There are disappointment and many questions among the Catholics in Russia following the cancellation of an anticipated encounter, scheduled for today, between the new bishop of the archdiocese of the Mother of God in Moscow, Archbishop Paolo Pezzi, and the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, Alexy II. The postponement was announced by the patriarchate itself.
It would have been the first meeting on this level between the two communities in more than 10 years.
The affair raises questions among the faithful, in part because it is added to the Church's failure to participate in the eighth national day of prayer and fasting, held yesterday in the capital. Catholic leaders did not provide any explanations for this.
"We had great hope in this meeting", a priest in Moscow said, "we hoped that it might be not simply a courtesy visit, but the chance for a fraternal and constructive discussion of the problems that concern our faithful".
Among the most important questions at the moment, we recall: the request for support from the patriarch in resolving the problem of visas for foreign religious with the authorities; clarification of the positions expressed by Metropolitan Kirill and by Bishop Hilarion of Vienna and Austria, on the abolition of the Catholic dioceses in Russia; the request to include the Catholic Church in the interreligious council of Russia (which includes Orthodox, Muslims, Jews, and Buddhists); discussing the possibility of collaborating on social and charitable projects.
Questions have been raised, finally, by Archbishop Pezzi’s decision not to be in Moscow for Easter.
The prelate has decided to celebrate the feast in Kaliningrad, the westernmost diocese of the country.
Some of the faithful note that it would be the first time since 1991 that the bishop has not been present in his diocese for the occasion.
According to official sources, his place will be taken by the apostolic nuncio, Archbishop Mennini.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to either myself or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that I agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Sotto Voce