We here at CWI have now been cleared to carry the following information for publishing.In recent times, we became aware that a CENSORED over in the CENSORED was alleged to be having an ongoing 'relationship' with a female within his own diocese.
This necessitated our wish to investigate this matter, and so we began a tedious process which involved the gathering of facts as opposed to rumours et al.
Within a very short period of time, it was becoming obvious that there was indeed truth in the claims being made, and therefore, a request was made through CW only a matter of days ago seeking further information from those concerned about this matter.
Little did we expect the amount of information that literally flowed in to us here in CWI which we then passed to our investigator and legal representative for verification and clearance.
Thus, we now wish to state that the CENSORED concerned in relation to this matter is CENSORED, currently CENSORED of the CENSORED and it is well known that this CENSORED has been ongoing for a few years.
However, we do wish to state that this is not going to be another CENSORED saga as no funds are unaccounted for in the CENSORED, and there is no evidence of there being any child(ren) resulting from this CENSORED.
Perhaps it should also be noted that what is being stated here is that there is a CENSORED occurring here, and indeed it has been well noted that it certainly has gone beyond being platonic.
We await a response in relation to this matter despite our best efforts to obtain one from the CENSORED.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to us or to the blogspot ‘Clerical Whispers’ for any or all of the articles placed here.
The placing of an article hereupon does not necessarily imply that we agree or accept the contents of the article as being necessarily factual in theology, dogma or otherwise.
Source (PVT)
SV (ED & 1)