The bishop of North Sydney, Glenn Davies, accused the Catholic Church yesterday of misinterpreting the qualifications of a saint.
In an article published on the Sydney Anglican dioceses' website yesterday, Bishop Davies, who also chairs the Evangelical Fellowship in the Anglican Communion, said MacKillop was no more holy in God's eyes than anyone else whose sins had been forgiven.
"No one wishes to belittle Mary MacKillop's achievement in Australia: the founding of a religious order and her work among the poor with the establishment of an orphanage, a women's refuge and a home for older women," Bishop Davies said.
"Those achievement can be celebrated at home and abroad and no one should complain.
"(But) to award such a person with sainthood for these achievement and two alleged miracles is to misunderstand what the Bible describes as the qualifications of a saint.
"Put simply, anyone whose sins have been forgiven by God, through faith in Jesus Christ, is a saint."
Bishop Davies said the second problem with the Catholics' process of canonisation was that it drew on human analysis of a so-called miracle.
The Pope has accepted, following a rigorous scientific analysis by a Catholic committee responsible for approving miracles, that two NSW women were healed of inoperable cancer by MacKillop.
"Who can prove that the reported miracles were actually the work of Mary McKillop?" Bishop Davies said.
"Did the persons healed pray to only Mary or did they also pray to God?
"Even if they prayed to Mary MacKillop, what evidence is there that it was Mary MacKillop's intercession that healed them? Furthermore, what evidence is there in the Bible that departed saints pray for us?"
Bishop Davies argued that nobody who had had their sins forgiven by God should be scared of referring to themselves as a saint. "It is a title that God has bestowed upon us through our union with Christ, and we should therefore own it with pride," he said.
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.