Friday, May 22, 2009

Survivors left to deal with legacy of abuse

SURVIVORS of abuse at state-run institutions interviewed in a research project had all experienced one or more significant life problems, according to the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse.

Special interviews undertaken in 2005 and 2006 by the commission found that 247 victims had all suffered problems – mainly mental health issues, unemployment and substance abuse.

More than 90% of the interviewees had experienced physical and emotional child abuse and about half, child sexual abuse.

The research found that more than four out of five victims were insecure about adult attachments, and at some point in their life had a psychological disorder, including anxiety, mood, substance use and personality disorders.

Those interviewed by the commission were men and women of about 60, and had entered institutions run by nuns or religious brothers due to family adversity or petty criminality.

The participants had spent, on average, about five years living with their families before entering institutions, and about 10 years living in institutions. Just over a third of those who had memories of having lived with their families reported family-based child abuse or neglect.

In a special note to the victims, the researchers working on the project said they had been moved and inspired by the power of the human spirit demonstrated in the face of the terrible adversities suffered.

"At times it was heartbreaking to listen to the stories you told.

"We grieved for your childhoods and we grieved that, for many of you, the legacy of your early experiences continue to affect your... lives.

"But alongside your pain, anger and sadness was an inner strength and resilience that clearly sustained you and that allowed many of you to move on..."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer

No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.

The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.

Source (IE)

SV (3)