject the dangerous notion of a
conflict between the right to religious freedom and other human rights,
thus disregarding or denying the central role of respect for religious
freedom in the defence and protection of fundamental human dignity.
Even
less justifiable are attempts to counter the right of religious freedom
with other alleged new rights which, while actively promoted by certain
sectors of society and inserted in national legislation or in
international directives, are nonetheless merely the expression of
selfish desires lacking a foundation in authentic human nature.
Finally,
it seems unnecessary to point out that an abstract proclamation of
religious freedom is insufficient: this fundamental rule of social life
must find application and respect at every level and in all areas;
otherwise, despite correct affirmations of principle, there is a risk
that deep injustice will be done to citizens wishing to profess and
freely practise their faith.”
The violations, many violations, bloody or not, all lead back
to this. The list begins in the East and confirms that the continent
where religious freedom is most violated, is Asia.
It begins with Iraq, where "attacks have brought death, grief
and dismay among the Christians of Iraq, even to the point of inducing
them to leave the land where their families have lived for centuries "
moving on to Egypt with the massacre in Alexandria.
"This succession of
attacks is yet another sign of the urgent need for the governments of
the region to adopt, in spite of difficulties and dangers, effective
measures for the protection of religious minorities. Need we repeat it? In
the Middle East, Christians are original and authentic citizens who are
loyal to their fatherland and assume their duties toward their country. It
is natural that they should enjoy all the rights of citizenship,
freedom of conscience, freedom of worship and freedom in education,
teaching and the use of the mass media” (Message to the People of God of
the Special Assembly for the Middle East of the Synod of Bishops, 10). I
appreciate the concern for the rights of the most vulnerable and the
political farsightedness which some countries in Europe have
demonstrated in recent days by their call for a concerted response on
the part of the European Union for the defense of Christians in the
Middle East. Finally, I would like to state once again
that the right to religious freedom is not fully respected when only
freedom of worship is guaranteed, and that with restrictions. Furthermore,
I encourage the accompaniment of the full safeguarding of religious
freedom and other humans rights by programmes which, beginning in
primary school and within the context of religious instruction, will
educate everyone to respect their brothers and sisters in humanity. Regarding
the states of the Arabian Peninsula, where numerous Christian immigrant
workers live, I hope that the Catholic Church will be able to establish
suitable pastoral structures".
“Among the norms prejudicing the right of persons to religious
freedom, particular mention must be made of the law against blasphemy in
Pakistan: I once more encourage the leaders of that country to take the
necessary steps to abrogate that law, all the more so because it is
clear that it serves as a pretext for acts of injustice and violence
against religious minorities. The tragic murder of the
governor of Punjab shows the urgent need to make progress in this
direction: the worship of God furthers fraternity and love, not hatred
and division. Other troubling situations, at times
accompanied by acts of violence, can be mentioned in south and
south-east Asia, in countries which for that matter have a tradition of
peaceful social relations. The particular influence of a
given religion in a nation ought never to mean that citizens of another
religion can be subject to discrimination in social life or, even worse,
that violence against them can be tolerated”.
In several countries, moreover, " a constitutionally recognized
right to religious freedom exists, yet the life of religious
communities is in fact made difficult and at times even dangerous (cf.
Dignitatis Humanae, 15) because the legal or social order is inspired by
philosophical and political systems which call for strict control, if
not a monopoly, of the state over society. Such
inconsistencies must end, so that believers will not find themselves
torn between fidelity to God and loyalty to their country.
I
ask in particular that Catholic communities be everywhere guaranteed
full autonomy of organization and the freedom to carry out their
mission, in conformity with international norms and standards in this
sphere. a constitutionally recognized right to religious freedom exists,
yet the life of religious communities is in fact made difficult and at
times even dangerous (cf. Dignitatis Humanae, 15) because the legal or
social order is inspired by philosophical and political systems which
call for strict control, if not a monopoly, of the state over society. Such
inconsistencies must end, so that believers will not find themselves
torn between fidelity to God and loyalty to their country.
I
ask in particular that Catholic communities be everywhere guaranteed
full autonomy of organization and the freedom to carry out their
mission, in conformity with international norms and standards in this
sphere".
“Turning our gaze from East to West, we find ourselves faced
with other kinds of threats to the full exercise of religious freedom. I
think in the first place of countries which accord great importance to
pluralism and tolerance, but where religion is increasingly being
marginalized. There is a tendency to consider religion,
all religion, as something insignificant, alien or even destabilizing to
modern society, and to attempt by different means to prevent it from
having any influence on the life of society.
Christians
are even required at times to act in the exercise of their profession
with no reference to their religious and moral convictions, and even in
opposition to them, as for example where laws are enforced limiting the
right to conscientious objection on the part of health care or legal
professionals. In this context, one can only be gratified by the
adoption by the Council of Europe last October of a resolution
protecting the right to conscientious objection on the part of medical
personnel vis-à-vis certain acts which gravely violate the right to
life, such as abortion”.
“Another sign of the marginalization of religion, and of
Christianity in particular, is the banning of religious feasts and
symbols from civic life under the guise of respect for the members of
other religions or those who are not believers. By acting
in this way, not only is the right of believers to the public expression
of their faith restricted, but an attack is made on the cultural roots
which nourish the profound identity and social cohesion of many nations. Last
year, a number of European countries supported the appeal lodged by the
Italian government in the well-known case involving the display of the
crucifix in public places.
I am grateful to the
authorities of those nations, as well as to all those who became
involved in the issue, episcopates, civil and religious organizations
and associations, particularly the Patriarchate of Moscow and the other
representatives of the Orthodox hierarchy, as well as to all those –
believers and non-believers alike – who wished to show their sympathy for this symbol, which bespeaks universal values”.
“Acknowledging religious freedom also means ensuring that
religious communities can operate freely in society through initiatives
in the social, charitable or educational sectors. Throughout the world, one can see the fruitful work accomplished by the Catholic Church in these areas. It
is troubling that this service which religious communities render to
society as a whole, particularly through the education of young people,
is compromised or hampered by legislative proposals which risk creating a
sort of state monopoly in the schools; this can be seen, for example,
in certain countries in Latin America”.
“Continuing my reflection, I cannot remain silent about another
attack on the religious freedom of families in certain European
countries which mandate obligatory participation in courses of sexual or
civic education which allegedly convey a neutral conception of the
person and of life, yet in fact reflect an anthropology opposed to faith
and to right reason”.
Religion, the Pope concluded, “does not represent a problem for
society, that it is not a source of discord or conflict” and “the
Church seeks no privileges, nor does she seek to intervene in areas
unrelated to her mission, but simply to exercise the latter with
freedom”.
SIC: AN/INT'L