I have been reading Everybody Matters,
a memoir by Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland (1990-1997) and
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (1997-2002).
The author was born
in 1944, and is thus a year older than I am; so it is instructive to
read about her experience of a Catholic upbringing in County Mayo at a
time when Ireland was much more of a Catholic country than it is today.
The author grew to adulthood in the 1960s when all the old social and
cultural certainties were being challenged. She was very aware of the
real injustices surrounding her in Irish society: the fears of the
homosexual community when their behaviour was still regarded as a
criminal offence; the stigma attached to illegitimate children and their
mothers; the cruel treatment meted out to the traveller community.
There was also, as we learnt much later on, widespread abuse of
vulnerable children in the industrial schools run by the Church.
The
culture in Ireland has now changed completely and the author has played
her part in this. The Catholic Church, from being an institution
wielding too much temporal power at the expense of real charity or
proper evangelisation, has been purged and humbled.
There is now
recognition among faithful Irish Catholics that true holiness of life
has little to do with a public parade of pious behaviour. The kind of
hypocrisy that coloured Irish life when the author was a young adult
barrister practising at the Bar in Dublin is today a thing of the past.
Mary
Robinson herself would not cavil at being described as a liberal
Catholic, critical of the Church. She interprets the Gospel entirely in a
socialist way, as being concerned with justice and peace, fairness and
equality: changing the conditions of people’s lives rather than an inner
conversion to Christ. She has questioned the all-male priesthood and as
an early sympathiser with feminist issues, “the subtle violence of
keeping one sex in a box” as she puts it.
However, one early
memory she recalls with later indignation rather makes me smile. This is
when she refers in her schooldays to “buying black babies in Africa”;
she comments: “Only later did I appreciate the underlying racism and
appalling nature of this exercise.”
In my own Catholic primary school, a
convent, we also helped to “save” black babies in Africa, but I do not
see this as “racist” or as “appalling” in hindsight. The very worst one
could say of this quaint practice was that it was paternalistic. Today
paternalism is regarded as shockingly patronising and only one step away
from actual “racism”.
All that happened in those more innocent days was
that we gave sixpence or a shilling a week to the class teacher for a
black baby from the missions whom we had “adopted”; the more the sum
increased, the nearer the baby climbed a ladder towards baptism and
becoming a member of the Church.
What in principle is wrong with
that?
After the Second Vatican Council the whole idea of working in the
missions came into question: who were we to impose our (western)
religion on poor Africans? This was a form of exploitation almost as bad
as colonialism itself; and as we were all now ecumenical, we should
respect African native beliefs and not try to change them, and so on.
But in the 1950s, choosing to become a priest or religious and then
spending your entire life working in conditions of great hardship to
bring the Good News of salvation to those trapped by witchcraft,
paganism and superstition, was seen as self-sacrificing, a noble thing
to do.
Further, the mission schools were often of a high educational
standard.
The White Fathers, who worked in North Africa among the Muslim
populations, often became distinguished Arabic scholars. And the film
“Of Gods and Men” tells its own heroic story.
I am sure Mary
Robinson did good work in highlighting injustices around the globe
during her time as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights – but she needs
to avoid a certain self-righteous and Left-wing attitude when pointing
to the Church’s missionary past.