Friday, February 10, 2012

Differences between Gardai and HSE harming abuse investigation says report

A turf war between the HSE and the Gardaí is compromising the proper investigation of child sex abuse, according a new report by the Garda Inspectorate.

The report, Responding to Child Sexual Abuse, said that conflict between the Gardaí and the HSE meant allegations of abuse were not being investigated quickly enough, which was compromising child safety, according to the Irish Times. 

Joint action sheets were supposed to be drawn up in all child sexual abuse cases involving the HSE and the Garda Síochána so that those involved knew what aspects of an investigation they were responsible for, the Inspectorate pointed out.

In a sample of cases in Dublin, the plans had been completed in just 1 per cent of cases.

The report also said that Children First was not being implemented.  

It said, “Any reasonable analysis of the ... evidence of the failures to implement the Children First protocol between the Garda and HSE would have to conclude that there is a serious problem, requiring urgent action to resolve it.”

The Inspectorate, which advises the Garda and government on policing policy, said there appeared to be reluctance on the part of the HSE to call Gardaí in to investigate allegations until after children had undergone therapy.  

This undermined subsequent prosecutions because an accused could question the integrity of evidence that emerged in therapy. The lack of more meaningful co-operation between the HSE and Garda was disappointing, particularly in light of the Garda’s excellent relations with other agencies.

According to the report, basic record-keeping was so poor that the official crime figures did not capture up to 65 per cent of sex crimes against children reported to the Garda in recent years. The situation had only become apparent after the Garda was unable to supply the Inspectorate with annual figures for sexual offences against children.

The Inspectorate requested paperwork to be checked in all 112 Garda districts.  

The disparity that emerged between the paper records and the Garda computer database of crime rates called into question the integrity of all child abuse figures, it said.  

In almost one-third of cases, details of investigations had been entered into the Garda’s Pulse computer database, but had not been classified as criminal offences and so were missing from the overall crime figures.

Guidelines for entering crime data were not being followed and in one incident, three cases involving nine injured parties had been entered as a single offence.

The Inspectorate said while its latest report had only studied crime figures on child sex abuse, it would later review how the Garda recorded all crime types.

The Inspectorate recommended a much greater degree of specialisation within the Garda in its approach to investigating the sexual abuse of children.  

These specialists should include detectives trained to interview child victims.  

This should never be left to front-line uniformed Gardaí, it said.

It called for the appointment of a Garda assistant commissioner with special responsibility for child protection.

The Inspectorate’s report was commissioned in 2009 by then Minister for Justice Dermot Ahern.  

It was to examine the Garda’s approach to child sex abuse, particularly in the wake of the Murphy commission’s report into the Archdiocese of Dublin, which criticised the Garda.

“It is not an acceptable option for the Garda Síochána to do nothing,” the report says. 

The Inspectorate notes most investigations into child sex abuse should take only three months.