Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Catholic Church facing lawsuit (NOT for paedophilia!!)

AN ONTARIO restoration company is suing the Roman Catholic Church in Halifax for about $120,000 it says it is owed for work it did on the roof of Saint Mary’s Cathedral Basilica.

FirstOnSite Restoration L.P., which has an office in Dartmouth, has filed a claim in Nova Scotia Supreme Court alleging that the Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp. of Halifax breached a contract by failing to pay $119,895.34 for work the company carried out last year replacing the east side of the basilica’s roof.

"On a number of occasions, (FirstOnSite) demanded payment and it did not receive a response," says the statement of claim filed with the court Wednesday.

The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp. has not yet filed a defence in the case, and none of the allegations in the statement of claim have been proven in court.

FirstOnSite says it got the roofing contract last July 7 after providing a quote. It had been invited to bid on the project by the church corporation’s insurer, which is not named in court documents.

The company says it started the work on Aug. 25 and was expected to complete it in about a month.

But in early September, hurricane Earl hit Halifax with a combination of high winds and rain that resulted in water getting into the Spring Garden Road basilica. 

The company says it had taken reasonable steps to protect the job site.

FirstOnSite alleges the church corporation handled the cleanup and remediation of the water leak.

"At no time did the defendant ever invoice or blame FirstOnSite for the water infiltration," the statement of claim says.

The roofing project continued to be plagued by weather delays but the company says it finished the work on Nov. 9.

Firstonsite says it invoiced the church corporation through the insurer for the completed work but was never paid. 

The company says it then received a letter from the insurer in January denying payment because of alleged deficiencies in the roof and allegations that the company failed to follow the project’s specifications.

"Prior to this correspondence, none of these issues had been raised," FirstOnSite says in its statement of claim.

The company says it was willing to fix any actual problems with the roof but the corporation would not allow it to investigate or to make any repairs.

The company is seeking the cost of the roofing work, plus interest and costs.