Friday, July 30, 2010

Church that sends prayers to your iPhone

The faithful can now get daily prayers sent directly to their iPhones after the Catholic Diocese of Salford joined the digital revolution by creating its own ‘app.’

It will deliver daily readings and thoughts. Father John Flynn, from the diocese, said that the app was about making Catholicism accessible to all.

He said: “We firmly believe that in Christ everything is revealed and we want to make that a viable option for people, be that Holy Joes or the bloke in the white van going along the M6.

“I think it’s very useful for the diocese to be competent with these technologies because so many areas of public life are.

“But we’re not trying to get the popularity vote, we’re just trying to give people another avenue into the Church.

“In 1979, Pope John Paul II called for a new evangelisation, which is the spreading of the gospel in the marketplace.

“Since then, the Church has been very keen on interpreting what he means and putting it into practice, and one aspect of that is to use modern technology to put the message of the Catholic faith across.”

The app was engineered by Cuckoo Design, based at The Old Bank on Chapel Street, Salford.

Spokesman Steve Wheatley said: “About a year ago, the diocese were looking to update their image to go with the opening of the Cathedral Centre and one of the fathers walked across the road and knocked on our door to ask if we could help.

“In our terms, they were looking for a formal corporate identity, a modern crest or emblem to use. It was a perfect opportunity to make important content even more accessible, remotely, gain valuable attention and ultimately drive up visitor numbers.

“Anything that can help a client reach out and genuinely connect with their audience is hugely beneficial.”

SIC: ManEveN

Church-state court dispute over Prague cathedral ends

The Czech Constitutional Court (US) has halted the proceedings on the complaint by the Metropolitan Chapter that represented the Catholic Church in the protracted dispute over the ownership of St Vitus Cathedral at Prague Castle, according to the ruling available on the US website.

The decision has been expected as the St Vitus Metropolitan Chapter withdrew its complaint in June following an agreement between the state and the church.

The US judges then waited for a month whether another church body would withdraw its complaint over the ownership of the All Saints Church at Prague Castle, which did not happen.

The dispute between the state and the church over the cathedral, which was founded in the 14th century and fully completed in 1929, has lasted since 1992.

Under the latest court verdict, the cathedral belongs to the state. The Metropolitan Chapter lodged a constitutional complaint against the verdict in May 2009.

The previous court verdicts ascribed the cathedral's ownership to the church, but the state appealed and the Supreme Court (NS) cancelled the decision.

In the new proceedings the lower-level courts definitively decided that the cathedral's owner is the state. The NS upheld the decision.

The NS based its position on the government directive from 1954 that declared Prague Castle as a protected heritage area belonging to the Czechoslovak people, that is to the state.

The agreement on joint care of the cathedral was signed in May by President Vaclav Klaus and new Prague Archbishop Dominik Duka.

It says the court disputes about the cathedral will not continue, and that the dispute should be solved on the basis of a mutual consensus.

Prague Castle is the seat of the Presidential Office.

St Vitus Cathedral is the most visited Czech church and a symbol of Czech statehood.

In the past, Czech kings were crowned in it, and the remains of significant Czech sovereigns, noblemen and church dignitaries are buried in the cathedral.

Czech coronation jewels are also kept in the cathedral.

SIC: PDM

Methodist Church launches boycott of Israeli goods

The Methodist Church’s decision to boycott produce from illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory has been supported by both the United Church of Canada the World Council of Churches (WCC).

The decision was made during the Church’s annual conference in Portsmouth on June 30 and constitutes part of a report on illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Policy Advisor for Methodist Church, Steve Husklesby, expressed hope that the move would “highlight concerns that people have over the occupation and the impact on Palestinian communities.”

The 54-page report, ‘Justice for Palestine and Israel’, was presented alongside a joint Jewish-Christian statement of support.

Its thirty signatures included representatives from the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) UK Jews for Justice for Palestinians and the Holy Land Trust.

The WCC has since insisted that the measure is a necessary step forward in strengthening the moral convictions of British Christians.

Program Executive for the Middle East, Michel Nseir, told The Muslim News that the public should “no longer maintain a continuous, non critical support for the policies and Government of Israel.”

He instead asks Christians to “take responsibility for their behaviour” by boycotting the largely agricultural produce in supermarkets.

Last September, the WCC asked all churches to support an international boycott of Israeli settlement produce and services from the region. This was supported by Kairos Palestine, a body of Palestinian Christian leaders who launched a document entitled ‘Moment of Truth’ on December 11, 2009.

The organisation believes that the Israeli occupation is a “sin against God and humanity” and calls upon World Churches to “stand alongside the oppressed” - they have since received a letter of support from South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

Though Nseir foresees “new debate and discussion” among the other churches as a result of the boycott, the Catholic Church has of yet refused to comment on the Methodist church’s actions.

When asked whether they would consider taking similar measures, Louis Henderson, a spokesman for the Church of England, opposed the idea - its Ethical Investment Advisory Group, has not recommended any such boycott.

“The Ethical Advisory Group has no specific policies on a boycott of any country,” Henderson told The Muslim News.

More open opposition came from Christian Friends of Israel (CFI) (UK) and the Zionist Federation (ZF), whose membership includes followers of the Methodist Church.

The organisations argued that the report had been influenced by ‘supercessionism' – a strain of Christianity which denies the Biblical claim of Jewish people to the land of Israel.

They further condemned the report as “one-sided” and “biased” towards Palestinians, calling for a more balanced approach to the Middle East conflict.

Their argument that the Israeli occupation of the West bank is perfectly legal contradicts the WWC’s recognition of Israeli settlements as “illegitimate under international law.”

In a joint statement, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council condemned the report.

The bodies declared that the Methodist church had abused the goodwill of the Jewish community and are misinformed regarding the Middle Eastern conflict.

“The Methodist Conference has swallowed hook, line and sinker a report full of basic historical inaccuracies, deliberate misrepresentations and distortions of Jewish theology and Israeli policy,” said the statement.

Chief Executive of the Council of Christians and Jews, David Gifford, echoed this sentiment, asserting that the Conference gave “unfairly biased sympathy” to Palestinians; the Board of Deputies believed that the conference should “hang its head in shame”.

The WCC are sceptical that a similar boycott could be implemented in America, with Michel Nseir citing a “different dynamic” under which American churches operate.

SIC: TMN

Archbishop details reconciliation offer with St. Stanislaus

Archbishop Robert Carlson has offered St. Stanislaus Kostka a way to re-join the Archdiocese after a protracted dispute over control of parish assets.

Since 1891, a lay board of directors has managed the parish's property.

But in 2004, then-Archbishop Raymond Burke demanded that St. Stanislaus follow conventional Roman Catholic parish governance practices, which give the archbishop more control.

Members of the church, worried that the archdiocese wanted to sell the property, refused.

In 2005, Burke officially removed the church from the Archdiocese, saying leaders had led the parish into schism, or direct conflict with the Vatican.

Several board members and a priest they hired, Marek Bozek, were declared excommunicated, though several board members have since reconciled.

Under Archbishop Carlson's offer made public Thursday, St. Stanislaus would continue to own all its property, including the church, rectory, and Polish Heritage Center, but would lease the church and rectory to the Archdiocese.

In a statement, Carlson said he intends for the arrangement to continue in perpetuity. If St. Stanislaus is closed, the statement said, the parish corporation would continue to own the property and could use it for Polish Roman Catholic cultural and religious purposes.

In the statement, Carlson also promised that the Archdiocese would pay the salary of a new priest for the first year, and provide funding for a consultant that would help raise money for the parish.

An attorney for the St. Stanislaus board offered no opinion about the agreement, but thanked Bozek and Archbishop Carlson for continuing negotiations, while noting that obstacles remain.

Parish members are being briefed on the agreement, the statement said, and could offer their opinion to the board about the agreement in early August.

The agreement would not affect an ongoing court case.

SIC: KMWU

Pa. diocese sued after abuse accuser's suicide

The estate of a man allegedly abused by a priest in the 1980s is suing the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, alleging he committed suicide this year after the diocese stopped paying for his mental health treatments following two other suicide attempts.

Michael Unglo, 39, formerly of Etna in suburban Pittsburgh, committed suicide in May at a center in Stockbridge, Mass., according to a copy of the lawsuit obtained by The Associated Press. He alleged he was molested in the early 1980s while an altar boy, by a priest who was convicted of molesting another boy and later resigned.

The diocese decided to stop paying for Unglo's treatment even though the diocese continued to pay for the priest's health insurance and paid the priest an unspecified monthly stipend, Alan Perer, attorney for Unglo's estate, said Thursday at a news conference.

"There was money to fund a convicted, pedophile, defrocked priest and yet not enough money to continue to provide for the victim of that priest who ultimately killed himself," Perer said.

The lawsuit alleges negligence by the diocese and Bishop David Zubik and seeks at least $50,000 in damages for factors including Unglo's pain and suffering, his medical expenses, his future lost income and his family's loss of his companionship.

The diocese issued a statement Thursday denying negligence or any responsibility for Unglo's death, noting that it "provided hundreds of thousands of dollars for counseling and residential treatment" that continued until his death.

The Associated Press could not immediately locate the former priest, Richard Dorsch, for comment. Calls to two Pennsylvania numbers listing that name were not answered, and a third was disconnected.

According to the lawsuit and electronic court documents examined by The Associated Press, Dorsch was convicted of two counts of indecent assault and one count of corruption of minors in 1995 for molesting another boy.

News accounts at the time said Dorsch resigned from the priesthood in 1996, while Thursday's lawsuit contends he was defrocked.

Dorsch was sentenced to 11 to 23 months in jail after molesting a 13-year-old boy he had invited to North Park near Pittsburgh for a day of swimming and golfing, court records show.

The lawsuit alleges Unglo was molested, beginning at age 10, in the early 1980s while he was a student and altar boy at All Saints Church and school in Etna, east of Pittsburgh, where Unglo grew up. His family said he was also molested at North Park.

Unglo tried to commit suicide in June 2008 "as a result of the effects of the extreme sexual abuse that had been perpetrated on him," the lawsuit said.

Michael Unglo graduated with honors from the University of Pennsylvania and was a successful Madison Avenue advertising copywriter when he began suffering flashbacks a couple of years ago, his family said. When he died, he was being treated for complex post-traumatic stress disorder fueled by the abuse, said Samuel Unglo, executor of his brother's estate.

Unglo said his brother briefly mentioned the abuse when Dorsch's conviction made news in the mid-1990s, but said, "I'm fine; I'll move on with things."

The lawsuit contends the Pittsburgh diocese began paying for his counseling and treatment in July 2008. The suit claims Bishop Zubik met with Unglo's brothers that December and committed to "do whatever it takes to right the wrong that was done to Michael R. Unglos by one of the church's own."

Perer said Dorsch sent Michael Unglo a "vague" letter apologizing for any suffering, without specifically acknowledging the sexual abuse. Michael Unglo didn't want to meet with the priest, and the diocese "refused to orchestrate" a meeting between the priest and Unglo's family, his brother said.

The diocese paid to treat Unglo at two New York City hospitals, as well as outpatient treatments. Unglo again tried to commit suicide in June 2009, the lawsuit said. The diocese continued to pay for Unglo's treatment in New York, at another center in Baltimore, and finally at Austen Riggs in Stockbridge, the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit contends the diocese made a final payment of $75,000 to Unglo in March, saying no further payment for his treatment would be forthcoming.

Perer said the diocese has claimed to have spent $300,000 for Unglo's treatment. Samuel Unglo said his brother "exhausted" his financial resources and wasn't working or insured when he died.

"My brother was very stressed out about the fact that the resources were running out," Samuel Unglo said. Three days before his suicide, Michael Unglo said, "I want you to know I'm in great pain," his brother reported.

On May 4, Unglo committed suicide at Austen Riggs, the lawsuit said.

The $25,000 sought for each negligence allegation is the minimum necessary to bring the lawsuit in Common Pleas Court.

SIC: AP

When the Catholic Church excelled in PR

It would be nice to think that the Counter-Reformation was a programme worked out on the back of an envelope by clever cardinals in some smoke-filled sacristy in Trent, in between sessions of the famous Council.

A few figures in scarlet might have gathered round a thurible and brainstormed: what was wrong with the Church, and what needed to be done – a strategy for recovery, as it would be called nowadays.

But it wasn’t really like that.

The Counter-Reformation, like all mass movements, began at the bottom of the ecclesiastical pyramid, and the Council of Trent, and its protracted implementation, represented its final stages, not its genesis.

It began in the hearts and minds of people like St Ignatius of Loyola, as well as other lesser known figures such as St Anthony Mary Zaccaria (founder of the Barnabites), and St Cajetan (founder of the Theatines), though the first stirrings may well be traceable to the great Englishman, Cardinal Pole.

But if one were to reconstruct the points that might have been written on the back of that non-existent envelope, they could have looked like this. A programme for recovery, circa 1540, would have had at its centre the principle of clear doctrine, clearly expressed, clearly communicated.

To this end, one could have listed the following necessary steps to be taken: the publication of catechisms, for old and young; better preaching, and better clergy training; the use of the printed word, with the requisite development of printing presses, with means of publication and distribution; the fostering of sound popular devotions; investment in Catholic education at all levels and liturgical renewal.

But one could also add something less practical but equally important: the invention of a proper Catholic style, in both music, liturgy, art and architecture, a style that would capture the spirit of the emerging age.

In the first field, that of education, catechesis, preaching and mission, the early Jesuits certainly excelled.

One can think for example of St Peter Canisius, who spearheaded the re-evangelisation of Germany with his catechetical works; and one remembers with pride St Edmund Campion, who even though on the run during his brief English ministry still managed to write, print and distribute the Decem Rationes, popularly known as “Campion’s Brag”, a stunningly effective work of apologetics, all the more so for being produced under the very noses of the Elizabethan authorities.

Its very daring got it noticed.

Again, Jesuit colleges throughout Europe, but especially in the Austrian lands, were effective in re-Catholicising territories that had been lost to the Church.

But in the second field, that of the creation of a Catholic style, the Jesuits led the way too. If one wants to see the fruits of their patronage, visit any Jesuit church on the continent, perhaps starting with the two great churches of Rome, the Gesù and Sant’Ignazio, both of which showcase the achievements of the Jesuit brother Andrea Pozzo. Pozzo made his initial reputation as a stage designer for biblical pageants, and his ceiling fresco in Sant’Ignazio with its trompe l’oeil illusionism is certainly stagey, as is his design for St Ignatius’s tomb in the Gesù, but this theatricality is not to be dismissed.

What Pozzo does is what every Baroque artist did: he blurs the boundaries between heaven and earth, between spectator and spectacle. Pozzo’s work draws you in. To gaze at the tomb of Ignatius and spot the little angel who indignantly tears up the tomes of Luther, Calvin and Zwingli, to see Religion crushing the monster that is Heresy, is to realise that this is a drama of which you, too, are a part.

Baroque art overflows in all directions, in music as in architecture, as in painting and sculpture.

The aim of the artist was to raise the heart and mind to God, to make that passage, from the mundane to the sublime, easier.

The artistic heritage of the Counter-Reformation is still with us, while the theology books of once-leading players like St Robert Bellarmine gather dust in the book stack. Few would advocate a return to Counter-Reformation theology and apologetics, though St Ignatius’s Spiritual Exercises are still with us, as is his surely enduring emphasis on mental prayer.

But the art of the Counter-Reformation is dated as well, though there are parts of the world where people are still building baroque or neo-baroque churches. But the real enduring legacy of the art of the Counter-Reformation is that it underlines the way art and theology need to be allies, and how one can reinforce the other.

Both preach, one with words, one in a way that transcends language. The artists of the Catholic Reformation also make the important connection between Catholicism and beauty, Catholicism and culture.

Thanks to these artists, to experience beauty almost became identical with having the Catholic experience, and the Catholic experience became an experience people wanted to have. One gets a hint of this looking at Bernini’s St Teresa in Ecstasy: here the teaching of the Council of Trent is communicated in enraptured marble.

Again, thanks to many lesser artists, visiting cities as diverse as Mexico or Valetta or Manila meant entering a milieu which was unmistakeably Catholic, where the very stones breathed a lived faith that might move the hardest of hearts.

Why these thoughts today?

In Europe, at least, faith and culture have become separated, and Catholicism is marginalised.

Hence the Pope has recently set up the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelisation, under the leadership of Archbishop Rino Fisichella. If the archbishop were sketching ideas on the back of an envelope right now, they might resemble some of the points above, for the situation of the Church in Europe today greatly resembles that of the Church in Europe during the Reformation period.

Vast territories that once were Catholic are Catholic no longer; many symbols of the faith endure, but they are symbols whose meaning is now obscure to all but the antiquarian-minded.

One thing that the new Pontifical Council must do is open up a way for the Church to speak to the world without being misunderstood.

This means, in essence, proper public relations, or what the Americans call “public diplomacy”, and more cynical Europeans call propaganda. This was something at which Bellarmine excelled, as did Pozzo and Bernini, each in their different ways.

Before anything like evangelisation can begin, we need to detoxify the brand, to make it attractive once more, to undo the damage to the Church done by paedophile priests and their enablers.

Re-enchanting Catholicism, and making it synonymous with beauty again, will perhaps take centuries. Archbishop Fisichella, who is a very able man, will need an army of people like St Ignatius and Andrea Pozzo to help him in his formidable task.

SIC: CHO

Fewer Spaniards say they are Catholic: study

The proportion of Spaniards who say they are Roman Catholic has fallen to 73 percent from around 80 percent eight years ago, according to a survey released Thursday by the CIS research centre.

About 25 percent of all Spaniards now claim to be atheists or without a religion, compared to 17 percent in 2002, the June survey of 2,500 adults found.

Only 13 percent of those questioned said they attended Mass each week compared to 20 percent eight years ago.

And more than half of those surveyed, 56 percent, said they "practically never" attended Mass.

The findings reflected not just the rapid pace of secularisation the country has undergone this century but also the Roman Catholic Church's "loss of credibility", Spanish theologian Juan Jose Tamayo told radio Cadena Ser.

SIC: AFP

Vatican under fire over new rules on modesty

THE Vatican was criticised after taking action against tourists wearing skimpy clothes.

Tourists entering St Peter's Basilica have long been required to dress modestly, but yesterday the Swiss Guards -- the Pope's security force -- appeared to have extended the rules to the entire Vatican City state.

The guards drew aside men in shorts and women with uncovered shoulders and short skirts to tell them that they were not dressed properly.

Some female visitors bought shawls and scarves from hawkers, while a few men had to go to nearby shops to buy long trousers. Others were refused entry altogether.

Visitors said that the Roman Catholic Church should have more important things to worry about at a time it was battling scandals over paedophile priests.

"Given all the scandals the church has been involved in, what possible right can it have to be preaching about the morality of sleeveless dresses?" asked one woman in her 70s, identified only as 'Maria'.

The tough dress code also applied to Romans using the Vatican's pharmacy, supermarket and post office.

Adherence to the strict dress code has frayed tempers in the past -- especially when the summer temperatures soar.

Stall-holders have always managed to make a living through the sale of paper pants and shirts -- turning St Peter's Square into an giant open-air changing room.

It is not entirely unheard of for the precincts to be turned into something of a battle zone as fraying nerves give way and the language becomes anything but holy.

Landmarks

Rome's policemen have also been out in force to ensure tourists don't cool their feet in the Trevi Fountain and other landmarks.

At the Vatican, authorities have erected signs showing no one can enter the basilica with bare legs and bare shoulders. Guards, neatly dressed in shirts and ties, patrol the entrances.

There had been some confusion as to when the code had to be obeyed. Some thought that the dress code only applied when the Pope was at home.

It is not only the Vatican, but the diocese of Rome and its hundreds of churches, that require what authorities consider 'appropriate' dress. But unlike the Vatican, most of the churches cannot afford guards, and they have become cool refuges for the barely-clad.

Some tourists do come prepared, pulling out pants and shirts from backpacks and changing in St Peter's Square, often prompting cat calls.

SIC: II

Perth's Catholic Archbishop stirs fears about atheism

PERTH Catholic Archbishop Barry Hickey has suggested Julia Gillard's atheism could cost her votes.

But he says Tony Abbott's "strong Christian faith" could benefit him.

The provocative comments triggered heated debate on Perth talkback radio yesterday as a string of callers objected to the apparent leap into partisan politics.

The archbishop told The Australian he had not meant to imply people should not vote for the Prime Minister - a self-professed atheist - and was simply "sounding a caution" about the rise of secularism in politics.

"I had no intention of attacking Julia Gillard at all. My point was the future, not the present - that if the people who don't subscribe to any religion get stronger, we might have a repeat of what happened in Europe, where the church was sidelined," he said.

Ms Gillard declined to respond directly but said she respected the work done by the Catholic Church and other religious groups.

The archbishop's comments follow attacks by two other church leaders in recent months - Sydney Anglican Archbishop Peter Jensen and Sydney's Catholic Archbishop Cardinal George Pell - who warned against atheism.

The Perth archbishop sparked yesterday's debate with a statement he sent to The West Australian newspaper on July 22, which was not published until yesterday.

Titled "Comments on the forthcoming election", it said many Christians were concerned "someone who does not believe in God may not endorse the Christian traditions of respect for human life, for the sanctity of marriage and the independence of churches.

"Some will undoubtedly vote for Mr Abbott because they appreciate his strong Christian faith (but) this might be counter-balanced by others who see it as a negative," he said.

SIC: TAAUS

Gay community hails unlikely hero from Presbyterian church

A Presbyterian minister seems an unlikely hero for any gay rights group in Northern Ireland but the Rev Chris Hudson is at the very heart of this week's Belfast Pride celebrations.

So much so that a large procession of gay men and women trooped into his church in leafy south Belfast on Sunday evening. Some confessed they hadn't been in church for over 20 years. But as the poster outside said: ‘It's ok to be gay and Christian'.

It was the first time such a public meeting had been held in All Souls Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church as part of the Belfast Pride Festival, which celebrates diversity.

Many said they would be back for a church service after the festival on Sunday.

With the annual Belfast Pride more famous for religious people protesting it, the Rev Hudson's voice of support in recent years has been important to the organisation. And in this, its 20th year, they decided to honour him with their Hero of the Year award at the recent Belfast Pride Awards.

The Belfast Pride Parade is targeted every year by demonstrators from Sandown Free Presbyterian Church and the Rev David McIlveen has been a vocal opponent.

But the Rev Hudson appears undeterred. And two years ago he walked for the first time in the Belfast parade — complete with dog collar.

“I wanted at least one church in Belfast that gave complete affirmation to gay and lesbian people about their sexuality,” he said.

As a non-subscribing Presbyterian Church, All Souls is independent of any ruling body. The congregation have been very welcoming to gay and lesbian people who have decided to come to All Souls,” he explained. “We don't make a big thing about it.”

Among the topics up for discussion at Sunday's public meeting in the church included passages from the Bible interpreted as condemning homosexuality.

“Leviticus is quoted quite a lot, concerning ‘man lying down with another man', but Leviticus is a priestly code for Jewish priests,” Rev Hudson argued. “It's a list of behaviours, trying to set the priests of Israel apart. They were trying to outdo each other.”

Rev Hudson also believes the apostle Paul did not condemn homosexuality as is widely believed, but the “quite licentious Greeks” he found worshipping various gods and goddesses.

“There was no concept of homosexuality as we understand it today,” he said.

Brian Adams, from Belfast Pride, described Rev Hudson as their “greatest friend” in Northern Ireland. “He has been very brave and very vocal and so obstinate in his public support for us.”

SIC: BT

Church backs Army killings probe

The Catholic Church has backed calls for an independent inquiry into the British Army killings of 11 people in west Belfast almost 40 years ago.

The Bishop of Down and Connor, Noel Treanor, will urge the British Government to apologise and declare innocent those shot dead in the so-called Ballymurphy Massacre when he meets bereaved families on Friday.

He will also hand the relatives previously undisclosed church archive documents relating to the deaths in August 1971.

Catholic priest Hugh Mullan was among the 11 civilians shot dead by British soldiers over a three-day period in the republican neighbourhood.

The military entered the area to round up suspected paramilitaries after the Northern Ireland government introduced the controversial policy of internment without trial.

The relatives' calls for an internationally-chaired independent inquiry have intensified since the publication in June of the Saville report into the British Army killings of 14 people on Bloody Sunday in Londonderry in 1972.

Some of the soldiers who were involved in that notorious incident in Derry had been in Ballymurphy six months earlier.

A spokesman for the Catholic Church said Bishop Treanor would take a tour of the area where the shootings took place before handing over the archive files to the relatives.

The documents include the church's report into what happened, based on eyewitness accounts. A number of British military personnel are among those interviewed. The authors of the report said the killings were not justified.

West Belfast MP Gerry Adams said: "The families of those killed have borne this trauma for almost 40 years. They have courageously campaigned for the truth. I welcome the fact that the church is now prepared to release eyewitness accounts which lend support to the families' quest for a fully independent international investigation in these deaths."

SIC: BT

Cardinal Zen: not true that “Beijing really wants Bishops appointed by the Pope”

Gianni Valente, (once?) my friend, writes again on 30 Days (2010 No. 5) about the Church in China.

I admire his interest for this Church so dear to us and his zeal in bringing it to the attention of his readers.

I am sorry to say, however, that I cannot agree with the way he sees things in that very complex situation.

Appointment of Bishops

The title of the article says: “Beijing wants Bishops appointed by the Pope”. Such a title betrays an optimism not justified by facts. It is true that recent episcopal ordinations in China are recognized by both the Holy See and the Chinese Government. It is also true that two Chinese academics made affirmations which suggest a change of position on the part of the Government (those are affirmations made in China, which we should take them with a pinch of salt; by the way, academics are not part of the ruling establishment). Anyway, it is a far cry to conclude from these facts and these affirmations to a “Copernican Revolution”, as G. V. does.

Let us take up the question asked by G. V.: “How should we interpret the facts?”

First of all, I noticed a contradiction in what G. V. says. On p. 22, he talks about a new “conception” in the sense that the Chinese Government would have agreed to the Catholic doctrine about the ordination of bishops. Then, on p. 23, he says that the Government does not care about doctrines, but accepts the fact that the bishops should be approved by the Pope, because otherwise they would not be accepted by the faithful people. So it is a pragmatically motivated acceptance. The latter analysis seems to be the true one. The Government has to compromise, facing the resolute faith of the people, obviously encouraged by the Letter of the Pope to the Church in China and by other authoritative pronouncements of the Holy See (like the Communiqué at the conclusion of the last plenary meeting of the Pontifical Commission for the Church in China).

So, again, is it true that Beijing really wants bishops appointed by the Pope?

The quoted facts and pronouncements of the two academics do not seem to be

sufficient proof of that statement. However, relying on other sources (not available to us), G. V. tells us that there is a simple procedure for the nomination of bishops, which functions as follows:

a) There is a mechanism of local selection (by representatives of the parishes);

b) The names are then presented to the Government and approved;

c) The final choice is by consent between the two sides. Quoting Professor Liu Peng, G. V. says: “The list is submitted to the Holy See and the two sides make the choice jointly”. G. V. also says that “from political-diplomatic circles in China he came to know that a list of more than fifteen names of episcopal candidates has been sent to the Vatican and, it so happens that the names on the list almost correspond to those chosen independently by the Holy See” [Yes, it so happens that… What a surprise! We cannot resist asking: Is this a cry of joy on the part of G. V.? Or is he, unwittingly, making fun of himself?]

d) G. V. says that “the last binding word belongs to the Holy See”;

e) Towards the end of the article, G. V. even affirms that “the Chinese Government approves ordinations of bishops chosen on the basis of their approval by the Holy See”.

If this procedure reflected reality, we would have reason for rejoicing, because the authority of the Pope to nominate the bishops would be guaranteed, the Pope would have the first and the last word on the matter or at least the final choice would be made out of a cordial mutual understanding between the two sides.

But is it really so? From the pieces of information that we happen to gather here in Hong Kong, the reality is much less encouraging.

First of all, we have to note that points a) and b) above actually cannot really be distinguished, because the so-called “elections” are almost always manipulated by the Government through the Patriotic Association.

Then the whole process, as it takes place in reality, looks more like a tug-of-war than a “cordial mutual understanding”. The Government still puts so much pressure on the Holy See so that their candidates be approved (candidates they have nurtured for a long time!)

So, we do not even see a shadow of the so-called “Copernican Revolution”.

Remaining Obstacles?

After having presented as fundamentally resolved the problem of the nomination of bishops, G. V. points to possible obstacles on the way to a smooth journey ahead. These obstacles are:

a) The problem of the underground bishops;

b) The problem of the bishops under arrest;

c) The solicitation (fortunately G. V. did not use the word “provocation”) from the Vatican when it invited the Chinese bishops to avoid taking part in the possibly coming Assembly of the Representatives of Chinese Catholics. G. V. is worried that a non-participation in that Assembly would put the Chinese bishops in great difficulty. He foresees that many of the poor bishops “will be exposed to the tirades of those who accuse them of capitulation in the face of interference by the civil authorities into the life of the Church”.

G. V. lists three reasons against the appropriateness of such a “solicitation”:

a) He cites one of the Chinese bishops recently interviewed by UCAN who says that “the Assembly has nothing to do with the spirit of the Church, since it is a meeting convened by the Government” (is there anybody who can explain to us the logic of such a statement?)

b) An eventual participation by many bishops in the Assembly would cause embarrassment to the Holy See (the implication is that it is unwise for the Holy See to risk its own prestige);

c) A large-scale absence would offer a pretext of new criticism from those people in the Chinese leadership who have always been opposed to dialogue with the Vatican (so, according to G. V., the Vatican is playing in favour of its adversaries).

It is not difficult to realize that the purpose of the whole article is precisely in this “tail”, where G. V. feels it is his duty to criticize the Holy See for its firm and resolute position against the said Assembly.

I would like to ask G. V. whether he is aware of the nature of this Assembly. It pretends to be an act of democratic self-government on the part of the Church in China, while in reality it is nothing but a confirmation of the will to carry on an independent Church, totally subject to the Government, with the bishops humiliated and denied their rightful authority. After the clear declarations of the Holy Father in his Letter to the Church in China on the apostolic nature of the Church, how can our bishops still subject themselves to such slavery? What is their conscience telling them?

Would the faithful accept from their bishops such an act of incoherence with their status of communion with the Holy Father?

G. V. maintains his optimism even in the face of a possible new impasse. He has confidence in the “tried capacity (of the Holy See?) to combine the clarity of statements of principles with flexible attention to the concrete situations”. G. V. seems to be saying to the Holy See: “Don’t treat too harshly the Chinese bishops, whatever their choice in respect to the said Assembly”. I am sorry to admit that Gianni Valente will probably not be disappointed in his hope. In fact, in not so far away past instances even the penalty of excommunication set down by Canon Law and recalled to mind by explicit authoritative statements, could nonchalantly be done away with.

May God save us from all evil.

SIC: AN

40 areas picked for Church to hand over school control

THE Department of Education has pinpointed more than 40 areas around the country where it believes a number of Catholic Church-run primary schools could be handed over to be run by another patron.

The department has written to senior bishops stating why it might be appropriate for the church to cede control there.

The Archbishop of Dublin, Dr Diarmuid Martin, and chair of the Bishops' Commission for Education, Bishop Leo O'Reilly, were among those who received the letter.

The department has based its figures on a number of criteria, such as a stable population and the number of Catholic schools in the area.

It has not released the list.

However, the Irish Independent has learned it is to be split between Dublin and others parts of the country, including Tramore, Co Waterford; Killarney, Co Kerry; Athlone, Co Westmeath; and Ballinasloe, Co Galway.

Earlier this year, only 10 areas were under consideration by the department, but that number grew to 40, giving the church greater choice.

The process could take years and there is no guarantee that parents and local church officials will approve the handover.

The Catholic Church is patron of 92pc of the State's 3,200 primary schools and Archbishop Martin has said it was no longer tenable for the church to run them all.

Declining vocations make it difficult for the church to maintain its involvement in the day-to-day running of schools, while the increasing cultural and religious mix in Ireland has fuelled demand for greater choice.

Knowledge

The bishops put the onus on the department to identify areas where there might be a case for handing over a Catholic school to another patron, based on its detailed knowledge of schools and their communities.

But, ultimately, it will be up to the local bishop, school boards of management and parents to decide whether they want to change.

While the Catholic Church has expressed a willingness to roll back, other patron bodies, such as the multidenominational Educate Together and the Irish language Gaelscoileanna movement, are keen to increase their presence.

The State has also become involved in the provision of primary education through the opening of a number of community primary schools, run by the County Dublin Vocational Education Committee (VEC).

For its part , the department has been mindful that the process of change does not leave the State in a situation where it is left with schools in the most disadvantaged communities.

A spokesperson for the Catholic bishops said they were awaiting information from the department.

A spokesperson for the Irish National Teachers' Organisation said there was a need for increased diversity but criticised the department's "lack of consultation with parents, teachers and management bodies".

Meanwhile, differing opinions have emerged from the Labour Party regarding a groundbreaking proposal to divide the patronage of a new second-level school between Co Dublin VEC and the multi-denominational body, Educate Together.

The party's education spokesperson Ruairi Quinn attacked the decision not to give Educate Together recognition in its own right.

But Dublin West Labour TD Joanna Tuffy, welcomed the proposed partnership, claiming it had the potential to be an inclusive approach.

SIC: II

Ex-hospital chaplain claims he was defamed by priest

A MAN on leave from the priesthood is suing a hospital's head chaplain, whom he claims accused him of misappropriating funds, for defamation of character.

Ciaran Dalton, a former chaplain at James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, claimed in the Circuit Civil Court yesterday that Fr Martin Geraghty, head chaplain at the hospital, slandered him.

Mr Dalton alleged Fr Geraghty told a lay chaplain, Caroline Mullen, that money was missing from a fund built up from Mass collections and that Mr Dalton had taken it.

Fr Geraghty, who lives in Phibsborough, Dublin, has denied he made the statement and told the court he had never bad-mouthed Mr Dalton.

Mr Dalton, who lives in Blanchardstown, Dublin, told the court he had legitimately obtained money from the fund to pay for a two-year counselling course at Trinity College, Dublin.

Fr Geraghty said the fund was lodged in Bank of Ireland in his name.

It was used for defraying expenses of chaplains who attended day courses, conferences, retreats, and for buying gifts for patients, and was funded by collections taken up at Masses in the hospital.

Leave

Mr Dalton obtained leave of absence from the priesthood in 2007, after which point Fr Geraghty said he noticed a sum of several thousand euro had been paid out of the fund.

Fr Geraghty told Judge Mathews he became nervous about the withdrawal and had gone to an auxiliary bishop in the Dublin Archdiocese Ray Field.

He was advised to "regularise" the fund and have the money paid back.

Bishop Field had advised him to deal with two accountants associated with the Dublin Archdiocese and they carried out an investigation. It was discovered the money was paid to Trinity College and vouched for.

Fr Geraghty told the court the fund had been started about 20 years ago when chaplains were paid very poorly. But chaplains were now appointed and paid by the Health Service Executive.

Fr Geraghty said there was more than €6,000 in the fund up to two weeks ago, when the new manager at the Blanchardstown Hospital directed that it be discontinued and broken up among various charities.

The HSE had not been aware of its existence until the matter of the alleged defamation had occurred.

SIC: II

Cooney -v- McQuaid: 2

John Coonet, religion correspondent for the Irish Independent and biographer of John Charles McQuaid, appears to be the object of a secular fatwa because of his accusations of child abuse against McQuaid, the late Archbishop of Dublin and Primate of All Ireland.

The latest example of a media boycott against Cooney came in the refusal of the entire media to report a word of his speech on McQuaid at the Daniel Corkery Summer School last Friday.

Cooney's biography of the late Primate, John Charles McQuaid, Ruler of Catholic Ireland, now 11 years old, was welcomed, in the main, by modern, secular Ireland but even liberlas at RTÉ and the Irish Times appear to have been repelled by his accusation that McQuaid was a pederast.

Despite being just one of a handful of religious correspondents in the media - and easily the most senior and long time such correspondent - Cooney has been virtually blacked by RTÉ and most other broadcasting media since the Murphy Report on clerical child abuse in the Dublin Archdiocese. This, presumably, is because of his aggressive and revived allegations against the most dominant Irish cleric of the last century.

Last Friday (23rd July 2010), the Daniel Corkery Summer School heard Cooney deliver a thundering peroration of his allegations against McQuaid with what he said is additional evidence and the promise of further revealations to come in his forthcoming book, The Curse Of McQuaid.

His book, Cooney claims, 'will provide numerous sordid details of McQuaid's dark secret.'

Cooney's speech last week also referred to what he claimed was further evidence of McQuaid's sexual activity. These, the journalist said, were advances made, not to children but to a young priest and 2 clerical students resulting in 2 Garda investigations into these allegations made in the the 1960's and early '70's.

Cooney told his audience that the investigations cleared McQuiad - unsurprisingly, given the period - but he also claimed that the files have gone missing.

Cooney also referred to other evidence he says he has unearthed in recent years which provide similar evidence against McQuaid.

Expect more fireworks at Cooney's own summer school, the General Humbert Summer School beginning 17 August.

SIC: Phoenix

When Will The Cardinal Quit?

In today's post-Ryan and Murphy investigations into paedophile clerics, the new 'hidden Ireland' is the Irish Hierarchy, pace the reformist Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin.

Cardinal Seán Brady, the Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland, has lost his voice after deciding to stay put in his lofty post in the wake of the public outrage at disclosures that as a young priest and expert in Canon law, he swore to secrecy 2 innocent children who were raped by the notorious monk, Brendany Smyth.

The revealation of Brady's secret which was hidden for 35 years has left him bereft of moral authority. His sin of omission in failing to report Smyth's crimes to the Gardaí has already cost the Irish Church over a quarter of a million euro in a legal settlement with Marie McCormack, a childhood victim of the fiendish Smyth.

And more of Smyth's victims are lining up at the Four Courts to sue Brady, leader of the Irish CHurch, in his personal capacity.

No wonder, then, that the Speechless Seánie refuses to be drawn by nedia hacks, claiming he has the support of devout Catholics to stay on as 'a wounded healer', in spite of a recent Irish Times poll showing a whopping 83% of Irish people believe he should resign.

The reality is that the Vatican would not countenancethe falling on his crozier of Ireland's senior churchman. Rome is tightening its vice-grip on errant bishops (and dioceses) who are in trepidation at this autumn's forthcoming probe of Apostolic Visitors, ordered by Pope Benny, to be led by the lofty Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the former archbishop of Westminster.

Little wonder, then, Irish bishops this summer have gone underground and are making themselves scarce with the media. They are afraid of Rome. They are now so nervous about the impending inquisition from Rome that they are zealously competing with one another to urge their flocks back to confession and traditional pious devotions. No wonder that the visitation to dioceses of coveted relics and bones of saints have become the one growth area in an ecclesiastical body that has been mortally wounded by the Sins Of The Fathers.

In the absence of hard news, speculation is rife that Cardinal Brady's days in Armagh's Ara Coeli are numbered and that sooner or later, he will announce his retirement on health grounds. Already, he has petitioned Rome for a Co-Adjutor Archbishop with rights of succession to help him carry his heavy burden. Rome has so far stalled on this request but may grant him a second auxiliary bishop.

According to Clerical Errors, Brady is personally pushing the credentials of his speech writer and right-hand man, Fr. Tim Bartlett, a Belfast priest attached to the Diocese of Down and Connor.

But Goldhawk has learned that a recent attempt by Brady to have Bartlett appointed Bishop of Down and Connor was thwarted by none other than Diarmuid Martin.

Behind the closed corridors of the Vatican known only too well by the diplomatic Martin, the Dub successfully pressed the case of Noel Treanor, a Monaghan man, who like himself, had spent years in elite church circles abroad.

Privately, Martin believes that Brady's position is untenable.

The man, known as St Martin of Tours on account of his travel bug, still wants to get back to a top job in the Vatican and become a cardinal. He is due a reward from Pope Benny for his deft handling of the Murphy investigation into the archdiocese of Dublin.

But, so far, Benny prefers to keep him in Dublin. The prospect of being promoted to Armagh, which he regards as a provincial backwater compared with Dublin is not a pleasant one for Dermo.

To head off this unattractive posting amongst the Irish peasantry, he is discreetly supporting Treanor's promotion to Armagh, a move that would also thwart Brady's backing of Bartlett.

SIC: Phoenix

The Vatican's secret secret (Contribution)

I have been rereading the infamous Crimen Sollicitationis, the Vatican document from 1922 which laid down policy for cases of sex abuse, and which has been held up as evidence that there was a world-wide organised coverup of paedophilia.

It's hardly gripping, which may be why until now I never made it through to the end.

But it is worth persevering to Title Five, on crimen pessimum, because that casts the whole story in an entirely different light.

The crimen pessimum that the Vatican defines (the official translation is "the foulest crime") is not just child abuse and bestiality, though these are explicitly mentioned. But it is first defined to cover all forms of gay sex that a priest may have with anyone:

The term crimen pessimum ["the foulest crime"] is here understood to mean any external obscene act, gravely sinful, perpetrated or attempted by a cleric in any way whatsoever with a person of his own sex."

This is to be treated in exactly the same way as the crime of soliciting sex (or even flirting) in the confessional. The offenders are to be suspended from their sacramental duties, sacked from all their posts, and possibly defrocked as well. (para 61).

All these offences must be reported at once to the Holy Office (now the CDF) (para 66) under penalty of grave sin (para 70); and, should any priest convicted of them move to another diocese to preach, he must be reported at once to the authorities there so that he can be kept away from hearing confessions (para 69). The equivalent for a paedophile would of course be keeping him away from children.

Now, this isn't a policy of transparency, and it doesn't say anything, either way, about reporting cases to the civil authorities. So it won't answer to modern conditions. But it certainly isn't a licence to move abusive priests around and let them reoffend.

So why was it kept so secret?

The answer may well be in the definition of crimen pessimum to cover all forms of gay sex whatsoever.

If every instance of that misbehaviour had to be centrally reported the CDF would have been entirely overwhelmed.

The equation of gay men with paedophiles is repugnant; it is also unrealistic.

There are far more gay men in the priesthood than paedophiles, or even ephebophiles.

I doubt that the men who drew up the document can have realised this; but the Vatican is not full of fools, and someone, somewhere in there must have realised that the proposed policy was almost completely unworkable and seen that the document need not be enthusiastically promulgated.

SIC: TGUK

Venezuelan cardinal defends his right to criticize government

Accepting an invitation to address the coordinating committee of Venezuela's national assembly, the cardinal of Caracas defended his right as a citizen to voice his concern about political issues without being slandered by the nation's president.

Vatican Radio reported that Cardinal Jorge Urosa Savino addressed the 15-member committee July 27 after being accused of attacking Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and the nation's legislature.

Opening celebrations of Venezuela's bicentennial July 5, Chavez called the cardinal a pig and said "he tries to scare people about communism."

Cardinal Urosa told the committee that in exercising both his rights as a citizen and his duties as archbishop of Caracas, he was giving voice to Gospel values and to "the concerns and interests of the Venezuelan people for peace, encounter, inclusion and for respect for the civil, social and political human rights enshrined in the constitution."

Venezuelan Catholic leaders have been among the harshest critics of the policies of Chavez, who was first elected in 1998 and has promised to transform the oil-rich nation into a socialist state. Church officials have accused the Chavez government of violating civil rights, permitting an explosion of crime and weakening democracy. Chavez, in turn, has accused the church leadership of elitism.

Cardinal Urosa told the parliamentary committee that none of his preaching or public statements has ever been motivated by political partisanship, but by concern for democracy, human rights and political pluralism.

"I expressed the opinion that President Chavez wants to lead the country on the path toward Marxist socialism," he told the committee, adding that "this is not news because the president on various occasions has affirmed being a Marxist."

"The Marxist socialist stand is totalitarian because it occupies every sphere, as happened in the countries subjected to a socialist or communist regime such as in Central Europe and the Soviet Union in the past and in Cuba still today," he said.

The cardinal said he has never attacked the legislature or other branches of government, although he has expressed concern about certain laws that appear to be reducing political pluralism and freedom of expression or which tend to reduce the power of local and regional governments, concentrating power in the hands of the national government.

Cardinal Urosa said he and the country's other bishops are ready and willing to engage in dialogue with the government and the legislators for the good of the Venezuelan people and the safeguarding of democracy and human rights in the country.

SIC: USCM

Predator Catholic priests and the best punishment

About 5,000 priests and religious brothers have been identified as credibly accused of sexually violating minors.

Most of these men were unavailable to criminal prosecution due to statutes of limitation; some within the statutes are in prison.

The rest are dead, have voluntarily left the priesthood, were laicized, are residing in religious communities with more or -- usually -- less appropriate supervision, or wait in limbo for the church to adjudicate their cases.

Since 2002, there are have been strong, recurrent cries to remove all credibly accused priests from the priesthood.

In May, the Vatican agreed with its top sexual abuse prosecutor, Msgr. Charles J. Scicluna, declaring that abusive priests must be “amputated” in order to save the church’s body from diseased parts.

Once again, Rome dodged the reality that the true scandal always has been ecclesiastical cover-up of sexual abuse.

There was no Vatican mention of amputating involved bishops and provincial superiors.

It is understandable that victims and others want to see abusive priests taken from their lives.

After all, these priests once tore from childhood and adolescence boys and girls whose pathways to spiritual, psychological, and relational growth were obstructed, often tragically, by the destructive aftermath of sexual violation.

But, is removing a perpetrating priest from the priesthood the most healing and the safest move?

Both pastoral and protective concerns suggest another option.

From a pastoral perspective, the bishop and his priest have a covenantal bond that the priest will obey the bishop and the bishop, in turn, will spiritually father his priest. Excision of any member of the people of God is drastic and models a contingent kind of love all too common in the secular world.

Moreover, it is a mechanism familiar within paradigms of sexual abuse: banish the evil, the pain, and the betrayal out to the periphery of consciousness -- or even better, beyond consciousness -- where travesty cannot be reflected back to us.

Blessed are the invisible for they remind us not of the potential for cruelty in all of us.

Bishops and provincials also have a sacred responsibility to protect the Catholics in their care from known or likely dangers; an obligation that extends to the wider community. Recidivism is a problem among sexual abuse perpetrators.

Unfortunately, science cannot accurately predict who will re-abuse and who will not.

Priests, however, may be at particular risk. One analysis of sexual offenders found that men who were unmarried and who abused boys that were not family members were somewhat more likely to re-offend than other perpetrators.

Further, we know that significant life stressors can induce psychological regression in which even men who stopped abusing begin again.

A priest who loses his vocation, home, manner of dress, and circle of colleagues is at risk to regress and to re-abuse.

So what can we do with priests who have perpetrated? I suggest a Penance, Productivity, and Provisioning Program for these men.

Penance: Priests and religious credibly accused of sexual abuse, but not available to the criminal justice system, would be offered residence in a containment and healing center administered and secured by secular professionals. In return for continuation as a priest, these men would agree to live here for the remainder of their lives. They could not leave the center without a security guard accompanying them. There would be no TVs, computers, or phones in their rooms and reading material, like magazines, would be screened to prevent pornography from entering the centers. Each man would work with a therapist and/or spiritual director to develop an individual penance program, including prayer. Residents would turn over their assets, retirement funding or salaries to the centers to defray the costs of their care.

Productivity: Residents would expected to be productive, and this too could be individualized. Baking bread, tilling the soil, candle making and other crafts, teaching other residents are all possibilities. Some could generate income to help sustain the centers at less cost to Catholics. In addition, residents could make themselves available to researchers seeking to learn more about commonalities among abusive priests.

Provisioning: Resident clergy would be able to say Mass and perform the sacraments among themselves; they would remain priests. They would receive room and board, medical treatment, psychotherapy, and spiritual direction according to individual plans. Bishops would commit to visiting their priests annually to extend pastoral care and to remain conscious of the role of sexual abuse in the lives of these men, their victims, and the wider Catholic community.

Every priest credibly accused of sexual abuse would be offered participation in this program.

Men who refused the program would then be separated from the priesthood without salary or other benefits canonically possible to withhold.

Even then, however, bishops would remain in yearly contact with them, reminding the men that they were priests who betrayed their vocations and should be making reparation while receiving care through participation in the Penance, Productivity, and Provisioning Program.

The Vatican would do well to remember that amputation results in phantom limb pain.

The “diseased” part is gone but suffering continues.

Maintaining the abusing priest’s attachment to the body of the church keeps him, his victims, his crimes, and his needs visible to hierarchy covenantally required to hold all of that in their sights.

SIC: NCR

Knock wants Athlone woman's case to be recognised as miracle

The case of an Athlone woman who said she was cured of Multiple Sclerosis during a visit to Knock is being sent to the Vatican in the hope that it could be officially declared a miracle by the Catholic Church.

Carton Drive resident Marion Carroll has told of how she was paralysed with the illness in September 1989 and was bound to a stretcher during her visit to Knock.

She said she was miraculously healed after receiving Holy Communion at the shrine.

"I got a beautiful feeling inside me. It was like a whispering breeze had told me that if the straps were taken off my stretcher I'd be able to get up and walk," she explained.

Marion then asked for the straps to be taken off.

When they were, she said: "My two legs swung around and I stood up, and it was like I was never sick."

Pat Lavelle, manager of the shrine in Knock, has confirmed that attempts are underway to have the Vatican recognise Marion's cure as a miracle.

"This is the first case in 131 years," he said, referencing the 1879 apparition of Our Lady at the site.

"The case complies with the two main conditions of a miraculous cure; it's instant and it's total."

It is believed that accounts from people who knew Marion at the time, as well as medical records and testimonies of nurses who cared for her, have been compiled for the consideration of Church authorities.

However, one issue which could arise when seeking the Vatican's declaration of a miracle cure is that Marion's MS was not formally diagnosed.

Marion's story was included in a recent RTÉ documentary and this has given fresh impetus to the appeal to the Vatican.

SIC: WI

Father Oprah Back on Daytime TV to Promote Tell-All

The Miami priest once known as "Father Oprah" was back on daytime TV today, but not with the queen of talk from Chicago.

Once Catholic but now Episcopalian priest Alberto Cutie appeared on the "Wendy Williams Show" Wednesday morning to discuss his new book that details the sex scandal that pushed him away from his former faith and into the arms of his wife.

The book, due out in January, deals with the dilemma Cutie faced when he fell in love with parishioner Ruhama Canellis as he served as the head of St. Francis de Sales Catholic Church in Miami Beach.

"The dilemma has to do with a man who loves God...but also someone who happened to fall in love," Cutie said Wednesday.

As a Catholic priest, Cutie was required to remain celibate.

But things heated up with Canellis, and when a Spanish-language tabloid published photos of Cutie and Canellis canoodling on the beach, the priest was essentially forced out of his parish.

The scandal outraged many in Miami's Catholic community, though Cutie said he didn't mean any harm.

"I didn't mean to cause any damage, things just happened," Cutie told Williams.

After flipping to the Episcopalian faith and joining the Church of the Resurrection in Biscayne Park, Cutie married Canellis, who is now reportedly pregnant with the couple's first child.

The two have been married just over a year, and Cutie said there are still some things he's adjusting to.

"You have a lot less space in the closet," Cutie said. "I have two pairs of shoes, I can't count the number of shoes my wife has."

Cutie said he still loves the Roman Catholic Church, but that his relationship with God can't replace an intimate relationship.

"It's a struggle that as human beings we shouldn't have to choose between loving God and loving another person," he said.

"Now, when I look back, I wish I would have done this 10 years ago."

SIC: NBCMiami

Europe eyes Africa for salvation as priests get scarce

Africa’s brain drain is no longer restricted to engineers, doctors, teachers or nurses; priests are becoming the hottest commodity.

The Church in developed countries has turned to the new digital media and Africa for recruits.

Ireland, a major exporter of Catholic priests to Kenya in the 1960s, is now facing a crisis that could see it close down its parishes in the next 15 years.

France, which is also facing a similar crisis, has turned to social network sites, such as Facebook, to entice new blood into priesthood.

In April, the Catholic Church in France launched a campaign in Facebook with the slogan “Why Not Me.”

According to Time magazine, the site has been popular with young people. The campaign also involves distributing brochures in bars, movie theatres and restaurants. A few years ago, the Roman Catholic Church in England launched a campaign using beer mats and posters to recruit more priests.

But before they can recruit and train their own priests, Europe and the US are turning to developing countries for imports. Of almost 1,316 foreign priests in France, 650 come from Africa, according to the Times report.

According to the latest Pontifical Yearbook, released in February, Africa and Asia are the only places with increases of followers, priests and sisters, but figures are declining in Europe and America.

Number of priests

The number of Catholic priests has grown by 3.8 per cent in Asia and 3.6 per cent in Africa in the period 2000 to 2008. Europe and the Americas showed a decrease of about half a percentage point in priests, while the number dropped 1.8 per cent in Oceania.

Although not yet a flood, a number of Nigerian Catholic priests are now working in the US, while a spattering of Kenyans are to be found in places like Kentucky.

The importation of priest into the developed countries has raised a debate with some theologians claiming this is another form of brain drain from Africa, denying its people trained workers.

According to the Statistical Yearbook of the Church, in 2006, there was one priest for every 1,510 Catholics in the US compared to one priest for every 4,343 Catholics in Kenya.

Those moving to the “greener pastures” say they are not attracted by money but a calling to take care of the Lord’s sheep.

In an interview with the New York Times, two years ago, Fr Maina Waithaka, a 32-year-old Kenyan priest then stationed in Chicago was categorical, “I have priest friends from Kenya who visit, and vice versa. Those guys live rich and have a much better lifestyle. They have a cook and someone to wash their clothes. I have to do my laundry and think of what to eat. You tell me this is fun?”

The same article quotes another Kenyan priest working in Kentucky, Rev Chrispin Oneko, who first went to work in Jamaica before moving to the US.

He says his was answering to a call to help the church in Jamaica and the US which are facing a personnel crisis.

A priest in Ireland may earn about Sh78,750 monthly.

This could rise to a base salary of Sh108,000 a month, plus Sh4,800 for each year since ordination in the US.

But American priests may earn more.

SIC: DN

Papal visit: where are the three 'disappeared' Oratorians, ask parishioners

Parishioners of the Birmingham Oratory have written an open letter to the Oratorian priest acting as the Vatican’s delegate to the Congregation, asking about the fate of two priests and a brother who – though not accused or suspected of any sexual impropriety – were mysteriously sent into exile in May.

This is a complex business, but it strikes me that the Birmingham Oratory really needs to display some transparency now, rather than let the matter fester until Pope Benedict XVI visits them in September.

As The Times reported on May 21, the then Provost of the Birmingham Oratory, Fr Paul Chavasse, had left his post amid allegations of a “close but chaste” relationship with a young man. But he was not the only Oratorian forced to leave:

Father Philip Cleevely, Father Dermot Fenlon and Brother Lewis Berry have been told “to spend time in prayer for an indefinite period” by Father Felix Seldon, the priest appointed to conduct an “apostolic visitation”.

The Tablet reports today that Father Cleevely has gone to Pluscarden Abbey, Moray, Father Fenlan to Mount Saint Bernard Abbey, Leicestershire, and Brother Berry to somewhere in France.

But why were these three Oratorians given this savage punishment?

Their supporters have been trying to find out, to no avail: all we have to go on are rumours about “disputes over the beatification of Newman”, which could mean anything.

If these Birmingham Oratorians are innocent of wrongdoing, should they really be excluded from the greatest moment in the history of their Congregation?

I’ve just spoken to a senior (and non-partisan) lay Catholic who felt that this apparent injustice should be highlighted despite the dangers of rocking the boat so soon before the papal visit. So here is the open letter.

Time for some answers.

An Open Letter to Father Felix Selden CO, Delegate of the Apostolic See for the Confederation of the Oratory, from parishioners of the Birmingham Oratory and members of the National Association of Catholic families.

We are grateful to Father Felix Selden for having had the courtesy to reply to our letter of 1st July, in which we enquired about the return of Father Dermot Fenlon, Father Philip Cleevely and Brother Lewis Berry to the Birmingham Oratory.

Unfortunately none of our questions were answered.

His argument appears to be that as mere lay people, we have no right to know what is going on at the Birmingham Oratory.

However we are parents, chosen by God to discharge the duty of protecting vulnerable young people in a society at war with our values. We have seen the inexplicable removal of two priests and a brother who have exerted themselves heroically in the defence of our Catholic families.

Consequently, our family and others are now left much more vulnerable. I am afraid that is very much our business and indeed intimately affects our families: we have every right to a coherent explanation of what is going on, and an assurance that these priests and brother will be returned to their ministry with us forthwith.

Father Selden expresses concern that lay people are protesting the conduct of the Apostolic Visitation and suggests that this is creating scandal “and might dangerously harm the Church and the Oratory of Birmingham”.

It is very difficult to read this in any other way than as a veiled threat. Is there a threat here of direct action against the lay protestors, or indirect action against the two priests and brother concerned if the lay people cannot be silenced?

We are bound to point out that the scandal was absolutely not of our own making. We will not easily forget the look of bewilderment on our children’s faces when they heard from the pulpit the announcement of the expulsion of these three holy men with no explanation, and the difficult task we have (and continue to have) in trying to mitigate the enormous scandal that has been done to these little ones.

There is a very ready remedy: bring back those of our good pastors who are innocent of any wrong doing (as we have been assured is the case with these three).

No threat will convince us as parents to remain silent: the threat from the immoral culture all around us, which in many sad cases has infiltrated the Catholic Church even to the extent of compromising some of her pastors, is far more deadly to us than anything that might be done to silence us.

We love the Catholic Church very much but cannot elevate Church reputation and image above our children’s moral safety. Our children’s very souls are at stake and we will not be silence.

We ask once again: are these three holy men going to be returned to Cardinal Newman’s Oratory where they belong or not?

If they are to return, when will that be?

SIC: TCUKB

"No pedophilia crisis" says Catholic League (Contribution)

According to Dr. William Donohue of the Catholic League, the Catholic Church does not have a "pedophilia crisis."

His opinion is contradicted by numerous court documents, statements of the U.S. Bishops, the Vatican, and Pope Benedict XVI, each of whom have condemned the pattern of covered-up case of clerical pedophilia.

So if a pedophilia crisis is clear to these officials and to more than 60 million American Catholics, why does Dr. Bill continuously repeat that there is none?

To be sure, he admits to a problem of sexual abuse among Catholic clergy, but in a advertisement published in the New York Times (March 30, 2010), Donohue argues that ... "all along it's been a homosexual crisis."

Citing the exhaustive study out of John Jay College in New York, Donohue notes that "Eighty percent of the victims of priestly abuse are male."

The male-with-male character is sufficient to change pedophilia into homosexual relations in Donohue's way of thinking.

On CNN (Rick's List, March 31, 2010), Donohue summarized this position in his unenviable style: " ...yes, there's a connection between homosexuality and sexual abuse of minors...They can't keep their hands off the boys, don't you get it?"

Perhaps this makes sense in some universe based on locker-room logic. But counting the frequency of male-with-male relations is not the same as scientific study of homosexual behavior.

Since Donohue took his doctorate in the social sciences, he strays beyond his field of competence when defining the motives for sexual abuse. Such analysis properly belong to fields like psychology. You wouldn't want a hair-dresser's definition of a "split end" to be applied to a football coach's plays for a "split end" and social science's terms do not always apply to the behavioral sciences.

As noted by Andrew Sullivan, Donohue confuses sexual orientation with sexual abuse. Educated discourse among Catholics deserves more sophistication, I think, and clarity of definitions is a good place to begin.

Sexual orientation, which is considered to manifest itself with the on-set of puberty, is about whom you seek to love.

"Love" here is more than a physical act, but includes search for companionship, understanding, and support. These qualities are sought by both homosexuals and heterosexuals. The search may go badly, with exploitation and meanness intruding - for both homosexuals and heterosexuals - but the orientation is realized between mutually consenting adults.

Pedophilia, on the other hand, is about control of an adult person over a minor. It is clear from the John Jay data on clerical abuse that most cases (73%) took place before the minor turned 14, with more than a fifth (22%) being perpetrated on victims younger than 10 years of age. Children 13 or younger seldom function sexually as adults.

But because the legal age of a minor includes all those under 18, the sociological numbers include many teenagers who approximate adulthood. The John Jay numbers show that the frequency of abuse diminishes as the minor grows older.

Donohue confirms this fact by writing in his July 13th column: " ... if some guy tried to kiss me when I was 17, I would have flattened him." Presumably, the more the victim becomes adult, the less likely it is that the sexual predator can control them. And because such control is at the heart of pedophilia, sexual exploitation of children has been roundly condemned by the Catholic Church.

The vulnerability of the Church in this sordid mess lies principally in a pronounced reluctance to confront predators or take significant action to separate them from ministry. While I have little doubt that Dr. Bill want to end sexual abuse in the Church as much as I do, his faulty analysis is problematic because it might perpetuate the crisis. How can you adopt the proper remedy against what Pope Benedict called "the filth of the Church" unless you have a proper diagnosis?

"Flattening" people with your fists may resolve the problem for Dr. Bill, but I doubt it is feasible approach for universal Catholicism.

I think there is an important difference between the abuse in pedophilia and homosexual orientation. Confusing them and using bludgeoning oversimplifications ultimately trivializes both of them. These, however, are not trivial issues.

PS - I encourage readers to consult Dr. Donohue's posted response where he retreats from his former identification of pedophilia and homosexual orientation to assert now that they are merely "linked."

SIC: TWP