Friday, July 15, 2011

Call for Inquiry into BBC bias in favour of assisted suicide and euthanasia

A British Labour MP, Jim Dobbin, is leading a group of British parliamentarians in calling for a full inquiry into the BBC’s bias in favour of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Mr Dobbin, chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group, is the primary sponsor of an Early Day Motion tabled in the House of Commons on July 4 noting the, “strong campaign waged by the BBC network … to allow euthanasia, with five programmes broadcast in favour of a change in the law in the last three years with none arguing against the practice.”

The MPs are especially concerned that while the BBC is willing to give airtime to euthanasia campaigners such as the author Terry Pratchett to argue for a change in the law, it omitted to report the passing of a resolution by the British Medical Association denouncing the bias in the constitution of the Demos Commission on Assisted Dying, chaired by Lord Falconer.

Mr Dobbin has written to Lord Patten, the chairman of the BBC Trust, and to Mark Thompson, the BBC Director General, urging them to, “not delay in establishing an inquiry at the highest level” given that the corporation’s Royal Charter requires it to take an impartial stand on all issues of public policy.

The letters state, “We know that you are both men of the highest honour – but whatever your intentions, we know from experience that the BBC is riddled with men and women determined to promote abortion and euthanasia,”

Mr Dobbin continued, “We are determined, however, to do everything we can to ensure that an inquiry at the highest level is established.”

In a separate letter sent to Lord Patten on July 5 Lord Alton of Liverpool reminded the BBC Trust chairman that the BMA conference was told by its deputy chairman, "assisting patients to die prematurely is not part of the moral ethos or the primary goal of medicine.  If the legislation were to be changed, it would have serious negative consequences on the relationship between doctors and their patients.”

Lord Alton wrote, "Given the wall-to-wall coverage given to Mr Pratchett et al, we were therefore surprised to see no reference to the BMA's motion or votes on any BBC news coverage.”  “

If the Corporation's rationale for broadcasting the documentary equivalent of 'snuff' movies is 'public interest' might the public not also have been interested to learn the views expressed by their doctors?”

Lord Alton concluded by saying, "In light of the failure of the BBC to present this side of the argument and the uncritical airtime it has given to the Falconer Commission, the signatories below feel that an inquiry at the highest possible levels ought to be announced to conclude definitively whether the BBC has honoured its duty to be impartial in its presentation of this contentious and difficult issue."