Those who know and respect monsignor William Shomali, the Auxiliary
Bishop and Vicar General of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem, were
surprised and disturbed by his declarations on the Talmud and on Israeli
education in the September 30 issue of Famiglia Cristiana.
Commenting on recent episodes of vandalism against Christian holy places
by Jewish extremists, he claimed “hatred of Christians” was taught in
Israeli schools and the Talmud itself.
“The Talmud, the holy book studied by
the ultra-orthodox, more highly venerated than the Bible itself, invites
religious hatred, speaks badly of Jesus, and even worse of Mary and, in
general, of Christians” he said, adding that “in Israeli schools love for the other is not taught but rather the destruction of the other”.
These blanket, defamatory generalizations
produced consternation in Israeli political representatives, Jewish
religious authorities and friends engaged in interreligious dialogue.
While unanimously condemning the criminal acts committed by a small
group of Jewish extremists and “hoodlums” against Christian sites, and
calling for action to apprehend the culprits and impede recurrence, they
strongly objected to the content of Bishop Shomali’s assertions.
Rabbi David Rosen, the Jerusalem based
International Interreligious Affairs Director of the American Jewish
Committee sought firstly, to correct Bishop Shomali’s misconception of
the role of the Talmud in Jewish life.
“Contrary to the age old canard that has
been popular among those Christians who have denigrated Judaism over the
centuries” he says, “the Talmud is not ‘more highly venerated than the
Bible itself’ and it is not even a ‘holy’ book for Jews’ but rather the
all- important compendium of commentaries and debates on the principles
and precepts of the Bible and the traditions expounding the latter.”
Regarding Bishop Shomali’s accusations
against the Israeli educational system, Rabbi Rosen says that “While
there is much that needs to be done to educate about other religions in
Israeli schools … it is a totally unjustified defamation to claim that
Israel’s schools teach ‘the destruction of the other.’ ”
Israel’s Ambassador to the Holy See, Zion Evrony, also points out that “Monsignor Shomali’s claim that in Israeli schools ‘love for the other’ is not taught but rather the ‘destruction of the other’
is totally false and misleading. The values of human rights, respect
for the other and tolerance are central themes in the Israeli
educational system. The way to solving problems is only through
education and mutual understanding, not through building new hate…As
opposed to the situation in most Countries of the Middle East,
Christians in Israel live safely, practice their religion freely and
their number is increasing.”
Rev. Joseph Sievers, Professor of Jewish
History and Literature of the Hellenistic Period at the Pontifical
Biblical Institute, says “This characterization of the Talmud as
reported in ‘Famiglia Cristiana’ is incorrect and truly
unfortunate.” He recalls however that educational problems do exist,
referring to a recent, more nuanced statement issued by the Assembly of
Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land expressing “grave concern about the
education of the young in some schools where contempt and intolerance
are taught”. He points to the path he hopes will be chosen by citing
another Vatican document (Notes on the correct way to present the Jews
and Judaism in preaching and Catechesis in the Roman Catholic Church”)
“…Our two traditions are so related that they cannot ignore each other. Mutual knowledge must be encouraged at every level….”
Rabbi Rosen comments, “I do not deny that
there is prejudice among Jews towards Christians and
Christianity.…However, this prejudice is the result of the tragic
experience of persecution and prejudice that Jews experienced at the
hand of Christians over the ages. I deeply regret that such prejudice
remains and unreservedly condemn an act of disrespect to Christians,
their places of worship and their beliefs. Such actions are a
desecration of the Divine Name and in fact insult Judaism even more than
Christianity. However it is important to understand where this
animosity really comes from and not to avoid that truth by conjuring
false scapegoats or regurgitating old prejudices.”
Rome’s Chief Rabbi, Dr. Riccardo Di Segni
finds that Bishop Shomali’s statements regarding Israeli schools are
“reminiscent of a pre-Vatican II attitude towards Judaism we had hoped
no longer exists”, in which “love” in the New Testament was falsely set
against “legalism” as characterizing the Jewish Bible – or “Old
Testament.”
“They are very disturbing proclamations,
and contrary to the principles governing our contemporary dialogue”
agrees Dr. Luigi De Salvia, President of “Religions for Peace/Italy”, recalling the directives of the Vatican document “Guidelines and Suggestions for implementing the Conciliar Declaration, ‘Nostra Aetate, N.4’ ” which state among other things “…The
Old Testament and the Jewish Tradition founded upon it must not be set
against the New Testament in such a way that the former seems to
constitute a religion of only justice, fear, and legalism, with no
appeal to love of God and neighbor….”
“Hopefully these words will be rescinded or clarified” Dr. De Salvia concludes. Regarding
the Talmud’s alleged and disputed references that might or might not
pertain to Jesus, both Jewish and Christian experts concord they are
still open to contrasting interpretations.
Rabbi Rosen points out, “There is
difference of opinion among scholars as to whether the few references in
the Talmud that have been attributed to refer to Jesus of Nazareth are
in fact just that. The Talmud was not written under Christian Rule but
in the main under Babylonian rule, and thus there are few references at
all to Christians” he says.
Prof. Sievers, citing the thesis of Peter Schaefer in ‘Jesus in the Talmud’,
says these passages “were subject to Christian censorship and may best
be understood in the context of Christian-Jewish polemics of late
antiquity.”
Rome’s Chief Rabbi warns that in any case,
“we must keep a sense of proportion. The material to which Bishop
Shomali might be referring occupies, in all, 2 – 3 pages out of a total
of 2,700. They are Haggadic narrative, enigmatic and confused, and it is
quite unlikely that they refer to Christians. Numerous Christian
scholarly studies, including Italian sources, have cast serious doubt
that these sentences are about Jesus or Christians. They bear no
normative authority and have been used over the centuries as pretexts
for the burning of Talmuds.”
“We must contextualize”, continues Rome’s
Chief Rabbi. “A serious and valid interreligious dialogue necessitates
taking historical evolution into account in textual interpretations.”
“Excessively literal interpretations of the
Gospels and Patristic texts, for example, spread hatred and
anti-Judaism for hundreds of years, instigating anti-Semitism and
violence against Jews.”