ARCHBISHOP DIARMUID MARTINOPINION: Those responsible for decades of abuse must act to restore credibility and help the survivors
WHERE DOES the church go from here? The church has failed people. The church has failed children. There is no denying that. This can only be regretted and it must be regretted. Yet “sorry” can be an easy word to say. When it has to be said so often, then “sorry” is no longer enough.
But “sorry” must always be the first word.
The Ryan report shocked me. But it did not totally surprise me. I was ordained 40 years ago today and at my ordination and that of a friend we had a group of former residents of industrial schools: people of our own age, great people and friends of ours.
As students we had worked in a hostel in Dublin for former residents of industrial schools, especially Artane. Later I worked in a centre in London for ex-prisoners, a large proportion of whom included generations of Irish industrial school residents. The stories they told then were not radically different from what the Ryan report presents, albeit in a systemic and objective way which reveals the horror in its integrity.
Sadly, the Ryan report came so late.
Anyone who had contact with ex-residents of Irish industrial schools at that time knew that what those schools were offering was, to put it mildly, poor-quality childcare by the standards of the time. The information was there.
A chaplain to Artane had put much of it writing. A few courageous and isolated journalists like Michael Viney spoke out. When the first efforts were made to reform Artane, it was patently evident that the only change possible was to close it down.
Someone wrote to me this week about an entirely different matter and said: “there is always a price to pay for not responding”. The church will have to pay that price in terms of its credibility.
The first thing the church has to do is to move out of any mode of denial. That was the position for far too long and it is still there.
Yes, there was abuse in other quarters. Yes, childcare policy in Ireland at the time was totally inadequate. But the church presented itself as different to others and as better than others and as more moral than others. Its record should have shown that and it did not. Ryan reveals church institutions where children were placed in the care of people with practically no morals.
Where the church is involved in social care it should be in the vanguard. That is different to a situation in which the church proclaims that it is in the vanguard. In industrial schools the church, with good intentions, became involved in a Victorian model of childcare and became more Victorian than the Victorians, and when Victorianism was shown to be wrong, those responsible did not have the foresight to recognise that and children were exposed to pathological Victorianism.
There is a sense of shock among many good priests and religious at what has happened. But that sense of shock should not slip into a situation in which they feel themselves almost as the victims. No one in the church must ever try to water down or reformulate the suffering of survivors. Let the survivors speak and tell their stories as they experienced them.
What do I say to the religious orders who have been identified as being responsible for what happened? Let me speak to them directly: I think that you have to ask and truly try to answer the question which Ryan has put to you: “What happened that you drifted so far away from your own charism?”
I believe that you owe it to your good members to try to answer that question thoroughly, honestly and in a transparent way. Your credibility and the credibility and survival of your charism depend on the honesty with which you go about that soul searching. This may be a painful task, but it is unavoidable if it is to be possible for your charism to survive. People are angry and disillusioned.
What was lost was more than just a charism. Somehow along the way the most essential dimension of the life of the followers of Jesus Christ got lost by many. The Christian message is a message of love. What the Ryan commission recounts is sadly so very far removed from that. In Jesus’s eyes the poor deserve the best and they did not receive it here.
Even where you have recognised what was wrong, the Ryan report must have brought home to you the extent of what went wrong in a manner which perhaps you were not able to imagine in the past. The facts are now clear and you have to take notice and make some new gesture of recognition.
An agreement was made with government seven years ago. The fact that the mechanisms of fulfilling your side of that agreement have not yet been brought to completion is stunning. There may have been legal difficulties, but they are really a poor excuse after so many years.
Whatever happens with regards to renegotiating that agreement, you cannot just leave things as they are. There are many ways in which substantial financial investment in supporting survivors and their families can be brought about, perhaps in creative ways which would once again redeem your own charism as educators of the poor. In many ways it is your last chance to render honour to charismatic founders and to so many good members of your congregations who feel tarnished.
Sadly, in a very short time another report on the sexual abuse of children will be published, this time about how such abuse was managed in the Archdiocese of Dublin of which I am archbishop. It will not be easy reading. The steps that have been taken to put in place good child safeguarding norms will never wipe away the sufferings of those who were abused.
Let the truth, however, come out.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Source (IT)
SV (3)
I wonder if perhaps it would be useful if I offered an account of a similar but far worse situation which happened here in Canada.
ReplyDeleteIn Canada from the mid-19th century up until about forty to fifty years ago, Amerindian (also called Native American) children were sent to industrial schools that were run by both the catholic church and the various protestant denominations in Canada. The children were brutally mistreated, with many stories of sexual abuse, abuse, violence and other things that were hurtful to children. The schools also didn't feed the children enough to eat, and at the same time there were rampant outbreaks of tuberculosis at the schools. The malnutrition made the tuberculosis more deadly than it otherwise would have been, and as a result about 50,000 children died at these schools, which was about 50% of the total figure of children who actually attended the schools. The government and the churches knew all about it, and they refrained from shutting down the schools. Now the situation in Ireland, doesn't look quite as bad as that, although it is nevertheless still tragic that children should be abused in such a way.
I know an historian who has researched these industrial schools and she tells me that sexual abuse and other types of abuse are unfortunately common across industrial schools in the 19th and early parts of the 20th century. That doesn't excuse it by any means, although it does add some perspective to evaluate what happened in Ireland.
It requires repentance and forgiveness. May the Lord reconcile the victims and the perpetrators, and grant them peace, Amen.
FYI: something seems to be going wrong with the comment-possibility???
ReplyDeleteTrying again :-)
ReplyDeleteThank you, David.
It was good to find you words, giving me a lot finding my own ideas.
True, the abuse of the Stolen Generations, the Inuit, the Australian Aboriginals, Indians to be a result of 19th century colonial history.
(As were the children in colonial migration).
To me, Dutch, the Irish residential abuse is not Irish.
Its part of our European 19th century as well.
As an orphan in Amsterdam I myself was depending on State and R.C. care, Raised in these institutions (nuns) before, during and after Vat II (age 6-18) I was object of the same abuse on all fields: emotional, physical, verbal, neglect, sexual, spiritual, lack of life skills and education. Not one of the Ryan report conclussions I donot know or recognise from either personal experiences, those of my brothers or so many of the children I grew up with. One might even say, as with the Stolen Generations, this residential abuse did stole and destroyed our language. And forced me into a culture which is not mine.
Since our words were not welcomed, our experiences denied. Forcing us to contiued denial of dignified selfs
As I just read in one of the CW articles: I listened. I heard. I believe you,” a Dubliner wrote in one of the books of solidarity ...
For years already, thankheaven I listenend and heard the Irish victims. Its their courage that made me hear and believe myself!
As all over (western) Europe children in residential care were abused by state and church abused, sometimes even by the same Congregations. Neither these congregations, nor their methods used, then AND afterwards. They are neither were Irish!
Have a look at whats currently going on in the W. Germany f.e. at http://www.schlaege.com/
(or, as a Canadian, at the history of the the Good Shepard Sisters (with their recently opened museum in Quebec))
Spreading the believe the residential abuse was Irish I do consider part of the R C denial. As Father Michael Mernagh pointed at last December stating: We are all in denialWorse: spreading the believe that denial, that residential care, to be Irish is part of continued abuse of victims. In Ireland and elsewhere in W. europe.
Cause along with the denile, part of our European reality are our different languages.Which, along with so few serieus investigation done yet, makes it easy to spread that incorrect believe that abuse having been Irish. The Irish investigation done is a very important step though. In recognising old news.
Though doubtless the costs of the whole proces for the Ryan report (as well as i the Canadian ) will harm them in their need of (national) recognision by state and church care. Financially the denial is worth it, for church as well as for the other national States.
The irish victims and their revolutionary courage and hope in this whole proces, as the help they were given by those who dared to listen did give so many of us that much.
That way, irish taxpayers pay for the victims in other countries as well.
To finish:
ReplyDeleteDavid wrote:
" It requires repentance and forgiveness. May the Lord reconcile the victims and the perpetrators, and grant them peace, Amen."
As a roman catholic and my experiences I''m grateful for your prayer shared. It touches me.
But real forgiveness is only possible after the fearless acknowledged truth. (and needed mournings)
To reconcile, to know victims and perporators one needs to know the truth. Not a political truth, not a political accepted truth while still in denial.
And as Dorothy Solle once wrote: God needs people.
To me for now I do prefere the promise/ prayer the son of Tobasonakwut Kinew, a Canadian Indian taught me a few weeks ago, while telling about his grandfather and his father, visiting the pope : "The experiences of my father and the other residential school survivors will remind us of a phrase that my community has adopted from the Jewish community: Gaawiin Minawaa Wiikaa. Never Again."
Thank you for making me realise this and some parts of my personal experiences I was - the fear for fear- not able to know before yet. I'm very glad with that.
Be blessed.
Gaawiin Minawaa Wiikaa.