The inherent separatism of the Society of St. Pius X and other similar Traditionalist groups is made glaringly obvious by the progress of Bishop Richard Williamson’s breakaway organization.
In his latest newsletter,
Williamson rejoices in the establishment of a new (and expensive) Queen
of Martyrs house for his group in southeast England.
(Note that the
link is to his weekly “Eleison Comments”, and so the text there will be
replaced by the next week’s comments within a few days.)
More importantly, Williamson regards it as good news that the
“betrayal of the Faith” by what he now calls the “Newsociety of St. Pius
X” is becoming clearer to priest members, some of whom regard the
current leadership as far too soft.
According to Williamson, “Newsociety
leaders are abandoning Archbishop Lefebvre’s glorious fight for the
Faith in exchange for a mess of Conciliar pottage”—a trend for which the
Church of Rome has yet to see even the remotest evidence.
allegation lies at the root of the growing split.
But the point to
notice here is that this tendency toward separatism is always found in
groups of believers who reject the authority principle which is
explicitly identified in Divine Revelation as found only in the Church
united with the See of Peter.
To avoid any possible misunderstanding, let me explain my
terminology. I use the term “Traditionalist” to describe one who makes
an “ism” out of Tradition, in effect preferring his own theory of the
deposit of Faith to the authority of that Church which alone can
properly guard and explicate it.
“Tradition alone” (without the Church’s
authority) is no better than “Scripture alone” (without the Church’s
Note also that when I use the religious term “separatism”, I
mean that phenomenon by which groups of believers, lacking any
principle of authority, break into separate churches or sects whenever,
according to their own lights, the church or congregation of which they
have been a part fails to meet their own private tests for doctrinal,
moral or ritual purity.
Thus separatism is a key feature of Protestantism, explaining why
there are now several hundred conflicting Protestant sects. But
separatism is also a key component of Traditionalism, and so we can all
be sure of one thing: The splintering will continue.
As I have said
before, all those who love Tradition but accept the ongoing authority of
the Catholic Church over its proper interpretation, as that authority
is exercised in their own time and against their own potential
errors, are correctly called by a different name. They are called Catholics, and should accept no substitutes.
But with the growth of Williamson’s splinter movement, one would
think that many in the Society of St. Pius X would have their eyes
opened. The SSPX remains the largest of the Traditionalist separatist
groups, and the shocks and aftershocks the SSPX is experiencing ought to
enable both the leaders and the followers to see the implacable inner
logic at work.
For these separatist concussions are merely so many
conclusions which demonstrate the falsity of the initial premises.
all, just as Bishop Williamson possesses no possible authority for
judging the leadership of the SSPX as treasonous to the faith, in exactly the same way
the SSPX has no authority for making any judgment whatsoever against
the faith of Bishop Williamson—let alone the Faith of the Church of
Authority in separatist groups is all smoke and mirrors.
The lesson ought to be painfully clear to everyone involved.
better to suffer any number of unfortunate modern tendencies (wherever
such tendencies are truly unfortunate) and any number of wounded
sensibilities (wherever such tendencies are simply uncongenial to one’s
own particular piety)—better, I say, to suffer uncountable sins and
sufferings in union with Rome than to enjoy a single apparent triumph
through separation from the Bride of Christ.
Let those with ears, hear.