If Pope John Paul II was an international icon, his successor, Benedict XVI, remains largely undefined in the public eye in the United States even as the Roman Catholic Church experiences a wrenching transition. This week provides an opportunity for Benedict to establish his public image and steady the U.S. church, as he makes his first visit to the United States since ascending to the papacy after John Paul's death three years ago.
Benedict will visit Washington, D.C., and New York on Tuesday through April 20. He'll celebrate Mass in two baseball stadiums, address the United Nations General Assembly and meet with President Bush, Roman Catholic educators and other religious leaders. A visit to Ground Zero in lower Manhattan also is planned.
The trip comes as the Roman Catholic Church in the United States — with the third-largest Catholic population in the world — struggles against titanic pressures. Among them: a sex-abuse scandal that led six dioceses to file for bankruptcy and left others in financial straits as payouts to victims exceeded $1.5 billion; a demographic shift in U.S. religion that has saddled the church with the largest net loss of one-time members of any major faith; and a fundamental threat to church orthodoxy linked in part to the nation's secular, polyglot culture.
It is against this backdrop that Benedict, who turns 81 on Wednesday, will introduce himself to the United States.
Within the U.S. church, many conservatives ardently support Benedict. They admire his embrace of the traditional Latin Mass, his challenge to Islamic extremism (which inflamed many Muslims but inspired dialogue with others), and his encyclicals on love and hope. For them, Benedict is not in John Paul's shadow.
"He's immediately established his own credentials as a spiritual, theological force," said Deal Hudson, director of InsideCatholic.com and a well-known conservative Catholic thinker. "He's shown he's a man of great learning and culture and not the least bit afraid of anyone."
While Benedict is a hero to many U.S. conservatives, he is not a U.S.-style conservative. He opposes the war in Iraq, raises piercing questions about capitalism, is against the death penalty and strongly defends immigrants and the poor.
To many non-Catholics, Benedict remains a mystery: A study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found 32 percent of Americans didn't know enough about Benedict to offer an opinion of him.
While his reputation as a cardinal was as John Paul II's hard-line theological enforcer, he's adopted a gentler approach as pontiff.
Those who tune in this week will discover a leader focused on what veteran Vatican observer John Allen called "affirmative orthodoxy; a strong defense of traditional Catholic faith and practice ... but phrasing all that in the most relentlessly positive fashion possible."
"Benedict's diagnosis is that people are far too familiar with what the Catholic Church is against rather than what it's for ... and so I think his effort is to try to present a positive vision of what the Catholic Church represents," said Allen, Vatican correspondent for the independent National Catholic Reporter.
Aside from publicly repeating Catholic teachings on issues such as abortion and the Vatican's long-standing concern for peace in the Middle East, Benedict's vision likely will be underscored in two places: his U.N. speech and his meeting with Catholic educators.
Benedict has argued that "the dictatorship of relativism" is a crisis of modernity. At the United Nations, he's expected to argue that "what the world desperately needs today is a global moral consensus — that is, a consensus on fundamental moral truths that are universal and unchanging that can serve as a basis for things like protection of human rights and human dignity," Allen said.
On Catholic education, the pope will emphasize the idea that "the Catholic identity of Catholic institutions of higher education serves both the church and the wider culture," said George Weigel, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a conservative Washington think tank.
Emphasis on orthodoxy may seem odd in the United States, whose Catholics tend to be dogmatically lax. The Pew study found that 51 percent of American Catholics support abortion rights, in stark conflict with Vatican teaching. And nearly 60 percent support the death penalty, contrary to church teaching.
Many Catholics have left the church: One-third of Americans who were raised Catholic are now ex-Catholics, according to the Pew study. The crisis of lost followers has been masked by huge growth among immigrants who are disproportionately Catholic, so the percentage of Americans who are Catholic has remained at about 25 percent.
Yet compared with Europe, where virtually every aspect of traditionalism seems under siege, the United States is a vibrant religious garden.
Nevertheless, the Catholic Church's credibility in the U.S. religious marketplace took a major hit with revelations of systemic cover-ups in many dioceses of the sexual abuse of children by priests. Benedict must address in some way what Allen called "the deepest trauma in the life of the Catholic Church in the United States in its more than 200 years of history."
Victims' advocates said neither Benedict's words nor his actions are enough. They wanted him to discipline bishops who presided in U.S. dioceses where abuse occurred and to develop systems to prevent abuse around the world, especially in developing countries.
"I think he's responding in the way that's the safest, easiest and most tempting for church officials," said David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, a leading victims-advocacy group. "Turn away, do little, issue vague apologies when forced to. And pretend it's done. ... We're long past the point where one symbolic gesture or a few soothing words can really make a difference."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce