Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Second venue pulls out of marriage conference

A conference convened to debate the institution of marriage almost had to be cancelled after a second venue pulled out at the eleventh hour.

Christian Concern organised the conference in light of the Government's current consultation on legalising gay marriage.

Speakers Phillip Blond, Cristina Odone, Professor Brenda Almond and Brian S Brown of the US campaign group, National Organisation for Marriage, were invited to debate whether a compelling case could be made for traditionally defined marriage.

The conference had originally been booked at the Law Society but had to be moved after the organisation cancelled the booking on the grounds that it did not fit with its diversity policy.

It was then re-booked at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster. 

However, Christian Concern was contacted late on Tuesday afternoon - the day before the conference - and told that the event had been deemed inappropriate for the conference centre as it did not fit with the values of the government agency that runs the facility.

Overnight legal efforts to halt the decision failed and the conference had to be moved to an alternative venue at the last minute as delegates were due to arrive before a court could sit.

After a hasty search for alternatives, the conference was finally able to go ahead as scheduled at the nearby Thistle Hotel.

Andrea Minichiello Williams, chief executive of Christian Concern said: “It is extraordinary that at a time that the Government is consulting with the public about the legal definition of marriage, a Government owned venue has suddenly decided that a conference examining the issue can not be held. A climate of fear and intimidation is being created which is suppressing proper, free discussion of these vital issues. This should be of concern to all who care about the vitality of our democracy.”

1 comment:

Lady Portia said...

Andrea Minichiello Williams, chief executive of Christian Concern said: “It is extraordinary that at a time that the Government is consulting with the public about the legal definition of marriage, a Government owned venue has suddenly decided that a conference examining the issue can not be held. A climate of fear and intimidation is being created which is suppressing proper, free discussion of these vital issues. This should be of concern to all who care about the vitality of our democracy.”

The legal definition of marriage or the lawful definition......2 different things entirely.

Marriage is quite simply the union of the male and female energies inside each human being on their journey to wholeness/holiness.

It has nothing to do with marrying prince charming or a princess.

It is not about looking out there for a partner- that was the church scam.

Now if only people would wake up to this duality creation and look inward to wholeness/holiness- then there would be no need to discuss the legalities of marriage- for it is simply the business of each individual and no man in a dress or in curls can make it legal- for it is way out of their 3D consciousness.